SF30_SPE60016R07060005.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

See Block 14

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE SPE600 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SPE60016R0706

X

2016 MAR 25

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of OffersX is extended, X is not extended.

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning

DLA ENERGY

8725 JOHN J KINGMAN RD STE 4950

FT BELVOIR VA 22060-6222

USA

15C. DATE SIGNED 16C. DATE SIGNED

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

5/24/2016

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

See Attached Continuation Sheet(s).

(X)

CHECK ONE

PAGE OF PAGES

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

13. THIS APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE

PAGE 2 OF 10 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

SPE60016R0706-0005

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES OR COSTS

a. Amendment 0001 is revised as follows:

Block 9B is corrected to read 25 March 2016.

Block 3 is corrected to read 22 April 2016.

Provision B34.01 SERVICES TO BE FURNISHED AND PRICES (DLA ENERGY FEB 1991) is a re-print, and does not contain any revisions.

Reference to Clause E22 is deleted.

The Performance Work Statement (PWS) is a re-print, and does not contain any revisions.

b. Amendment 0002 is rescinded in its entirety.

c. Amendment 0003 is revised as follows:

Block 9B is corrected to read 25 March 2016.

Paragraph (1) is revised to read as follows:

The following clauses are incorporated by reference:

FAR 52.204-4 PRINTED OR COPIED DOUBLE-SIDED ON POSTCONSUMER FIBER

CONTENT PAPER (MAY 2011)

FAR 52.223-5 POLLUTION PREVENTION AND RIGHT-TO-KNOW INFORMATION (MAY

2011)

FAR 52.244-6 SUBCONTRACTS FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS (FEB 2016)

FAR 52.247-6 FINANCIAL STATEMENT (APR 1984)

The following provision is updated and included in full text:

E22 LIST OF INSPECTION OFFICES FOR DLA ENERGY CONTRACTS (DLA ENERGY APR 2016)

The following lists shall be used to identify the Government inspection office assigned inspection responsibility for DLA Energy contracts in a particular geographic area. These contracts include, but are not limited to, those for bulk petroleum products and additives, into-plane refueling, petroleum storage and laboratory services, coal, aerospace energy (including compressed gases), and posts, camps, and stations. The area of inspection responsibility and corresponding office code are assigned in paragraphs (a) and (b).

The address and phone number of each inspection office by office code is provided in paragraph (c). Unless a particular inspection office is identified in another part of the contract, the assignments in this contract provision shall apply.

AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY AND OFFICE CODES WITHIN THE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES (CONUS):

Alabama 110 Maine 110 Oklahoma 110 Arizona 120 Maryland 110 Oregon 120 Arkansas 110 Massachusetts 110 Pennsylvania 110 California 120 Michigan 110 Rhode Island 110 Colorado 120 Minnesota 110 South Carolina 110

PAGE 3 OF 10 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

Connecticut 110 Mississippi 110 South Dakota 110 Delaware 110 Missouri 110 Tennessee 110 District of Columbia 110 Montana 120 Texas 110 1

Florida 110 Nebraska 110 Utah 120 Georgia 110 Nevada 120 Vermont 110 Idaho 120 New Hampshire 110 Virginia 110 Illinois 110 New Jersey 110 Washington 120 Indiana 110 New Mexico 120 West Virginia 110 Iowa 110 New York 110 Wisconsin 110 Kansas 110 North Carolina 110 Wyoming 120 2

Kentucky 110 North Dakota 110 Louisiana 110 Ohio 110

EXCEPTIONS:

1 The El Paso, Texas, area is assigned to Code 120 (DLA Energy Americas – West).

2 The Newcastle, Wyoming, area is assigned to Code 110 (DLA Energy Americas – East).

AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY AND OFFICE CODES OUTSIDE THE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES (OCONUS)

(INCLUDING ALASKA AND HAWAII):

Afghanistan 400 Cyprus 200 Malaysia 300 Singapore 300 Africa 200 3 Egypt 4003 Maldives 300 South America 110 Alaska 300 Europe (Continental) 200 Malta 200 South Korea 300 Antarctica 300 Georgia 200 Mauritius 200 Sri Lanka 300 Armenia 200 Greenland 200 Mexico 110 Syria 400 Ascension Island 110 Hawaiian Islands 300 Midway Island 300 Taiwan 300 Australia 300 Hong Kong 300 Mongolia 300 Tajikistan 400 Azerbaijan 200 Iceland 200 Myanmar 300 Thailand 300 Azores 200 India 300 Nepal 300 Turkey 200 Bahrain 400 Indonesia 300 New Zealand 300 Turkmenistan 400 Bangladesh 300 Ireland 200 North Korea 300 United Arab Bermuda 110 Iran 400 Oman 400 Emirates 400 Bhutan 300 Iraq 400 Pacific Islands United Kingdom 200 Brunei 300 Israel 200 (Central & South) 300 Uzbekistan 400 Cambodia 300 Japan 300 Pakistan 400 Vietnam 300 Canada 110/120 4 Jordan 400 Papua New Guinea 300 Wake Island 300 Canary Island 200 Kazakhstan 400 Philippines 300 Yemen 400 Caribbean Islands 110 Kuwait 400 Qatar 400 Central America 110 Kyrgyzstan 400 Russia 200 Chagos Archipelago 300 Laos 300 Ryukus Islands, Japan 300 China 300 Lebanon 400 Saudi Arabia 400 Comoros 200 Madagascar 200 Seychelles Is. 200

EXCEPTIONS:

3 Except for Egypt, which is assigned to DLA Energy Middle East (Code 400), all other countries in Africa fall under DLA

Energy Europe (Code 200).

4 The provinces of Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, Newfoundland and Labrador, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Prince

Edward Island are assigned to DLA Energy Americas East (Code 110). The rest of Canada falls under DLA Energy Americas West (Code 120).

INSPECTION OFFICES AND CODES.

110. DLA Energy Americas East

PAGE 4 OF 10 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

ATTN: Quality Manager 5

Federal Building, Suite 1005 2320 LaBranch Street Houston, TX 77004-1091 Phone: (713) 750-9514/9561

FAX: (713) 750-0041

120. DLA Energy Americas West ATTN: Quality Manager 5

3171 N Gaffey Street San Pedro, CA 90731-1099 Phone: (310) 241-2806/2807

FAX: (310) 241-2836

200. DLA Energy Europe and Africa

Military Mailing Address:

DLA Energy Petroleum Lab ATTN: Quality Manager 5

CMR 422

APO AE 09067-0422

Phone: 49-631-3406-2285/2286 6

FAX: 49-631-3406-2289 6

Commercial Shipping Address:

DLA Energy Petroleum Lab ATTN: Quality Manager Bldg. 320, Rhine Ordinance Barracks Am Opelkreisel 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany

300. DLA Energy Pacific ATTN: Quality Manager 5

1025 Quincy Avenue, Building 479, Suite 2000 Pearl Harbor, HI 96860-4512 Phone: (808) 473-4307/4287

FAX: (808) 473-4232

400. DLA Energy Middle East ATTN: Quality Manager 5

PSC 851, Box 180

FPO AP 09834-2800

Phone: 973-1785-6493 6

FAX: 973-1785-4650 6

[Location: Bahrain]

5 Designated location of the DLA Energy Regional Quality Manager/Pre-Award Survey Monitor.

6 Dial 011 before these numbers when calling from the U.S. When calling these numbers from outside the U.S., use the appropriate international long distance prefix for the country where the call originates.

The following clause is included in full text:

PAGE 5 OF 10 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

FAR 52.247-2 PERMITS, AUTHORITIES, OR FRANCHISES (JAN 1997)

(a) The offeror does *, does not *, hold authorization from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) or other cognizant regulatory body. If authorization is held, it is as follows:

(Name of regulatory body)

(Authorization No.)

(b) The offeror shall furnish to the Government, if requested, copies of the authorization before moving the material under any contract awarded. In addition, the offeror shall, at the offeror’s expense, obtain and maintain any permits, franchises, licenses, and other authorities issued by State and local governments.

d. Amendment 0004 is revised as follows:

Block 3 is corrected to read 12 May 2016.

Block 9B is corrected to read 25 March 2016.

e. FAR 52.212-02 EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014) has hereby been revised to remove all Subfactors under Factor 2: Past performance. The revised provision is as follows:

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. This acquisition will be evaluated using the best value continuum tradeoff process in accordance with FAR 15.101-1 to select the contractor whose proposal represents the best overall value to the Government. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Factor 1: Technical Capability/Risk Subfactor 1: Readiness Plan Subfactor 2: Response and Sustainment Plan Subfactor 3: Equipment

Factor 2: Past Performance

Factor 3: Price

Factor 4: Socioeconomic Commitment

Offerors may submit offers for one or more zones; however, offers must include a unit price break down for all line items within each zone. Each delivery zone will be evaluated and awarded on a zone by zone basis.

Awardees may be awarded multiple zones.

PAGE 6 OF 10 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

The order of importance of Evaluation Factors/Subfactors (in descending order) are Technical Capability/Risk, Past Performance, Price, and Socioeconomic Commitment. Technical and past performance, when combined, are significantly more important than Price. Socioeconomic Commitment will be rated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis.

Factor 1: Technical Capability/Risk will be evaluated utilizing the following subfactors: Readiness Plan, Response and Sustainment Plan, and Equipment. Each subfactor will be rated independently.

Technical Capability/Risk Subfactors will be rated as follows:

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY/RISK EVALUATION RATINGS

Color Rating Description

Blue Outstanding Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses.

Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

Purple Good Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Green Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable.

Factor 2: Past Performance will be evaluated utilizing the following ratings. An overall confidence rating will be assigned for Past Performance.

The Government will review the offeror’s recent and relevant past performance. Recent past performance is defined as having occurred within three (3) years prior to the solicitation issuance date. Relevant past performance is defined as past performance that is similar in scope, complexity, and dollar value to the subject procurement. Past performance information submitted may include that for performance still in progress; however, it should have a minimum of one year performance history. The assessment of the offeror’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the offeror’s ability to meet the solicitation requirements. A record of poor performance may be considered an indication that the offeror has failed to conform to contract requirements and/or to standards of good workmanship, adhere to contract schedules, PAGE 7 OF 10 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

including the administrative aspects of performance; provide reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction; and/or display a business-like concern for the interests of the customer.

Offerors shall be afforded an opportunity to address adverse reports of past performance, and the offeror’s response, or lack thereof, will be taken into consideration. Recent contracts may be examined to ensure that corrective action measures have been put in place to prevent the recurrence of past performance problems.

Prompt actions taken to correct performance problems may be considered a reflection of management concern for customer satisfaction; however, such action may not mitigate all negative performance trends.

The Government reserves the right to consider any information available to it in evaluating an offeror’s past performance. This includes information obtained from the offeror’s references, past and present customers, subcontractors, and any other sources that may have useful information. However, the Government reserves the right not to contact all of the references listed by the offeror. The Government also reserves the right to assess the offeror’s past performance based solely on the offeror’s performance under an existing DLA Energy contract, or a previous DLA Energy contract for work similar to that required by the solicitation.

Past Performance will be rated as follows:

PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY RATINGS

COLOR RATING DESCRIPTION

Blue Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Purple Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Green Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Red Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

PAST PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE RATINGS

COLOR RATING DESCRIPTION

Blue Substantial Confidence

(SAC)

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Purple Satisfactory Confidence (STC) Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Green Limited Confidence (LIC) Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

PAGE 8 OF 10 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

Yellow No Confidence (NOC) Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Red Unknown Confidence (UNC) (Neutral) No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Factor 3: Price will be evaluated evaluate prices at the line item level per Delivery Zone by performing a price analysis in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b)(2). The evaluated price per Delivery Zone will be calculated by multiplying the estimated quantity for each line item by the offered unit price for each line item. The results of the price analysis will be incorporated into the Prenegotiation Briefing Memorandum

(PBM).

Offerors must offer on the entire quantity to be delivered, as listed for each line item, per Delivery Zone.

Offers for less than the entire requirement will not be considered for award.

With regard to evaluating the options, as stated in Solicitation Provision FAR 52.212-2, paragraph (b), the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement per Delivery Zone. The Government may determine that an offer may not be awarded if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the options.

Factor 4: Socioeconomic Commitment will be evaluated by reviewing the information submitted by potential vendors to evaluate their proposals demonstrating support of socioeconomic programs and small business concerns. DLAD Provision 52.215-9002 Socioeconomic Proposal defines the information each offeror is to submit and will be used for the evaluation of this Factor. Socioeconomic Commitment will be rated as follows:

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

f. Amendment 0005 does not extend the closing date of the solicitation per FAR 15.206(c) as its purpose is only for clarification purposes. Per FAR 15.307(b), offerors that remain in the competitive range

SOCIOECONOMIC COMMITMENT RATINGS

COLOR RATING DESCRIPTION

BLUE Acceptable Demonstrates their commitment to providing subcontracting opportunities to small businesses and HBCUs/MIs.

RED Unacceptable Does not demonstrate a commitment to providing subcontracting opportunities to small businesses and HBCUs/MIs.

PAGE 9 OF 10 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

will be given an opportunity to revise their proposals during negotiations and prior to request for Final Proposal Revisions.

PAGE 10 OF 10 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES OR COSTS