Tab 7 FALCON PAS Project Performance Management and Evaluation Plan.docx
DOCX document 41 KB Posted
- Opportunity number
- DFOP0016632
- Issued by
-
Department of State
About this file
This document appears to be a Project Performance Management and Evaluation Plan for the FALCON project, a federal grant opportunity from the Department of State's Cyberspace and Digital Policy program (CFDA 19.665). The plan outlines the project's scope, objectives, and key performance indicators to monitor and evaluate project activities and outcomes. It includes details on data collection, quality assurance, and risk analysis. The overall goal of the FALCON project is to establish a reservoir of commercial cybersecurity capabilities that the Department of State can leverage to support U.S. allies and partners in preventing, responding to, mitigating, and recovering from cybersecurity incidents. The grant opportunity is open to 501(c)(3) nonprofits, with a focus on promoting investments in secure ICT infrastructure and advancing an open, interoperable, and secure internet.
Tab 7 FALCON PAS Project Performance Management and Evaluation Plan Word
View the file
Other files
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FALCON
Project Performance Management Plan Red text indicates content the Applicant must enter or update.
Blue text indicates drafting guidance and instructions.
Project Activity Scope ________________XXX
| Project Beneficiary |
| XXX |
| Estimated Period of Performance |
| XX months |
| CDP Strategic Goals & Objectives supported |
| Specify the CDP Functional Bureau Strategy Goals and Objectives supported by the project. |
Goal 1: XXXXX, Objective 1.1: XXXXX Goal 2: XXXXX, Objective 2.3: XXXXX
| DCCP Pillars supported |
| From the list below, keep the pillars this project supports and delete the rest. |
1. Build Connections by promoting investments in secure, diverse, and resilient ICT infrastructure.
2. Advance an Open, Interoperable, Reliable, and Secure Internet by promoting inclusive, rights-respecting, multi-stakeholder models of internet governance and pro-competition, pro-innovation digital economy policies and regulations.
3. Grow Global Markets for U.S.ICT goods and services, especially high-quality, interoperable, secure ICT equipment, software, and services.
4. Enhance Cybersecurity by increasing adoption and implementation of cybersecurity best practices.
Part 2: Indicator Table To help think through what is necessary to adequately monitor the project and account for results, complete the table below. For each indicator, provide its name/title, the project objectives and activities that the indicator relates to, whether it measures an output (direct, tangible results from executing an activity) or an outcome (what we achieve from completing the outputs in terms of changes to laws, behaviors, norms, etc.), the data source (how data will be collected), baseline values if known (where we are starting), and any target values per year or quarter or the PoP of the project if know (the desired value for the output or outcome).
To complete the below table, consult the DCCP Indicator List and the Indicator Selection Guidance to select appropriate DCCP indicators. Project-specific indicators not identified in the DCCP Indicator List will also likely be needed. All indicators should be included below and reported on in every quarterly report, even if some indicators have “0” results for several quarters.
Note: The award recipient will work with the State Department to finalize indicators, including some that will be required by the Department.
| Indicator Title |
| Project Objective(s) |
| Project Activit(y/ies) |
| Indicator Type (Output or Outcome) |
| Data Source/ |
Collection Method
| Baseline Value (if known) |
| Annual Targets |
(if known)
Add more rows as needed
Part 3: Performance Monitoring & Evaluation Description This section summarizes how the project will be monitored, including roles and responsibilities for collecting and ensuring the quality of project performance management data the applicant will report.
Provide a narrative explanation describing how project performance will be accounted for, including:
· Roles and responsibilities for collecting data (including the use of sub-contractors, if applicable)
· Further explanation of any data collection methods described in the indicator table, if necessary (e.g., use of specific tools or surveys typically employed by organization)
· Procedures for ensuring data quality and security, including the use of software or other methods
· A description of any evaluations that would be conducted by an independent third-party Part 4: Risk Analysis This section provides an analysis of the project risks and offers a risk mitigation strategy for CDP review and final approval.
- 2 -
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .