UU Building 525 Seismic Feasibility Study Phase 2 (1).pdf

University of Utah University Hospital Building 525

Seismic Upgrade Feasibility Study Phase 2

March 29, 2024 U of U Project # 70240

GSBS Project # 2019.015.00

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1. Summary

1.2. Project Scope

2.0 STRUCTURAL

2.1. Executive Summary

2.2. Background

2.3. Design Methodology and

Performance Criteria

2.4. West and East Ancillary Building

Findings

2.5. MRI and Radiology Addition Findings

3.0 ARCHITECTURAL SYSTEMS

3.1. Project Approach / Procedures

3.2. Summary of Findings

4.0 MECHANICAL & PLUMBING

SYSTEMS

4.1. Project Approach / Procedures

4.2. Summary of Findings

4.3. Discussion of Mechanical System

5.0 ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

5.1. Project Approach / Procedures

5.2. Summary of Findings

5.3. Equipment Replacement

Schedule

6.0 COST ESTIMATING

6.1 Project Approach / Procedures

6.2 Discussion of Cost Estimate

6.3 Estimate Approach

6.4 Cost Estimate Full Details

7.0 APPENDIX

7.1 Cost Estimate Full Details

7.2 Structural Schematic Retrofit

Drawings

7.3 Architectural Assessment Log

7.4 Mechanical Assessment Log

7.5 Electrical Assessment Log

CONSULTANT TEAM

PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ARCHITECTURAL

GSBS Architects 375 West 200 South, Suite 100 Salt Lake City, UT 84101

Stephen Howard

Chad Farley

STRUCTURAL

Reaveley Engineers 675 East 500 South, Suite 400 Salt Lake City, UT 84102

Dorian Adams

Oliver Burt

MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, FIRE PROTECTION

Van Boerum & Frank, Inc 181 East 5600 South Murray, UT 84107

Jeff Watkins

Roman Buys

ELECTRICAL AND FIRE ALARM

Spectrum Engineers 324 South State Street, Suite 400 Salt Lake City, UT 84111

Carlton Getz

COST ESTIMATING

Construction Control Corporation 307 West 200 South, Suite 4006 Salt Lake City, UT 84101

Kirk Powelson

Kris Larson

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH TEAM

PLANNING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION (PDC)

Eric Bermudez, Project Manager

UNIVERITY OF UTAH FACILITIES MANAGEMENT

Christian Allen, Construction Project Manager

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 Summary

In Phase 1 of the Building 525 Seismic Upgrades – Feasibility Study, Reavely Engineers was asked to evaluate the feasibility of structural rehabilitation methods identified in previous reports. Reavely Engineers evaluated two retrofit schemes for the East and West buildings and three schemes for the MRI and Radiology additions which were presented to the University of Utah team. The University requested that the architectural and MEP team evaluate the impact of these structural schemes would incur to their respective disciplines. The following report indicates the findings based on existing drawings and visual evaluation.

1.2 Project Scope

The purpose of this Phase 2 Building 525 Seismic Upgrades – Feasibility Study is to summarize the anticipated impact on architectural, mechanical, plumbing, fire protection and electrical systems if structural lateral force resisting systems are added based on the Building 525 Seismic Upgrades – Feasibility Study Part 1 Report completed by Reaveley Engineers.

Upon a thorough review, t was determined by the University of Utah team that the following scenarios will be investigated: For the East & West Buildings, Option 1B: Adding shotcrete to the exterior face of existing concrete. For the MRI & Radiology Building, Option 2: Which widened drift joints to eliminate the potential of adjacent buildings colliding in seismic event. (See previous reports for schemes analysis and selection.)

The result of this new feasibility study is a summary of the systems impacted by the two seismic retrofits and a high-level budget estimate for this work.

515 EAST 100 SOUTH SUITE 1200 · SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84102

reaveley.com

Building 525 Seismic Upgrades –

Feasibility Study

Phase 2

Dorian Adams, SE

Oliver Burt, SE

Austin Guter, PE

Vanessa Murphy, EIT

University of Utah

March 8, 2024

2022.0009

GSBS Architects

375 West 200 South

Salt Lake City, Utah 84101

P: 801-521-8600

PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY

Page | i

Building 525 Seismic Upgrades

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

BACKGROUND 3

DESIGN METHODOLOGY AND PERFORMANCE CRITERIA 5

PERFORMANCE CRITERIA DEFINITIONS 5

WEST AND EAST ANCILLARY BUILDING FINDINGS 6

CONCRETE JACKET RETROFIT 6

MRI AND RADIOLOGY ADDITION FINDINGS 6

PROPOSED REHABILITATION STRATEGY: 7

OPTION 2 - WIDEN DRIFT JOINT 7

COST ESTIMATE 7

SCOPE 7

SUMMARY 7

NON-STRUCTURAL IMPACT 8

APPENDIX A SCHEMATIC RETROFIT DRAWINGS 1

APPENDIX B COST ESTIMATE DETAILS 1

APPENDIX C PHOTOS 2

Page | ii

DISCLAIMER

The opinions and recommendations contained in this report are based on available drawings, on field investigations performed as a part of this project, and on analysis and calculations performed based on the information gathered. This report does not address any other portions of the structure other than the areas mentioned, nor does it provide any warranty, either expressed or implied, for any portion of the existing structure.

The recommendations presented in this report are limited by the extent and accuracy of information available to us during this evaluation. Conditions detrimental to the structure may exist which are not documented in the original drawings and were not visible or were not otherwise discovered during the field observation portion of this investigation.

This report is intended for planning purposes only and not for construction.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Scope and Purpose

The purpose of this report is to further evaluate the feasibility of structural rehabilitation methods to correct the structural deficiencies identified in previous Structural Evaluation Reports (See UU Project

#70240 for detailed reports). This study evaluates the ability of the seismic force resisting system to achieve a Risk Category IV performance level. Structural elements that do not achieve the performance levels associated with this Risk Category IV structures are label as deficient.

This feasibility study evaluates the practical application of strengthening the East and West Building with the concrete jacketing option presented in the previous study. We also evaluate the impacts of strengthening the MRI and Radiology buildings using Option 2 strategies of widening the joint between buildings and strengthening the moment frame connections.

Our site investigations found there are several areas where repairs can be installed in a relatively simple manner, while others will require a very significant effort.

East and West Building:

There are several instances where the proposed strengthening method is difficult to achieve due to limited access. In these instances, alternative strengthening methods will likely be required. Alternate methods include adding additional shearwalls or strengthening adjacent, accessible shearwalls to reduce the force demand on the overloaded wall elements. Further iterative analytical analysis will be required to determine the amount of strengthening required.

MRI and Radiology Buildings:

It was found at the roof interface with the East/West buildings that roof framing beams were located directly adjacent to the concrete wall and that the joint detail shown in record drawings was different than the installed condition. The result of this finding is that the existing beam will be required to be removed and a new beam installed further away from the joint. The area of roof deck that needs to be removed will increase. Instead of a 1-foot wide strip being removed, a +/- 3’ strip will need to be removed.

Page | 2

Existing Building Description

Drawings Medical Center Expansion by Gustavson, Nelson, and Panushka (GNP), January 1978, architectural and structural drawings

MRI Addition University of Utah by HDR, October 1985, architectural and structural drawings

University of Utah Radiology Addition by Gerald Nichols & Associates Architects, October 1992, architectural and structural drawings

Construction Years 1978, 1985, 1992

Performance Objective BSE-1E Immediate Occupancy, BSE-2E Life Safety

Risk Category per 2018 IBC IV

Gravity Framing – Roof Metal deck spanning between steel beams, supported by steel columns

Gravity Framing – Floors Concrete over metal deck bearing on steel wide-flange beams and columns

Lateral Resistance West Building and East Ancillary Building

Dual System: Reinforced Concrete Shear wall and Steel Moment Frames

MRI and Radiology Addition – Steel Moment Frame

Foundations West Building and East Ancillary Building – Shallow Conventional Reinforced Concrete

MRI and Radiology Addition – Spread footings and drilled piers/caissons

East and West Building – Concrete Perimeter Frame

Retrofit Options Description Estimate of Probable Cost*

#1 – Concrete Jacketing

See Appendix A

Sheets SF101 to SF301

Increase seismic performance of concrete wall piers and spandrel beams by adding shotcrete to the inside/exterior face of existing concrete at select locations.

$1,659,538*

MRI and Radiology Buildings

Retrofit Options Description Estimate of Probable Cost*

#2 – Widen Drift Joint

See Appendix A

Sheets SF310 to SF315

Widen drift joints to eliminate the potential of adjacent buildings colliding in seismic event.

$749,324*

*Cost estimate was performed by Construction Control Corporation. See Appendix B for a detailed breakdown of estimated costs.

Page | 3

BACKGROUND

Reaveley Engineers was engaged by GSBS Architects to perform a seismic evaluation of Building 525 on the University of Utah campus. The results of that evaluation are documented in a report dated

February 3, 2020 (University of Utah Project Number 70240). The current effort is to perform a feasibility study to implement the seismic retrofit options that address the deficiencies discovered in the prior evaluation.

This feasibility study is a result of meeting on site with Architect, Mechanical, and electrical consultants to look at each location and identify impacts to each system respectively. Each location was investigated to the extent possible.

Prior analysis found several structural elements do not meet the desired seismic performance objective.

Building deficiencies are listed in the table below. Structural elements not achieving the desired performance levels are deficient. The figure below shows the four areas of Building 525 that were included in the previous evaluation.

Structural Deficiencies

Deficiency Location Description Result

Concrete Spandrel

Beams

(51 Locations)

East & West Building Shear Failure. Does not meet

Life Safety performance deficient by 30%

Severe Cracking

Concrete Wall Piers

(18 Locations)

East & West Building Shear Failure. Does not meet

Life-Safety performance deficient by 33%-77%

Severe Cracking

Moment Frame

Connections

MRI and Radiology

Additions

Brittle Pre-Northridge connection. Panel Zone

Failure

Brittle failure and loss of strength of beam connections.

Building Separation

Joint Dimension

East, MRI, and Radiology Joint dimension between these buildings is too small

Pounding between buildings causing localized damage.

Page | 4

Figure 1 – Building Names and Construction Dates

West Building

East Ancillary

Building

Radiology Addition

MRI Addition

Page | 5

DESIGN METHODOLOGY AND PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

Conceptual seismic upgrade scenarios were designed per ASCE 41-17 Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of

Existing Buildings following the Nonlinear Static Analysis procedure, also known as a pushover analysis.

Building 525 is a Risk Category IV building according to 2018 IBC and the performance objectives corresponding to the with Risk Category IV structures is shown in the following table.

Hazard Level Performance Level Sxs Sx1

BSE-1E Immediate Occupancy 0.403g 0.213g

BSE-2E Life Safety 1.019g 0.625g

Table 1 – Performance Objective used in the Design of Upgrade Scenarios

The purpose of this dual performance objective is to ensure the building will continue to support the community’s needs in the event of small to moderate earthquake and will also protect life safety during and after large earthquake.

Safety factors were used in the evaluation in accordance with the provisions of ASCE 41. Safety factors vary by element type and failure mechanism. Brittle failure mechanisms have higher safety factors than ductile yielding mechanisms. A knowledge factor of 1.0 has been used for this analysis.

PERFORMANCE CRITERIA DEFINITIONS

Immediate Occupancy

The structure remains safe to occupy and essentially retains its pre-earthquake strength and stiffness but may not function, negligible structural damage and minor non-structural damage, limited interruption to building operations, losses < 15% of value.

Life Safety

The structure has significant structural damage to components but retains a margin against the onset of partial or total collapse, some injuries may occur, extensive non-structural damage, building not safe to occupy until repaired, losses < 30% of value.

Page | 6

WEST AND EAST ANCILLARY BUILDING FINDINGS

Previous analysis of the West and East Ancillary buildings found some deficient exterior wall piers and concrete beams. Part of this evaluation included limited material testing and field verification. This was done to verify strengths of construction materials and to verify building modifications (new openings, infilled openings, etc.) that have occurred over the life of the building.

The rehabilitation approach has been evaluated to address deficient wall piers and coupling beams.

Deficient concrete members are proposed to be reinforced with a new reinforced concrete jacket. The retrofit aims to promote flexural hinging of concrete elements, in lieu of shear hinging in concrete elements.

Flexural hinging of concrete is a more ductile failure mechanism than shear hinging. The increase in ductility allows structural elements to deform and absorb more energy before breaking and losing strength. The retrofit measures below aim to achieve flexural hinging, improve ductility, and achieve overall building performance objectives.

CONCRETE JACKET RETROFIT

The concrete jacket retrofit involves placing a minimum of 6” of new reinforced concrete against deficient concrete walls piers and coupling beams. Prior to placing the new reinforced concrete, the existing concrete surface will have to be intetionally roughed and will have epoxy dowels installed along the length of the affected surface to promote good bond between the two layers of concrete.

This concrete can either be placed on the interior or exterior side of a deficient wall or beam. Work on the exterior of the building may be advantageous to the University to reduce distruptions to hospital functions. Work on the interior of the building will likely disrupt hospital operations in the area (dust barriers, temporary room shutdown etc.) Exterior application of concrete introduces a new aesthetic to the building such as intermittent thickened sections and troweled shotcrete finish that will be addressed from an architectural perspective in a future phase of the study.

The cost estimate in this report only considers placing concrete on the interior side of the wall. There will be some savings to apply the concrete to the exterior side of the wall due to less cost to address interior construction; however, those savings will be offset to a large degree by cost for scaffolding and costs to to enhance the exterior wall aesthetic.

MRI AND RADIOLOGY ADDITION FINDINGS

Previous analysis found the following deficiencies of the MRI and Radiology buildings. See previous report for more detailed description of deficiencies.

1. Existing Moment Frame Panel Zones

a. Adequate to meet Life Safety Performance Objectives

b. Do not meet Immediate Occupancy Performance Objectives

2. Moment Frame Connections are Pre-Northridge type connections

a. Beams are not detailed to ensure the beam will yield prior to beam-column connection failure. Beams are susceptible to cracking prior to achieving design deformation.

Page | 7

3. Expansion Joint

a. The building separation joints between East Building, MRI Building, and Radiology

Building is smaller than the expected building movement in a major seismic event.

Pounding at the building interface can cause local damage and potential instability.

PROPOSED REHABILITATION STRATEGY:

OPTION 2 - WIDEN DRIFT JOINT

This proposed solution increases the joint dimension and modifies existing structural moment frames to achieve the desired performance objectives. This solution requires the following:

1. Increase joint between floor slabs by cutting back existing floor slab on the Radiology building at level 2. Not required at MRI Building.

2. Increase joint between roof of Radiology and MRI buildings by cutting back roof deck.

3. Repair column and beam connections moment frame connections

COST ESTIMATE

SCOPE

Construction Control Corporation developed the following estimates of probable cost. Details of the estimates are included in Appendix B.

Structural elements are included in the cost and impact to non-structural elements is not included. For instance, removal and replacement of ceilings, interior, and exterior finishes to install concrete walls is excluded, but the cost of the concrete, formwork and reinforcement is included.

SUMMARY

East and West Building

Retrofit Options Estimate of Probable Cost Non-Structural Impact

#1 – Concrete Jacketing $1,659,538 High (Medium if exterior installation)

MRI and Radiology Buildings

Retrofit Options Estimate of Probable Cost Non-Structural Impact

#2 – Widen Drift Joint $749,324 Medium

Page | 8

NON-STRUCTURAL IMPACT

All seismic retrofit options will disrupt the use of the space where the work is being performed and will require the removal and replacement of non-structural elements. The amount of disruption depends on factors such as materials (placing concrete or installing steel elements), construction methods (welding, cutting, drilling, grinding), the size of the area required to perform the work, noise, and the potential for dust/debris. In each case, University policies will be followed for containment and cleanliness. The levels of non-structural impact are intended to provide general descriptions for comparison among the options.

Low Impact: Structural elements can be installed with isolated impact on non-structural systems (may require phasing to reduce impact). Room size areas are disrupted.

Medium Impact: Interior or exterior non-structural elements must be removed to install structural elements

(all work performed from either interior or exterior). Some structural elements require removal of exterior veneer. Larger areas are disrupted compared to “Low Impact”.

High Impact: Non-structural elements at interior and exterior are required to be removed to install structural elements. Larger areas are disrupted compared to “Medium Impact”.

3.0 ARCHITECTURAL SYSTEMS

3.1 Project Approach / Procedures

Site observations occurred with a licensed architect and licensed engineers to evaluate the proposed structural retrofits to the building. Coordination also occurred with University Facilities District staff to understand current uses of the affected spaces.

The assessment was performed through a combination of site observations and review of the existing available documentation of the building. Site observation was visually documented through photographs and annotations based on findings of existing conditions.

3.2 Summary of Findings

There are two general scopes of structural retrofits from the structural feasibility study. The first is a series of reinforcements to the concrete perimeter frame of the west and east wings of the building. This consists of adding concrete jackets to select spandrel beams and piers. The second scope is to upgrade the steel frame systems of the 1985 MRI addition and the 1992 Radiology addition. This consists of upgrading the moment frame connections, adding lateral bracing between roof beams, and increasing the building separation joint. Beams at the existing building joint will need to be removed and replaced to accommodate the wider building joint.

Each of these scopes is addressed below by location in the building.

Pier Walls at West Wall of West Building Two pier walls on Level 1 between gridlines 3 and 4 were identified as needing reinforcement by the structural feasibility study.

Exam room 1227 and Locker Room 1261 will be affected by the work. Exam room equipment and locker room casework will need to be removed and replaced. Space in the exam rooms will be reduced, possibly affecting the function and accessibility of that space. All interior finishes disturbed by performing the work will need to be replaced like for like.

Pier Walls at South Wall of East Building Three pier walls on level 1 between gridlines A and C on gridline 1 were identified as requiring reinforcement by the structural feasibility study. Performing this work to the south in coordination with other necessary work in this location seems optimal. Room 1598 is a mechanical room and there are electrical service panels along the pier wall that will need to be coordinated.

Pier Walls between the East and West Buildings Between gridlines 2 and 3 between the east and west buildings there are pier walls on levels A, 2, 3, and 4 that were identified as requiring reinforcement by the structural feasibility study.

The pier wall on level A is at Mechanical Shaft A545 that includes medical gas lines among other lines. Due to the potential impacts of reinforcement at this location on hospital operations alternative reinforcement strategies should be studied. There is an abandoned opening directly to the north at the west end of Hall A530 that could potentially be infilled.

The pier wall on level 2 is in a corner of Hall 2320 that appears to have been closed off by subsequent remodels. Selective demolition will be required to assess the condition of this area. Additionally, architectural plans do not appear to match the structural analysis. Further study of this area will be necessary.

Along the pier wall on level 3 is in the Women’s Locker Room 3540A. A portion of that room will need to be closed to perform the work. Lockers will need to be salvaged to be replaced and all interior finishes that are disturbed will need to be replaced like for like.

The pier wall on level 4 is in a Control Room 4040G for Operating Room 4040. This location will need to be studied to understand how to minimize impact on hospital operations. There is an electrical panel at this location so further study will also be required to determine whether the panel can be relocated or whether structural reinforcement can be achieved in an alternate location. All interior finishes that are disturbed will need to be replaced like for like.

Pier Wall at South Wall The pier wall on level 4 at gridlines J and 2 is located between a structural column, a window, a building expansion joint, and an egress corridor. Carbon fiber should be evaluated as a structural solution for this location. Maintaining the required egress width during construction will be necessary at this location. The building expansion joint and window will need to be reinstalled. All interior finishes that are disturbed will need to be replaced like for like.

Spandrel Panels at Exterior Walls There are several exterior spandrel panels on levels A, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 along the west, south, and east exterior walls that are identified as needing reinforcement by the structural feasibility study. To avoid impacting hospital operations it has been determined that structural reinforcement will occur on the exterior face.

The thickness of the concrete reinforcement is 6” and will have a noticeable affect on the appearance of the building. Developing a strategy to address these additions should be identified in a future study of the exterior of building 525.

Scaffolding to perform the work will primarily need to be located on lower roofs. These locations will need to be evaluated for their ability to support scaffolding.

Spandrel Panel in East Building There is one spandrel in the east building between the north and south sections on level 1 in Hall 1510 that is identified as needing reinforcement by the structural feasibility study. All interior finishes that are disturbed will need to be replaced like for like.

Spandrel Panel Between East and West Buildings There is one spandrel panel on level 3 at the west wall between the east and west building in room 3540 that is identified as needing reinforcement by the structural feasibility study. This area will need to be evaluated whether enough space is available to use shotcrete. If not, the reinforcement is to be formed the concrete will need to be pumped in from holes through the floor above. Closing the hall at this location will need to be evaluated for impact on egress and hospital operations. All interior finishes that are disturbed will need to be replaced like for like.

Spandrel Panels Between East Building and Radiology Addition There are four spandrel panels on level A, one on level 1, and one on level 2 between the east building and the radiology addition.

The window openings at these locations on level A and level 2 have been covered during subsequent remodels. These openings should be studied whether the former window openings can be infilled by concrete as opposed to reinforcing the spandrel panel to achieve similar seismic performance. Work can be performed from either the east or the west depending on access and impact on hospital operations. All interior finishes that are disturbed will need to be replaced like for like.

The spandrel panel on level 1 appears to be at an opening that was widened in a subsequent renovation.

Additional structural analysis is required at this location.

Moment Frame Connections and Lateral Bracing All column and beam connections on the level 1 of the MRI addition and levels 1 and 2 of the Radiology addition are identified as needing reinforcement by the structural feasibility study. These columns occur at the exterior walls and approximately 3’ from the east building throughout the spaces. Adding the moment frame connection will require at least 4’ of space in each direction from each column to perform the work.

Several of these columns are completely blocked by various MRI scan rooms. Other columns occur at various offices, recovery spaces, changing rooms, and equipment rooms. In an effort to reduce disturbance of MRI services, this work can potentially be coordinated with periodic replacement of equipment and scan rooms.

Phasing of this work could potentially be sequenced between gridlines.

Additionally, the structural feasibility study identifies areas requiring lateral braces placed at approximately 5’ on center. It should be anticipated that 10’ of space running through much of the space will need to be opened to perform this work. This will potentially have significant impact on the hospital functions and significant conflicts with the various MRI scan rooms. Similarly, this work can potentially be coordinated with periodic replacement of equipment and scan rooms.

All fireproofing will need to be replaced to match existing 3 hour rating. All interior finishes that are disturbed will need to be replaced like for like.

Widened Building Joint The building joints between the east building at both the MRI and Radiology additions are identified as needing to be widened by the structural feasibility study. The roof slab of the MRI addition is noted to be cut back by 6-8”. Additionally, the level 2 floor slab, the level 2 roof slab, and the level 3 walkway roof slab of the radiology addition are noted to be cut back by 6-8”.

As there are beams running along these locations the structural feasibility study identifies these beams as needing to be replaced to cut back the slabs. The new beams would be approximately 6-8” from their existing locations. It should be anticipated that the entire space beneath these beams will need to opened to facilitate their replacement and cutting back the slab edge.

New expansion joint covers will be required at all slabs that are cut back. Additionally, roofing will need to be repaired in a manner that maintains the roofing warranty. All interior finishes that are disturbed will need to be replaced like for like.

It also appears that all exterior wall expansion joints where the additions meet Building 525 are inappropriately sized or missing altogether. Further study is required to determine the required width and how this might affect existing openings and exterior wall cladding.

4.0 MECHANICAL & PLUMBING SYSTEMS

4.1 Project Approach / Procedures

There are several mechanical systems that will likely need some adjustment to accommodate the structural and seismic recommendations. As built plans, and site observations were utilized to assess the existing conditions in areas where seismic work will need to be performed. The main set of drawings that was utilized were dated 1978.

4.2 Summary of Findings

There are several areas where plans were noticeably inaccurate or outdated. As such, the findings in this assessment are limited to information that was available. There were several areas within the hospital where access to existing conditions was not available due to plan inaccuracies, missing information, and inability to access above ceilings due to hospital operations. Site visits were valuable in several areas where it was obvious that existing conditions did not match plans.

4.3 Discussion of Mechanical Systems

The main utility chase for the building is located near gridline 2, between gridlines E and F. The adjacent wall that calls for reinforcement with a concrete wall pier retrofit has associated challenges due to the mechanical and plumbing utilities. If relocation of these utilities is deemed necessary, it will require a complete temporary shutdown in order to drain the system and relocate the pipes. This will likely require shutting down large portions or even the entirety of the hospital while those systems are taken down and relocated. Because these are the main utility lines, it will have ramifications to the operation of the entire building.

There are several locations where concrete wall spandrel retrofit is called for. There is minimal impact to the existing mechanical and plumbing systems in these areas. Specifically, where there were once windows in these areas and thus there are no mechanical or plumbing utilities that will be affected by this work.

Beam/Column joints and Access for new moment frame bracing is required on the East side of the building on levels 1 and 2. Access was limited in these areas but based on conditions in other portions of the hospital, it is expected that the existing ductwork will have to be removed and reinstalled in order to gain access to structural elements. This work is unlikely to have significant impacts on other areas of the hospital. Work is likely to include removal of ductwork, diffusers, VAV boxes, and Coils. Some piping may be required to remain and will need to be worked around.

Specific challenges are present on level 2 above the small mechanical equipment room 1873B.

There is significant amounts of ductwork, piping, and equipment that will prevent access to the structural elements in this space.

Plumbing systems will likely need to be uninstalled or demolished where moment frame bracing is required and/or beam and column joints are to be installed. These plumbing systems will need to be reinstalled once the work is complete in these areas.

5.0 ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

5.1 Project Approach / Procedures

The assessment was performed through a combination of (a) review of existing available documentation and

(b) field investigation and evaluation during site walkthroughs of building systems in the areas where seismic structural reinforcement is anticipated for the building. The field investigation was visually documented through photographs and notations made in specific spaces based on findings of existing conditions.

5.2 Summary of Findings

In most locations where seismic structural reinforcement is anticipated the impact to electrical systems is limited to:

A. incidental impacts on branch circuiting, devices, and light fixtures local to the immediate area of structural work which will require removal and reinstallation to match existing conditions; and

B. the removal, retention, and reinstallation of existing ceiling and wall mounted devices (including fire alarm devices, lighting and lighting controls, paging speakers, etc.) where removal of ceilings and walls will be required to provide physical access for the structural work.

However, certain locations were noted where the impact to electrical and low voltage systems will be substantial due to the extent of the structural reinforcement. This is especially the case in the imaging addition on the east side of Building 525 where bracing and reinforcing for horizontal beams will be installed in certain areas requiring extensive access around significant electrical equipment. Areas of particular concern are noted below:

A. Level 1 (East) – Structural reinforcement within the MRI equipment rooms (1843 and 1873b) where there is significant electrical, power, and data distribution and sensitive equipment and filters requiring protection during construction;

B. Level 1 (East) – Structural reinforcement within the electrical room (1598) where there is significant electrical branch circuit distribution around which structural reinforcement will need to be coordinated and/or electrical distribution removed and reinstalled to accommodate required access;

C. Level 1 (East) – Structural reinforcement within the corridor (1850) the extent of which may require removal and reinstallation of a significant amount of ceiling and wall mounted devices and equipment due to the access requirements for reinforcement in this area;

D. Level 1 (East) – Structural reinforcement within the corridor (1529) where feeder and branch circuit distribution serving the imaging suites in the east side expansion of Building 525 crosses perpendicular to the expected structural beam reinforcement required along the beam line between the original building and the expansion which may require significant interruption of imaging services for installation.

PROJECT ESTIMATE CONSTRUCTION CONTROL CORPORATION 3/27/2024

PROJECT NAME……...…..UofU BUILDING 525 SEISMIC UPGRADE

TOTALS

ARCHITECT…..….….…..…GSBS

STAGE OF DESIGN…..…..FEASIBILITY

CSI # WEST & EAST BUILDING MRI BUILDING RADIOLOGY BUILDING TOTAL

02 EXISTING CONDITIONS 669,615$ 186,128$ 315,616$ 1,171,359$

03 CONCRETE 788,507$ -$ -$ 788,507$

04 MASONRY -$ -$ -$ -$

05 METALS -$ 158,765$ 238,350$ 397,115$

06 WOODS & PLASTICS 55,000$ -$ -$ 55,000$

07 THERMAL & MOISTURE PROTECTION 314,816$ 129,408$ 109,558$ 553,782$

08 DOORS & WINDOWS -$ -$ -$ -$

09 FINISHES 610,770$ 282,676$ 524,511$ 1,417,957$

10 SPECIALTIES 11,000$ 2,766$ 5,239$ 19,005$

11 EQUIPMENT 10,000$ -$ -$ 10,000$

12 FURNISHINGS -$ -$ -$ -$

13 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION -$ -$ -$ -$

14 CONVEYING SYSTEMS -$ -$ -$ -$

21 FIRE SUPPRESSION 28,600$ 47,022$ 89,055$ 164,677$

22 PLUMBING 155,000$ 27,660$ 202,385$ 385,045$

23 HVAC 143,000$ 542,136$ 1,026,746$ 1,711,882$

26 ELECTRICAL 278,300$ 149,364$ 282,879$ 710,543$

27 COMMUNICATION 185,900$ 33,192$ 62,862$ 281,954$

28 ELECTRONIC SAFETY & SECURITY 57,200$ 22,128$ 41,908$ 121,236$

31 EARTHWORK -$ -$ -$ -$

32 EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS -$ -$ -$ -$

33 UTILITIES -$ -$ -$ -$

SUBTOTAL 3,307,708$ 1,581,245$ 2,899,108$ 7,788,061$

GENERAL CONDITIONS 25% 826,927$ 395,311$ 724,777$ 1,947,015$

BONDS & INSURANCE 2% 66,154$ 31,625$ 57,982$ 155,761$

OVERHEAD & PROFIT 10% 330,771$ 158,125$ 289,911$ 778,806$

DESIGN CONTINGENCY 20% 661,542$ 316,249$ 579,822$ 1,557,612$

TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 5,193,102$ 2,482,555$ 4,551,599$ 12,227,255$

LOCATION……….…..……..SALT LAKE CITY, UT

BUILDING COST SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION

*THIS ESTIMATE DOES NOT CONTAIN PATIENT/STAFF RELOCATION COSTS*

**THIS ESTIMATE CONTAINS CONSTRUCTION COSTS ONLY - SOFT COSTS ARE NOT INCLUDED**

PROJECT ESTIMATE CONSTRUCTION CONTROL CORPORATION 3/27/2024

PROJECT NAME……...…..UofU BUILDING 525 SEISMIC UPGRADE WEST & EAST BUILDING

ARCHITECT…..….….…..…GSBS

STAGE OF DESIGN…..…..FEASIBILITY

CSI # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL

02 EXISTING CONDITIONS 669,615$

03 CONCRETE 788,507$

04 MASONRY -$

05 METALS -$

06 WOODS & PLASTICS 55,000$

07 THERMAL & MOISTURE PROTECTION 314,816$

08 DOORS & WINDOWS -$

09 FINISHES 610,770$

10 SPECIALTIES 11,000$

11 EQUIPMENT 10,000$

12 FURNISHINGS -$

13 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION -$

14 CONVEYING SYSTEMS -$

21 FIRE SUPPRESSION 28,600$

22 PLUMBING 155,000$

23 HVAC 143,000$

26 ELECTRICAL 278,300$

27 COMMUNICATION 185,900$

28 ELECTRONIC SAFETY & SECURITY 57,200$

31 EARTHWORK -$

32 EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS -$

33 UTILITIES -$

SUBTOTAL 3,307,708$

GENERAL CONDITIONS 25% 826,927$

BONDS & INSURANCE 2% 66,154$

OVERHEAD & PROFIT 10% 330,771$

DESIGN CONTINGENCY 20% 661,542$

TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 5,193,102$

LOCATION……….…..……..SALT LAKE CITY, UT

UNIT QTY

BUILDING COST SUMMARY

ARCHITECT…..….….…..…GSBS

STAGE OF DESIGN…..…..FEASIBILITY

CSI # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL

LOCATION……….…..……..SALT LAKE CITY, UT

UNIT QTY

02 EXISTING CONDITIONS

Exterior Scaffolding 32,560 SF 12.00$ 390,720$ Roof Protection at Level 3 Scaffold 1,779 SF 5.00$ 8,895$ Temporary Protections, Pedestrian Protection, Walkway 1 Allow 50,000.00$ 50,000$

Interior Remove Misc. Millwork, Furniture at Wall 22 Loc 1,500.00$ 33,000$ Remove Ceiling 4,400 SF 4.50$ 19,800$ Remove Flooring 4,400 SF 4.50$ 19,800$ Wall Demolition 9,900 SF 7.00$ 69,300$ Misc. Demolition 4,400 SF 5.25$ 23,100$ Temporary Protections/ICRA 22 Loc 2,500.00$ 55,000$

TOTAL EXISTING CONDITIONS 669,615$

03 CONCRETE

Prepare Existing Surface 2,062 SF 3.50$ 7,217$ Exterior Epoxy Doweling 2,062 SF 20.00$ 41,240$ Exterior 6" Shotcrete at Spandrels, Piers 2,062 SF 150.00$ 309,300$

Interior Spandrel Concrete Reinforcement 494 SF 250.00$ 123,500$ Interior Pier Concrete Reinforcement 1,229 SF 250.00$ 307,250$

TOTAL CONCRETE 788,507$

04 MASONRY

TOTAL MASONRY -$

05 METALS

TOTAL METALS -$

06 WOOD & PLASTICS

Reinstall Misc. Millwork 22 Loc 2,500.00$ 55,000$

TOTAL WOOD & PLASTICS 55,000$

07 THERMAL & MOISTURE PROTECTION

Rigid Wall Insulation 2,062 SF 10.00$ 20,620$ Weather Barrier 2,062 SF 8.00$ 16,496$ Exterior Sheathing 2,062 SF 5.00$ 10,310$ Exterior Finish - Metal Panel 2,062 SF 95.00$ 195,890$ Interior Fireproofing Repair 22 Loc 2,500.00$ 55,000$ Caulking & Sealing 22 Loc 750.00$ 16,500$

TOTAL THERMAL & MOISTURE PROTECTION 314,816$

08 DOORS & WINDOWS

Exterior Glazing Removal & Replacement N/A

TOTAL DOORS & WINDOWS -$

09 FINISHES

Exterior Wall Furring/Channel Over Concrete 2,062 SF 10.00$ 20,620$ Replace Interior Wall Framing 9,900 SF 12.00$ 118,800$ Gyp. Wallboard 9,900 SF 7.50$ 74,250$

ARCHITECT…..….….…..…GSBS

STAGE OF DESIGN…..…..FEASIBILITY

CSI # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL

LOCATION……….…..……..SALT LAKE CITY, UT

UNIT QTY

Replace Ceiling 4,400 SF 22.50$ 99,000$

Replace Flooring 4,400 SF 28.50$ 125,400$

Paint Gyp. Wallboard 9,900 SF 4.50$ 44,550$

Base 660 LF 7.50$ 4,950$

Misc. Wall Finishes, Protection 9,900 SF 8.00$ 79,200$ Misc. Architectural Repair, Match Existing 8,800 SF 5.00$ 44,000$

TOTAL FINISHES 610,770$

10 SPECIALTIES

Misc. Replace Wall Specialties 22 Loc 500.00$ 11,000$

TOTAL SPECIALTIES 11,000$

11 EQUIPMENT

Pneumatic Tube Modification 1 Allow 10,000.00$ 10,000$

TOTAL EQUIPMENT 10,000$

12 FURNISHINGS

TOTAL FURNISHINGS -$

21 FIRE SUPPRESSION

Misc. Fire Suppression Modification 4,400 SF 6.50$ 28,600$

TOTAL FIRE SUPPRESSION 28,600$

22 PLUMBING

Misc. Plumbing Remove & Reinstall, Med-gas 22 Loc 2,500.00$ 55,000$

Extensive Piping Modification at A545 1 Allow 100,000.00$ 100,000$

TOTAL PLUMBING 155,000$

23 HVAC

HVAC Demolition - Misc. Demolition 22 Loc 1,500.00$ 33,000$

HVAC - Replace at New Walls 22 Loc 5,000.00$ 110,000$

TOTAL HVAC 143,000$

26 ELECTRICAL

Existing Electrical Removal at Affected Areas 14,300 SF 5.00$ 71,500$

Service & Distribution Existing

Power - Remove & Replace at Interior Walls 9,900 SF 12.00$ 118,800$

Lighting - Replace at Affected Ceilings 4,400 SF 20.00$ 88,000$

TOTAL ELECTRICAL 278,300$

27 COMMUNICATIONS & AV

Communications, Nurse Call - Replace at Affected Areas 14,300 SF 8.00$ 114,400$

A/V - Replace at Affected Areas 14,300 SF 5.00$ 71,500$

ARCHITECT…..….….…..…GSBS

STAGE OF DESIGN…..…..FEASIBILITY

CSI # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL

LOCATION……….…..……..SALT LAKE CITY, UT

UNIT QTY

TOTAL COMMUNICATION 185,900$

28 ELECTRONIC SAFETY & SECURITY

Fire Alarm - Misc. Reinstall 14,300 SF 2.00$ 28,600$

Security, Surveillance - Misc. Remove & Reinstall 14,300 SF 2.00$ 28,600$

TOTAL ELECTRONIC SAFETY & SECURITY 57,200$

PROJECT NAME……...…..UofU BUILDING 525 SEISMIC UPGRADE MRI BUILDING

ARCHITECT…..….….…..…GSBS 5,532 SF

02 EXISTING CONDITIONS 33.65$ 186,128$

03 CONCRETE -$ -$

04 MASONRY -$ -$

05 METALS 28.70$ 158,765$

06 WOODS & PLASTICS -$ -$

07 THERMAL & MOISTURE PROTECTION 23.39$ 129,408$

08 DOORS & WINDOWS -$ -$

09 FINISHES 51.10$ 282,676$

10 SPECIALTIES 0.50$ 2,766$

11 EQUIPMENT -$ -$

12 FURNISHINGS -$ -$

13 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION -$ -$

14 CONVEYING SYSTEMS -$ -$

21 FIRE SUPPRESSION 8.50$ 47,022$

22 PLUMBING 5.00$ 27,660$

23 HVAC 98.00$ 542,136$

26 ELECTRICAL 27.00$ 149,364$

27 COMMUNICATION 6.00$ 33,192$

28 ELECTRONIC SAFETY & SECURITY 4.00$ 22,128$

31 EARTHWORK -$ -$

32 EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS -$ -$

33 UTILITIES -$ -$

SUBTOTAL 285.84$ 1,581,245$

GENERAL CONDITIONS 25% 71.46$ 395,311$

BONDS & INSURANCE 2% 5.72$ 31,625$

OVERHEAD & PROFIT 10% 28.58$ 158,125$

DESIGN CONTINGENCY 20% 57.17$ 316,249$

TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 448.76$ 2,482,555$

LOCATION……….…..……..SALT LAKE CITY, UT

UNIT QTY

ARCHITECT…..….….…..…GSBS 5,532 SF

STAGE OF DESIGN…..…..FEASIBILITY

CSI # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL

LOCATION……….…..……..SALT LAKE CITY, UT

UNIT QTY

02 EXISTING CONDITIONS

Ceiling Removal 5,532 SF 4.50$ 24,894$ Cut Back Slab Edge 134 LF 75.00$ 10,050$ Cut Back Roof Edge 134 LF 95.00$ 12,730$ Structural Shoring 134 LF 50.00$ 6,700$ Remove Beam at Roof 134 LF 75.00$ 10,050$ Misc. Demolition 5,532 SF 7.00$ 38,724$ Temporary Protections 5,532 SF 15.00$ 82,980$

TOTAL EXISTING CONDITIONS 186,128$

03 CONCRETE

TOTAL CONCRETE -$

04 MASONRY

TOTAL MASONRY -$

05 METALS

Beam/Column Collector Connection 26 EA 1,500.00$ 39,000$ Moment Frame Bracing 331 LF 125.00$ 41,375$ Replace Roof Beam 7,035 LB 10.00$ 70,350$ Replace Metal Deck at Beam Replace 536 SF 15.00$ 8,040$

TOTAL METALS 158,765$

06 WOOD & PLASTICS

TOTAL WOOD & PLASTICS -$

07 THERMAL & MOISTURE PROTECTION

Expansion Joint - Roof, Wall 224 LF 120.00$ 26,880$ Roof Repair/Expansion Joint at Cut-back 536 SF 150.00$ 80,400$ Fireproofing 5,532 SF 3.00$ 16,596$ Caulking & Sealing 5,532 SF 1.00$ 5,532$

TOTAL THERMAL & MOISTURE PROTECTION 129,408$

08 DOORS & WINDOWS

TOTAL DOORS & WINDOWS -$

09 FINISHES

Replace Ceiling 5,532 SF 18.00$ 99,576$

Architectural Repair at Expansion Joint 896 SF 50.00$ 44,800$ Misc. Architectural Repair, Put-back 5,532 SF 25.00$ 138,300$

TOTAL FINISHES 282,676$

10 SPECIALTIES

Misc. Replace Specialties 5,532 SF 0.50$ 2,766$

TOTAL SPECIALTIES 2,766$

11 EQUIPMENT

TOTAL EQUIPMENT -$

ARCHITECT…..….….…..…GSBS 5,532 SF

STAGE OF DESIGN…..…..FEASIBILITY

CSI # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL

LOCATION……….…..……..SALT LAKE CITY, UT

UNIT QTY

12 FURNISHINGS

TOTAL FURNISHINGS -$

21 FIRE SUPPRESSION

Remove Fire Suppression System at Affected Ceilings 5,532 SF 2.00$ 11,064$

Replace Fire Suppression System 5,532 SF 6.50$ 35,958$

TOTAL FIRE SUPPRESSION 47,022$

22 PLUMBING

Misc. Plumbing Remove & Reinstall, Med-gas 5,532 SF 5.00$ 27,660$

TOTAL PLUMBING 27,660$

23 HVAC

HVAC Demolition - Ceiling 5,532 SF 3.00$ 16,596$

HVAC - Replace 5,532 SF 95.00$ 525,540$

TOTAL HVAC 542,136$

26 ELECTRICAL

Existing Electrical Removal 5,532 SF 2.00$ 11,064$

Service & Distribution Existing

Power - Misc. 5,532 SF 5.00$ 27,660$

Lighting - Selective Remove & Reinstall 5,532 SF 20.00$ 110,640$

TOTAL ELECTRICAL 149,364$

27 COMMUNICATIONS & AV

Communications - Reinstall 5,532 SF 3.00$ 16,596$

A/V - Reinstall 5,532 SF 3.00$ 16,596$

TOTAL COMMUNICATION 33,192$

28 ELECTRONIC SAFETY & SECURITY

Fire Alarm - Reinstall 5,532 SF 2.00$ 11,064$

Security, Surveillance - Reinstall 5,532 SF 2.00$ 11,064$

TOTAL ELECTRONIC SAFETY & SECURITY 22,128$

PROJECT NAME……...…..UofU BUILDING 525 SEISMIC UPGRADE RADIOLOGY BUILDING

ARCHITECT…..….….…..…GSBS 10,477 SF

02 EXISTING CONDITIONS 30.12$ 315,616$

03 CONCRETE -$ -$

04 MASONRY -$ -$

05 METALS 22.75$ 238,350$

06 WOODS & PLASTICS -$ -$

07 THERMAL & MOISTURE PROTECTION 10.46$ 109,558$

08 DOORS & WINDOWS -$ -$

09 FINISHES 50.06$ 524,511$

10 SPECIALTIES 0.50$ 5,239$

11 EQUIPMENT -$ -$

12 FURNISHINGS -$ -$

13 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION -$ -$

14 CONVEYING SYSTEMS -$ -$

21 FIRE SUPPRESSION 8.50$ 89,055$

22 PLUMBING 19.32$ 202,385$

23 HVAC 98.00$ 1,026,746$

26 ELECTRICAL 27.00$ 282,879$

27 COMMUNICATION 6.00$ 62,862$

28 ELECTRONIC SAFETY & SECURITY 4.00$ 41,908$

31 EARTHWORK -$ -$

32 EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS -$ -$

33 UTILITIES -$ -$

SUBTOTAL 276.71$ 2,899,108$

GENERAL CONDITIONS 25% 69.18$ 724,777$

BONDS & INSURANCE 2% 5.53$ 57,982$

OVERHEAD & PROFIT 10% 27.67$ 289,911$

DESIGN CONTINGENCY 20% 55.34$ 579,822$

TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 434.44$ 4,551,599$

LOCATION……….…..……..SALT LAKE CITY, UT

UNIT QTY

ARCHITECT…..….….…..…GSBS 10,477 SF

STAGE OF DESIGN…..…..FEASIBILITY

CSI # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL

LOCATION……….…..……..SALT LAKE CITY, UT

UNIT QTY

02 EXISTING CONDITIONS

Ceiling Removal 10,477 SF 4.50$ 47,147$ Cut Back Slab Edge 310 LF 75.00$ 23,250$ Cut Back Roof Edge 155 LF 95.00$ 14,725$ Misc. Demolition 10,477 SF 7.00$ 73,339$ Temporary Protections 10,477 SF 15.00$ 157,155$

TOTAL EXISTING CONDITIONS 315,616$

03 CONCRETE

TOTAL CONCRETE -$

04 MASONRY

TOTAL MASONRY -$

05 METALS

Beam/Column Collector Connection 52 EA 1,500.00$ 78,000$ Moment Frame Bracing 279 LF 125.00$ 34,875$ New Steel W18X35 Beams 12,548 LB 10.00$ 125,475$

TOTAL METALS 238,350$

06 WOOD & PLASTICS

TOTAL WOOD & PLASTICS -$

07 THERMAL & MOISTURE PROTECTION

Expansion Joint - Roof, Wall 370 LF 120.00$ 44,400$ Roof Repair/Expansion Joint at Cut-back 155 LF 150.00$ 23,250$ Fireproofing 10,477 SF 3.00$ 31,431$ Caulking & Sealing 10,477 SF 1.00$ 10,477$

TOTAL THERMAL & MOISTURE PROTECTION 109,558$

08 DOORS & WINDOWS

TOTAL DOORS & WINDOWS -$

09 FINISHES

Replace Ceiling 10,477 SF 18.00$ 188,586$

Architectural Repair at Expansion Joint 1,480 SF 50.00$ 74,000$ Misc. Architectural Repair, Put-back 10,477 SF 25.00$ 261,925$

TOTAL FINISHES 524,511$

10 SPECIALTIES

Misc. Replace Specialties 10,477 SF 0.50$ 5,239$

TOTAL SPECIALTIES 5,239$

11 EQUIPMENT

TOTAL EQUIPMENT -$

12 FURNISHINGS

TOTAL FURNISHINGS -$

ARCHITECT…..….….…..…GSBS 10,477 SF

STAGE OF DESIGN…..…..FEASIBILITY

CSI # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL

LOCATION……….…..……..SALT LAKE CITY, UT

UNIT QTY

21 FIRE SUPPRESSION

Remove Fire Suppression System at Affected Ceilings 10,477 SF 2.00$ 20,954$

Replace Fire Suppression System 10,477 SF 6.50$ 68,101$

TOTAL FIRE SUPPRESSION 89,055$

22 PLUMBING

Misc. Plumbing Remove & Reinstall, Med-gas 10,477 SF 5.00$ 52,385$

Extensive Mechanical Piping Modification at 1873B 1 Allow 75,000.00$ 75,000$ Extensive Mechanical Piping Modification at 1598 1 Allow 75,000.00$ 75,000$

TOTAL PLUMBING 202,385$

23 HVAC

HVAC Demolition - Ceiling 10,477 SF 3.00$ 31,431$

HVAC - Replace 10,477 SF 95.00$ 995,315$

TOTAL HVAC 1,026,746$

26 ELECTRICAL

Existing Electrical Removal 10,477 SF 2.00$ 20,954$

Service & Distribution Existing

Power - Misc. 10,477 SF 5.00$ 52,385$

Lighting - Selective Remove & Reinstall 10,477 SF 20.00$ 209,540$

TOTAL ELECTRICAL 282,879$

27 COMMUNICATIONS & AV

Communications - Reinstall 10,477 SF 3.00$ 31,431$

A/V - Reinstall 10,477 SF 3.00$ 31,431$

TOTAL COMMUNICATION 62,862$

28 ELECTRONIC SAFETY & SECURITY

Fire Alarm - Reinstall 10,477 SF 2.00$ 20,954$

Security, Surveillance - Reinstall 10,477 SF 2.00$ 20,954$

TOTAL ELECTRONIC SAFETY & SECURITY 41,908$

APPENDIX A

SCHEMATIC RETROFIT DRAWINGS

University of Utah Building 525 Seismic Evaluation ASCE 41-17 Tier 3

675 East 500 South, Suite 400 – Salt Lake City, Utah 84102 – 801.486.3883 – www.reaveley.com

APPENDIX A – PLANS & BUILDING ELEVATIONS

3D ISOMETRICS

OVERALL PLAN

EXISTING SHEARWALL ELEVATIONS

COMPLIED HISTORIC DRAWINGS

UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL EXPANSION

UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL EXPANSION WEST PAVILION

INTERIORS

UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL EXPANSION ECCLES CRITICAL

CARE PAVILION VERTICAL EXPANSION

HSC AMBULATORY CARE COMPLEX

Page

SF101

SF102

SF201-SF211

ESF204,ESF207

ESF101D

EFSF205

ESB202,EBSB203

INDEX

oburt Rectangle

DRAWING NUMBER:

DRAWING TITLE:

NO. DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS:

DATE

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

DRAWING DATE:

1 2 3

C

B

A A

B

C

1 2 3 4

G :\P ro je ct s\

\2

9-

U

U B ui ld in g

E va lu at io n\

D ra w in gs \0

S tru ct ur al \2

9-

U U

B ui ld in g

E va lu at io n.

rv t

/4

/2

:1 9:

A

M

U U

B ui ld in g

E va lu at io n

10/03/19

Author

Checker

3D ISOMETRIC

VIEWS

SF101

SCALE:

NORTH EAST ISOMETRIC

SCALE:

SOUTH ISOMETRIC

SF207

A1

SF205

A1 @ EAST

BLDG WALL

SF203

A1

SF202

A1

SF205

A1

SF204

A1

SF204

A1 @ WEST

BLDG WALL

WEST BUILDING

EAST - SOUTH BUILDING RADIOLOGY

BUILDING

ADDITION

MRI ADDITION BUILDING

SF21

1A2

SF21

1A2

SF211

A3

SF210

A3

SF210

A1

SF201

A1

SF209

A1

SF202

A1

SF201

A1

SF203

A1

SF208

A1

SF208

A1

SF207

A1

SF209

A1

SF210

A1

SF211

A3

SF210

A3

@ EAST

BLDG WALL

SF206

A1

@ EAST

BLDG WALL

SF206

A1

@ EAST

BLDG WALL

@ EAST

BLDG WALL

EAST - NORTH BUILDING

DRAWING NUMBER:

DRAWING TITLE:

NO. DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS:

DATE

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

DRAWING DATE:

1 2 3

C

B

A A

B

C

1 2 3 4

G :\P ro je ct s\

\2

9-

U

U B ui ld in g

E va lu at io n\

D ra w in gs \0

S tru ct ur al \2

9-

U U

B ui ld in g

E va lu at io n.

rv t

/4

/2

:1 9:

A

M

U U

B ui ld in g

E va lu at io n

10/02/19

MK

AG

OVERALL PLAN

SF102

NO SCALESF102

A1 OVERALL PLAN

LEVEL A

0"

LEVEL 1

14' - 3"

LEVEL 2

28' - 6"

LEVEL 3

42' - 9"

LEVEL 4

57' - 0"

LEVEL 5

71' - 3"

LEVEL 6

85' - 6"

ROOF

99' - 9"

PENTHOUSE

114' - 6"

234 1.W681113 9 7 512 10

16" Conc

16" Conc

16" Conc

38" Conc

10" Conc

16" Conc

36" Conc

12" Conc

18" Conc

12" Conc

12" Conc

18" Conc

12" Conc

18" Conc

12" Conc

18" Conc

6" Conc

DRAWING NUMBER:

DRAWING TITLE:

NO. DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS:

DATE

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

DRAWING DATE:

1 2 3

C

B

A A

B

C

1 2 3 4

G :\P ro je ct s\

\2

9-

U

U B ui ld in g

E va lu at io n\

D ra w in gs \0

S tru ct ur al \2

9-

U U

B ui ld in g

E va lu at io n.

rv t

/4

/2

:1 9:

A

M

U U

B ui ld in g

E va lu at io n

10/01/19

MK

AG

EXISTING

SHEARWALL

ELEVATIONS

SF201NO SCALESF201

A1 EXISTING SHEARWALL ELEVATIONS

oburt Rectangle oburt Rectangle oburt Rectangle oburt Rectangle oburt Rectangle oburt Rectangle oburt Rectangle oburt Rectangle oburt Rectangle oburt Rectangle oburt Rectangle oburt Rectangle oburt Rectangle oburt Rectangle oburt Snapshot oburt Snapshot oburt Rectangle oburt Polygon oburt Callout reinforcement on this side of the wall is required.

oburt FreeText

SF201

oburt Building Section - Up oburt FreeText

AA

oburt Polygon oburt Line oburt FreeText

SF201

oburt Building Section - Up oburt FreeText

AA

oburt Line oburt Line oburt Text Box Reinf. Plan oburt FreeText

SF301

oburt Building Section - Up oburt FreeText oburt Polygon oburt Line oburt FreeText

SF301

oburt…