W56HZV18R0173-0004.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Firm Fixed Price

0004 2019JUN19

W56HZV

U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND

WARREN, MICHIGAN 48397-5000

SARA SARTI

EMAIL: SARA.E.SARTI.CIV@MAIL.MIL

W56HZV-18-R-0173

2019JUN03

X

X 2019JUL17 01:00pm

/SIGNED/

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 6

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: SARA SARTI

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCTA-HTM-M/(586)282-5674

Type of Contract 1: Firm Fixed Price

Kind of Contract: System Acquisition Contracts

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

Solicitation Number: W56HZV-18-R-0173

Amendment Number: 0004

1. Amendment 0004 to Solicitation Number W56HZV-18-R-0173 is issued to incorporate the following revisions:

A. Standard Form 33, Solicitation, Offer and Award, Block 09: Revise hour and date specified for receipt of Offers from 2019 JULY 03

1:00 PM local time to 2019 JULY 17 1:00 PM local time.

B. SECTION M:

1. Revise M.5.1.1(b) as follows:

FROM:

The Government-calculated transportation costs for the FOB Origin CLINs identified in Section B, including the option .

Transportation costs will be added to the total evaluated price as provided in TACOM Clause 52.247-4457 Method of Evaluation for

F.O.B. Origin Transportation Offers.

TO:

The Government-calculated transportation costs for the FOB Origin CLINs identified in Section B, including the option, as calculated

IAW RFP Section M.6.

2. Except as provided by Amendment 0004 to Solicitation W56HZV-18-R-0173, all other terms and conditions of this Solicitation remain unchanged.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0005 ***

2 6

W56HZV-18-R-0173

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M.1 BASIS FOR AWARD

M.1.1 GENERAL The Government plans to award one Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for five

(5) Ordering Years and two (2) Option Years as a result of this solicitation. The Government reserves the right to choose not to award a contract if such action is in the Governments best interest.

M.1.1.1 There are two evaluation factors:

a. Past Performance Factor

b. Price Factor

The relative order of importance of these Factors are described in Section M.4 below.

M.1.1.2 It is the Governments intent to award one five-year, firm-fixed price (FFP), Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract with two additional option years. Award will be made using the Trade Off source selection process IAW FAR 15.101-1. The

Government will follow the source selection process set forth in Section M.3 below.

M.1.1.3 Award without Discussions: In accordance with FAR 52.215-1(f), the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (this excludes clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offerors initial proposal should contain the offerors best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. If discussions are held, they will be conducted with all offerors included in the competitive range.

M.1.2 Eligibility for Award. Award will only be made to an offeror who is eligible for award. To be eligible for award:

a. The offeror must be registered in System for Award Management (SAM) (see provision 52.204-7); and

b. The offeror must be determined responsible (See Section M.3.5); and

c. The proposal must not contain a Deficiency(s) (per FAR Part 15.001)

M.1.3 Importance of Price. Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal (1) is otherwise eligible for award under M.1.1.3, and (2) represents the best value to the Government. This may not be the offeror with the lowest evaluated Price Factor. However, the closer the offeror's evaluations are to each other in those Factors other than the Price Factor, the more important the Price Factor becomes in the decision. Notwithstanding the relative order of importance of the two evaluation Factors stated herein, price may be controlling when:

(a) Proposals are otherwise considered approximately equal in non-price factors; or

(b) The advantages of a higher rated, higher priced proposal are not considered to be worth the price premium.

M.2 REJECTION OF OFFERS

M.2.1 The Government may reject any proposal if doing so is in the Government's best interest at any time after receipt of proposals.

Examples include, but are not limited to, the following proposal conditions:

a. The proposal fails to meaningfully respond to the Proposal Preparation Instructions specified in Section L of this solicitation.

Examples of failure to meaningfully respond include: or

(1) When a proposal merely offers to perform work according to the RFP terms or fails to present more than a statement indicating its capability to comply with the RFP terms and does not provide support and elaboration as specified in Section L of this solicitation.

(2) A proposal fails to provide any of the data and information required in

Section L.

(3) A proposal merely repeats the contract statement of work without elaboration.

b. When an offerors proposal offers a product or service that does not meet all stated material requirements of the solicitation; or

c. The proposal proposes exceptions to the solicitation requirements, attachments, exhibits, enclosures, or solicitation terms and conditions; or

3 6

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

d. The proposal contains one or more OCIs that cannot be avoided or mitigated. Refer to Section L.3 of this solicitation, "Organizational Conflict of Interest."; or

e. The proposal is unbalanced as to price. See Section M.5.1.3; or

f. The proposals acceptance period does not meet the Governments required minimum acceptance period (Refer to Section L.1.2)

M.3 Source Selection Process.

M.3.1 Compliance Review. After receipt of proposals, but prior to the evaluation process, the Government will perform a compliance review of the offeror's proposal to determine the extent of compliance to the solicitation instructions, and whether the proposal meets any of the conditions listed in M.2, Rejection of Offerors.

M.3.2 Evaluation Process Evaluated proposals which are eligible for award will be subject to the Source Selection Trade-off process, considering both the evaluation factors and their relative order of importance as cited in Section M.4, to identify the proposal which represents the best value to the Government. The Government will weigh the evaluated proposals (other than the Price Factor) against the total evaluated price to the Government. As part of the best value determination, the relative strengths and weaknesses of each offeror's proposal shall be considered, as specified below, in addition to the other evaluation methods described below. Selection of the successful offeror shall be made following an assessment of each proposal, based on the response to the information requested in

Section L of this solicitation and against the solicitation requirements and the evaluation criteria described in Section M.

M.3.3 Source Selection Authority (SSA). The SSA is the official designated to direct the source selection process and select the offeror for contract award.

M.3.4 Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB). An SSEB has been established by the Government to evaluate proposals in response to this solicitation. The SSEB is comprised of technically qualified individuals who have been selected to conduct this evaluation in accordance with the evaluation criteria for this solicitation. Careful, full and impartial consideration will be given to the evaluation of all proposals received pursuant to this solicitation.

M.3.5 Determination of Responsibility. Per FAR 9.103, the Government will place a contract only with an offeror that the Contracting

Officer determines to be responsible or refer the matter to the SBA per FAR 19.602. A prospective offeror, in order to be eligible for award for this acquisition, must be able to demonstrate it meets the standards of responsibility set forth in FAR 9.104. As a part of this determination, the Contracting Officer may utilize the offeror's proposed prices, as well as other information, to determine if the prospective contractor has adequate financial resources to perform the contract. The Government reserves the right to conduct a Pre-

Award Survey on any or all offeror(s) or its subcontractors to aid the Contracting Officer in the evaluation of each offeror's proposal and ensure a selected offeror is responsible. To verify an Offeror meets the responsibility criteria at FAR 9.104, the Government reserves the right to request additional information, to include, but not limited to the following:

(a) Arrange a visit to the offeror(s) plant and perform a necessary Pre-Award Survey; or

(b) Request an offeror provide financial, technical, production, or managerial background information. If an offeror does not submit the requested information within seven working days from the date of the receipt of the request, or if an offeror refuses to provide the

Government access to its facility, the Government may determine the offeror to be non-responsible. If the Government visits the offeror's facility, the offeror shall ensure current data relevant to the proposal is available for Government personnel to review.

M.4 Evaluation Factors. The Government will assess each offeror in 2 factors: (1) Past Performance; (2) Price.

a. Factor 1: Past Performance (M.4.1)

b. Factor 2: Price (M.4.2)

The relative order of importance is Past Performance is significantly more important than Price. As required to be defined by FAR

15.304(e), the non-cost/price factors, when combined, are significantly more important than cost/price.

M.4.1 Past Performance Factor

M.4.1.1 The Government will conduct a Performance Confidence Assessment to establish a Confidence Assessment Rating for each offeror.

The Confidence Assessment Rating assigned will be based on the offerors Recent (L.4.1.1) and Relevant (L.4.1.2) performance record and the expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort described in L.4.1.2(i).

M.4.1.2 Contracts submitted in the Past Performance Factor volume of the offeror's proposal will not be considered if the Government determines them to be not Recent, not Relevant, or lacking any credible past performance information. Offerors without a record of

Recent and Relevant past performance information upon which to base a meaningful confidence assessment will be rated as "Neutral

Confidence", which is neither favorable nor unfavorable.

M.4.1.3 The offeror may also be evaluated on past contract performance information based on internal Government or private source

4 6

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

information and the Governement reserves the right to use any information as part of its evaluation. The Government may contact any of the references the offeror provides, may contact internal or external sources regarding past contract performance information, and reserves the right to use any information received as part of its evaluation.

M.4.1.4 Past performance which is identified in the offerors Past Performance Factor volume but is not supported with the information requested in Section L may be determined not Relevant. In addition, if any other proposal volume indicates the Government will not realize the benefit of the cited past performance during contract performance, the cited past performance may be determined not

Relevant.

M.4.1.5 In evaluating the offeror's performance history, the Government may compare the offeror's deliveries or performance to the

Contract's original delivery or performance schedule. Schedule extensions that were the fault of the offeror, even if consideration was provided, may be counted against the offeror.

M.5 Price Factor

M.5.1 The Price Factor evaluation will consider the Total Evaluated Price to the Government. The Government will also evaluate for price reasonableness and unbalanced pricing.

M.5.1.1 Total Evaluated Price: The Price Factor evaluation will result in a determination of the Total Evaluated Price. The Total

Evaluated Price equals the sum of the following:

(a) The proposed prices for all CLINs, including the option years, as calculated in Attachment 0008 Price Evaluation Worksheet; and

(b) The Government-calculated transportation costs for the FOB Origin CLINs identified in Section B, including the option, as calculated

IAW RFP Section M.6.

M.5.1.1.1 Weighted Average Unit Price:

For each CLIN with range pricing, the Government will calculate a weighted average unit price by first multiplying the unit prices proposed for each quantity range by the weighting percentages in Attachment 0008 Price Evaluation Worksheet. Weighted average unit prices will be the summation of the proposed unit prices for each range multiplied by the weighting percentages. The proposed price of each such CLIN will then be based on multiplying the weighted average unit price by the CLIN quantities in Attachment 0008 Price

Evaluation Worksheet.

M.5.1.2 Price Reasonableness: A price is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business. The Government may make a determination of price reasonableness by any means allowable under FAR 15.404-1.

M.5.1.3 Unbalanced Pricing. The Government will evaluate the offerors proposal for unbalanced pricing. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items or ranges is significantly over- or understated as indicated by the application of cost and price analysis techniques. Offerors are cautioned that a proposal the Government assesses to be unbalanced as to price, may either be rejected or determined unacceptable for award. See FAR 15.404-1(g) for more information on unbalanced pricing.

M.6 Government Evaluated Transportation Cost:

For the FOB Origin CLINs identified in Section B, Transportation costs will be included in the total evaluated price in accordance with narratives and provisions included within Section M.

For the evaluation of this offer, we will use the lowest freight rates from the Transportation Officer that are:

(a) In effect (or the lowest rates that will become effective before the expected date of initial shipment),

(b) On file or published with the Transportation Officer by the date of bid opening (or by the closing date specified for requests for proposals),

(c) For the Government selected method of shipment, and

(d) Based upon the following freight classification:

STCC ITEM NO.: 37 151 16 STCC 6001-AT

NMFC ITEM NO: 189140 NMFTA NMF 100-AR

The destinations used for the Governments Transportation Evaluation will be Gibbs and Fifth Streets, Warehouse 6, Bay 4, Tobyhanna, PA

18466-5059 and Building 299, East End, Receiving Door 16A, Rock Island, IL 61299-5000.

The Government transportation evaluation will utilize Offeror FAR 52.247-60, Guaranteed Shipping Characteristics fill-ins IAW FAR 52.247-

60 and Section F.3, Transportation Data for FOB Origin Offers, the contractor shall complete fill-ins for transportation methods for shipment.

5 6

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

The Government will apply the lowest evaluated transportation cost to the Offerors proposed price.

Evaluation of Transportation Costs: To determine the low Offeror, the Government will evaluate those transportation costs that apply to the quantities detailed below, by using the methodology described in the Section M FAR clause 52.247-47 entitled Evaluation FOB Origin, in addition to, utilizing information the Offeror provides in E.16. Inspection and Acceptance Points: Origin, the Governments required delivery schedule in accordance with FAR 52.211-8, Time of Delivery, dimensions provided in FAR 52.247-60, Guaranteed Shipping

Characteristics, F-13. Transportation Data for FOB Origin Offers, and F.2 FOB Point.

We will use the following quantities in conducting our evaluation:

CLIN Estimated Quantity Item Destination

0011-0017 303 each M200A1 Base Trailer Tobyhanna

0021-0027 303 each M200A1 Trailer w/ Adj Lunette Tobyhanna

0031-0037 4,100 each M200A1 AMMPS Tobyhanna

0041-0047 190 each M200A1 NG SEW Rock Island

END OF EVALUATION CRITERIA

*** END OF NARRATIVE M0001 ***

6 6