TN NP NATR 1H11 1J16_Bridge_Insp_Rpts_adv.pdf

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-013P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 359.60 INSPECTION DATE: 03/24/2023

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1 - CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

6 - BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH:

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

6 - N/A YEAR BUILT:

1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .

1H5 SKEW ANGLE:

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL:

1981-JOINT REPAIR. 2005-NEW ASPHALT OVERLAY.

LOCATION

35.0 FT (10.7 M)

26 FT (7.9 M)

32.5 FT (9.9 M)

28.2 FT (8.6 M)

0 °

N

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: .. 359.60 (KM PT 109.61)

STATE: .............................. 474 - TENNESSEE LOCATION: .... 8.7 MILES FROM TN ROUTE 13

FACILITY CARRIED: ......... NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: COUNTY ROAD

INSPECTION TEAM: S. Ingnam, J. Voight

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Joshua Voight

REPORT REVIEW:

Gary Goodlin

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 09/13/2023

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in poor condition overall, and continues to exhibit progressive deterioration. Problems include delamination and severe spalling with exposed rebar at the bridge rails ends, spalling and deterioration at various points along the bridge rail, moderate cracking with efflorescence on the slab underside and efflorescence along construction joints, minor to moderate cracking with efflorescence on abutment breastwalls, and moderate transverse and longitudinal cracking of the wearing surface and approaches.

The structure should be programmed for replacement. Object marker tape and object markers should be installed as outlined in this report to help improve motorist safety until the bridge can be replaced.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-013P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 359.60 INSPECTION DATE : 03/24/2023

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

B

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.7

INSTALL OBJECT MARKER TAPE ON ALL PARAPET ENDS.

4 EA 250 1000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 1000

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

58,59,60 REPLACE STRUCTURE.

1 LS 850000 850000

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 850000

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 850000

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates are based on historical data, including costs for similar projects when available. Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-013P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 359.60 INSPECTION DATE: 03/23/2023

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

F

G

F

P

G

G

N

N

N

F

N

N

N

N

N

G

G

N

N

N

N

N

G

G

F

G

N

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS N

3. WEARING SURFACE F

N FT

G

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS F

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS P

7. WEEP HOLES G

8. EXPANSION JOINTS F

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION N

12.OTHER N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

N

N

N

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

N

N

N

N

N

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-013P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

58.1

59.3

MODERATE LONGITUDINAL AND RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE; EXTENSIVE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE AND DELAMINATION ON SLAB SIDES. MINOR SPALLING OF SLAB SIDES.

FULL LENGTH LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ALONG CENTER THAT EXTENDS INTO NORTH ABUTMENT.

MODERATE TO HEAVY EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST FACE OF SLAB.

58.3

222.4

FULL LENGTH TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE AT FRAME ENDS.

MINOR TO MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE AND APPROACH PAVEMENT. FULL WIDTH TRANSVERSE CRACK ON SOUTH END OF SOUTH APPROACH PAVEMENT. LONGITUDINAL CRACKING ALONG WHEEL LINES.

58.5

58.6

SEVERE SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON WEST RAIL AT NORTH END OF FRAME. MODERATE TO SEVERE SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT SOUTHWEST (15'L) AND NORTHEAST (13'L) PARAPET AND WINGWALL ENDS.

MODERATE DELAMINATION AND SPALLING OF RAILINGS AT EXPANSION JOINTS. MINOR POPOUTS AND SPALLING OF CURBS AND RAILINGS. MINOR MAP CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE THROUGHOUT WEST CURB AND AT SOME LOCATIONS ON WEST RAILING. LARGE SPALL AND DELAMINATION IN WEST FACE OF WEST RAIL OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT. MODERATE TO HEAVY

EFFLORESENCE UNDER RAILS. SPALL IN EAST RAIL OVER NORTH ABUTMENT.

WIDE CRACKING IN EAST CONCRETE CURB OVER NORTH ABUTMENT.

58.7 MINOR GRAVEL AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES, VEGETATION GROWING ALONG WEST CURBLINE.

60.1

60.6

60.9

ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND WINGWALLS HAVE BEEN ROUTINELY PAINTED TO COVER GRAFFITI.

MODERATE FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACKING ON BOTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS OVER CENTER WEEPHOLE.

MODERATE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST SIDE OF BOTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS; MINOR COLLISION DAMAGE AT CORNERS. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF BREASTWALLS WITH EFFLORESCENCE NEAR TOP; EFFLORESCENCE LEACHING

ONTO BREASTWALLS FROM SLAB UNDERSIDE.

SPALLING IN WEST FACE OF NORTH ABUTMENT. MINOR SPALL IN WEST FACE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT. DIAGONAL CRACKING AT ABUTMENT CORNERS. MINOR COLLISION DAMAGE TO BOTTOM OF WEST FACE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT.

MINOR EROSION AT SOUTHEAST WINGWALL.

MINOR FLAKING OF FINISH COAT AND MINOR VERTICAL CRACK ON SOUTHEAST WINGWALL. SEVERAL POPOUTS PRESENT ON

WINGWALLS. SEE ALSO 58.6.

60.7 ACTIVE DRAINAGE THROUGH ABUTMENT WEEP HOLES.

60.8 VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS ARE OPEN BETWEEN ABUTMENTS AND WINGWALLS, NO FILLER PRESENT; SOME WITH MINOR

VINE GROWTH.

222.4

222.5

MINOR EROSION AT SOUTHEAST PARAPET END; MINOR UNDERMINING (5"L X 4"H X 8" UNDER) OF SHOULDER PAVEMENT.

222.7 OBJECT MARKERS NOT PROVIDED AT ABUTMENTS FOR UNDERPASS.

TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKER TAPE MISSING FROM ALL FOUR PARAPET ENDS. TEMPORARY FLASHER ON EAST

RAILING.

36.A RAILING HEIGHT OF 1'-11" DOES NOT MEET AASHTO MINIMUM HEIGHT SPECIFICATION OF 2'-3" FOR TRAFFIC BARRIERS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-013P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 19 17 32 29

HS 34 31 57 52

TYPE 3 29 26 49 44

TYPE 3S2 45 41 75 68

TYPE 3-3 58 53 97 88

DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/02/2016

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: POSITIVE MOMENT

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-013P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 359.60

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-013 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................M. LEWIS

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 1H5

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2482-A

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

474 - TENNESSEE

47181 WAYNE

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570013P0000000

8.7 MILES FROM TN ROUTE 13

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

359.6 (KM PT: 109.6)

0 1

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

CULVERTS)

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............26 FT ( 7.9 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 35.0 FT ( 10.7 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............34 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 30.8

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............57 TONS ( 51.7 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/24/2023 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-013P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 35° 13'54 20" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.2 FT ( 8.6 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 87°42 '00 50" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.5 FT ( 9.9 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 71 MI ( 114 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 34.0 FT ( 10.4 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......02 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 6 0 FT ( 1.8 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 6 0 FT ( 1.8 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 1 - HIGHWAY, WITH OR W/OUT (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

PEDESTRIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............700 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2019 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................760 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28.2 FT ( 8.6 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2039 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:..............................3.00 FT ( 0.91 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 1 92 FT ( 0 59 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 14.50 FT ( 4.42 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 4 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............5 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 5 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(61) CHANNEL:................................N (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:........... N

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... N - NOT OVER WATERWAY

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 3 - CONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: B - MAJOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 1000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 0

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 850000

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1981-JOINT REPAIR. 2005-NEW ASPHALT OVERLAY.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

Inspector: Joshua Voight Structure Number: 5570013P0000000

Inspection Date: 03/24/2023 Facility Carried: NATCHEZ TRACE PAR

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 4

Description EAST SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 7

Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING IN WEARING SURFACE, SOUTHBOUND LANE SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 8

Description SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT SOUTHWEST PARAPET AND WINGWALL END

PHOTO 9

Description DETERIORATION OF SOUTHWEST PARAPET AND WINGWALL END, OUTSIDE FACE

SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 10

Description DETERIORATION OF NORTHEAST PARAPET AND WINGWALL END, OUTSIDE FACE SHOWN

PHOTO 11

Description LARGE SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON WEST RAILING OVER NORTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 12

Description SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR IN WEST RAILING OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 13

Description TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE THROUGHOUT WEST CURB AND RAILING

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 14

Description SPALLING WITH EFFLORESCENCE UNDERSIDE OF EAST RAILING AT NORTH END

PHOTO 15

Description CRACKING IN EAST CURB OVER NORTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 16

Description DIAGONAL CRACK AND SPALL IN EAST RAIL AND POST OVER NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 17

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE LOOKING NORTH; NOTE CRACKING AND MODERATE

EFFLORESENCE.

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 18

Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE

EXTENDING DOWN INTO BREASTWALL

PHOTO 19

Description HEAVY EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST FACE OF SLAB, BOTTOM FACE OF FASCIA

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 20

Description SPALL ON EAST FACE OF SLAB OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 21

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 22

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE HEAVY EFFLORESCENCE AT WEST END.

PHOTO 23

Description TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST FACE OF ABUTMENTS, SOUTH

ABUTMENT SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 24

Description DIAGONAL CRACKING AT WEST CORNER OF NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE HEAVY

EFFLORESCENCE LEAKING ON ABUTMENT FROM DECK UNDERSIDE

PHOTO 25

Description TYPICAL FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK IN ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS, NORTH

ABUTMENT BREASTWALL SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 26

Description TYPICAL FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK IN ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS, SOUTH

ABUTMENT BREASTWALL SHOWN

PHOTO 27

Description COLLISION DAMAGE AT BOTTOM CORNERS OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS, SOUTH

ABUTMENT WEST CORNER SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 28

Description VERTICAL CRACKING IN SOUTHEAST WINGWALL

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 358.00

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LOOKING SOUTH

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-014P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 3/24/2023

WEST SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration FLH Office of Bridges and Structures Bridge Inspection Program 22001 Loudoun County Parkway, Building E2, Suite 200 Ashburn, VA 20147 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-014P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 358.00 INSPECTION DATE: 03/24/2023

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1 - CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

6 - BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH:

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

6 - N/A YEAR BUILT:

1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .

1H4 SKEW ANGLE:

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL:

1981-JOINT REPAIR. 2005-NEW ASPHALT OVERLAY.

LOCATION

33.0 FT (10.1 M)

25.8 FT (7.9 M)

32.5 FT (9.9 M)

28.2 FT (8.6 M)

0 °

N

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: .. 358.00 (KM PT 109.12)

STATE: .............................. 474 - TENNESSEE LOCATION: .... 7.1 MILES FROM TN ROUTE 13

FACILITY CARRIED: ......... NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: COUNTY ROAD

INSPECTION TEAM: S. Ingnam, J. Voight

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Joshua Voight

REPORT REVIEW:

Gary Goodlin

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 09/13/2023

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in fair condition overall. Problems at this time include moderate cracking with efflorescence on the slab underside and along the longitudinal construction joints and areas of moderate to severe cracking on the railings, southwest parapet and wingwall ends. The railings at the frame ends have delamination and spalling with exposed rebar at multiple locations. Additional problems include moderate cracking of the asphalt wearing surface and approach pavement, open vertical expansion joints between the abutments and the wingwalls, missing object marker tape at the northwest, northeast and southwest parapet ends, and object markers are not provided at the abutments for the underpass.

Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-014P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 358.00 INSPECTION DATE : 03/24/2023

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

C

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

58.6 REMOVE DETERIORATED CONCRETE AND

REPLACE WITH CONCRETE TO SIMILAR

DIMENSIONS IN RAILS.

1 LS 70000 70000

CONTRACT COSTS FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL,

MOBILIZATION, AND CONTINGENCIES. 1 LS 450000 450000

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 520000

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates are based on historical data, including costs for similar projects when available.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-014P

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

F

G

F

P

G

G

G

N

N

F

N

N

N

N

N

G

G

N

N

N

N

N

F

G

F

G

N

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS N

3. WEARING SURFACE F

N FT

G

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

VEGETATION

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS F

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES G

8. EXPANSION JOINTS F

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION N

12.OTHER VEGETATION G

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

N

N

N

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

N

N

N

N

N

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-014P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

58.1

59.3

58.10

MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE, PRIMARILY ALONG LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS. MINOR POPOUTS AND VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON BOTH SIDES OF SLAB AT MID SPAN EXTENDING TO UNDERSIDE; MINOR CRACKING AT CORNERS. MODERATE EFFLORESENCE AT ENDS OF CONSTRUCTION

JOINTS.

MINOR VINE GROWTH ON SLAB UNDERSIDE.

58.3

222.4

MODERATE TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE AND APPROACH PAVEMENT.

MODERATE TO HEAVY LONGITUDINAL CRACKING ALONG WHEEL LINES. FULL WIDTH TRANSVERSE CRACKING AT ENDS OF

BRIDGE AND AT MIDSPAN.

FULL WIDTH TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE OVER NORTH ABUTMENT AND AT BOTH APPROACHES.

MODERATE LONGITUDINAL CRACKING AT APPROACHES.

58.5

58.6

MINOR POPOUTS ON CURBS AND RAILINGS. MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON CURBS. MINOR

SETTLEMENT AT EAST CURB.

MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON RAILINGS, ESPECIALLY AT EXPANSION JOINTS. SEVERE CRACKING, DELAMINATION, AND SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON WEST RAIL POST AT SOUTH END OF FRAME AND EAST RAIL POST AT NORTH END OF FRAME. MODERATE CRACKING AND DELAMINATION ON OUTSIDE FACE OF RAILS NEAR

ABUTMENTS.

SEVERE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTHWEST PARAPET AND WINGWALL END. MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING ON PARAPET AND WINGWALL ENDS AT COLD JOINTS. SEVERE SPALLING OF PARAPET ENDS ON WEST SIDE WITH EXPOSED REBAR.

MINOR SCRAPES AT SOME LOCATIONS. HEAVY EFFLORESENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF RAIL THROUGHOUT.

58.7 MODERATE GRAVEL ACCUMULATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG CURBLINES.

60.1

60.6

MINOR CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS WITH EFFLORESCENCE NEAR TOP; EFFLORESCENCE LEACHING ONTO BREASTWALLS FROM SLAB UNDERSIDE. MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND POPOUTS ON BOTH SIDES OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS. MINOR FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK AT CENTER OF NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL. MODERATE FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK AT SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL. MINOR VEHICLE IMPACT DAMAGE TO SOUTHWEST

CORNER OF ABUTMENT. MINOR VEHICLE SCRAPES ALONG ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS.

EFFLORESCENCE AT WINGWALL JOINTS. DIAGONAL CRACK AT BASE OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL.

MINOR POPOUTS ON WINGWALLS. MINOR FLAKING OF FINISH COAT ON NORTHWEST WINGWALL. SEE ALSO 58.6.

60.8 VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS ARE OPEN BETWEEN ABUTMENTS AND WINGWALLS, NO FILLER PRESENT.

MINOR VINE GROWTH IN VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS.

60.9 MINOR EROSION ALONG NORTHEAST WINGWALL.

222.5 MINOR EROSION AT PARAPET ENDS WITH UNDERMINING AT NORTHEAST AND SOUTHEAST CORNERS. PAVEMENT DROP-OFF TO

SHOULDER IS UP TO 12".

222.7 MISSING TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT SOUTHWEST AND NORTHEAST END; FADED OBJECT MARKERS AT ALL

OTHER LOCATIONS.

SURVEY MARKER ON TOP OF EAST CURB NEAR NORTH END.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-014P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 18 16 31 28

HS 33 30 55 50

TYPE 3 29 26 48 44

TYPE 3S2 43 39 72 65

TYPE 3-3 56 51 93 84

DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/11/2016

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: POSITIVE MOMENT

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-014P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 358.00

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-014 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................M. LEWIS

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 1H4

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2484-A

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

474 - TENNESSEE

47181 WAYNE

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570014P0000000

7.1 MILES FROM TN ROUTE 13

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

358.0 (KM PT: 109.1)

0 2

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

CULVERTS)

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............25.8 FT ( 7.9 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 33.0 FT ( 10.1 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............33 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 29.9

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............55 TONS ( 49.9 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/24/2023 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

https://LENGTH:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-014P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 35° 13'01 50" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.2 FT ( 8.6 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 87°43 '06 30" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.5 FT ( 9.9 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 71 MI ( 114 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 34.0 FT ( 10.4 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......02 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 6 0 FT ( 1.8 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 6 0 FT ( 1.8 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 1 - HIGHWAY, WITH OR W/OUT (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

PEDESTRIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............700 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2019 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................760 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 28.2 FT ( 8.6 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2039 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:...............................4.80 FT ( 1.46 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2 50 FT ( 0.76 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 16.75 FT ( 5.11 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 4 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............5 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 6 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(61) CHANNEL:................................N (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:........... N

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 5 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... N - NOT OVER WATERWAY

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: C - MODERATE

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 0

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 520000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1981-JOINT REPAIR. 2005-NEW ASPHALT OVERLAY.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

Inspector: Joshua Voight Structure Number: 5570014P0000000

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 4

Description EAST SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO 6

Description TYPICAL FULL-WIDTH TRANSVERSE CRACK OF WEARING SURFACE OVER ABUTMENTS, SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING IN WEARING SURFACE, SOUTHBOUND LANE NEAR

NORTH END SHOWN

PHOTO 8

Description FULL WIDTH TRANSVERSE CRACK OF WEARING SURFACE AT MIDSPAN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description SETTLEMENT OF EAST CURB OVER NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 10

Description 12" DROP OFF AT END OF NORTHEAST RAILING

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description SPALLING ON SOUTHWEST CORNER OF RAILING; 7" X 7" X 2"

PHOTO 12

Description HEAVY CRACKING AND AT EFFLORESCENCE SOUTHWEST CORNER RAILING

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description TYPICAL CRACKING OF RAILING POSTS AND EFFLORESENCE; WEST RAILING, SEVENTH

POST FROM NORTH SIDE SHOWN

PHOTO 14

Description CRACKING, SPALLING, AND EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST FACE OF WEST RAILING NEAR

MIDSPAN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON WEST PARAPET OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 16

Description HEAVY EFFLORESCENCE AND DELAMINATION OF WEST PARAPET RAIL ON SOUTH

ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH; NOTE EFFLORESCENCE ALONG

CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE

PHOTO 18

Description VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST FACE OF SLAB AT MIDSPAN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 20

Description GENERAL VIEW SOUTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description IMPACT DAMAGE TO SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ABUTMENT

PHOTO 22

Description FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK IN SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AT CENTERLINE;

NOTE EXTENDS TO DECK UNDERSIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23

Description EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL NEAR EAST END

PHOTO 40

Description MISSING OBJECT MARKING IN NORTHEAST CORNER

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 354.79

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LOOKING SOUTH

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-015P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 3/2/2021

EAST SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-015P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 354.79 INSPECTION DATE: 03/02/2021

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1 - CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

6 - BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH:

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

6 - N/A YEAR BUILT:

1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .

1J2 SKEW ANGLE:

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL:

1983-JOINT REPAIR. 2005 - NEW ASPHALT OVERLAY.

LOCATION

34.5 FT (10.5 M)

27 FT (8.2 M)

32.5 FT (9.9 M)

28.2 FT (8.6 M)

16 °

N

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: .. 354.79 (KM PT 108.14)

STATE: .............................. 474 - TENNESSEE LOCATION: .... 3.9 MILES FROM TN ROUTE 13

FACILITY CARRIED: ......... NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: COUNTY ROAD

INSPECTION TEAM: B. Cazenas, R. Silvestry

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Reinaldo Silvestry

REPORT REVIEW:

Zane Bailey 703-404-6242

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 10/14/2021

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. Main problems at this time include open vertical joints between the wingwalls and the abutments, missing reflective object marker tape at the northeast parapet end, missing object markers at the abutments for the underpass, and minor longitudinal cracking on the deck underside.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-015P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 354.79 INSPECTION DATE : 03/02/2021

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D

Item No.

Maintenance Recomendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.7

REPLACE TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT ALL

BRIDGE CORNERS. INSTALL OBJECT MARKERS FOR

UNDERPASS AT ABUTMENT CORNERS.

4 EA 500 2000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 2000

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

60.8 CLEAN AND RESEAL VERTICAL JOINTS

BETWEEN ABUTMENTS AND WINGWALLS. 1 LS 8000 8000

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN, AND

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

1 LS 7000 7000

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 15000

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-015P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 354.79 INSPECTION DATE: 03/01/2021

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

G

G

G

G

G

G

N

N

N

G

N

N

N

N

N

G

G

N

N

N

N

N

G

G

F

G

N

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS N

3. WEARING SURFACE G

N FT

G

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES N

8. EXPANSION JOINTS F

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION N

12.OTHER N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

N

N

N

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

N

N

N

N

N

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-015P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

58.1

59.3

MINOR COLLISION SCRAPES AND SPALLING TO EAST SIDE OF DECK.

MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE ALONG LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING ON WEST SIDE OF DECK AT MIDSPAN. MINOR SCALING OF FINISH COAT WITH POPOUTS ON WEST SIDE OF

DECK. TIMBER FORM WORK EMBEDDED INTO EAST SIDE OF DECK, MID SPAN.

58.3

222.4

222.6

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE AT BOTH APPROACHES AND OVER BOTH ABUTMENTS.

MINOR CRACKING AND SETTLEMENT OF APPROACH PAVEMENT AT ENDS OF FRAME.

58.5

58.6

MINOR CRACKING AND SPALLING OF CURBS AND RAILING, ESPECIALLY AT EXPANSION JOINT AREAS.

MINOR GRAVEL AND VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG CURBLINES.

60.1 MINOR MAP CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND SPALLING OF FINISH COAT ON WEST SIDE OF NORTH ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL.

60.6

60.8

MINOR POPOUTS AND CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALLS. MINOR SPALLS ON SOUTHEAST, SOUTHWEST AND NORTHEAST WINGWALLS. TWO AREAS OF MINOR HONEYCOMBING ON SOUTHEAST WINGWALL, FINISH COAT HAS SPALLED OFF

AT THESE LOCATIONS.

VERTICAL JOINTS BETWEEN WINGWALLS AND ABUTMENTS ARE OPEN.

222.7 MISSING OBJECT MARKER TAPE AT NORTHEAST PARAPET END. 13'-6" VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS AT BOTH APPROACHES TO

UNDERPASS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-015P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 24 22 41 37

HS 43 39 73 66

TYPE 3 38 34 63 57

TYPE 3S2 58 53 96 87

TYPE 3-3 74 67 124 112

DESIGN LOADING: 2 - H 15

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 08/01/2015

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: POSITIVE MOMENT

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-015P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 354.79

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........5570-015 P

4 - SOUTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................CHEROKEE

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 1J2

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........2559-A

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

474 - TENNESSEE

13181 LINCOLN

00000

1 6 1 00001 0

COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570015P0000000

3 9 MILES FROM TN ROUTE 13

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

354.7 (KM PT: 108.1)

9 4

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 07 - FRAME (EXCEPT FRAME (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

CULVERTS)

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............27 FT ( 8.2 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 34.5 FT ( 10.5 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................2 - H 15 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-

CAPACITY RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............43 TONS ( 39 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............73 TONS ( 66.2 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 03/02/2021 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-015P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 35° 10'25 90" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 28.2 FT ( 8.6 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 87°43 '58.40" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 32.5 FT ( 9.9 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 71 MI ( 114 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 34.0 FT ( 10.4 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 22.0 FT ( 6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......02 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 6 0 FT ( 1.8 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 6 0 FT ( 1.8 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 1 - HIGHWAY, WITH OR W/OUT (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

PEDESTRIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............700 (34) SKEW ANGLE:.....