Attachment 0006 PPQ Form 07FEB2025.pdf
PDF 140 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W15P7T-25-R-MAPS
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) form template used to evaluate contractors' past performance within the last four years for the Marketplace for the Acquisition of Professional Services (MAPS) solicitation from the Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC-APG).
The form contains sections for general information, contract identification, and evaluation criteria across six performance areas: Quality, Schedule, Cost Control, Management, Small Business Subcontracting, and Regulatory Compliance. Each area uses a five-tier rating scale: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, and Unsatisfactory. The template requires detailed explanations for any Exceptional, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory ratings. Additional fields include NAICS code alignment, retention rate calculation, and sections for both contractor representative and government respondent identification and signatures. This is a standard template form with no specific performance information filled in.
View the file
Other files
Show all 25
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Contractor:
Contract Number:
Subcontract Number (if applicable):
POC:
POC Title:
Agency, Phone Number & Email Address:
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Prime Contractor Name:
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Phone Number:
Address:
Email:
Exceptional Must provide explination below Very Good Satisfactory Marginal
Must provide explination below Unsatisfactory
Must provide explination below
Exceptional Must provide explination below Very Good Satisfactory Marginal
Must provide explination below Unsatisfactory
Must provide explination below
Exceptional Must provide explination below Very Good Satisfactory Marginal
Must provide explination below Unsatisfactory
Must provide explination below
Exceptional Must provide explination below Very Good Satisfactory Marginal
Must provide explination below Unsatisfactory
Must provide explination below
Exceptional Must provide explination below Very Good Satisfactory Marginal
Must provide explination below Unsatisfactory
Must provide explination below
Exceptional Must provide explination below Very Good Satisfactory Marginal
Must provide explination below Unsatisfactory
Must provide explination below
Name:
Title:
Date:
Phone Number:
Address:
Email:
NAICS Best Aligned with this PPQ:
Retention Rate:
Enter Formula
Name Printed:
Date:
Signature:
Part IV: Return Information
NAICS Alignment
Retention Rate
Comments:
Comments:
Comments:
Government Respondent Identification
Contract Identification
Identification of Offerors Representative
Quality
Schedule
Comments:
Cost Control
Management
Comments:
Small Business Subcontracting
Comments:
Regulatory Compliance
Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Form Attachment 0006
The following questions pertain to the Contractor's record of past (within the past four years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract.
Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.
Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractors proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements, and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Part I: General Information
Part II: Contract Identification (to be completed by the Offeror)
Part III: Evaluation (to be completed by Government POC - Respondent)
PPQ
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .