Structure 2902-014P-2022.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

STX7025

ROUTE 70 OVER UNNAMED GUT

USVI (ST CROIX) - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

LE

STRUCTURE NO. 2902-014P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 1/25/2022

SD

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 2902-014P

STX7025 INSPECTION DATE: 01/25/2022

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1 - CONCRETE

04 - TEE BEAM

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

6 - BITUMINOUS

0 - UNKNOWN

1 - CONCRETE

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

25.0 FT (7.6 M)

25 FT (7.6 M)

25.0 FT (7.6 M)

23.6 FT (7.2 M)

0 °

N

LOCATION

USVI (ST CROIX) - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

STATE: .............................. 781 - VIRGIN ISLANDS

FACILITY CARRIED: ......... ROUTE 70

FEATURE INTERSECTED: UNNAMED GUT

MILE POINT: .. 0 (KM PT 0)

LOCATION: .... CENTERLINE ROAD

INSPECTION TEAM: F. Fernandez, D. Martin

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

David Martin

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 04/22/2022

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete tee beam bridge is in poor condition overall. The main problems include vertical and diagonal cracking of the beams near mid-span, with visible sagging of the beams; severe spalling with exposed and partially debonded rebar along the bottom of the exterior beams; cracking at the east abutment bearing area; and severe spalling with exposed rebar at both abutment breastwalls.

Other problems include collision damage to approach railing; vegetation growth partially covering the guardrails; and collapse of the southwest wingwall. It should also be noted that the railing system over the structure may not be strong enough to safely redirect an errant vehicle. In addition, the weight limit sign at the east approach is damaged.

Since the previous inspection, temporary barriers were placed along both rails, temporary end treatments were installed at the east end, and weight limit and vehicle restriction signs were installed at both approaches.

Replacement of the structure is strongly recommended. In the meantime, it is recommended that VIDPW strictly enforce the weight restriction until the structure can be replaced.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 2902-014P

STX7025 INSPECTION DATE : 01/25/2022

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

B

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

62.12 PERIODICALLY TRIM VEGETATION FROM AROUND

STRUCTURE AND APPROACHES. 1 LS 2000 2000

222.7 REPAIR WEIGHT LIMIT SIGN AT EAST APPROACH.

1 LS 500 500

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 2500

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

59,60 REPLACE STRUCTURE.

1 LS 600000 600000

36.A,222.

REPLACE RAILING SYSTEM OVER STRUCTURE

AND APPROACHES (UNTIL STRUCTURE CAN BE

REPLACED).

1 LS 45000 45000

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 645000

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0

647500TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Maintenance items are included to help improve motorist safety and arrest ongoing reinforcement corrosion until structure can be replaced.

Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

1 LS 2000 2000

1 LS 500 500

1 LS 600000 600000

1 LS 45000 45000

645000

6475002500

645000

647500

STRUCTURE NO. 2902-014P

STX7025 INSPECTION DATE: 01/24/2022

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

F

G

F

F

N

G

N

N

P

N

N

N

N

F

F

F

G

N

G

N

N

P

1- SUFF

3 - LOW

N

N

P

F

G

P

G

N

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS N

3. WEARING SURFACE F

F 11 FT

G

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

MM NENT FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

SAND

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS P

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS F

6. WINGWALLS P

7. WEEP HOLES N

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION N

12.OTHER N

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

N

N

N

N

N

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

58.1 SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR AND EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE IN NORTH EXTERIOR BAY. MINOR SPALL, 1SF X

1/4"D, IN CENTER BAY NEAR WEST ABUTMENT.

MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKS, ONE PER BAY, IN BOTTOM SLAB BETWEEN GIRDERS.

58.3

222.4

MODERATE WEARING OF ASPHALT WITH FADED LANE MARKINGS. MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING, POTHOLES, AND GOUGES, UP TO 8'L X 1'W X UP TO 2"D, IN ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE IN EASTBOUND LANE ON STRUCTURE AND AT WEST APPROACH.

58.6

222.3

222.7

TEMPORARY PLASTIC BARRIERS INSTALLED ALONG BOTH RAILS SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION. COLLISION DAMAGE TO

MULTIPLE BARRIERS, WITH SEVERAL BARRIERS DISPLACED AND MISSING.

COLLISION DAMAGE TO GUARDRAILS ON BOTH SIDES. TWISTED POSTS AND BENT FLANGES AT SOUTHEAST APPROACH GUARDRAIL. TEMPORARY END TREATMENTS INSTALLED AT EAST ENDS SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.

10'L SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT EAST END OF SOUTH PARAPET.

HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG GUARDRAILS. NORTHWEST TERMINAL AND OBJECT MARKER OBSCURED BY VEGETATION

GROWTH AND PLASTIC BARRIERS.

WEIGHT LIMIT AND "NO COMMERCIAL VEHICLES" SIGNS INSTALLED AT BOTH APPROACHES SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.

WEIGHT LIMIT SIGN AT EAST APPROACH IS NOT ANCHORED AND LEANING AGAINST TREE. "NO TRUCKS" SIGN AT EAST

APPROACH IS MISSING TOP FASTENER.

58.8 DISCONNECTED UTILITY DUCT AT UPSTREAM DROPS ABOUT 5' BELOW EXTERIOR BEAM.

59.2

59.8

59.9

MODERATE DELAMINATION AND SPALLING WITH EXPOSED AND CORRODED REBAR IN BOTH FASCIA BEAMS, FULL LENGTH.

REBAR PARTIALLY DEBONDED FROM BOTTOM OF BOTH FASCIA BEAMS. VERTICAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKS OF MOST BEAMS

NEAR MIDSPAN AND NOTICEABLE DEFLECTION OF BEAMS.

60.1

59.8

59.9

SPALLING ALONG WATERLINE OF EAST ABUTMENT WALL WITH EXPOSED AND CORRODED REBAR. DELAMINATION AND SPALLING

OF BOTH ABUTMENTS WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT SOUTH SIDE.

EXPOSED REBAR ALONG WATERLINE OF WEST ABUTMENT, NOT OBSERVED DUE TO HIGH WATER.

60.5

60.9

UP TO 40" (PREVIOUSLY 32") OF FOOTING FACE EXPOSED AT BOTH ABUTMENTS; NO UNDERMINING.

60.6

60.10

SOUTHWEST WINGWALL COLLAPSED INTO CHANNEL.

60.6

61.4

EXPOSED UTILITY PIPE ACROSS FLOOR OF CHANNEL 20' UPSTREAM OF BRIDGE.

HEAVY DEBRIS AGAINST UPSTREAM END OF BRIDGE. HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH IN UPSTREAM CHANNEL. FENCE INSTALLED ACROSS CHANNEL AT DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF STRUCTURE, WITH SOME DEBRIS CAUGHT IN FENCE.

ACCUMULATION OF SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS ACROSS DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL CAUSES WATER TO POND BELOW STRUCTURE.

36.A CONNECTION OF GUARDRAIL TO SUPERSTRUCTURE DOES NOT APPEAR CAPABLE OF SAFELY REDIRECTING ERRANT VEHICLES.

36.D SOUTHWEST GUARDRAIL TERMINAL DETACHED FROM POST.

H 10 9 17 15

HS 18 16 30 27

TYPE 3 14 13 24 22

TYPE 3S2 21 19 36 33

TYPE 3-3 28 25 46 42

0 - UNKNOWN

CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

X CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

02/10/2022

ENGINEERING JUDGMENT

PLANS NOT AVAILABLE. ASSUMED DESIGN LOAD BASED ON YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION. RATING BASED ON ENGINEERING JUDGMENT IN

ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO MANUAL FOR BRIDGE EVALUATION (MBE).

(201) PARK: USVI (ST CROIX) - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............STX7025

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........2902-014 P

(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:

(211) PROJECT NO(S):

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................01 - STATE HIGHWAY AGENCY

(22) OWNER:................................... 01 - STATE HIGHWAY AGENCY

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

781 - VIRGIN ISLANDS

78010 ST CROIX

14046

1 4 1 00000 0

UNNAMED GUT

ROUTE 70

STX7025

CENTERLINE ROAD

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

0 (KM PT: 0 )

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 04 - TEE BEAM (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............25 FT ( 7.6 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 25.0 FT ( 7.6 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 0 - UNKNOWN B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 8 - UNKNOWN

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 0 - UNKNOWN C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 8 - UNKNOWN

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 0 - UNKNOWN (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. P - POSTED FOR LOAD

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............18 TONS ( 16.3 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 0 - MORE THAN 39.9% BELOW LEGAL

LOADS (0 TONS)

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............30 TONS ( 27.2 METRIC TONS)

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 01/25/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 17 43'24 86" N (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 23.6 FT ( 7.2 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 64 47 '22.77" W (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 25.0 FT ( 7.6 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 2 MI ( 3 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 22.5 FT ( 6.9 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... FT ( 0 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... FT ( 0 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... FT ( 0 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............1000 (34) SKEW ANGLE:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2019 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................1200 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 23.6 FT ( 7.2 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2029 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT

REQUIRED)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:...........1 - NAVIGATION PROTECTION NOT MATERIAL:........................... 4 - STEEL

REQUIRED

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... FT ( 0 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

(58) DECK:....................................... 5 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............3 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 4 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................5 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 5 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 8 - STABLE FOR SCOUR CONDITIONS

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 1 1 1 (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: B - MAJOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... 35 - REHABILITATION - DETERIORATION (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 2500

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. 1 - WORK TO BE DONE BY CONTRACT (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 645000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

$ 2500

$ 645000

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

Inspector: David Martin Structure Number: STX7025

Inspection Date: 01/25/2022 Facility Carried: ROUTE 70

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING WEST

PHOTO 4

Description NORTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST

PHOTO 6

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH RAIL; NOTE TEMPORARY BARRIERS INSTALLED ALONG RAIL

PHOTO 8

Description CRACKING AND DETERIORATION OF WEARING SURFACE IN EASTBOUND LANE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description COLLISION DAMAGE TO SOUTHWEST GUARDRAIL TERMINAL

PHOTO 10

Description COLLISION DAMAGE TO TEMPORARY BARRIER AT NORTHWEST APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description "NO COMMERCIAL VEHICLES" SIGN AT WEST APPROACH

PHOTO 12

Description WEIGHT LIMIT SIGN AT EAST APPROACH; NOTE POST LEANING AGAINST TREE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description LOOSE AND LEANING "NO TRUCKS" SIGN AT EAST APPROACH

PHOTO 14

Description SOUTHEAST APPROACH GUARDRAIL TERMINAL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description BENT FLANGES DUE TO COLLISION DAMAGE ON SOUTHEAST GUARDRAIL

PHOTO 16

Description TWISTED SPACER AND BENT FLANGES AT 3RD POST FROM TERMINAL AT SOUTHEAST

APPROACH RAILING

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description CRACK IN EAST APPROACH PAVEMENT

PHOTO 18

Description NORTHEAST APPROACH GUARDRAIL MOSTLY BEHIND TEMPORARY BARRIERS; NOTE

COLLISION DAMAGE TO TEMPORARY BARRIERS

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO 20

Description SPALLING OF WEST ABUTMENT WALL WITH EXPOSED AND CORRODED REBAR

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description COLLAPSED WINGWALL AT SOUTHWEST CORNER

PHOTO 22

Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ALONG UNDERSIDE OF SOUTH EXTERIOR BEAM

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23

Description SHEAR CRACK ON BEAM #2 NEAR WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO 24

Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON DECK UNDERSIDE AT NORTH BAY NEAR MIDSPAN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 25

Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ALONG UNDERSIDE OF NORTH EXTERIOR BEAM

PHOTO 26

Description GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 27

Description FOOTING EXPOSURE AT DOWNSTREAM END OF EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO 28

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 29

Description FENCE ACROSS CHANNEL AT DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF STRUCTURE

PHOTO 30

Description UPSTREAM CHANNEL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 31

Description DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL