Solicitation STEP 1 - W9128F25BA002.pdf
PDF 6 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Fort Peck PH 1 Surge Tank Roof Replacement
- Solicitation number
- W9128F25BA002
About this file
This document is a federal solicitation (Invitation for Bid W9128F25BA002) for the Fort Peck Powerhouse #1 Surge Tank Roof Replacement project, issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District. The project involves a historical restoration of the surge tank roof, constructed in the 1940s, using a two-step sealed bidding process that requires contractors to first submit technical proposals without pricing information. The restoration involves completely removing existing roofing layers and replacing them with new Ludowici clay tiles matching the original materials, while preserving the historical integrity of the structure.
The project is located at Fort Peck Dam in Montana, with a roof spanning 40 feet in diameter and situated 272.48 feet above grade. The estimated construction magnitude is between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000. Key requirements include compliance with Montana State Historical Preservation Office regulations, replacing clay tiles, copper flashings, and potentially the asphaltic waterproofing. The contract is set aside for 100% small businesses, with a performance period of 650 calendar days from the notice to proceed. Contractors must submit technical proposals by 05 June 2025 at 2:00 PM Central Time, with a site visit scheduled to provide additional project details.
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
(See ).
SOLICITATION, OFFER,
AND AWARD
(Construction, Alteration, or Repair) IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.
9. FOR
INFORMATION CALL:
NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid and "bidder".
SOLICITATION
1. SOLICITATION NUMBER
5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER
CODE
6. PROJECT NUMBER
8. ADDRESS OFFER TO
4. CONTRACT NUMBER
7. ISSUED BY
10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying number, date)
11. The contractor shall begin performance within
12a. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?
(If "YES", indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12b.)
13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:
a. Sealed offers in original and
b. An offer guarantee
c. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.
d. Offers providing less than
STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 12/2022)
Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(d) calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.
is, is not required.
local time containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.
(date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers will be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by (hour) award, YES NO notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory negotiable.
calendar days and complete it within calendar days after receiving
a. NAME b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)
12b. CALENDAR DAYS
2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION
SEALED BID (IFB)
INVITATION FOR BID
NEGOTIATED (RFP)
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
3. DATE ISSUED PAGE OF PAGES
Created On:
06 May 2025, 14:45 PM Central Daylight Time
AWARD (To be completed by Government)
17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted calendar days after the date offers are due. (Insert any number equal to or greater than the minimum requirement by the Government in writing within stated in Item 13d. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13d.)
OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror)
AMOUNTS
18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.
19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS
(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)
AMENDMENT
NUMBER
DATE
CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE
14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code)
CODE FACILITY CODE
15. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code)
16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if different than Item 14.)
20a. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER (Type or print)
21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:
22. AMOUNT
26. ADMINISTERED BY
30a. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN (Type or print)
31c. DATE
STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 12/2022) BACK
31b. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BY
31a. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual document is necessary.
30b. SIGNATURE 30c. DATE
28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT (Contractor is required to sign this document and return and deliver all items or perform all work requirements identified on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be governed by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.
copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees to furnish
24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN
(4 copies unless otherwise specified)
23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
ITEM
25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO THE UNITED STATES
CODE AT
27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY
10 U.S.C. 3204(a) ( ) 41 U.S.C. 3304(a) ( )
20b. SIGNATURE 20c. OFFER DATE
Section 00 00 00 - Procurement and Contracting Requirements
FP PH1 Surge Tank Roof Replacement
W9128F25BA002
Section 00 01 15 - List of Drawing Sheets
Identifier Attachment Name
Attachment Description Reference Identifier
Date Line Item
# Of Pages
Provided Under Separate Cover
Attachment A - Past Performance Questionnaire
Form PPQ-0
Attachment A
- Past Performance Questionnaire
21 Feb
6 No
Attachment B -
MT20250057
March 14, 2025
Wage Determination
Attachment B
MT20250057
March 14, 26 Mar
No
Attachment C - Antiterrorism -
AT-OPSEC
Form 6055
Antiterrorism AT-OPSEC Form
Attachment C Antiterrorism
- AT-OPSEC
Form 6055
26 Mar
No
Attachment D - DRAFT - Bid Schedule-FP PH1 Surge Tank Roof
Attachment D - DRAFT Only - Bid Schedule FP PH1 Surge Tank Roof
Attachment D
- DRAFT
Only - Bid Schedule-FP PH1 Surge Tank Roof
27 Mar
No
Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation, Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) Schedule
Additional Information/Notes
Item Supplies/Service Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount
Only Accepting Step-One "Technical Criteria" for FP PH1 Surge Tank Roof. Attachment D - Bid Schedule is only a DRAFT version of the Bid Schedule that is subject to change at the time of Step-Two of the Two-Step IFB. Please DO NOT fill out the Bid Schedule.
Pricing Arrangement: Firm Fixed Price
1 Job
Section 00 21 00 - Instructions
SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS
Two-Step IFB (Step-One)
1. OVERVIEW
a. This is a for the Surge Tank Roof Replacement Project at Fort Peck Dam, SD. "Two-Step Sealed Bid Invitation for Bid" The Contracting Officer will award one (1) firm fixed-price construction contract to the responsive and responsible bidder whom the Government determines to have an acceptable technical proposal, conforms to the solicitation Step-One requirements, is fair and reasonable, and bids the lowest overall price in . Step-Two
b. The Request for Technical Proposals is issued within approximately 95% complete sufficiently descriptive Step-One technical specifications and construction drawings. The information contained in on the Government Step-One is not binding and the actual delivery or performance requirements will be contained in the invitation issued under . The 95% Step-Two specifications and drawings are not final or to be used for construction. Only those firms determined to be technically acceptable during will be issued the 100% final technical specifications during . Step-One Step-Two
c. The procedure is a combination of competitive procedures designed to obtain the benefits of a Two-Step Sealed Bidding sealed bidding while ensuring only technically acceptable firms participate in the priced sealed bid. The process allows for the technical proposal submission and evaluation to be performed concurrent with the development of the final 100% Step-One technical specifications and construction drawings. ensures that only technically acceptable firms participate in the Step-One
, the sealed bid process.Step-Two
d. under this process consists of the request for, submission of, evaluation and (if necessary) discussion of a technical Step-One proposal. Only one technical proposal may be submitted by each Offeror. The proposals are evaluated for technical acceptability.
The Step-One technical proposal must not include prices or pricing information.
e. In , Offerors must submit technical proposals that are complete and acceptable without the need for additional Step-One explanation or information. The Government may make a final determination regarding a proposal's acceptability solely on the basis of the proposal as submitted. The Government may proceed with Step-Two without requesting further information from any Offeror; however, the Government may request additional information from, or enter into discussions with, the Offerors of proposals that are determined to be reasonably susceptible of being made acceptable. Discussions will only be held if necessary, and if determined to be in the best interest of the Government.
f. A notice of "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" will be forwarded to each Offeror upon completion of the technical Step-One proposal evaluation and final determination. The names of the Offerors that submitted acceptable technical proposals will be listed on the Government's https://sam.gov website for the benefit of prospective subcontractors.
g. In , an amendment with the final 100% technical specifications and construction drawings will be issued to Step-Two only The normal sealed bidding process those Offerors whose technical proposals are determined to be acceptable in Step-One.
in FAR Part 14 will be followed. In Step-Two, only bids based upon technical proposals determined to be acceptable, Each bid submitted in Step-Two must be based on either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award.
the bidder's own technical proposal that was submitted, evaluated, and determined to be acceptable in . Bidders must Step-One comply with the 100% technical specifications and construction drawings and the bidder's acceptable technical proposal.
h. Contractor Team Arrangements are considered an arrangement in which (1) two or more companies form a partnership or joint venture to act as a potential prime contractor; or (2) a potential prime contractor agrees with one (1) or more other companies to have them act as its subcontractors under a specified Government contract or acquisition program. The Government will recognize the integrity and validity of Contractor Team Arrangements provided the arrangements are identified and company relationships are fully disclosed in an offer or, for arrangements entered into after submission of an offer before the arrangement becomes effective. The Government will not normally require or encourage the dissolution of Contractor Team Arrangements. The Offeror must identify the major or critical aspects of the requirement to be performed by those identified in the Contractor Team Arrangement.
i. Any Offeror submitting an offer in the name of a Joint Venture a fully executed copy of the Joint Venture must include Agreement with the offer. Joint Venture Agreements which require SBA approval may be submitted absent the requisite SBA Servicing Agency approving authorities' signature; however, the Offeror shall submit evidence from the Offeror's SBA
Servicing Agency that the Offeror has notified and discussed the proposed Joint Venture for this project with the appropriate SBA personnel.
2. STEP-ONE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
All Offerors are required to submit a technical proposal with the minimum content as specified herein. Proposals without the minimum content will be rated other than "Acceptable". Technical Proposals shall be emailed to the below Step-One individuals no later than the date and time established in Block 13 of the Standard Form (SF) 1442, or Block 14 of the most recent SF 30, as applicable:
Contracting Officer: Daniel Monahan at Daniel.D.Monahan@usace.army.mil
Contracting Specialist: Lynne Reed at Lynne.D.Reed@usace.army.mil
Each email shall contain the following information:
a. Solicitation No: W9128F25BA002
b. Bid Due Date and Time: [Block 13 of the SF 1442 or Block 14 of the most recent SF 30, as applicable]
c. Bid Validity Date: 60 Days
Proposals received after the date and time stated within Block 13 of the SF 1442 or Block 14 of the most recent SF 30, as To avoid rejection of a proposal, the Offeror must applicable, will be considered late and will not be considered for award.
ensure the e-mail submission is virus-free. The Government will follow FAR 14.406 if an e-mail bid is unreadable.
Offerors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) when sending the submission to comply with the annual representations and certifications requirements. The Offeror certifies with its offer that the representations and certifications included in SAM are current, accurate, and complete.
3. STEP-ONE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FORMAT REQUIREMENTS
Submit the Step-One technical proposal via email in PDF format and Optical Character Recognition (OCR)* compatible and word searchable. Each section must be clearly labeled by solicitation number, project name, and Offeror's name.
*OCR is a common method of digitizing printed texts so that they can be electronically searched, stored more compactly, displayed on-line, and used in machine processes such as machine translation, text-to-speech, key data extraction and text mining.
Submitted files should be named according to the following format: SOLICITATION NUMBER COMPANY NAME Technical Proposal # of #. Offerors should separate files over 20 megabytes (MB) into smaller files and send separate e-mails. Offerors shall identify each e-mail with the number relative to the total number of e-mails submitted (i.e., "e-mail 1 of 4"). Offerors should request Government receipt upon sending all e-mails. Offerors should not assume e-mail submissions are instantaneous and must consider file size and number of files sent. Offerors should send email submissions at least 1 hour early to ensure delivery and may send test e-mails to USACE the day before bid opening.
Technical proposals will be organized with a table of contents as follows:
- Solicitation number; Name, address, email, and telephone number of the Offeror; Names, titles, emails, COVER LETTER and telephone numbers of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror's behalf with the Government in connection with this IFB. Name, title and signature of the person authorized to sign the proposal.
A statement specifying agreement with all terms, conditions and provisions included in the IFB CAGE Code and UEID number for the Offeror, and all teaming partners and / or Joint Ventures.
The inclusion of any exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation in the technical proposal, or the inclusion of Note:
any other terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in a determination that the proposal is unacceptable and thus ineligible for award. Resolve questions about the terms and conditions or technical requirements of the solicitation prior to submission of the proposal.
- Standard Form 1442, completed and signed by authorized individual(s) of the Offeror, include the Offeror's UEID TAB A number in Block 14.
Acknowledgement of all amendments to the IFB in accordance with the instructions on the Standard Form 30
(amendment form).
- Section 00 45 00 - Representations and Certifications, Printed Entity Record from the online System for Award TAB B
Management (SAM) database.
- Teaming & Joint Venture Arrangements: Offers submitting proposals using a teaming arrangement shall submit a fully TAB C executed copy of the teaming arrangement signed both by the subcontractor/teaming partner and the Offeror and the narrative described in Section 00 21 00 paragraph 1.h above. If a teaming arrangement is not fully executed by all parties and provided with the Proposal, team member submission material will not be evaluated or considered.
Offers submitted in the name of a Joint Venture must be signed in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the joint venture agreement as evidenced in the proposal, including letters of commitment from the joint venture firms. See Section 00 21 00 paragraph 1.i above.
TAB D - All submission requirements for Factor 1: Prior Experience in Relevant Projects
- All submission requirements for Factor 2: Past PerformanceTAB E
4. STEP-ONE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL INQUIRIES AND QUESTIONS
Technical inquiries and questions relating to this solicitation shall be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at https://www.
projnet.org. To submit and review inquiry items, prospective Offerors will need to use the Bidder Inquiry Key presented below and follow the instructions listed below the key for access. A prospective Offeror who submits a comment /question will receive an acknowledgement of their comment/question via email. Another email to the same address will notify the prospective Offeror once the reply is available for viewing.
Offerors shall only submit one (1) question per inquiry. All inquiries containing multiple questions may be Please Note:
rejected. Please review all previous inquiries to limit redundant inquiries.
The Project ID is: 519193 - FP00103 Project Name: FP POWERHOUSE 1 REPAIRS Bidder Inquiry Key: GJX92Z-8TU5I6
Instructions for first-time ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access:
a. From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.
b. Identify the Agency. Select agency USACE.
c. Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.
d. Email. Enter the email address you would like to use for communication.
e. Click Continue. A page will then open saying that a user account was not found and will ask you to create one using the provided form.
f. Enter your First Name, Last Name, Company, City, State, Phone, Email, Secret Question, Secret Answer, and Time Zone.
Make sure to remember your Secret Question and Answer as they will be used from this point on to access the ProjNet system.
g. Click Add User. Once this is completed you are now registered within ProjNet and are currently logged into the system.
Instructions for future ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access:
a. For future access to ProjNet, you will not be provided any type of password. You will utilize your Secret Question and Secret Answer to log in.
b. From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.
c. Identify the Agency. Select agency USACE.
d. Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.
e. Email. Enter the email address you used to register previously in ProjNet.
f. Click Continue. A page will then open asking you to enter the answer to your Secret Question.
g. Enter your Secret Answer and click Login. Once this is completed you are now logged into the system.
in order to The Bidder Inquiry System will be unavailable for new inquiries 10 calendar days before proposal due date ensure adequate time is allotted to form an appropriate response to inquiries and amend the solicitation if necessary.
Proposing firms are requested to review the specification in its entirety and review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.
The ProjNet call center operates weekdays from 8AM to 5PM U.S. Central Time Zone (Chicago) or by appointment for OCONUS. The telephone number for the Call Center is 1-800-428-HELP. Email to staff@rcesupport.com.
5. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD
In accordance with the requirements of Part 9 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), no contract shall be entered into unless the Contracting Officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met. This includes the FAR requirement that no award will be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective prime contractor must meet the general standards in FAR Part 9 and any special standards set forth in the solicitation.
6. STEP-ONE REQUEST FOR TECHNICAL PROPOSALS EVALUATION
The Government will evaluate each Offeror's technical proposal based on how well the proposal addresses each of the evaluation factors listed below. Each of the evaluation factors will be evaluated by the Government and either an "Acceptable", "Unacceptable" or "Reasonably Susceptible of Being Made Acceptable" rating will be determined by consensus of the Government evaluation board. There are no relative weights assigned to the factors. A Step-One acceptable technical proposal must be rated "Acceptable" for all evaluation factors in order to receive an overall "Acceptable" technical proposal rating.
General Technical Proposal and Evaluation Information:
a. The evaluation will be conducted in accordance with FAR Subpart 14.5, Two-Step Sealed Bidding. For this procurement, only one (1) technical proposal may be submitted by each Offeror. The proposal must be complete without the need of additional explanation or information. The Government may proceed with Step-Two without requesting further information from any Offeror; however, the Government may request additional information from Offerors of proposals that it considers "Reasonably Susceptible of Being Made Acceptable."
b. Technical Proposals will be rated at the factor level. If any factor is determined to be "Unacceptable", the entire proposal
A technical proposal may be determined to be "Reasonably Susceptible of Being Made will be determined "Unacceptable".
Acceptable", and therefore eligible for discussions. However, a proposal with a factor that is determined to be "Unacceptable" will be eliminated from further consideration.
c. Technical proposals which do not provide the specified information in the specified location in accordance with the submission instructions may be rated other than "Acceptable". The Government is under no obligation to search for
If an Offeror submits alternate proposal elements that are not requested, the information that is not in the specified locations.
information will not be evaluated.
d. In general, example projects or experience that the Government does not consider relevant for the purposes of evaluating experience will not be considered as a part of the minimum project requirement.
e. The degree of acceptability to the Government inherent in the content of the Offeror's technical proposal will be a consideration under every evaluation factor.
f. If discussions are held with Offerors whose proposals are considered "reasonably susceptible of being made acceptable" and a request for proposal revisions are requested, the revised proposal will be re-evaluated in accordance with the criteria in the solicitation. After completion of discussions and evaluation of any revised proposals, the proposal will be determined as "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable". If determined "Unacceptable", a notice of unacceptability will be forwarded to the Offeror upon completion of the proposal's evaluation.
g. Any proposal which modifies or fails to conform to the essential requirements or specifications of the request for technical proposals will be considered nonresponsive and categorized as "Unacceptable".
h. The Offeror's conformance with the specified format and submission requirements will be considered during the technical evaluation. Failure to comply with the formatting and/or submission requirements may be seen as indicative of the type of problems that could be expected during contract performance. Lack of conformance and material omission(s) may cause the technical proposal to be rejected as "Unacceptable".
i. The Step-One submission instructions are written to give prospective Offerors, where feasible, an indication of the level of detail desired by the Government. The Offeror's failure to include information that the Government has indicated must be included will result in the proposal being found other than "Acceptable" if inadequate detail is provided.
j. The Do not include exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation in the technical proposal submissions.
inclusion of any terms and conditions in the proposals that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in a determination that the proposal/bid is "Unacceptable" and thus ineligible to bid in Step-Two. Resolve questions about the terms and conditions or technical requirements of the solicitation prior to submission of the proposal/bid; see "Proposal Inquiries and Questions", located above in Section 00 21 00.
k. . Each factor will be given one of the ratings identified and defined as follows: Factor Ratings
FACTOR 1
RATING
(Prior Experience in Relevant Projects)
DEFINITION
Acceptable The proposal meets the requirements of the Step-One request for technical proposal and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements.
Reasonably Susceptible of Being Made Acceptable
(Note: This rating is not used for the overall technical proposal rating)
The proposal, as proposed, cannot be rated as Acceptable because of error(s), omissions(s) or deficiency(ies) which are capable of being corrected without a major rewrite or revision of the proposal.
Unacceptable The proposal does not meet the requirements of the Step-One request for technical proposal.
FACTOR 2
(Past Performance)
DEFINITION
Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the Step-One request for technical proposal, and based on the Offeror's performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror's performance record is unknown.
Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the Step-One request for technical proposal, and / or based on the Offeror's performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
FACTOR 3
((Past Performance)
DEFINITION
Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the Step-One request for technical proposal, and based on the Offeror's performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror's performance record is unknown.
Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the Step-One request for technical proposal, and / or based on the Offeror's performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Submission Requirements and Evaluation Criteria for the Technical Proposal
The information provided in this section will be used in evaluating the Offeror's specialized technical experience specific to this solicitation.
Factor 1 - Prior Experience in Relevant Projects
Submission Requirements:
Submit example projects that best illustrate the Offeror's experience on projects of similar scope, complexity, and size three (3) as the Fort Peck Surge Tank Roof project. If more than three (3) projects are submitted, only the first three (3) will be evaluated.
Submitted projects must have been completed or substantially completed within the past 10 years. Each submitted project shall be limited to two (2) pages. Additional pages beyond the limit may not be evaluated.
Multiple Award Task Order Contracts (MATOCs) or any other type of task-order contracts that provide for the issuance of task orders for the performance of tasks be considered projects for the purposes of this evaluation. Only individual task will not orders issued under such contracts will be evaluated as projects. However, a phased project using phased task orders for a single customer with multiple inter-dependent facilities on a single site may be considered a project for the purposes of this evaluation.
Project descriptions that do not clearly describe the proposing firm's or team member's experience, the scope of the project, or the periods of project performance will not be considered.
The following information is required for each submitted example project:
a. Project Title
b. Location
c. Contract Number
d. Type of Contract: Indicate Firm Fixed Price; Cost Plus Fixed Fee; etc.
e. Total Dollar Amount at Award and Completion: Total amount of the proposing firm's contract or subcontract (if a key subcontractor)
f. Project Delivery Method: Indicate Design/Bid/Build; Design/Build; Integrated Design; Design Only; etc.
g. Role of Proposing Firm: Prime contractor or key subcontractor. If a subcontractor, state who is the prime contractor. State if the example project represents a Joint Venture. If a Joint Venture, name the Joint Venture's parties. Indicate type of work and percentage of work performed by the parties.
h. Brief Description of Project: Provide a narrative with details about the proposing firm's role and the relevancy to this project.
i. Project Relevancy: Address any relevancy of the submitted project using, at a minimum, the relevancy criteria below
j. Construction Start and Completion Dates: Project construction must be identified as complete or substantially complete. If a proposing firm presents a project that is substantially complete, the proposal must include an explanation of why that project should be considered.
k. Customer / End User's Primary Point of Contact: Name, relationship to project, agency/firm, phone number, and e-mail address. The Government may contact and interview project references. Reference information will not be revealed to other parties.
l. Procuring Activity Point of Contact: Name, relationship to project, agency/firm, phone number, and e-mail address. The Government may contact and interview project references. Reference information will not be revealed to other parties.
Evaluation Criteria:
The Government will evaluate each submitted project's extent of recent and relevant experience compared to this project's size, scope of work, and performance requirements. The Government will categorize the proposal with one (1) combined technical evaluation for this factor.
is a project that is complete or substantially complete within 10 years of this request for technical proposal A recent project issue date. If a proposing firm submits a project as substantially complete within the 10-year period, the proposal must include an explanation why that project should be considered substantially complete.
based on how closely they align with this project's requirements, including its scope and The relevancy of submitted projects complexity. Offerors should identify past performance and highlight how their relevant experience can reasonably translate to the work outlined below.
a. Technical Requirements:
1) Demonstrate the ability to work safely on roofing projects at significant heights (approximately Elevated Roofing Work:
250 feet), including consideration of appropriate safety measures and access methods.
2) Provide certification or identify a certified subcontractor for the safe removal and disposal of Asbestos Mitigation:
asbestos-containing materials.
3) Demonstrate experience or provide a general outline of experience or approach for removing and Clay Tile Roofing:
installing clay tile roofing systems using commonly accepted fastening methods.
4) Describe the general capability to work on roofing systems involving precast concrete panels, Precast Concrete Panels:
including basic methods to ensure secure attachment and maintain overall structural integrity.
b. The total cost of one (1) of the projects must be valued at more than $250,000.00.
Minimum Acceptability Criteria:
A firm's acceptable proposal for this factor must include:
a. examples that meet both the recency and relevancy requirements above. Three (3) project
The project descriptions and relevancy narratives must clearly articulate the relevancy in sufficient detail to determine technical capability. The more similarities an example project has with the prospective contract, the greater the degree of relevancy.
Factor 2 - Past Performance
Submission Requirements:
Submit past performance information on each project submitted for Factor 1. DO NOT provide Past Performance references for projects other than those project examples provided for Factor 1. The quantity of projects submitted for this factor is the same as the quantity of projects submitted for the Factor 1 submission requirements, three (3).
is provided for the offering firms to submit to the client of each The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment A) project the offering firm includes in its submission requirements for Factor 1. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client's point of contact. The completed PPQs should be submitted with the Step-One technical proposals. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Lynne Reed at and via email prior to the Step-Lynne.D.Reed@usace.army.mil Daniel Monahan at Daniel.D.Monahan@usace.army.mil One technical proposal closing date and time. Previously completed PPQs are acceptable.
Note: If any of the projects are Government contracts with a completed CPARS, please only complete blocks 1 through 5 of the PPQ form (Attachment A) and attach it to the front of the CPARS rating. Be sure to include the POC's information of the client and the contract number of the project.
The past performance evaluation assesses the degree of confidence the Government has in an Offeror's ability to supply products and services outlined in the Step-One IFB requirements based on the offeror's demonstrated record of performance. There are three (3) aspects to the evaluation which are recency, relevancy, and quality. The Government will at a minimum, evaluate the successful performance of all project examples submitted for Factor 1 and categorize the proposal with one (1) combined evaluation for this factor.
The burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the proposing firm. If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, the Government will only evaluate past performance of the division or unit submitting the offer or of the team member. The prime contractor will be rated on its own performance. A prime contractor may not establish past performance based on the past performance of its proposed key personnel, apart from that of the entity.
In accordance with FAR 15.305 and DFARS 215.305, the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor's performance will be considered. However, the comparative assessment in FAR 15.305(a)(2)(i) does not apply. Therefore, past performance will be rated on an "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" basis only.
In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror will be determined to have unknown (or "neutral") past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating will be considered "Acceptable."
The Government may also review past performance information from any sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Contractor Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) or other databases using all CAGE/UEID numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the Offeror's proposal; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining Officials; and the Defense Contract Management Agency. The Government reserves the right to check any or all cited references to verify supplied information and to assess owner satisfaction. The evaluation may consider the number and severity of problems, the demonstrated effectiveness of corrective actions taken, and the overall work record.
Minimum Acceptability Criteria:
Past performance information must be submitted for each of the three (3) projects submitted for Factor 1.
A proposing firm demonstrates acceptable past performance by meeting the minimum submission and past performance solicitation requirements and based on the Offeror's satisfactory or higher performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully supply products and services that meet all the requirements of this solicitation's plans and specifications.
FACTOR 3 - TECHNICAL APPROACH
Submission Requirements:
The Offeror shall provide a comprehensive Project Management Plan (PMP) developed specifically for this project, for evaluation purposes only, to verify Offeror's experience in understanding project scope, submittal schedules, equipment procurement and delivery, offsite fabrication and repair, key milestones and contract required schedule constraints. For proposal evaluation purposes only, the Offeror should use an arbitrary, non-binding Notice to Proceed (NTP) date of 1 July 2025. The PMP shall be limited to no more than 25 pages; therefore, any content beyond page 25 will not be evaluated.
The PMP should include an explanation of the management approach for the design/construction team, clearly showing how the prime contractor will manage the construction of the project to ensure a well-coordinated quality product, completed on time and with a minimum amount of contract modifications. The management approach should include address the interaction between the designers, construction prime and subcontractors during the design phase and construction phases of the project, including controls and revisions to the accepted design, requests for information, and shop drawings/submittal reviews. At a minimum, the PMP shall address the activities outlined below in the areas of Management Approach, Schedule Constraints and Major Activities.
Management Approach:
a. Include any special work restrictions or phasing identified in the solicitation documents.
b. Sub-Contractor Management.
c. Contract Close-out.
Schedule Constraints:
a. Pre-Construction Submittals submitted/approved within 90 calendar days after Notice To Proceed being issued.
b. Design drawings and install procedures completed and submitted 60 days prior to the start of any required outage.
c. On-site work should generally be scheduled and performed between April and November due to more favorable on-site weather conditions at Fort Peck. Any work proposed outside this period requires prior approval from the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR).
d. Work hours shall conform to solicitation constraints outlined in Section 01 12 00, FEDERAL HOLIDAYS AND
WORKING HOURS.
Major Activities:
a. Pre-construction submittals.
b. Design drawings.
c. Clay Tile Procurement.
d. Inspection of Existing Roof Underlayment.
e. Demolition and Removal of Asbestos-Containing Materials.
f. Installation of New Clay Tile Roofing System onto Precast Concrete Panels.
g. Final Inspection.
Evaluation Criteria:
Proposal must meet all the following minimum standards to receive an "acceptable" on this factor:
a. Management Approach, including any special work restrictions or phasing identified in the solicitation document.
b. The submitted schedule complies with and includes all of the listed Schedule Constraints and identifies all of the listed Major Activities above.
7. STEP-TWO INVITATION FOR BID, EVALUATION, AND AWARD
Step-Two in the process involves the submission of sealed priced bids by those who submitted acceptable technical proposals in .Step-One
The will be issued to the acceptable firms as an amendment to the solicitation and include Step-Two Invitation for Bid (IFB) the final 100% technical specifications and construction drawings, final bid schedule, and other final bidding information. The priced bids will be due no later than the date and time listed in the amendment. The bids submitted in Step-Two will be evaluated and the award made in accordance with Subparts 14.3 and 14.4.
In Step-Two, only bids based upon technical proposals determined to be "acceptable", either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award. Each bid in must be based on the bidder's own technical proposal that Step-Two was submitted, evaluated, and determined to be acceptable in Step-One.
Bidders must comply with the final technical specifications and construction drawings and the bidder's acceptable technical proposal. Do not include exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation in the bid submissions. The inclusion of any terms and conditions in the bid that conflicts with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in a determination that the proposal/bid is unacceptable and thus ineligible for Step-Two and award. Resolve questions about the terms and conditions or technical requirements of the solicitation prior to submission of the proposal/bid; see "Proposal Inquiries and Questions", located above in Section 00 21 00.
8. FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL TAXES
It is the Contractor's responsibility to investigate applicable federal, state, and local taxes as well as any specific exemptions that may exist for that specific state. This includes any applicable Value-Added Taxes (VAT), sales, use, and excise taxes. See General Conditions (Contract Clause) 52.229-3
FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL TAXES.
Enclosed Attachments:
1. Attachment A - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ-0)
FAR Clauses Incorporated by Reference
Number Title Effective Date
Alternate/ Deviation
Variation Effective Date
52.204-7 System for Award Management. Nov 2024 52.204-22 Alternative Line Item Proposal. Jan 2017
DFARS Clauses Incorporated by Reference
Number Title Effective Date
Alternate/ Deviation
Variation Effective Date
252.204-7019 Notice of NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements. Nov 2023
FAR Clauses Incorporated by Full Text
52.236-27 Site Visit (Construction). (Feb 1995)
As prescribed in , insert a provision substantially the same as the following:36.523
Site Visit (Construction) (Feb 1995)
The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any (a) contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.
Site visits may be arranged during normal duty hours by contacting:(b)
Name: Zach Watts
Address: 301 E. Kansas St. Fort Peck, MT 59223
Telephone: 406-526-3818
Date: 15 May 2025
Time: 10:00 AM Mountain Time
(End of Provision)
52.252-1 Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference. (Feb 1998)
As prescribed in , insert the following provision:52.107(a)
Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference (Feb 1998)
This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):
www.acquisition.gov____
(End of provision)
52.252-5 Authorized Deviations in Provisions. (Nov 2020)
As prescribed in , insert the following provision in solicitations that include any FAR or supplemental provision with an authorized 52.107(e) deviation. Whenever any FAR or supplemental provision is used with an authorized deviation, the contracting officer shall identify it by the same number, title, and date assigned to the provision when it is used without deviation, include regulation name for any supplemental provision, except that the contracting officer shall insert "(DEVIATION)" after the date of the provision.
Authorized Deviations in Provisions (Nov 2020)
The use in this solicitation of any Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 1) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the (a) addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the date of the provision.
The use in this solicitation of any (48 CFR Chapter ) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of (b) DFARS 2 "(DEVIATION)" after the name of the regulation.
(End of provision)
Section 00 21 13 - Instructions to Bidders
FAR Clauses Incorporated by Reference
Number Title Effective Date
Alternate/ Deviation
Variation Effective Date
52.214-3 Amendments to Invitations for Bids. Dec 2016 52.214-4 False Statements in Bids. Apr 1984 52.214-5 Submission of Bids. Dec 2016 52.214-6 Explanation to Prospective Bidders. Apr 1984 52.214-7 Late Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals of Bids. Nov 1999 52.214-18 Preparation of Bids-Construction. Apr 1984 52.214-19 Contract Award-Sealed Bidding-Construction. Aug 1996
Section 00 21 16 - Instructions to Proposers
Number Title Effective Date
Alternate/ Deviation
Variation Effective Date
52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting. Aug 2020
Section 00 22 00 - Supplementary Instructions
SECTION 00 22 00 - INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROCUREMENT
INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROCUREMENT
This solicitation and resulting contract are utilizing a Two Step Sealed Bidding procurement method as described in FAR Part 14.5.
This solicitation is the which is a request for technical proposals only. The technical drawings and specifications for are Step-One Step-One approximately 95% complete and not considered final or for construction.
Submitted technical proposals in response to this solicitation .shall not include prices or pricing information Bid bonds are not required with the technical proposal. Step-One Bid bonds will be required to be submitted with the Step-Two bid submission.
Step-One submissions will be reviewed for acceptability only. In , a proposal shall be rated acceptable for all evaluation factors in order to Step-One receive an overall "Acceptable" rating and to be eligible to participate in the bid. Step-Two
In only offers who submitted acceptable technical proposal in will be allowed to submit bids. The 100% final technical Step-Two Step-One drawings, final bid schedule and other final bidding information will be provided to all technically acceptable firms during via a Step-Two solicitation amendment.
The request for technical proposal is due no later than the date and time listed on the Standard Form 1442, Block 13 A. Step-One
Section 00 45 00 - Representations and Certifications
Number Title Effective Date
Alternate/ Deviation
Variation Effective Date
52.204-24 Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.
Nov 2021
52.209-2 Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations-Representation. Nov 2015
DFARS Clauses Incorporated by Reference
Number Title Effective Date
Alternate/ Deviation
Variation Effective Date
252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD Officials. Sep 2022 252.204-7008 Compliance with Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls. Oct 2016
252.204-7017 Prohibition on the Acquisition of Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services-Representation.
May 2021
252.225-7055 Representation Regarding Business Operations with the Maduro Regime. May 2022
DFARS Clauses Incorporated by Full Text
252.204-7007 Alternate A, Annual Representations and Certifications. (Oct 2024) Alternate A (Oct 2024)
ALTERNATE A, ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (OCT 2024)
Substitute the following paragraphs (b), (d), and (e) for paragraphs (b) and (d) of the provision at FAR 52.204-8:
(b)(1) If the provision at 52.204-7, System for Award Management, is included in this solicitation, paragraph (e) of this provision applies.
(2) If the provision at 52.204-7, System for Award Management, is not included in this solicitation, and the Offeror has an active registration in the System for Award Management (SAM), the Offeror may choose to use paragraph (e) of this provision instead of completing the corresponding individual representations and certifications in the solicitation. The Offeror shall indicate which option applies by checking one of the following boxes:
[X] (i) Paragraph (e) applies.
[ ] (ii) Paragraph (e) does not apply and the Offeror has completed the individual representations and certifications in the solicitation.
(d)(1) The following representations or certifications in the SAM database are applicable to this solicitation as indicated:
(i) 252.204-7016, Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services-Representation. Applies to all solicitations.
(ii) 252.216-7008, Economic Price Adjustment-Wage Rates or Material Prices Controlled by a Foreign Government. Applies to solicitations for fixed-price supply and service contracts when the contract is to be performed wholly or in part in a foreign country, and a foreign government controls wage rates or material prices and may during contract performance impose a mandatory change in wages or prices of materials.
(iii) 252.225-7042, Authorization to Perform. Applies to all solicitations when performance will be wholly or in part in a foreign country.
(iv) 252.225-7049, Prohibition on Acquisition of Certain Foreign Commercial Satellite Services-Representations. Applies to solicitations for the acquisition of commercial satellite services.
(v) 252.225-7050, Disclosure of Ownership or Control by the Government of a Country that is a State Sponsor of Terrorism. Applies to all solicitations expected to result in contracts of $150,000 or more.
(vi) 252.229-7012, Tax Exemptions (Italy)-Representation. Applies to solicitations and contracts when contract performance will be in Italy.
(vii) 252.229-7013, Tax Exemptions (Spain)-Representation. Applies to solicitations and contracts when contract performance will be in Spain.
(2) The following representations or certifications in SAM are applicable to this solicitation as indicated by the Contracting Officer: [Contracting Officer check as appropriate.]
[ ](i) 252.209-7002, Disclosure of Ownership or Control by a Foreign Government.
[ ](ii) 252.225-7000, Buy American-Balance of Payments Program Certificate.
[ ](iii) 252.225-7020, Trade Agreements Certificate.
[ ] Use with Alternate I.
[ ](iv) 252.225-7031, Secondary Arab…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .