Structure 2902-004P-2022.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

STX702505

ROUTE 7025 OVER UNNAMED CREEK

USVI (ST CROIX) - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 2902-004P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 1/24/2022

EU

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 2902-004P

STX702505 INSPECTION DATE: 01/24/2022

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1 - CONCRETE

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

6 - BITUMINOUS

0 - UNKNOWN

0 - UNKNOWN

1 - CONCRETE

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

27.9 FT (8.5 M)

14.8 FT (4.5 M)

28.8 FT (8.8 M)

20.8 FT (6.3 M)

0 °

N

LOCATION

USVI (ST CROIX) - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

STATE: .............................. 781 - VIRGIN ISLANDS

FACILITY CARRIED: ......... ROUTE 7025

FEATURE INTERSECTED: UNNAMED CREEK

MILE POINT: .. 0 (KM PT 0)

LOCATION: .... 0.15 MILES FROM HIGHWAY 63

INSPECTION TEAM: M. Bostick, F. Fernandez, D. Martin

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Mark Bostick

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 04/22/2022

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This two-span concrete tee beam bridge is in critically poor condition at this time. The bridge exhibits advanced and progressive deterioration of the structural concrete and steel reinforcement in most of the beams. The positive moment reinforcement for the concrete beams is exposed and no longer bonded to the concrete, thereby greatly reducing the load capacity of the structure. The exposed reinforcing steel in the exterior beams is 100% ineffective, as the bars have broken due to corrosion.

A letter from FHWA to VIDPW dated February 2, 2018 outlined specific safety measures to be taken immediately, including installing 5-ton weight limit signs at the bridge ends, and at the nearest intersections in advance of the bridge ends; reducing the number of traffic lanes on the structure from two lanes to one lane, using barrels and steel/aluminum fencing on both sides to narrow the traveled way to a single lane down the center of the bridge; installing appropriate warning signs, including “No Trucks” and “One Lane Bridge Ahead” signs, at both approaches; and installing “Stop” signs at both ends of the bridge to reduce vehicle impact on the structure. The letter further recommended that a temporary bridge be installed over the existing structure within 90 days, and that VIDPW continue to monitor the situation with interim inspections every three months.

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 2902-004P

STX702505 INSPECTION DATE: 01/24/2022

Since the previous inspection, temporary barriers were placed to narrow the traveled way to a single lane, along with new lane restriction and 5-ton weight limit signage installed at both approaches. However, numerous temporary barriers exhibit impact damage, and several barriers are displaced.

Due to the load rating performed of the structure based on the conditions observed during the inspection, it is recommended that posting for the structure be reduced to a 3-ton weight limit. Additionally, it is recommended that semi-permanent concrete barriers be placed on the structure to create a 10'-6" wide lane at the center of the bridge to limit the live loads to Beams 2 and 3 only.

It is recommended that VIDPW as soon as possible install a single lane Bailey-type temporary bridge to span over the existing structure. It is also strongly recommended that the "Stop" signs be installed at both ends of the bridge. Until the temporary bridge is in place, the weight limit posting should be reduced to 3-tons, concrete barriers be placed on the bridge, the weight limit be strictly enforced, and interim inspections be performed every three months.

As a permanent solution, it is recommended that the bridge be replaced with a new structure.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 2902-004P

STX702505 INSPECTION DATE : 01/24/2022

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

A

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.7 REMOVE EXISTING 5-TON WEIGHT LIMIT SIGNS AND

INSTALL 3-TON WEIGHT LIMIT SIGNS AT BOTH

APPROACHES. INSTALL "STOP" SIGNS TO HELP IMPROVE

MOTORIST SAFETY UNTIL TEMPORARY BRIDGE CAN BE

INSTALLED. INSTALL CONCRETE BARRIERS TO LIMIT

TRAFFIC TO SINGLE LANE OVER CENTER OF BRIDGE.

1 LS 10000 10000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 10000

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

58,59,60 REPLACE EXISTING STRUCTURE.

1 LS 600000 600000

62.9,222.

REPAIR APPROACH GUARDRAIL SYSTEM.

INSTALL TEMPORARY BRIDGE TO SAFELY

CARRY TRAFFIC UNTIL NEW STRUCTURE CAN

BE BUILT.

1 LS 100000 100000

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 700000

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : See 2/2/18 letter from FHWA to VIDPW for recommended safety measures to be taken immediately.

1 LS 10000 10000

1 LS 600000 600000

1 LS 100000 100000

700000

71000071000071000010000

700000

710000

10000

STRUCTURE NO. 2902-004P

STX702505 INSPECTION DATE: 01/23/2022

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

F

G

P

P

P

G

N

N

P

N

N

N

N

N

N

G

G

N

G

F

F

F

F

2 - INSUFF

3 - LOW

N

N

P

F

G

G

F

N

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS N

3. WEARING SURFACE F

N

DRAINAGE

3 FT

G

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

MM NENT FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

CONCRETE

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS F

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS F

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS F

7. WEEP HOLES N

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION N

12.OTHER N

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS G

N

G

N

G

G

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

58.1 SOUTH SPAN:

SPALL, 4'W X 2'L X 3"D, WITH EXPOSED REBAR IN BOTTOM OF DECK AT BAY #1 NEAR PIER. SPALL, 3'W X 2'L X UP TO 2"D, WITH

EXPOSED REBAR IN BOTTOM OF DECK AT BAY #2 AT SOUTH ABUTMENT.

NORTH SPAN:

SPALL, FULL WIDTH X 2'L X 2"D, WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT BAY #1 NEAR PIER. DELAMINATION AND SPALL, FULL WIDTH X 1'L X 1"D (PREVIOUSLY 6"W X 6'L), WITH EXPOSED REBAR IN BOTTOM OF DECK AT BAY #2 NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT. SPALL, 5'W X 2'L X 2-

1/2"D, WITH EXPOSED REBAR IN BOTTOM OF DECK AT BAY #3 NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT.

HONEYCOMBED CONCRETE IN UPSTREAM OVERHANG OF NORTH SPAN

58.5

58.6

222.3

NEW RAILING INSTALLED ALONG WEST SIDE OF BRIDGE SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION. TEMPORARY PLASTIC BARRIERS PLACED ALONG EAST AND WEST RAILS SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION TO REDUCE TRAFFIC TO SINGLE LANE.

IMPACT DAMAGE TO SOUTH END OF WEST TEMPORARY BARRIERS, DESTROYING ONE AND SEVERELY DAMAGING ANOTHER;

FILL MATERIAL MOUNDED AT THIS LOCATION. SEVERAL BARRIERS ARE DISPLACED.

BROKEN BRIDGE RAIL ANCHORAGE ON UPSTREAM SIDE NEAR NORTH END. PEELING PAINT ON EAST BRIDGE RAIL. IMPACT DAMAGE TO EAST RAIL AT NORTH AND SOUTH ENDS. EAST CONCRETE CURB AT 2ND POST FROM NORTH END FAILED DUE TO

IMPACT. INCORRECT LAPPING OF WEST GUARDRAIL NEAR MID-LENGTH.

COLLISION DAMAGE AT NORTHEAST CORNER END TREATMENT.

58.5

58.7

HONEYCOMBED CONCRETE, SPALLS AND EXPOSED REBAR BENEATH SIDEWALK IN BOTH SPANS. MODERATE CRACKING, UP TO 1/8" W, THROUGHOUT SIDEWALK. MINOR CRACKING AND FAILED PAINT ON CURBS AND PEDESTRIAN BARRIER.

MODERATE VEGETATION AND GRAVEL ACCUMULATION ALONG EAST AND WEST CURBLINES.

4 CLOGGED DRAINS ALONG CURBS, WITH WEST DRAINS AT ABUTMENTS COMPLETELY CLOGGED.

MOUNDS OF DEBRIS AT NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST CORNERS, BUT NO TEMPORARY BARRIERS PRESENT.

59.2 STRUCTURE CONSISTS OF FOUR TEE BEAMS. SPALLING OF ENTIRE BOTTOM PORTION OF BEAMS WITH REBAR COMPLETELY DEBONDED AND MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING THROUGHOUT. REBAR PARTIALLY MISSING ALONG BOTTOMS OF BEAMS #1 AND #4. SPALL, FULL HEIGHT X 3'L X UP TO 2"D, STARTING 1' FROM SOUTH ABUTMENT ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF BEAM #2 IN SOUTH

SPAN.

