Sum_of_Alter_in_PER_f_One_Note.docx
DOCX document 973 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Anclote Road Stormwater and Roadway Improvements - Professional Engineering Services (PID 003897A)
- Solicitation number
- 26-0128-RFQ-CCNA
- Issued by
- Pinellas County, Clewiston City, Florida
About this file
This is a Summary of Alternatives document prepared for Pinellas County, Florida's Anclote Road Stormwater and Roadway Improvements project, evaluating engineering design options for a 2.4-mile roadway corridor extending from Anclote Boulevard to Alternate US 19 in Tarpon Springs. The document presents four build alternatives organized across three project phases, plus a no-build alternative, for the improvement of the currently two-lane rural roadway. Build Alternative 1 for Phase Areas 1 and 2 proposes constructing two 11-foot lanes, a 10-foot-wide shared-use path, and a 5-foot sidewalk where feasible to continuously connect pedestrians and bicyclists throughout the corridor. Build Alternative 2 for Phase Areas 1 and 2 entails two 11-foot lanes, a 4-foot paved shoulder functioning as an on-street bike lane, and 5-foot sidewalks. For Phase Area 3, Build Alternative 1 includes two 11-foot lanes with Type F curb and 6- to 8-foot sidewalks, while Build Alternative 2 specifies two 10-foot lanes with Type F curb, 4-foot bike lanes, and a 6-foot sidewalk. All build alternatives share common advantages including consistent corridor connectivity, connections to the work release center and adjacent trails, enhanced multimodal levels of service, improved safety for non-motorized traffic, consistency with the Pinellas County Long Range Transportation Plan, roadway pavement and base rehabilitation, and improved drainage infrastructure.
The alternatives evaluation supports the professional engineering services procurement in which a qualified consultant will be selected through a qualifications-based selection process to prepare the Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) and Environmental Information Document (EID) in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency guidelines. The consultant will formally evaluate these alternatives, along with the no-build option, and recommend a preferred alternative for design advancement. This summary document represents the preliminary analysis phase of the project, which is funded through an earmarked State and Tribal Assistance Grant (STAG) from the EPA's Clean Water State Revolving Funds program totaling $2,240,000, with Pinellas County contributing $5,941,000 through the Local Infrastructure Sales Surtax (Penny for Pinellas), and total multi-year project costs estimated at $35,440,000 across design, acquisitions, and construction phases.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Anclote_Rd_SOS_100625.pdf | ||
| Sample_Agreement.pdf | ||
| 26-0128-RFQ-CCNA_3-4-26.pdf | ||
| Appendices_Final_PER__00387A_Anclote_Road_Combined_062024.pdf | ||
| 003897A_Anclote_Road_Improvements_Final_PER_062024_1.pdf | ||
| 003987A_FY26_PFO_11.20.25pdf.pdf | ||
| Sum_of_Alter_in_PER_f_One_Note.docx | DOCX document | |
| 102225_addit_cmts_Trees.pdf | ||
| Request_for_ITB_CCNA_RFP_Nov2023.docx | DOCX document | |
| Additional_requirements_rev1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Community_Grants_Procurement_Review_Checklist_October_2023.docx | DOCX document | |
| Anclote_Rd_SOS_100625.docx | DOCX document | |
| 06-Best-practice-guide-for-procure.pdf | ||
| Notice_of_Intent_to_Sole_Source_07-25-2023.pdf | ||
| Non-Competitive_Oversight_Committee_Justification_Form.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Summary of Alternatives in PER Wednesday, February 28, 2024
11:15 AM
Two main alternatives were evaluated for the improvement of the Anclote Road corridor. These alternatives are as follows:
• No Build: This alternative involves keeping the two-lane rural roadway section along the project limits and non-continuous sidewalks at various locations.
• Alternative 1 (Phase Areas 1 and 2): This alternative entails constructing two 11-foot lanes, a 10-foot-wide shared-use path, and a 5-foot sidewalk where feasible.
• Alternative 2 (Phase Areas 1 and 2): This alternative entails constructing two 11-foot lanes, a 5-foot paved shoulder as an on-street bike lane, and 5-foot sidewalks.
• Alternative 1 (Phase 3): This alternative entails constructing two 11-foot lanes, Type F curb, and a 6 to 8-foot sidewalk.
• Alternative 2 (Phase 3): This alternative entails constructing two 10-foot lanes, Type F curb, 4-foot bike lanes, and a 6-foot sidewalk.
4.2 Build Alternative 1 (Phase Areas 1 and 2)
The Build Alternative 1 entails constructing two 11-foot lanes, a 10-foot-wide shared-use path, and a 5-foot sidewalk where feasible. This alternative aims to connect pedestrians and bicyclists continuously within Phase Areas 1 and 2. The typical section for the alternative is shown in Figure 25.
Figure 25 – Build Alternative 1 Typical Section (Phase Areas 1 and 2) Certain advantages are associated with this alternative, including:
• Provides a consistent connection along the project corridor.
• Provides a connection to the work release center and adjacent trails.
• Enhances multimodal levels of service on the existing roadway network.
• Improves safety for non-motorized traffic.
• Consistent with the Pinellas County Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP).
• Rehabilitates the roadway pavement and base.
• Improves drainage.
4.3 Build Alternative 2 (Phase Areas 1 and 2)
The Build Alternative 2 entails constructing two 11-foot lanes, a 4-foot paved shoulder as an on-street bike lane, and 5-foot sidewalks. This alternative aims to connect pedestrians and bicyclists continuously within Phase Areas 1 and 2. The typical section for the alternative is shown in Figure 26.
Figure 26 – Build Alternative 2 Typical Section (Phase Areas 1 and 2) Certain advantages are associated with this alternative, including:
• Provides a consistent connection along the project corridor.
• Provides a connection to the work release center and adjacent trails.
• Enhances multimodal levels of service on the existing roadway network.
• Improves safety for non-motorized traffic.
• Consistent with the Pinellas County Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP).
The Build Alternative 1 for Phase Area 3 entails constructing two 11-foot lanes, Type F curb, and a 6- to 8-foot sidewalk. This alternative aims to connect pedestrians and bicyclists continuously within Phase Area 3. The typical section for the alternative is shown in Figure 27.
Figure 27 – Build Alternative 1 Typical Section (Phase Area 3) Certain advantages are associated with this alternative, including:
• Provides a consistent connection along the project corridor.
• Enhances multimodal levels of service on the existing roadway network.
• Improves safety for non-motorized traffic.
• Consistent with the Pinellas County Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP).
4.5 Build Alternative 2 (Phase Area 3)
The Build Alternative 2 for Phase Area 3 entails constructing two 10-foot lanes, Type F curb, 4-foot bike lanes, and a 6-foot sidewalk. This alternative aims to connect pedestrians and bicyclists continuously within Phase Area 3. The typical section for the alternative is shown in Figure 28.
Figure 28 – Build Alternative 1 Typical Section (Phase Area 3) Certain advantages are associated with this alternative, including:
• Provides a consistent connection along the project corridor.
• Enhances multimodal levels of service on the existing roadway network.
• Improves safety for non-motorized traffic.
• Consistent with the Pinellas County Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP).
image4.png image5.png image6.png image1.png image2.png image3.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .