Attachment_8_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire-Scotia_Depot_Equipt_Maint.pdf

ATTACHMENT 8—PAST PERFORMANCE

QUESTIONNAIRE

DEPOT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE - SCOTIA NY

SP8000-18-Q-0005 Page 1 of 4

This questionnaire is intended to provide basic information to the Government regarding a Contractor/Company’s past performance on similar projects/services/contracts they have been awarded and the satisfaction with the performance. Submit the completed questionnaire with your proposal.

Please provide the following information:

A. Reference/Contractor Name: ___________________________________________________ B. Project Name/Contract number: _________________________________________________ C. Period of Performance: ________________________________________________________ D. Total Contract Amount (Including any Options): ___________________________________ E. Describe services performed: ___________________________________________________

Point of Contact if the Government requires clarification on information filled out in this questionnaire: (name, title, organization, address, email and phone):

Evaluator’s experience with this Contractor/Company (evaluator is the person filling out this questionnaire):

Evaluator name: ______________________________________________ Evaluator title: ________________________________________________ Evaluator organization: __________________________________________

When answering the questions below, please consider previous experiences with the Company/Contractor you have undergone; please use the rating system on Page 3:

1) Please give a brief description of the project/services stated above?

Was the project/services completed successfully?

Depot Equipment Maintenance, Scotia NY Past Performance Questionnaire

SP8000-18-Q-0005 Page 2 of 4

SP8000-18-Q-0005 Page 3 of 4

2) How would you rate this company’s performance (use the ratings on Page 3):

E VG S M U N

Please add additional comments below.

3) How organized was the contractor/company throughout the project/services?

(use the ratings on Page 3): E VG S M U N Please add additional comments below.

4) Would you recommend this company to others for other projects/services? Yes or No.

Please add additional comments below.

5) Please include any additional comments below that will assist in the evaluation of the technical competence and reliability of this questionnaire.

SP8000-18-Q-0005 Page 4 of 4

Rating Definition Notes

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/User’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element assessed is accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor is highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/User. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. In addition, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government/User’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element assessed is accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor are effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performs a significant event that is a benefit to the Government/User.

There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or are satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there are only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovers from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DoD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or are not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurs that the contractor has trouble overcoming which impacts the Government/User.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or are ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occur that the contractor has trouble overcoming and which impacts the Government/User. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable No information or do not apply. Rating is neither positive nor negative.