NO SHEAR STIRRUPS VISIBLE IN SPALLED SECTIONS OF CONCRETE.

60.1

60.3

60.6

60.9

60.13

MODERATE CRACKING AT BOTH ABUTMENTS, PARTICULARLY NEAR BEARING SEATS OF FASCIA BEAMS.

HEAVY ABRADING OF BOTH SOUTH ABUTMENT AND PIER WALL. MINOR POCKET OF UNDERMINING, UP TO 1'W X 1"H X UP TO 6"U, ALONG BOTTOM OF SOUTH ABUTMENT AT UPSTREAM END.

GAPS IN JOINTS OF MASONRY BREASTWALLS AND WINGWALLS OF NORTH AND SOUTH ABUTMENTS AT UPSTREAM END.

PIERS CONSIST OF STEM WALL WIDENED WITH TWO COLUMNS AND A BEAM UNDERNEATH SLAB SIDEWALK.

61.2 PAVED EMBANKMENT AT SOUTHWEST CORNER HAS SETTLED DUE TO EROSION.

61.4 DEAD VEGETATION LODGED AT UPSTREAM END. MUDDY CHANNEL WITH CONTAMINATED WATER. LARGE SECTIONS OF CONCRETE DEBRIS IN CHANNEL BELOW STRUCTURE. MULTIPLE DISPLACED TEMPORARY BARRIERS IN DOWNSTREAM

CHANNEL.

61.6 PER PREVIOUS INSPECTION REPORT, BRIDGE WAS SUBMERGED DURING FLOOD IN 2010.

222.4 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACK, UP TO 1/4" W, IN ASPHALT OVER NORTH AND SOUTH ABUTMENTS IN SOUTHBOUND LANE. LIGHT WEAR, UP TO 1/8" D, IN APPROACH ROADWAY ASPHALT. MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING, UP TO 1/4" W X 200 SF, IN SOUTH

APPROACH ROADWAY ASPHALT.

222.7 LANE RESTRICTION AND 5-TON WEIGHT LIMIT SIGNS INSTALLED AT NORTH AND SOUTH APPROACHES SINCE PREVIOUS

INSPECTION.

36.A RAILING DOES NOT MEET CURRENT SAFETY STANDARDS.

58.3 CRACKING, UP TO 1/4" W, IN ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE AT NORTH AND SOUTH ENDS IN SOUTHBOUND LANE. MODERATE

WEAR, UP TO 1/8" D, EXPOSING AGGREGATE IN ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE.

61.3 DETERIORATED MORTAR IN DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL PROTECTIVE MASONRY WALLS.

222.8 TRAFFIC SLOWS AT SOUTH APPROACH DUE TO ANGLED INTERSECTION.

H 3 3 6 5

HS 6 5 11 10

TYPE 3 5 5 9 8

TYPE 3S2 9 8 15 14

TYPE 3-3 11 10 19 17

0 - UNKNOWN

CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

X CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

02/01/2022

ENGINEERING JUDGMENT

STRUCTURE IS POSTED "NO TRUCKS OVER 10,000 LBS" AT BOTH APPROACHES. IT IS RECOMMENDED TO REDUCE WEIGHT LIMIT

POSTING TO 3-TONS.

(201) PARK: USVI (ST CROIX) - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............STX702505

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........2902-004 P

(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:

(211) PROJECT NO(S):

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................01 - STATE HIGHWAY AGENCY

(22) OWNER:................................... 01 - STATE HIGHWAY AGENCY

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

781 - VIRGIN ISLANDS

78010 ST CROIX

13933

1 4 1 00000 0

UNNAMED CREEK

ROUTE 7025

STX702505

0.15 MILES FROM HIGHWAY 63

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

0 (KM PT: 0 )

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

GIRDER

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............002 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............14.8 FT ( 4.5 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 27.9 FT ( 8.5 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 0 - UNKNOWN A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 0 - UNKNOWN B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 8 - UNKNOWN

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 0 - UNKNOWN C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 8 - UNKNOWN

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. B - OPEN, POSTING REQUIRED

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............3 TONS ( 2.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 0 - MORE THAN 39.9% BELOW LEGAL

LOADS (0 TONS)

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............6 TONS ( 5.4 METRIC TONS)

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 01/24/2022 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 3 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 17 42'58 96" N (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 20.8 FT ( 6.3 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 64 52 '59.45" W (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 28.8 FT ( 8.8 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 1 MI ( 2 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 22.5 FT ( 6.9 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............01 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... FT ( 0 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... FT ( 0 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... FT ( 0 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............400 (34) SKEW ANGLE:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2019 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................480 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 20.7 FT ( 6.3 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2029 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N - NOT APPLICABLE, NO WATERWAY RIGHT:.................................. 5 3 FT ( 1.6 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:...........1 - NAVIGATION PROTECTION NOT MATERIAL:........................... 4 - STEEL

REQUIRED

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2 83 FT ( 0 86 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

(58) DECK:....................................... 5 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............2 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:......................N

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 5 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 8 - STABLE FOR SCOUR CONDITIONS

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 0 0 0 (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: A - CRITICAL

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... 31 - REPLACEMENT - LOAD/GEOMETRY (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 10000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. 1 - WORK TO BE DONE BY CONTRACT (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 700000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

IT IS RECOMMENDED TO PERFORM INTERIM INSPECTIONS EVERY THREE MONTHS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FHWA LETTER DATED 02/02/2018.

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

$ 10000

$ 700000

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

Inspector: Mark Bostick Structure Number: STX702505

Inspection Date: 01/24/2022 Facility Carried: ROUTE 7025

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD MARKET STREET

PHOTO 4

Description WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 6

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH, SOUTH SPAN; NOTE SPALLING WITH

REBAR EXPOSURE ALONG BEAMS

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description CRACKING IN ASPHALT OVER SOUTH END OF BRIDGE

PHOTO 8

Description INCORRECT LAPPING OF WEST GUARDRAIL NEAR MID-LENGTH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description DAMAGE TO 2ND RAIL POST FROM NORTH OF EAST RAIL

PHOTO 10

Description DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG WEST CURBLINE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description IMPACT DAMAGE AT NORTH END OF EAST RAIL

PHOTO 12

Description WEIGHT LIMIT SIGNS AT SOUTH APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description DAMAGED TEMPORARY BARRIERS AT SOUTHWEST APPROACH

PHOTO 14

Description IMPACT DAMAGE TO SOUTHEAST APPROACH GUARDRAIL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description SPALLED AND BROKEN CONCRETE DITCH AT SOUTHWEST CORNER

PHOTO 16

Description MAP CRACKING IN SOUTH APPROACH PAVEMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description LANE RESTRICTION SIGN AT NORTH APPROACH

PHOTO 18

Description WEIGHT LIMIT SIGNS AT NORTH APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description IMPACT DAMAGE TO NORTHEAST APPROACH GUARDRAIL; NOTE BENT POSTS AND

DAMAGE TO CURB

PHOTO 20

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description DEBONDED AND BROKEN LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT ALONG WEST EXTERIOR OF

BEAM #1 ON SOUTH SPAN

PHOTO 22

Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON DECK UNDERSIDE AT BAY #1 ON SOUTH SPAN NEAR

PIER

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23

Description CRACKING AND SPALLING WITH REBAR EXPOSURE ON BEAM #2 ON SOUTH SPAN NEAR

SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 24

Description CRACKING AND SPALLING WITH REBAR EXPOSURE AT DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF BEAM #2

ON SOUTH SPAN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 25

Description GENERAL VIEW OF PIER, NORTH FACE

PHOTO 26

Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON DECK UNDERSIDE AT BAY #1 ON NORTH SPAN NEAR

PIER

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 27

Description CRACKING AND SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON BEAM #3 ON NORTH SPAN

PHOTO 28

Description BROKEN LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT ALONG EAST EXTERIOR BEAM #4 ON NORTH

SPAN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 29

Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON UNDERSIDE OF SIDEWALK SLAB

PHOTO 30

Description GAPS IN MORTAR IN NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AT UPSTREAM END

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 31

Description UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO 32

Description DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL; NOTE DISPLACED TEMPORARY BARRIERS IN CHANNEL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 33

Description DETERIORATION OF MORTAR ON MASONRY CHANNEL PROTECTION WALL AT SOUTH

CHANNEL WALL ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE

PHOTO 34

Description DETERIORATION OF MASONRY CHANNEL PROTECTION WALL AT NORTH CHANNEL WALL

ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE