Attachment_0011_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_29May2019.doc

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

UNITED STATES ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND

TACOM CONTRACTING CENTER

6501 EAST 11 MILE ROAD

WARREN, MICHIGAN 48397-5000

REPLY TO

ATTENTION OF: CCTA-HTA-A

CCTA-HTA-A

Date issued with RFP PCO Letter: XXXXX Subject: Solicitation W56HZV-18-R-0173, M200A1 Trailer, Chassis, 2.5 ton Single Axle Chassis Trailer, Past Performance Questionnaire

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

LIGHT ENGINEER UTILITY TRAILER SOLICITATION

1. Product Director Light Tactical Vehicles (PD LTV) and the United States Army Contracting Command-Warren (ACC-WRN) has a need to procure M200A1 Trailers that fully comply with the requirements of the existing Government-owned Technical Data Package (TDP). These trailers are used by different customers as a component to multiple generator systems. The trailer mounted generator systems provide power throughout all levels of the US Army. ACC-WRN is conducting a past performance assessment in anticipation of possible contract award.

2. Offerors interested in proposing on this work have been requested to send the attached Past Performance Questionnaire to points of contact on recent and relevant contracts as defined in Section L of the solicitation. In this regard, we are requesting your assistance in completing this questionnaire so that we may evaluate the offeror in the area of past performance. The attached questionnaire has been developed for ease of electronic completion. Please provide your comments regarding the overall assessment of the contractor’s performance in each of the areas of consideration in the gray boxes for the identified contract. Any additional information, which your organization deems relevant or important, will be welcome by our evaluation team. If a question on the questionnaire is not applicable, please so indicate. It is important that your information be as factual, accurate, and complete as possible to preclude that the need for follow-up by the evaluators.

3. Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward by electronic mail to the MTV Trailers mailbox: usarmy.detroit.acc.mbx.mtv-trailers@mail.mil. Please confirm receipt of the submitted questionnaire via email response from the aforementioned email address. Please submit questions or comments regarding this letter to Taneisha Grant at (586) 282-0443 or by e-mail at taneisha.r.grant.civ@mail.mil or the undersigned at (586) 282-6076 or by e-mail at charley.g.jackson2.civ@mail.mil.

4. Please complete and submit your questionnaire within 24 hours of the closing date of this solicitation. Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Sincerely, Charley G. Jackson, Jr.

Contracting Officer

[Encl(s)] (1) Past Performance Questionnaire Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid response to the following questions. If you do not have the appropriate knowledge with the company in question, please forward this questionnaire to the person who does. Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward by electronic email to the MTV Trailers mailbox at usarmy.detroit.acc.mbx.mtv-trailers@mail.mil within 24 hours of the closing date of this solicitation. Thank you for your assistance.

PART I - IDENTIFICATION (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. RELEVANT CONTRACT

Prime Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract/Task Order Number:

Contract Award Date:

Contract Period of Performance End Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion:

B. OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II - EVALUATION

(To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

RATING SCALE & DEFINITIONS

Table 1 identifies the rating scale and descriptions. Please apply the rating that most closely matches your assessment for each area of consideration listed below. Please include a written narrative for each rating applied, utilizing the adjectival rating definition in Table 1.

Table 1

1. Quality:

a. Trailer Chassis. Assess the quality and workmanship of the contractor’s deliverable product(s) in accordance with the contract terms and conditions. (i.e. testing deficiencies, effective and timely corrective action plans, etc.)

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

b. Assess the contractor’s ability to apply a coating system and manage a corrosion prevention system.

To what extent did the contractor satisfy the above stated past performance requirement, on an overall basis? Please check one answer and provide an explanation for your rating.

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

2. Delivery Schedule:

a. Assess the contractor compliance to the contractual delivery schedule. Please include the contractor’s efforts that contributed, negatively or positively, to the delivery schedule and provide comments if any Delivery extensions were granted, and why the extensions were needed (i.e. the extent of the fault of the contractor).

Exceptional Very Good

Satisfactory Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

3. Management / Business Relations:

a. Assess the contractor’s management and business relations efforts during the contract period. (i.e. timely and effective communication, effective management of staff levels, etc.)

Exceptional Very Good

Satisfactory Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

b. Quality Management Systems (QMS). Assess the contractor’s ability to establish, integrate into production, and regularly use a QMS such as ISO 9001. In the comment section provide information on any issues or root causes.

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

c. Effectiveness of Program Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

To what extent did the contractor satisfy the above stated past performance requirement, on an overall basis? Please check one answer and provide an explanation for your rating.

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

d. To what extent was the contractor effective in managing significant risks (cost, schedule, and performance) in the performance of this contract?

To what extent did the contractor satisfy the above stated past performance requirement, on an overall basis? Please check one answer and provide an explanation for your rating.

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

4. Regulatory Compliance. Assess the contractor’s compliance with all terms and conditions in the contract relating to applicable regulations and codes, considering aspects of performance such as compliance with financial, environmental, safety, and labor regulations as well as any other reporting requirements in the contract terms and conditions Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

5. General Comments.

Any additional information, which your organization deems relevant or important, will be welcome by our evaluation team. Please provide any other relevant or important performance information.

Comments:

PART III - RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

Please provide a point of contact who compiled or completed this questionnaire and who, if needed, may be contacted by our evaluation team regarding the information provided in this questionnaire.

Organization:

Address:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

E-mail Address:

Once Filled In, this document is considered

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104