(USS WASP) Attachment S-7 Proposal Assessment 15Jan20.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 19 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N00024-20-R-4404
About this file
This document contains a solicitation for the USS WASP (LHD 1) FY21 Dry-Docking Selected Restricted Availability (DSRA). The Naval Sea Systems Command issues solicitation N00024-20-R-4404 for ship maintenance, modernization, and repair services requiring a pier capable of berthing the USS WASP as well as resources to complete coordination and integration of multiple areas of shipwork. Interested parties must register with SAM.gov and monitor the beta.SAM.gov site for solicitation release and amendments. Statements of intent are required from interested contractors to receive government furnished information. The availability is from December 2020 to April 2022 at an East/Gulf Coast contractor's facility. The RFP contains specific dates and pricing terms. The government aims to make one award by August 2020.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 53 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Section L & M Requirements
| USS WASP (LHD 1) FY20 DSRA | Offeror: [Insert Offeror Name] | |
| SECTION L, II | Yes, No | |
| Paper copies - Price Proposal | 0 | |
| Paper copies - Non-price Proposal | 1 - Gantt Chart Only | |
| CDs/DVDs - Price Proposal | 2 - Required compatibility and software, scanned for viruses and labeled to indicate the offeror’s name, the solicitation # and the associated volume #s | |
| CDs/DVDs - Non-Price Proposal | 4 - Required compatibility and software, scanned for viruses and labeled to indicate the offeror’s name, the solicitation # and the associated volume #s | |
| SECTION L, IV | Yes, No | |
| Hard Copy Proposal(s) Format | Double-sided on 8.5 x 11 inch paper with a one-inch margin. |
Text: 12-point Times New Roman font.
Graphics pages text: Not smaller than 10-point font, legible, and readable.
| SECTION L, V, A. VOLUME I | Yes, No, N/A (if N/A why) | |
| Cover Letter | Page limit of 3 | |
| Identified all enclosures included with the proposal | ||
| CAGE and DUNS numbers, name address and contact information for the Prime contractor | ||
| Provided notice of any alterations to the solicitation, such as “fill-in” blocks and certifications | ||
| Provided notice of any alterations to the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications). | ||
| Affirmatively stated whether or not the offeror has ownership of, or committed access to, NAVSEA certified dry-dock(s) capable of dry-docking the USS WASP (LHD 1). If yes: |
Provided the name of dry-dock(s)
| Affirmatively stated whether the dock(s) are available to bid this solicitation. If the stated that a dock is not available, provided the details of the awarded contract or dry-dock maintenance period that has made the dock unavailable (Customer, Contract Number, Vessel (if applicable), Dry-Dock Period of Performance, Scheduled Dry-Dock Maintenance Period) |
| Affirmatively stated whether or not the offeror has ownership of, or committed access to, NAVSEA certified dry-dock(s) capable of dry-docking the USS WASP (LHD 1). If yes: |
Provided the name of dry-dock(s)
| Provided Name, address, and telephone number of each proposed first-tier subcontractor with a proposed subcontract estimated at $10 million or more. |
| For any WI with a total dollar value of zero dollars proposed in Attachment J-4, provide an explanation as to why. In addition, if applicable: |
For any WI with a total value of zero labor hours proposed (prime and subcontractor combined) (although material is proposed), provided an explanation as to why.
| For any WI with a total dollar value of zero material proposed (prime and subcontractor combined) (although labor is proposed), provided an explanation as to why. | |
| Signed SF 33 | Blocks 12 through 18 completed |
| All amendments acknowledged | |
| Completed applicable “fill-ins” | |
| Signed by representative authorized to contractually bind the company | |
| Section K Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements provided and completed | |
| Small Business Subcontracting plan per FAR Part 19, Large businesses only | Provided rationale for any proposed goals that are lower than the statutory requirements identified |
at https://www.sba.gov/contracting/contracting-officials/goaling.
| Addressed FAR 52.219-9 and all of the subparagraphs in FAR 52.219-9(d): subparagraphs (12), (13), (14) and (15). | ||
| Joint Venture / teaming agreements | If applicable | |
| Completed Section B, Carrying forward information from applicable Pricing Workbook | Proposed on all CLINs | |
| Complete all Section B Note fill-ins | ||
| Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet | Work Item Pricing | |
| Matches Section B CLIN pricing and notes | ||
| Daily Extension Rates | ||
| IPD | ||
| IPD Reduction for Days Completed Early | ||
| Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price (VATEP) Schedule Acceleration | ||
| Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor Rate & Material Burden Rate, New Work and Growth Reservation. | ||
| Execution Milestones and Key Event Dates | Applicable Attachment J-3 | |
| Completed Attachment S-7 | To be responsive, offerors should rely on the solicitation Sections L and M as this may not be a comprehensive list. | |
| SECTION L, V, B. VOLUME II | SECTION M, III, A and B | |
| Factor 1 (Eligibility) (Section L) | Factor 1 Evaluation Criteria (Section M) | Proposal Reference |
| a) Provide a completed Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet (Attachment S-5) that identifies the specific pier and dock intended to be used for the proposed availability and indicates that the pier and dock meet the minimum characteristics identified in Attachment S-5. | Provide a completed Attachment S-5 that: |
a) Identifies the specific pier(s) and dock(s) intended to be used for each proposed Availability, and
b) Indicates that those pier(s) and dock(s) meet the minimum characteristics of Table 1 on Attachment S-5.
b) Provide a signed letter identifying and confirming ownership of a pier capable of berthing and a dry-dock capable of docking the vessel during the applicable period in accordance with the Execution Milestones & Key Events (Attachment J-3). The representative who signs the letter must be authorized to contractually bind the company. If the Offeror is utilizing a subcontractor for physical resources (pier or dry-dock), a letter signed by the subcontractor identifying and confirming committed access to the proposed pier & dry-docks is required. The subcontractor representative who signs the letter must be authorized to contractually bind the company. The proposed pier and dry-dock facilities, whether owned by the Offeror or subcontractor, must be accessible by the USS WASP without any modification to the vessel.
c) Provide a copy of the Offeror's current Master Ship Repair Agreement (MSRA), MSRA number, or proof of MSRA equivalency that meets the requirement of CNRMC instruction 4280 series. To be eligible for award, a prospective contractor must possess a MSRA as described in DFARS 217.71 Master Agreement for Repair and Alteration of Vessels (MARAV) or demonstrate organization and facilities equivalent to that reflected in a MSRA. Offerors meeting this eligibility requirement with documents and evidence outside of a MSRA must contact the PCO to schedule an on-site inspection. All requests for MSRA equivalency inspections must be received by 1:00 pm, local time, Washington DC on 31 January 2020. Requests shall be sent to Melissa Donnelly and Thomas Williams at melissa.donnelly@navy.mil and thomas.d.williams4@navy.mil. Failure to request an inspection by the designated time may result in a negative determination of Offeror eligibility. 1. Assess whether, upon receipt of proposals, the Offeror holds a Master Ship Repair Agreement (MSRA) or has demonstrated equivalency as outlined in Factor 1.
2. Assess whether the Offeror has ownership or committed access to a pier capable of berthing the vessel, and has ownership or committed access to a dry dock capable of docking the vessel, in accordance with Section L.
| d) In accordance with the most current version of MIL-STD-1625D, provide a current dry-dock certification applicable to the dry-dock proposed for the Availability. Certifications shall demonstrate the dry-dock will remain certified throughout the entire proposed use of the dry-dock. If the proposed dry-dock is currently uncertified, or if the certification will expire prior to the end of the Offeror's proposed docking period, the Offeror shall provide a detailed plan and schedule to certify or re-certify the dry-dock in order to remain certified throughout the proposed docking period in the Execution Milestones & Key Events (Attachment J-3). | 3. Assess if the proposed dry-dock is certified in accordance with MIL-STD-1625D, and remains certified from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete” as outlined in Attachment J-3; and should the dry-dock certification in accordance with MIL-STD-1625D lapse anytime during the proposed docking period, the Offeror has adequately described a plan for recertification. | |
| Factor 2 (Resource Capacity & Schedule) (Section L) | Factor 2 Evaluation Criteria (Section M) | Proposal Reference |
| Subfactor A - Manpower | ||
| (1) Manpower Plan to Actual Data Sheet, (Attachment S-4) |
(a) Provide a completed Manpower Plan to Actual Data Sheet, (Attachment S-4) in Microsoft Excel in the format provided in this solicitation for all projects, including all discrete commercial, ship repair and new construction projects, on-going and completed within their proposed shipyard and within the local Naval Station, if their shipyard is within the homeport area of fleet concentration area between the week commencing 22 April 2019 and the week concluding 27 December 2019. For each project, provide the man day information requested on a week by week basis over the project’s duration to the contractual delivery date and to the contractor expected delivery date. Data shall be current as of the week concluding 27 December 2019. Data tables shall be provided in Microsoft Excel. Data shall be provided in accordance with the following definitions:
i. Project Start Date – The contractually agreed start of contractor project execution.
ii. Project Completion Date - The contractually agreed contractor completion date, start of corresponding to the contractor’s Performance Measurement Baseline (PMB)
iii. Actual / Forecast Completion Date - The Contractor’s Actual Completion Date (if project completed prior to 27 December 2019 or the Contractor’s Forecast Completion Date based on the Contractor’s most likely estimate (if expected to occur after 27 December 2019).
iv. Performance Measurement Baseline (PMB) – The weekly time-phased man day resourced plan, prime and subcontractor, against which the accomplishment of authorized work can be measured, aligned to the contractor’s contractually agreed schedule of record.
v. Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled (BCWS) - The sum of the man day budgets for all work (prime and subcontractor), scheduled within each given weekly time period.
vi. Budgeted Cost of Work Performed (BCWP) - A measurement of the work completed, BCWP is the value of work performed, or “earned,” by both prime and subcontractor when compared to the original plan, that is, the Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled (BCWS). The BCWP is the value of completed work expressed as the man day value of the performance man day budget assigned to that work. The sum of the budgets for completed work packages and completed portions of open work packages. Within the S-4, the BCWP is the man day value completed within each given weekly time period.
vii. Actual Cost of Work Performed (ACWP) - The man days actually incurred and recorded, prime and subcontractor, in accomplishing the work performed within each given weekly time period.
viii. Estimate to Complete (ETC) – The contractor’s weekly time-phased man day resource plan, prime and subcontractor, aligned to the contractor’s most likely man day and contract completion estimate. 1. The Government will evaluate Factor 2, Subfactor A, Manpower to:
a) Assess the extent to which the Offeror’s narrative demonstrates a detailed, substantiated and complete understanding of how the Offeror will provide efficient manpower to successfully complete the Availability’s requirements as proposed, accounting for:
a. the Offeror’s current man day performance as shown in the Offeror’s current Progress/Manning data.
b. the Offeror’s workload during the current period.
c. the Government’s understanding of the port-wide workload during the Offeror’s current period.
d. the Offeror’s workload during the proposed Availability, accounting for work the Offeror currently has under contract and work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete.”
e. the Government’s understanding of the forecasted port-wide workload from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete.”
(2) The Offeror shall provide three (3) Manpower Curves (Total) in accordance with the requirements detailed in CDRL A012 that graphically delineate the resources tied to each individual ship availability in men-per-day. All curves provided shall span the date of this solicitation through the “Contract Complete” date, total manpower ceiling including expected growth and new work, and shall show correlated manning values across all curves. If the expected growth and new work on surface ship maintenance availabilities is different from the growth CLINs included in the contract and any new work included in the Availability’s proposal evaluation, please explain in the offeror’s narrative. Offeror shall include a data table providing the numerical data by trade that populates each curve. There is no page limit associated with this documentation. Data tables shall be provided in Microsoft Excel. A curve shall be provided for each of the following and reflect the full Availability duration:
a) The manpower curve (total) associated with the requirements detailed in CDRL A012 Initial IPS for the proposed Availability. This chart shall show the total FTE resources currently employed by the Offeror and expected to be employed by the Offeror.
b) The total FTE resources required to complete this proposed Availability plus work the Offeror currently has under contract from the date of this solicitation through the “Contract Complete” date. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual Availability. Each ship Availability shall be labeled by hull number. This chart shall commence at the start of the earliest project included in the offeror’s S-4 and continue through the completion of this solicitation’s “Contract Complete” date. This chart shall show the total man days currently employed by the Offeror and expected to be employed by the Offeror.
c) The total FTE resources required to complete this proposed Availability plus work the Offeror currently has under contract during the Availability duration, plus work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements from the date of this solicitation through “Contract Complete” date. All projects included in the Manpower Utilization Data Sheet (Attachment S-1), shall be included in this curve. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual Availability. Each ship Availability shall be labeled by hull number. This chart shall commence at the start of the earliest project included in the offeror’s S-4 and continue through the completion of this solicitation’s “Contract Complete” date. This chart shall show the total man days currently employed by the Offeror and expected to be employed by the Offeror. 1. The Government will evaluate Factor 2, Subfactor A, Manpower to:
b) Assess the extent to which the Offeror’s narrative regarding utilization of overtime, hiring additional personnel and utilization of subcontractors is supported by current manning performance and narrative.
(3) The Offeror shall provide Manpower Curves (Trade) in accordance with the requirements detailed in CDRL A012 which graphically delineates the resources tied to each trade in men-per-day. All curves provided shall span the date of this solicitation through the “Contract Complete” date and shall show correlated manning values, including expected growth and new work, across all curves. If the expected growth and new work on surface ship maintenance availabilities is different from the growth CLINs included in the contract and any new work included in the Availability’s proposal evaluation, please explain in the offeror’s narrative. For the purposes of building these charts, the offeror shall assume that expected growth and new work is proportional to the trade breakdown of each Availability’s defined scope. If the Offeror’s trade break down for expected growth and new work is different than the from the trade breakdown of each Availability’s defined scope, please explain in the Offeror’s narrative. Offeror shall include a data table providing the numerical data by trade that populates each curve. Data tables shall be provided in Microsoft Excel. The following trades shall be reflected in each curve: Abrasive cleaning/blasting, Fire Watch, Welding, Burning, Brazing, Carpentry, Machinists (inside and outside), Electrical Work, Electronic Work, Engineering, Design Support, Lagging, Ship-fitting, Boiler-making, Painting, Sheet-metal Work, Pipefitting, Rigging, General Labor, Staging/Scaffolding and Diesel Mechanics. There is no page limit associated with this documentation. Curve(s) shall be provided for each of the following and reflect the date of this solicitation through “Contract Complete” date:
(a) The manpower curve (trade) associated with the requirements detailed in CDRL A012 Initial IPS for the proposed Availability.
(b) The trade FTE resources required to complete this proposed Availability plus work the Offeror currently has under contract from the date of this solicitation through “Contract Complete” date. This chart shall commence at the start of the earliest project included in the Offeror’s S-4 and continue through this solicitation’s “Contract Complete” date. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual trade. Each trade shall be labeled.
(c) The trade FTE resources required to complete this proposed Availability plus work the Offeror currently has under contract from the date of this solicitation through “Contract Complete” date, plus work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements from the date of this solicitation through “Contract Complete” date. All projects included in the Manpower Utilization Data Sheet (Attachment S-1) shall be included in this curve. This chart shall commence at the start of the earliest project included in the Offeror’s S-4 and continue through the completion of this solicitation’s “Contract Complete” date. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual trade. Each trade shall be labeled.
(d) Chart showing the total available trade FTE resources currently employed by the Offeror and expected to be employed by the Offeror from the date of this solicitation through “Contract Complete” date. This chart shall commence at the beginning of the evaluated period provided in the Offeror’s attachment S-4 and continue through the completion of this solicitation’s “Contract Complete” date. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual trade. Each trade shall be labeled.
*Offerors shall ensure the data presented in the manpower curves correlates with the man days proposed for all base, options growth and new work. Provide a calculations translation as part of the required excel tables. 1. The Government will evaluate Factor 2, Subfactor A, Manpower to:
c) Assess the extent to which the offeror’s proposed manpower curves (total) demonstrate a detailed, substantiated and complete understanding of how the offeror will provide the manpower resources to successfully complete the Availability’s requirements and all existing and proposed work. The Government will assess these curves in relation to the narrative provided in Factor 2, Subfactor A (1). Emphasis will be placed on how the offeror plans to deconflict anticipated manning shortfalls.
(4) The Offeror shall provide Manpower Curves (Trade) in accordance with NSI 009-60 which graphically delineate the resources tied to each trade in men-per-day. All curves provided shall represent the full Availability period of performance and shall show correlated manning values across all curves. Offeror shall include a data table providing the numerical data by trade that populates each curve. The following trades shall be reflected in each curve: ship fitter, welder, inside machinist, outside machinist, electrician, pipe fitter, sheet metal, painter, carpenter, rigger, labor, other. There is no page limit associated with this documentation. Curve(s) shall be provided for each of the following and reflect the full Availability period of performance:
(a) The manpower curve (trade) associated with the NSI 009-60 Initial IPS for the proposed Availability.
(b) The trade manpower resources required to complete this proposed Availability plus work the Offeror currently has under contract during the Availability period of performance. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual trade. Each trade shall be labeled.
(c) The trade manpower resources required to complete this proposed Availability plus work the Offeror currently has under contract during the Availability period of performance, plus work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements during the Availability period of performance. All projects included in the Manpower Utilization Data Sheet (Attachment S-1) shall be included in this curve. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual trade. Each trade shall be labeled.
(d) Chart showing the available trade manpower resources currently employed by the Offeror and expected to be employed by the Offeror during the Availability period of performance. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual trade. Each trade shall be labeled.
1. The Government will evaluate Factor 2, Subfactor A, Manpower to:
d) Assess the extent to which the Offeror’s proposed manpower curves (trade) demonstrate a detailed, substantiated and complete understanding of how the Offeror will provide the trade manpower to successfully complete the Availability’s requirements and all existing and proposed work. The Government will assess these curves in relation to the narrative provided in Factor 2, Sub-factor A (4). Emphasis will be placed on how the Offeror plans to de-conflict anticipated trade manning shortfalls and manning inefficiencies.
e) As an indicator of the Offeror’s ability to man the efforts that are the subject of the proposed solicitation in accordance with the proposed manning, the Government will evaluate the adequacy of the Offeror’s prior manning performance for current projects, as defined in Section L, including planned to actual manning performance based on an evaluation of Attachment S-4, as well as the narrative in Factor 2.
| Subfactor B - Physical Resource Capacity |
| (1) The Offeror shall provide a narrative and a graphical representation (in the format of the Pier and Dry-dock Graphical Representation Template (Attachment S-8)) that demonstrates that the Offeror has the pier and dry-dock available to complete the requirements of the proposed Availability. The graphical representation shall show the pier and dry-dock expected to be in working capacity by month from proposal submission through the “Contract Complete” date in Attachment J-3, and the awarded and outstanding work utilizing those resources by month. The narrative shall not exceed 10 pages, and the narrative and graphical representation shall address the following: |
(a) The pier and dry-dock required to complete work the Offeror currently has under contract based on current contract schedule. Additionally, identify the total pier and dry-dock currently in working capacity, and expected to be in working capacity by month from proposal submission through the “Contract Complete” datein Attachment J-3.
(b) The pier and dry-dock required to complete all outstanding proposals, per proposed schedules. Identify the pier and dry-dock committed to previously awarded requirements, as well as the proposed use of resources to complete the work of ALL outstanding proposals (including this proposal).
(c) The pier and dry-dock required to complete any other anticipated requirements (including but not limited to non-navy work, pier and dry-dock upgrades, maintenance or dredging).
(d) Should the Offeror propose to utilize subcontracted pier or dry-dock, the Offeror shall include an explanation of the requirements that will be sourced by the prime's facility and the pier and dry-dock that will be provided by the subcontractor.
(e) The Offeror's plan to resolve pier and dry-dock resource conflicts as a result of the award of other outstanding proposals, pier and dry-dock shall not be committed to multiple ships during the same time period without reasonable explanation.
(f) In the event the Offeror proposes an interval of less than seven (7) days between the undocking date of other requirements and the proposed docking date of this Availability, and/or a proposed docking date within the first seven (7) days of the Availability, then the narrative shall detail the necessary steps to accomplish. 2. The Government will evaluate Factor 2, Subfactor B, Physical Resource Capacity to:
a) Assess the extent to which the offeror’s narrative and graphical representation demonstrates that the Offeror's capability to provide the required physical resources to complete the Availability. An emphasis will be placed on how the offeror plans to deconflict anticipated physical resource conflicts.
| Subfactor C - Integrated Production Schedule (IPS) | |
| (1) The Offeror shall provide documentation for the proposed Availability inclusive of the resource loaded Initial Integrated Production Schedule elements. (The format in CDRL A012 shall be used as the template for IPS submissions.) A Resource Loaded Schedule is a project-related schedule that consists of a timeline with details on allocated resources, planned activities and preset milestones. It is a time management document that explains how project manpower resources areto be consumed throughout scheduled project time. The offeror shall provide the reports in the electronic formats required and in paper (hard copy) format. The hard copy of the Gantt charts shall be provided on 11 x 17 inch paper. Offerors shall integrate all work included in the work package, including all base and option items. However, for the purposes of proposal submission only, reports do not require incorporation of Alteration Installation Team (AIT) schedules, Government-Contracted Third Party Maintenance Provider schedules, Ship's Force schedules, Commercial Industrial Services (CIS) schedules, Fleet Maintenance Activity (FMA) schedules and Government Intermediate-Level schedules. There is no page limit associated with this documentation. | |
| (2) The Offeror shall provide a narrative to explain their Integrated Production Schedule. | 3. The Government will evaluate Factor 2, Subfactor C, Integrated Product Schedule for: |
a) Understanding of scope and integration of the work items in the Work Item Specification Package (Attachment J-1)
b) Identifying the critical path and logically sequencing work items, and
c) Integrating the milestones and key events in the Execution Milestones & Key Events (Attachment J-3) reasonably.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .