ATTACHMENT 0003 - Scorecard.pdf
PDF 84 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W15P7T-25-R-MAPS
About this file
This document is an Attachment 0003 - Scorecard that outlines the evaluation criteria for the Marketplace for the Acquisition of Professional Services (MAPS) solicitation. The scorecard provides the maximum points available for various factors, including:
Government Approved Systems and Rates (2 points), Certifications (2 points), Relevance of Past Performance (15 points), NAICS Alignment (3 points), Recency of Past Performance (3 points), Performance Quality (5 points), Recruitment (3 points), Retention (3 points), and Risk Management (3 points). The total available points is 39.
The related federal contract opportunity is the MAPS solicitation, with Solicitation Number W15P7T-25-R-MAPS, issued by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground. The solicitation is in the pre-solicitation phase, and an industry day is planned for November 8, 2024 to present the draft RFP and gather feedback.
View the file
Other files
Show all 25
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
# RFP Section Capability Qualification Max Points
1 L.2.2.1
Government Approved Systems and Rates
Offeror receives one (1) point for having two (2) of the following approved systems or rates; Offeror receives one (1) additional point for having three (3) or more approved systems or rates:
__Approved Rates (e.g., Forward Pricing/Billing) __Purchasing System __Estimating System __Property Management System
2 L.2.2.2 Certifications Offeror receives 1 point (per certification), for having any of the additional certifications:
__CMMC Level 2 or Higher
__ANSI/EIA-748
3 L.2.3.2 Relevance
Offerors will earn five (5) points per QP that meets 100% of the Technical Capabilities under the Domain they are proposing.
Offerors will earn three (3) points per QP that meets 75-99% of the Technical Capabilities under the Domain they are proposing.
Offerors will earn two (2) points per QP that meets 50-74% of the Technical Capabilities under the Domain they are proposing.
Offerors will earn one (1) point per QP that meets 25-49% of the Technical Capabilities under the Domain they are proposing.
Offerors will earn zero (0) points per QPs that meets 0-24% of the Technical Capabilities under the Domain they are proposing.
The maximum points to be received for Relevance is 15.
4 L.2.3.3
NAICS
Alignment
Each QP that is submitted to demonstrate past performance, that aligns with Domain specific NAICS will receive one (1) additional point.
The maximum points to be received for NAICS Alignment is three (3).
5 L.2.3.4 Recency
The QP's submitted must have at least one (1) year of performance, but not over four (4) years old. If the Offeror has a QP that has a period of performance end date within the last two (2) years that QP will receive one (1) additional point per QP.
The maximum points to be received for Recency is three (3).
6 L.2.3.5 Performance Quality
Offeror receives one (1) point for one (1) recent QP with a Satisfactory or above PP Rating in all CPAR/PPQ elements.
Offeror receives three (3) points for two (2) recent QPs with a Satisfactory or above PP Rating in all CPAR/PPQ elements.
Offeror receives five (5) points if all three (3) recent QPs with Satisfactory or above PP Rating in all CPAR/PPQ elements.
Offeror does not receive credit for a project with a below satisfactory rating in any of the CPAR ratings, a neutral rating (i.e., lack of past performance information), or a non-relevant project (regardless of the PP score). If offeror h CPAR the Government will utilize CPAR. If no CPAR is available then the offeror can submit PPQs.
The maximum points to be received for Performance Quality is five (5).
7 L.2.4.1 Recruitment
Offeror receives points based on the confidence rating defined below:
High Confidence (3 Points): The Government has high confidence that the offeror can assess the ability to attract qualified personnel, ensuring stable project execution with little or no Government intervention.
Some Confidence (2 Points): The Government has some confidence that the offeror can assess the ability to attract qualified personnel, ensuring stable project execution with some Government intervention.
Low Confidence (1 Point): The Government has low confidence that the offeror can assess the ability to attract qualified personnel, ensuring stable project execution even with Government intervention.
The maximum points to be received for Recruitment is three (3).
8 L.2.4.2 Retention
Offeror receives points based on the confidence rating defined below:
High Confidence (3 Points): The Government has high confidence that the offeror can assess the ability to retain qualified personnel, ensuring stable project execution with little or no Government intervention.
Some Confidence (2 Points): The Government has some confidence that the offeror can assess the ability to retain qualified personnel, ensuring stable project execution with some Government intervention.
Low Confidence (1 Point): The Government has low confidence that the offeror can assess the ability to retain qualified personnel, ensuring stable project execution even with Government intervention.
The maximum points to be received for Recruitment is three (3).
9 L.2.4.3 Risk Management
Offeror receives points based on the confidence rating defined below:
High Confidence (3 Points): The Government has high confidence that the offeror can evaluate the proactive risk management strategies, including contingency planning and provide a clear strategy for identifying, mitigating, and managing risks with little or no Government intervention.
Some Confidence (2 Points): The Government has some confidence that the offeror can evaluate the proactive risk management strategies, including contingency planning and provide a clear strategy for identifying, mitigating, and managing risks with some Government intervention.
Low Confidence (1 Point): The Government has low confidence that the offeror can evaluate the proactive risk management strategies, including contingency planning and provide a clear strategy for identifying, mitigating, and managing risks even with Government intervention.
The maximum points to be received for Recruitment is three (3).
TOTAL CREDITS AVAILABLE 39
TOTAL CREDIT EARNED
MAPS SCORECARD
ATTACHMENT 0003
Systems and Rates
Past Performance
Technical
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .