SF30_SPE60016R07000001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

See Block 14

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE SPE600 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SPE60016R0700

X

2015 DEC 03

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of OffersX is extended, is not extended.

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning

DLA ENERGY

8725 JOHN J KINGMAN RD STE 4950

FT BELVOIR VA 22060-6222

USA

15C. DATE SIGNED 16C. DATE SIGNED

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

See Attached Continuation Sheet(s).

(X)

CHECK ONE

PAGE OF PAGES

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

13. THIS APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE

The purpose of Amendment 0001 is to remove “Truck” for mode of transportation for Line Item 0005 and to revise the language of FAR 52.212-2 -- Evaluation -- Commercial Items (OCT 2014).

1. Reference Line Item 0005 – NAS Souda Bay on page 15 of 102. Truck mode is hereby deleted.

2. Reference FAR 52.212-2 -- Evaluation -- Commercial Items (OCT 2014) on page 97 of 102. FAR 52.212-2 is here by revised as follows:

52.212-2 -- Evaluation -- Commercial Items (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL ACCEPTABILITY

The following subfactors are equal in importance:

SUBFACTOR

1. Supplies or services and prices/costs, Section B

2. Description/specifications/statement of work, Section C

3. Inspection and acceptance, Section E

4. Deliveries or performance, Section F

Subfactors 1 – 4 will be rated either “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable.” These ratings are defined as follows:

ACCEPTABLE: The offeror’s proposal conforms to the Supplies or services and prices/costs in Section B, Description/specifications/statement of work in Section C, Inspection and acceptance in Section E, and Deliveries or performance in Section F.

UNACCEPTABLE: The offeror’s proposal does not conform to any one or more of the following requirements: the Supplies or services and prices/costs in Section B, Description/specifications/statement of work in Section C, Inspection and acceptance in Section E, and Deliveries or performance in Section F.

Proposals may be comprised of individual, independent offers, differentiated by product grade, shipping mode and/or FOB point. An individual offer within a proposal may be rated “Unacceptable,” while remaining offers within the same proposal may be rated “Acceptable.” A rating will be made for each individual offer within each proposal.

Each individual offer within a proposal must receive an “Acceptable” rating for every subfactor in order to be rated technically acceptable. If an individual offer within a proposal receives a rating of “Unacceptable” for one subfactor it will be rated technically unacceptable. Therefore, some individual offers within a proposal may be considered technically acceptable while other individual offers within the same proposal may be considered technically unacceptable.

An offeror that proposes an exception to any of the requirements of the solicitation, as related to the aforementioned subfactors, will be reviewed to determine whether the fuel will meet the Government’s specification and delivery requirements, can physically be accepted, and not compromise fuel quality. If so, an offer containing the exception will also be technically acceptable. Programmatic exceptions are addressed to all offerors via amendment. Likewise, a rating may be made “Acceptable” if an offeror corrects, or the Government accepts by reason of exception, any subfactors previously rated “Unacceptable” by the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB).

The Contract Team is responsible for addressing “Unacceptable” ratings, questions, clarifications, and/or

PAGE 2 OF 5 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

SPE60016R0700-0001

comments posed by Technical Team members and relative to each offeror’s proposal, during negotiations. All offerors will have an opportunity to make revisions to submitted proposals during negotiations and to submit a final proposal revision unless the offeror should choose to withdraw before the time final proposal revisions are requested.

FACTOR 2: PRICE

Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment (EPA) contracts will result from this solicitation. The Contract Team will evaluate proposals for pricing purposes in accordance with FAR 52.212-2 – EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014). The lowest price is defined as the lowest laid-down price, to include transportation costs as determined by the Bid Evaluation Model (BEM) which will provide the basis to make awards. The BEM is a computer evaluation model which analyzes numerous variables. These variables include the offeror’s proposed prices, fuel types, minimum and maximum award quantities, shipping locations, shipment mode capabilities, minimum and maximum cargo sizes, customer receipt locations, and receipt mode capabilities. Transportation rates will be included for tanker, barge, pipeline, and tank truck transportation modes in accordance with M-0006/M41.02 EVALUATION OF OFFERS (OTHER THAN OFFERS INVOLVING F.O.B.

TANKER LOADING) – TRANSPORATION RATESAND RELATED COSTS) (DLA ENERGY JUL 1991)

and M-0007/M41.04 EVALUATION OF OFFERS - TRANSPORTATION RATES AND RELATED COSTS (BULK) (DLA ENERGY JUL 2010).

Government additive costs will be used to evaluate, where applicable, proposals of product not fully additized at the loading facility, but instead are additized/injected in route to a facility or customer location.

The BEM will calculate the overall pattern of delivery of fuel from contractor facilities to specific customer locations that represents the lowest total combination of price for product and transportation.

REVIEW OF INITIAL PROPOSALS

All proposals received in response to the solicitation will be reviewed and evaluated in accordance with this plan. Proposal prices will be redacted in the documents provided to the technical team. Each proposal received will be evaluated solely against the requirements set forth in the solicitation. A proposal will not be compared relative to another proposal received or to requirements that are not in the solicitation.

The Government’s objective is to ensure that contracts are awarded to responsible offerors who have the ability to perform a contract under this solicitation and which also represents the overall best value to the Government based on technical acceptability and price.

After all SSEB evaluators have completed their independent evaluations, they will confer as a group under the direction of the SSEB Chairperson via email, teleconferences, and/or face-to-face meeting. Once discussions are complete, the SSEB Chairperson will prepare a written consensus report that rates each proposal against the evaluation criteria for each factor to determine an overall rating for each proposal. Included in the consensus report will be a narrative summary containing a technical analysis that justifies the rating for each evaluation criteria and the justification for the overall rating given to each proposal.

After each proposal has been evaluated, discussions will be held with each offeror within the competitive range. All offerors will have an opportunity to make revisions to submitted proposal during negotiations and to submit a final proposal revision unless the offeror should choose to withdraw before the time final proposal revisions are requested.

REVIEW OF FINAL PROPOSALS

DLA Energy will request offeror submission of Interim Proposal Revisions (IPRs) before the conclusion of negotiations. IPRs will be entered into the BEM and evaluated. Each offeror will be provided with two documents generated from the BEM: the Minimum Cost Bid Evaluation Worksheet (MCBEW) and the Laid-Down Cost Report (LCR), as follows:

PAGE 3 OF 5 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

- The MCBEW will provide detailed information on how an offer is evaluated to each demand location. Details such as product, price, method of delivery for each leg of the route, transportation and additive costs, and any applicable evaluation factors are included, and the ‘final laid in price’ is identified for each location.

This information will be generated separately for each offeror, and each offeror will receive only the information applicable to their offer.

- The LCR will provide information on the award price at each demand location. The report is limited to providing the solicitation line item, location, quantity awarded, and ‘laid in price’ for quantity awarded. In this instance, the laid in price is the aggregate price including product, additive, transportation and any evaluation factor costs. No information concerning apparently successful offer, shipping point, or product routing is included.

- Offerors will be given time to review the MCBEW and LCR, after which DLA Energy will close negotiations and call for Final Proposal Revisions (FPRs). FPRs will be entered into the BEM and evaluated. Offerors will be provided with updated copies of the MCBEW and LCR.

REVERSE AUCTION

Offerors will then be given an opportunity to provide a further discount using the Reverse Auction (RA) Procurex tool. All offerors will be entered in the RA. No further action is required for offerors that choose not to offer a price discount during the RA. Any offeror that does participate will enter a discount price in the RA. The discount price will be offered by product and region, rather than specific line item. For example, a discount may be offered for all JA1 in the Atlantic/Europe/Mediterranean region. This discount will be offered from a notional price (e.g., $1.00), and not from an actual offer price.

The Contracting Officer will establish an RA bid line for each product and region. Each bid line will have a notional price established. This notional price is the price against which vendors will offer their discounts.

The minimum decrement for bids will be $0.00001. At the conclusion of the RA, the lowest discount price offered by each vendor will be recorded. This discount will be applied to the price offered at time of FPRs, and the BEM will be run to determine the award pattern with any discounts offered during the RA. A mock RA will be held to allow all offerors to become familiar with the process before the actual RA is conducted.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

3. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

PAGE 4 OF 5 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

Section B

PAGE 5 OF 5 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED: