(USS WASP) Attachment S-7 Proposal Assessment 27Apr20.xlsx

Section L & M Requirements

Text: 12-point Times New Roman font.

Graphics pages text: Not smaller than 10-point font, legible, and readable.

Provided the name of dry-dock(s)

Provided the name of dry-dock(s)

For any WI with a total value of zero labor hours proposed (prime and subcontractor combined) (although material is proposed), provided an explanation as to why.

at https://www.sba.gov/contracting/contracting-officials/goaling.

a) Identifies the specific pier(s) and dock(s) intended to be used for each proposed Availability, and

b) Indicates that those pier(s) and dock(s) meet the minimum characteristics of Table 1 on Attachment S-5.

b) Provide a signed letter identifying and confirming ownership of a pier capable of berthing and a dry-dock capable of docking the vessel during the applicable period in accordance with the Execution Milestones & Key Events (Attachment J-3). The representative who signs the letter must be authorized to contractually bind the company. If the Offeror is utilizing a subcontractor for physical resources (pier or dry-dock), a letter signed by the subcontractor identifying and confirming committed access to the proposed pier & dry-docks is required. The subcontractor representative who signs the letter must be authorized to contractually bind the company. The proposed pier and dry-dock facilities, whether owned by the Offeror or subcontractor, must be accessible by the USS WASP without any modification to the vessel.

c) Provide a copy of the Offeror's current Master Ship Repair Agreement (MSRA), MSRA number, or proof of MSRA equivalency that meets the requirement of CNRMC instruction 4280 series. To be eligible for award, a prospective contractor must possess a MSRA as described in DFARS 217.71 Master Agreement for Repair and Alteration of Vessels (MARAV) or demonstrate organization and facilities equivalent to that reflected in a MSRA. Offerors meeting this eligibility requirement with documents and evidence outside of a MSRA must contact the PCO to schedule an on-site inspection. All requests for MSRA equivalency inspections must be received by 1:00 pm, local time, Washington DC on 31 January 2020. Requests shall be sent to Melissa Donnelly and Thomas Williams at melissa.donnelly@navy.mil and thomas.d.williams4@navy.mil. Failure to request an inspection by the designated time may result in a negative determination of Offeror eligibility. 1. Assess whether, upon receipt of proposals, the Offeror holds a Master Ship Repair Agreement (MSRA) or has demonstrated equivalency as outlined in Factor 1.

2. Assess whether the Offeror has ownership or committed access to a pier capable of berthing the vessel, and has ownership or committed access to a dry dock capable of docking the vessel, in accordance with Section L.

(a) Provide a completed Manpower Performance Performance Data Sheet, (Attachment S-4) in Microsoft Excel in the format provided in this solicitation for all projects, including all discrete commercial, ship repair and new construction projects, that are completed, awarded, on-going, or proposed (including the proposal for the USS WASP DSRA) between the week ending 20 May 2019 and the Contract Complete date of this solicitation. This shall capture all work within the shipyard and within the local Naval Station, if their shipyard is within the homeport area of fleet concentration area.

i. For each project, provide the Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) information requested on a week-by-week basis (week-ending) over each project’s duration, from the Contract Start and Actual / Forecast Start Dates to the Contract Completion and Actual / Forecast Completion Dates.

ii. For each trade, totaled across all projects, provide the Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) information requested on a week-by-week basis (week-ending) over the period of performance from paragraph 1) above. Trades depicted may be aligned to the Offeror’s business systems.

Data shall be current as of the week concluding 31 January 2020. Remaining growth work options must also be represented (by project) and clearly distinguished from currently authorized work. The S-4 project data for this solicitation shall align to the CDRL A012 submission. The Offeror shall provide the calculations and data necessary to convert the FTE information included in the curves into man-hours. The offer shall also provide calculation and data necessary to convert FTE into Actual Employees (assumed absentee rates, overtime, etc.), if applicable. Data shall be provided in accordance with the following definitions:

i. Contract Start Date – The contractually agreed start of contractor project execution.

ii. Contract Completion Date - The contractually agreed completion date of project execution

iii. Actual / Forecast Start Date - The date the project started (if project started prior to 31 January 2020) or the contractor’s currently estimated start date.

iv. Actual / Forecast Completion Date – The date the project completed (if project completed prior to 31 January 2020) or the contractor’s currently estimated completion date

v. Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled (BCWS) - The sum of the man day budgets for all work (prime and subcontractor), scheduled within each given weekly time period.

vi. Budgeted Cost of Work Performed (BCWP) - The budgeted cost of the value of all work completed, or “earned,” by both prime and subcontractor within a given time period.

vii. Actual Cost of Work Performed (ACWP) - The cost actually incurred and recorded, prime and subcontractor, for work completed within a given time period.

viii. Estimate to Complete (ETC) – The estimate of time-phased resources required to complete the remaining authorized work.

ix. Estimate at Complete (EAC) – The sum of the contract’s cumulative to-date ACWP plus the estimate of time-phased resources required to complete the remaining authorized work.

x. Full Time Equivalents (FTE) – The number of hours within a given period divided by the sum of the number of working days within the period, multiplied by 8 (to represent the standard work day).

xi. Remaining Growth Options – The number unused and unexercised growth hours, time phased over usage rates prescribed in Section B Note F, paragraph 3. 1. The Government will evaluate Factor 2, Subfactor A, Manpower to:

a) Assess the extent to which the Offeror’s proposal demonstrates a detailed, substantiated and complete explanation of how the Offeror will provide efficient manpower to successfully complete the Availability’s requirements as proposed, accounting for:

a. the Offeror’s current manpower performance as shown in the Offeror’s attachment S-4.

b. the Offeror’s workload during the current period.

c. the Government’s understanding of the port-wide workload during the Offeror’s current period.

d. the Offeror’s workload during the proposed Availability, accounting for work the Offeror currently has under contract and work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete.”

e. the Government’s understanding of the forecasted port-wide workload from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete.”

(2) The Offeror shall provide three (3) Manpower Curves (by Project in FTE) representing the EAC and Actual / Forecasted Start & Completion Dates of each project presented in attachment S-4, as described herein. Offerors shall clearly delineate prime and subcontractor FTE, even though this is not a requirement of the S-4. Remaining options must also be represented and clearly distinguished from currently authorized work. Growth options shall be totaled for each set of project curves required and displayed as a single curve within each chart. The offeror shall provide horizontal lines across each curve to identify the FTE employed by the offeror, the FTE provided through subcontractors, and the FTE provided through temporary labor. The three Manpower Curves are as follows:

a) The total FTE resources required to complete the proposed availability.

b) The total FTE resources required to complete 1) this proposed availability, plus 2) work the Offeror currently has under contract. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual availability. Each ship availability shall be labeled by hull number.

c) The total FTE resources required for all projects completed, awarded, on-going, or proposed, as provided in Attachment S-4. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual Availability. Each ship’s availability shall be labeled by hull number.

1. The Government will evaluate Factor 2, Subfactor A, Manpower to:

b) Assess the extent to which the Offeror’s narrative regarding utilization of overtime, hiring additional personnel and utilization of subcontractors, and temporary labor is supported by current manning performance and narrative.

(3) The Offeror shall provide three (3) Manpower Curves (by Trade in FTE) representing the EAC and Actual / Forecasted Dates of each project presented in attachment S-4, as described herein. Remaining growth options are not required to be provided for trade-level manpower curves. The offeror shall provide horizontal lines across each curve to identify the FTE employed by the offeror, the FTE provided through subcontractors, and the FTE provided through temporary labor. The three Manpower Curves are as follows:

(a) The trade FTE resources required to complete the proposed availability. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves, each representing an individual trade. Each trade shall be labeled.

(b) The trade FTE resources required to complete 1) this proposed availability, plus 2) work the Offeror currently has under contract. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves, each representing an individual trade. Each trade shall be labeled.

(c) The trade FTE resources required for all projects completed, awarded, on-going, or proposed, as provided in Attachment S-4. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual trade. Each trade shall be labeled. 1. The Government will evaluate Factor 2, Subfactor A, Manpower to:

c) Assess the extent to which the Offeror’s proposed manpower curves (total) demonstrate a detailed, substantiated and complete understanding of how the Offeror will provide the man days to successfully complete the Availability’s requirements and all existing and proposed work. The Government will assess these curves in relation to the narrative provided in Factor 2, Emphasis Area A (4). Emphasis will be placed on how the Offeror plans to de-conflict anticipated manning shortfalls and manning inefficiencies.

(4) Offerors shall provide a narrative, not to exceed 25 pages:

(b) That supports the extent to which the Offeror has provided the planned FTE, both prime and subcontractor, necessary to complete all their current projects, including all discrete commercial, ship repair and new construction projects, completed within their proposed shipyard and within the local Naval Station, if their shipyard is within the homeport area of fleet concentration area. As part of their narrative, Offerors shall provide:

(i) A root cause analysis of any shortfalls in the completion of production FTE to schedule and inefficiencies in the amount of FTE actually required to complete the FTE budgeted for that work, as identified in the data submitted in Attachment S-4. “Shortfalls” are defined as cumulative actual FTE completed (ACWP) less than baseline FTE planned (BCWS). “Inefficiencies” are defined as cumulative actual FTE completed (ACWP) greater than the cumulative baseline FTE budget for that work completed (BCWP).

(ii) An explanation of the mitigations implemented and planned to resolve those shortfalls and inefficiencies on the solicited availability, a timeline of their implementation, and a quantified explanation of their observed or expected effectiveness.

(iii) An explanation of how the Offeror will provide the proposed manpower resources to complete the solicited availability, accounting for:

a. The Offeror’s current and projected manpower resourcing performance as shown in the Offeror’s current S-4 Manpower Performance Data Sheet.

(b) Corresponding to the curves (total) and (trade), provided in response to Factor 2, Sub-factor A, Manpower, paragraphs (2) and (3), outline how the Offeror will achieve proposed FTE levels via overtime, additional hiring actions, the utilization of subcontractors, or the utilization of temporary labor (if applicable). Outline the state of the Offeror’s current workforce (Factor 2, Sub-factor A, paragraph (4)) in relationship to the proposed Availability, and ensure the following areas are addressed:

(i) Should the Offeror propose to utilize overtime for the proposed availability, the narrative shall include a plan to manage and provide the overtime from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete” dates, as outlined in Attachment J-3, plus work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete.” Offerors shall include in their narrative an explanation of how they will manage and mitigate the following potential risks:

a. Degraded Safety

b. Decreased Productivity

c. Increased workforce absenteeism and turnover

(ii) Should the Offeror propose to hire additional personnel for the proposed Availability, the narrative shall include a plan to manage and provide the additional personnel from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete,” plus work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete.”

(iii) Should the Offeror propose to utilize subcontracted resources for the proposed Availability, the Offeror shall include in their narrative an explanation of the requirements that will be completed by the prime and the work that will be subcontracted, including the work item, trade and duration of each subcontract requirement. The Government considers the use of subcontractors in excess of 45% of production labor to increase the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. The Offeror shall include in its narrative a plan to manage the subcontractor manning levels included from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete,” plus work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete.”

(iv) Should the Offeror propose to utilize temporary labor for the proposed availability, the narrative shall include a plan to manage and provide the temporary labor from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete” dates, as outlined in Attachment J-3, plus work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete.” Offerors shall include in their narrative an explanation of how they will manage and mitigate the following potential risks:

a. Degraded Safety

b. Decreased Productivity 1. The Government will evaluate Factor 2, Subfactor A, Manpower to:

d) Assess the extent to which the Offeror’s proposed manpower curves (trade) demonstrate a detailed, substantiated and complete understanding of how the Offeror will provide the trade manpower to successfully complete the Availability’s requirements and all existing and proposed work. The Government will assess these curves in relation to the narrative provided in Factor 2, Emphasis Area A (4). Emphasis will be placed on how the Offeror plans to de-conflict anticipated trade manning shortfalls and manning inefficiencies.

e) As an indicator of the Offeror’s ability to man provide the FTE for the efforts that are the subject of the proposed solicitation in accordance with the proposed manning, the Government will evaluate the adequacy of the Offeror’s prior manning performance for current projects, as defined in Section L, including planned to actual manning performance based on an evaluation of Attachment S-4, as well as the narrative in Factor 2.

(a) The pier and dry-dock required to complete work the Offeror currently has under contract based on current contract schedule. Additionally, identify the total pier and dry-dock currently in working capacity, and expected to be in working capacity by month from proposal submission through the “Contract Complete” datein Attachment J-3.

(b) The pier and dry-dock required to complete all outstanding proposals, per proposed schedules. Identify the pier and dry-dock committed to previously awarded requirements, as well as the proposed use of resources to complete the work of ALL outstanding proposals (including this proposal).

(c) The pier and dry-dock required to complete any other anticipated requirements (including but not limited to non-navy work, pier and dry-dock upgrades, maintenance or dredging).

(d) Should the Offeror propose to utilize subcontracted pier or dry-dock, the Offeror shall include an explanation of the requirements that will be sourced by the prime's facility and the pier and dry-dock that will be provided by the subcontractor.

(e) The Offeror's plan to resolve pier and dry-dock resource conflicts as a result of the award of other outstanding proposals, pier and dry-dock shall not be committed to multiple ships during the same time period without reasonable explanation.

(f) In the event the Offeror proposes an interval of less than seven (7) days between the undocking date of other requirements and the proposed docking date of this Availability, and/or a proposed docking date within the first seven (7) days of the Availability, then the narrative shall detail the necessary steps to accomplish. 2. The Government will evaluate Factor 2, Subfactor B, Physical Resource Capacity to:

a) Assess the extent to which the offeror’s narrative and graphical representation demonstrates that the Offeror's capability to provide the required physical resources to complete the Availability. An emphasis will be placed on how the offeror plans to deconflict anticipated physical resource conflicts.

a) Understanding of scope and integration of the work items in the Work Item Specification Package (Attachment J-1)

b) Identifying the critical path and logically sequencing work items, and

c) Integrating the milestones and key events in the Execution Milestones & Key Events (Attachment J-3) reasonably.