Q A_9-23-2016.pdf
PDF 97 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W52P1J-16-R-0081
About this file
ATTACHMENT 0013 - Q A 9-23-2016.PDF
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment_0013_Combined_Q A.pdf | ||
| 0018_Pine_Bluff_Wage_Determination.pdf | ||
| W52P1J16R0081_0003.pdf | ||
| 0017_Dover_AFB_Wage_Determination.pdf | ||
| 0015_Redstone_Wage_Determination.pdf | ||
| 0016_Pueblo_Wage_Determination.pdf | ||
| 0014_Tooele_Wage_Determination.pdf | ||
| Attachment_0013_Combined_Q A.pdf | ||
| W52P1J16R0081-0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment_0013_Combined_Q A.pdf | ||
| W52P1J16R0081_QA2.pdf | ||
| W52P1J16R0081-0001.pdf | ||
| W52P1J16R0081.pdf | ||
| W52P1J16R0081.pdf | ||
| W52P1J16R0081ATT0004.docx | DOCX document | |
| W52P1J16R0081ATT0010.pdf | ||
| W52P1J16R0081ATT0011.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W52P1J16R0081ATT0012.pdf | ||
| W52P1J16R0081ATT0005.docx | DOCX document | |
| W52P1J16R0081ATT0003.docx | DOCX document | |
| W52P1J16R0081ATT0009.pdf | ||
| W52P1J16R0081ATT0008.pdf | ||
| W52P1J16R0081ATT0007.docx | DOCX document | |
| W52P1J16R0081ATT0006.docx | DOCX document | |
| W52P1J16R0081ATT0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| W52P1J16R0081ATT0002.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Q1. The umbrella scope identifies different quantities for PCAPP Campaign 1 Waste Containers than the numbers identified in Task 6. Please clarify which list is correct.
A1. Quantities in Task 6 are the correct amounts.
Q2. The umbrella scope under 3.5 indicates that Wastes which contain Schedule 2 Constituents are identified in Appendix A. Appendix A does not identify any Schedule 2 constituents. Please clarify.
A2. 2. Contractor must be able to address wastes from Sch 2 chemicals. None were identified in the Umbrella.
Q3. Page 60 Section L.1.4 (2) identifies a "cost comparison shall be submitted in the format shown in Appendix B of the SOW" but Appendix B is the CDRLs and does not include this format. Please provide the format.
A3. Appendix B, D003 states that the format should be: Microsoft Office (Word, Excel, PowerPoint) or in another format approved by the Government.
Paragraph L.1.4(2.) has been revised from:
"The Offeror shall provide an initial pricing of treating each waste stream listed in Appendix A of the task order 0001 SOW through task order 0006 SOW using:
An existing non-incineration technology if applicable, incineration. The Offeror shall compare the costs of each approach. The cost comparison shall be submitted in the format shown in Appendix B of the SOW.
Sufficient detail must be provided in the cost breakdown to allow a consistent evaluation of the anticipated costs. Waste shipment costs shall be presented as a separate line item.
The waste streams and volumes/quantities listed in Appendix A of the task orders 0001 through 0006 SOW shall be used for cost proposal purposes only. They do not represent guaranteed amounts for the contract.
To:
"2. The Offeror shall provide an initial pricing of treating each waste stream listed in Appendix A of the task order 0001 SOW through task order 0006 SOW using:
An existing non-incineration technology if applicable, incineration. The Offeror shall compare the costs of each approach. The cost comparison shall be submitted in a matrix format using Microsoft Office or a format compatible with Microsoft Office.
Sufficient detail must be provided in the cost breakdown to allow a consistent evaluation of the anticipated costs. Waste shipment costs shall be presented as a separate line item.
The waste streams and volumes/quantities listed in Appendix A of the task orders 0001 through 0006 SOW shall be used for cost proposal purposes only. They do not represent guaranteed amounts for the contract."
Q4. Section L.1.2.3 states "The Offeror shall identify the extent to which the Offeror (prime and team members identified in the proposal) has been involved in similar or related contracts awarded within the past five years." Please consider extending the time frame to contracts awarded in the past ten years.
A4. The Government has opted to use the five year time frame for WMS and CWC
Compliance/Experience to ensure the selected contracts were operating under more recent environmental regulations. As such, the Government declines extending the time frame for contracts awarded from five to ten years.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .