ATTACHMENT 0003 Scorecard Large Business 13DEC2024.pdf
PDF 86 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W15P7T-25-R-MAPS
About this file
This is a scorecard evaluation template for large businesses under the Marketplace for the Acquisition of Professional Services (MAPS) solicitation from the Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground. The scorecard outlines a 55-point evaluation system across nine criteria categories.
The scoring criteria include: Systems and Rates (2 points for approved systems/rates), Certifications (2 points for CMMC Level 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022), Past Performance elements including Relevance (15 points maximum based on percentage match to Technical Capabilities), NAICS Alignment (3 points), Recency (3 points for work within past 2 years), and Performance Quality (15 points maximum based on CPAR/PPQ ratings). Technical evaluation areas include Recruitment (5 points), Retention (5 points), and Risk Management (5 points), each rated on a scale from Outstanding (5 points) to Unacceptable (0 points). The evaluation methodology emphasizes past performance quality and technical relevance as the highest weighted factors.
View the file
Other files
Show all 25
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
# RFP Section Capability Qualification Max Points
1 L.2.2.1
Government Approved Systems and Rates
Offeror receives one (1) point for having two (2) of the following approved systems or rates; Offeror receives one
(1) additional point for having three (3) or more approved systems or rates:
__Approved Rates (e.g., Forward Pricing/Billing) __Purchasing System
Estimating System Property Management System
2 L.2.2.2 Certifications Offeror receives 1 point (per certification), for having any of the additional certifications:
__CMMC Level 2 or Higher __ISO/IEC 27001:2022
3 L.2.3.2 Relevance
Offerors will earn five (5) points per QP that meets 100% of the Technical Capabilities under the Domain they are proposing.
Offerors will earn three (3) points per QP that meets 75-99% of the Technical Capabilities under the Domain they are proposing.
Offerors will earn two (2) points per QP that meets 50-74% of the Technical Capabilities under the Domain they are proposing.
Offerors will earn one (1) point per QP that meets 25-49% of the Technical Capabilities under the Domain they are proposing.
Offerors will earn zero (0) points per QPs that meets 0-24% of the Technical Capabilities under the Domain they are proposing.
The maximum points to be received for Relevance is 15.
4 L.2.3.3
NAICS
Alignment
Each QP that is submitted to demonstrate past performance, that aligns with Domain specific NAICS will receive one (1) additional point.
The maximum points to be received for NAICS Alignment is three (3).
5 L.2.3.4 Recency
The QP's submitted must have at least one (1) year of performance, but not over four (4) years old. If the Offeror has a QP that has a period of performance end date within the last two (2) years that QP will receive one (1) additional point per QP.
The maximum points to be received for Recency is three (3).
6 L.2.3.5 Performance Quality
Offeror receives one (1) point for each QP with a Satisfactory PP Rating in all CPAR/PPQ elements.
Offeror receives three (3) points for each QP with a Very Good PP Rating in all CPAR/PPQ elements.
Offeror receives five (5) points for each QP with an Exceptional PP Rating in all CPAR/PPQ elements.
Offeror does not receive credit for a project with a below satisfactory rating in any of the CPAR ratings, a neutral rating (i.e., lack of past performance information), or a non-relevant project (regardless of the PP score). If offeror has CPAR the Government will utilize CPAR. If no CPAR is available then the offeror can submit PPQs.
The maximum points to be received for Performance Quality is 15.
7 L.2.4.1 Recruitment
Offeror receives points based on the rating defined below:
5 Points: Outstanding - Proposal meets requirements and indicates and exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh and weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.
3 Points: Good - Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.
2 Points: Acceptable - Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance.
Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.
1 Point: Marginal - Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths.
Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.
0 Points: Unacceptable - Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable.
The maximum points to be received for Recruitment is five (5).
8 L.2.4.2 Retention
Offeror receives points based on the rating defined below:
5 Points: Outstanding - Proposal meets requirements and indicates and exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh and weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.
3 Points: Good - Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.
2 Points: Acceptable - Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance.
Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.
1 Point: Marginal - Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths.
Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.
0 Points: Unacceptable - Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable.
The maximum points to be received for Recruitment is five (5).
9 L.2.4.3 Risk Management
Offeror receives points based on the rating defined below:
5 Points: Outstanding - Proposal meets requirements and indicates and exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh and weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.
3 Points: Good - Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.
2 Points: Acceptable - Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance.
Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.
1 Point: Marginal - Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths.
Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.
0 Points: Unacceptable - Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable.
The maximum points to be received for Recruitment is five (5).
TOTAL CREDITS AVAILABLE 55
TOTAL CREDIT EARNED
MAPS SCORECARD
LARGE BUSINESS
ATTACHMENT 0003
Systems and Rates
Past Performance
Technical
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .