Modified - Ft. Sill Solicitation Amendment W5168W23R0007 0001_17AUG23.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is as follow s: 1) Extend the proposal due date from 18 August 2023 to 25 August 2023; 2) Include Answ ers to Questions From Industry (Attachment Q); 3) Update the Period of Performance for each CLIN to cover 20 December 2023 through 19

December 2028; 4) Include Addendum to 52.212-2 w ithin the Solicitation; 5) Include the updated Attachment F - Estimated Workload Data -

Capabilities - 14AUG23, Attachment H - Staff ing Matrix - 14Aug23, Attachment I - Ft. Sill-Collective Bargaining Agreement 01.01.23-12.31.23, and Attachment Q - Ft. Sill FFS RFP Q and A - W5168W23R0007 15AUG23_Final. All other items and condictions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 10

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 17-Aug-2023

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W5168W23R0007

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

21-Jul-2023

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

17-Aug-2023

CODE

FDO FSH IRC

2371 INFANTRY POST RD, BLDG 602

FORT SAM HOUSTON TX 78234

W5168W 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W5168W23R0007-0001

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 18-Aug-2023 02:00 PM to 25-Aug-2023 02:00 PM.

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0003

The pricing detail quantity has increased by 1.00 from 59.00 to 60.00.

CLIN 0004

CLIN 0005

CLIN 0006

CLIN 0007

CLIN 0008

The pricing detail quantity 60.00 has been added.

The unit of issue Months has been added.

DELIVERIES AND PERFORMANCE

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0001 has been changed from:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

POP 20-SEP-2023 TO

19-OCT-2023

N/A DOL FT. SILL

DOL FT. SILL

2248 RANDOLPH RD

FORT SILL OK 73503

FOB: Destination

W90JVF

To:

POP 20-DEC-2023 TO

19-JAN-2024

N/A DOL FT. SILL

DOL FT. SILL

2248 RANDOLPH RD

FORT SILL OK 73503

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0002 has been changed from:

POP 20-SEP-2023 TO

19-SEP-2028

N/A DOL FT. SILL

DOL FT. SILL

2248 RANDOLPH RD

FORT SILL OK 73503

19-DEC-2028

N/A DOL FT. SILL

DOL FT. SILL

2248 RANDOLPH RD

FORT SILL OK 73503

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0003 has been changed from:

POP 20-OCT-2023 TO

N/A DOL FT. SILL

DOL FT. SILL

2248 RANDOLPH RD

FORT SILL OK 73503

N/A DOL FT. SILL

DOL FT. SILL

2248 RANDOLPH RD

FORT SILL OK 73503

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0004 has been changed from:

N/A DOL FT. SILL

DOL FT. SILL

2248 RANDOLPH RD

FORT SILL OK 73503

N/A DOL FT. SILL

DOL FT. SILL

2248 RANDOLPH RD

FORT SILL OK 73503

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0005 has been changed from:

N/A DOL FT. SILL

DOL FT. SILL

2248 RANDOLPH RD

FORT SILL OK 73503

N/A DOL FT. SILL

DOL FT. SILL

2248 RANDOLPH RD

FORT SILL OK 73503

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0006 has been changed from:

N/A DOL FT. SILL

DOL FT. SILL

2248 RANDOLPH RD

FORT SILL OK 73503

N/A DOL FT. SILL

DOL FT. SILL

2248 RANDOLPH RD

FORT SILL OK 73503

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0007 has been changed from:

N/A DOL FT. SILL

DOL FT. SILL

2248 RANDOLPH RD

FORT SILL OK 73503

N/A DOL FT. SILL

DOL FT. SILL

2248 RANDOLPH RD

FORT SILL OK 73503

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0008 has been changed from:

N/A DOL FT. SILL

DOL FT. SILL

2248 RANDOLPH RD

FORT SILL OK 73503

N/A DOL FT. SILL

DOL FT. SILL

2248 RANDOLPH RD

FORT SILL OK 73503

The following have been added by full text:

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2

Evaluation-Commercial Items

A. Basis for Contract Award

(1) Award will be made to a single offeror whose timely offer is deemed responsible IAW FAR, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements and whose proposal, judged by an overall assessment of the evaluation criteria and other considerations specified in this solicitation, represents the Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable

(LPTA) offer, or to the State Licensing Agency (SLA) under the R-SA priority pursuant to the procedures outlined below. The Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussions.

(2) This procurement will be conducted pursuant to the Randolph-Sheppard Act (R-SA), 20 U.S.C. 107 § Operation of Vending Facilities and 34 CFR § 395.33 Operation of Cafeterias by Blind which establishes priority for blind persons recognized and represented by the State Licensing Agency (SLA), in the award of contracts for the operation of cafeterias on federal facilities. Accordingly, although the solicitation is set-aside 100% for small business, the SLA will also be permitted to submit a proposal in accordance with 34 CFR § 395.33(b).

(3) Trade-offs between cost/price and non-cost/price factors are not permitted.

(4) The Government will evaluate proposed prices for reasonableness using price analysis techniques. Proposed prices evaluated as unreasonable (includes unbalanced, inaccurate or incomplete price proposals) may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition.

(5) The Government intends to award one single award contract as a result of this solicitation. Offers received for less than the stated number of items listed in the pricing schedule, Schedule - Supplies or Services and Attachment

G - FBGA Pricing Matrix – 20220412 of the solicitation will be considered ineligible for award.

(6) Offerors that fail to comply with the solicitation’s instructions, terms, and conditions may be removed from further consideration. As this requirement is in excess of $100M, the guidance at DFARS 215.306 and the procedures at FAR 15.306 (c) and (d) will be followed. Should discussions become necessary, the Government reserves the right to conduct them. In this event, the KO will establish a competitive range and will seek SSA approval

a. Evaluation Criteria.

(1) Evaluation criteria consists of three factors:

Factor 1: Technical Capability Factor - Staffing Plan

Factor 2: Past Performance Factor

Factor 3: Price Factor

Evaluation of the offeror's proposal shall address each factor as it applies to the PWS. During evaluations of each proposal, the Government will assign each factor an adjectival rating and write a narrative evaluation reflecting the identified findings.

(2) Factor 1 – Technical Capability - Staffing Plan. To be considered acceptable, the Offeror shall clearly demonstrate that their staffing is appropriate to successfully perform the PWS requirements. Appropriate staffing includes the number of personnel and the labor mix to successfully perform the PWS requirements. The offeror’s staffing and rationale shall clearly demonstrate (1) that the number of staff and the associated labor type outside of serving times is appropriate to clearly demonstrate successful completion of the PWS requirements; and (2) the staffing will ensure successful continuous operations of all PWS tasks during the feeding times (to include as patrons/units rotate through the facility). Additionally, the Offeror’s staffing shall clearly demonstrate they can accommodate fluctuating workloads within a band of meals, minimize personnel turnover, and allow for cross-training and cross-utilizing of personnel to perform the requirements of the PWS.

Adjectival Ratings: Acceptability of the proposed service. Technical capability will be evaluated on an acceptable or unacceptable basis using the ratings below. Proposals are evaluated for acceptability, but not ranked.

Each Technical Capability factor will receive one of the ratings defined. In order to be considered awardable, there must be an acceptable rating in every non-price factor.

Table 4 - Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

(3) Factor 2 – Past Performance. The past performance evaluation will assess the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. The Government will consider the recency and relevancy of past performance information compared to the requirements detailed in the PWS, the source of the information, the context of the data and general trends in the offeror’s performance and any associated risk. To develop an overall rating, the

Government’s evaluation will take into account relevant information submitted by each offeror as part of its proposal and the Government’s assessment and evaluation of other sources of information. Other sources of information for past performance may include, but are not limited to the Contract Performance Assessment

Reporting System (CPARS) reports, the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Report System (ESRS), other databases, questionnaires and interviews.

(a) The Government will evaluate the relevancy and recency of performance of work similar in scope, magnitude, and complexity of this acquisition. The past performance information provided in the proposal and obtained from other sources will be used to establish the degree of relevancy of past performance.

(b) The Government will evaluate the extent of the offeror’s ability to perform the referenced contract successfully in the areas of:

1) Technical/Quality of Product or Service

2) Schedule/Timeliness

3) Management or Business Relations

4) Small Business Subcontracting (Only applies to the SLA)

5) Regulatory Compliance

(d) Assigned Ratings. The Past Performance Factor will be rated on an acceptable or unacceptable basis using the ratings defined below:

Table 5 - Past Performance Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. See note below.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

The Government reserves the right to consider Past Performance Questionnaires received after the due date for receipt of proposals. The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information and the right to consider other relevant past performance information. The Government may call customers, whether or not provided by the offeror, to inquire about the offeror’s past performance. The Government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure the problems it finds with the information provided by the offeror. The burden of providing thorough and complete past performance information remains with the offeror.

In accordance with FAR 15.305(a) (2) (iv), an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

(4) Factor 3 – Price. Price will not be scored or rated. Evaluation of price will be performed using one or more of the proposal analysis techniques in FAR 15.404-1(b). Unbalanced pricing may be evaluated IAW FAR 15.404-

1(g), as applicable, to assess potential performance risk which could result in unreasonably high prices. Through these techniques, the Government will determine whether prices are reasonable, complete, and balanced

Total Evaluated Price (TEP) – The TEP for award purposes will be calculated as follows from the Schedule of

Supplies/Services of the Solicitation:

- The total price of Phase-in CLIN;

- The total price of Project Management for all years;

- The total price of each of the Dining Facility CLINs for all years (to include remote site feeding and opening/closing of DFACs); and

- The total price of the option to extend services as described in (4)(a) below.

(a) Option to Extend Services. As part of price evaluation, the Government will evaluate its option to extend services (FAR Clause 52.217-8) by adding six (6) months of the offeror’s final ordering year price to the offeror’s total price. Offerors are not required to enter a price for the six month extension period.

(b) The Government will review the contractor’s proposed basic labor rates by labor category to ensure they meet the minimum hourly wage rate delineated in the SCA WD and/or CBA

b. Solicitation Documents: The following are required for award as a matter of solicitation compliance, but they are not included in the source selection evaluation or be considered in the basis for award.

1) SF 1449 (Solicitation, Offer and Award) – The Government will review each proposal to ensure offerors fully completed the SF1449, acknowledged all amendments and provided the cognizant point of contact information, to include identification of the individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government. Failure to meet these requirements will result in the proposal being deemed non-responsive and make the offeror ineligible for award of a contract.

2) Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs – The offeror shall ensure the Schedule of Supplies/Services of the

Solicitation is fully completed and error free. It shall contain the offeror’s prices for the established Contract Line

Items Numbers (CLINS).

3) Representation, Certification, and Other Statements of Offerors – The Government will review the online representations and certifications of each offeror to ensure they are current and accurate. Failure of an offeror ensure online representations and certifications are current and accurate, to include small business certification under

NAICS 722310, will result in the proposal being deemed non-responsive and make the offeror ineligible for award of a contract.

4) Mission-Essential Contractor Services Plan - The Government will evaluate each proposal to ensure the offeror has submitted a Miission-Essential Contractor Services Plan that meets the requirements delineated in DFARS

252.237-7024, Notice of Continuation of Essential Contractor Services. Failure to submit an acceptable Mission-

Essential Contractor Services Plan, or negotiate an acceptable plan, will make the offeror ineligible for award of a contract.

5) Property Management Plan (PMP) - The Government will evaluate each proposal to ensure the offeror has submitted a PMP that meets the requirements delineated in FAR 52.245-1. Failure to submit an acceptable PMP, or negotiate an acceptable plan, will make the offeror ineligible for award of a contract.

6) For the SLA, the Government will evaluate the Small Business Subcontracting Plan in accordance with FAR

Clause 52.219-9 Alt II and DFARS Clause 252.219-7003. Failure of the SLA to submit an acceptable subcontracting plan, or negotiate an acceptable plan, will make the offeror ineligible for award of a contract.

GENERAL INFORMATION

1. The Ordering Period under which Task Order (TO) may be awarded under the forthcoming contract will be 60 consecutive months from the basic contract award date with the option for six (6) additional months through FAR

52.217-8.

2. The Government guarantees a contract minimum of $10,000 which will be awarded on a TO at time of award of basic contract.

3. The Contract Maximum for the five (5) year ordering period to include FAR 52.217-8 is estimated at

$148,083,971.14 and can be adjusted at time of award.

4. This contract will be awarded by the Mission Installation Contracting Command – Installation Readiness Center

(MICC-IRC) and administered by the Mission Installation Contracting Command – Fort Sill, OK.

ATTACHMENT LIST

Attachment A - Dinning Facility Location Maps – 29 Mar 2018

Attachment B - Headcount AFMIS Data - FY19-21

Attachment C - Dining Facility Drawings Fort Sill FS – 29 Mar 2018

Attachment D1 - Government Furnished Property – 24 Feb 2021

Attachment D2 - Real Property – 1 Nov 2022

Attachment D3 - Durable Property – Sep 2019

Attachment E - Sample Materials List – 1 Nov 2022

Attachment F - Estimated Workload Data - Capabilities – 14AUG23

Attachment G - Reserved

Attachment H - Staffing Matrix – 14Aug23

Attachment I - Ft. Sill-Collective Bargaining Agreement 01.01.23-12.31.23

Attachment J - Ft. Sill Facility Photos

Attachment K - Consent Forms for Release of Past Performance Info

Attachment L - Specific Relevant Contracts Reference Sheet- 20210920

Attachment M - Past Performance Questionnaire – 20210920

Attachment N - Ft. Sill, OK FFS DOL Wage Determination

Attachment O –

Attachment P –

Attachment Q -

Performance Work Statement 16 June 2023_Final

PIEE Solicitation Vendor Posting Offer Training

Ft. Sill FFS RFP Q and A – W5168W23R0007 15AUG23_Final

(End of Summary of Changes)