ATTACHMENT 0002 PPQ Template 13DEC2024.pdf

PDF 128 KB Posted

Attached to
Marketplace for the Acquisition of Professional Services (MAPS) - UPDATE
Solicitation number
W15P7T-25-R-MAPS
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire (PPQ) template used to evaluate contractor performance for federal contract opportunities. The form is structured in three parts: Part I requires the offeror to provide contract identification details including company information, contract numbers, and program details; Part II consists of a comprehensive evaluation to be completed by the Government Point of Contact across seven performance areas (Quality, Schedule, Cost Control, Management, Small Business Subcontracting, Regulatory Compliance, and General Comments) using a five-tier rating system (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, and Unsatisfactory).

The evaluation criteria requires detailed explanations for any Exceptional, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory ratings. The template includes fields to identify other relevant past performance references and requires the evaluator's complete contact information. The form concludes with Part III containing return instructions and signature requirements. A NAICS code alignment section is included to properly categorize the type of work being evaluated. The document is marked "FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION" and will be used in the evaluation process for awarding federal contracts.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment 0003 Systems Agreements and Certifications Form 07FEB2025 SB.pdf PDF
Attachment 0001 Cover Letter Form 07FEB2025.pdf PDF
Attachment 0006 PPQ Form 07FEB2025.pdf PDF
Proposed Timeline 07FEB2025.pdf PDF
Attachment 0004 Qualifying Project Forms 07FEB2025.pdf PDF
Attachment 0002 Gate Questions 07FEB2025 SB.pdf PDF
Section LM Change Document 07FEB2025.pdf PDF
Attachment 0005 Scorecard LB an SB 07FEB2025 SB.pdf PDF
Attachment 0002 Gate Questions 07FEB2025 LB.pdf PDF
Attachment 0003 Systems Agreements and Certifications Form 07FEB2025 LB.pdf PDF
Attachment 0005 Scorecard LB an SB 07FEB2025 LB.pdf PDF
RFP DRAFT 3 07FEB2025.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 0001 Gate Questions 13DEC2024.pdf PDF
Executive Summary of Changes 13DEC2024.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 0003 Scorecard Large Business 13DEC2024.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 0003 Scorecard Small Business 13DEC2024.pdf PDF
Section L and M Draft 13DEC2024.pdf PDF
MAPS Industry Day Slides - Industry Participant List.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 0002 - PPQ Template.pdf PDF
DRAFT PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT SCOPE.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 0001 - Gate Questions.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 0003 - Scorecard.pdf PDF
Section L and M Draft 05NOV2024.pdf PDF
MAPS_Industry-Day_Flyer_2024_UPDATE.pdf PDF
MAPS_Industry-Day_Flyer_2024 1.pdf PDF
Show all 25

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION

ATTACHMENT 0002

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

Contractor:____________________ Contract No.:____________________________ Subcontract No. (if applicable):_________________________________ POC:________________________ Title:________________________ (Name) (E.G. PCO/ACO/TM)

(Agency, Telephone No., & E-mail Address)

The following questions pertain to the Contractor's record of past (within the past four years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible.

Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.

Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractors proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements, and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the Contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Government Point of Contact – Respondent)

A. Quality Exceptional (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Very Good Satisfactory Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below

Comments:

B. Schedule Exceptional (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Very Good Satisfactory Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

C. Cost Control

Very Good Satisfactory Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

D. Management

Very Good Satisfactory Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

E. Small Business Subcontracting

Very Good Satisfactory Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

F. Regulatory Compliance

Very Good Satisfactory Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

G. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

H. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

I. Government Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

J. NAICS Alignment:

Please identify the NAICS Code that best aligns with this PPQ:

NAICS:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

Signature Date

Typed or Printed Name

Subcontract No if applicable:
Contract No:
Title:
Name:
EG PCOACOTM:
J NAICS Alignment:
Typed or Printed Name:
Date:
Agency Telephone No Email Address:
A CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION:
B IDENTIFICATION OF OFFERORS REPRESENTATIVE:
Group1: Off
Group2: Off
Group3: Off
Group4: Off
Group5: Off
Group6: Off
Text2:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .