S02 Past Performance Questionnaire Exhibit N.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24926R0002
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a VA leased space project for the Franklin County Community-Based Outpatient Clinic (CBOC) in Frankfort, Kentucky, solicitation number 36C24926R0002. The questionnaire is issued by the NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity in Murfreesboro, Tennessee and is designed to collect performance feedback from previous contractors. The document is divided into two main sections: Section A for contractor information and Section B for assessors to provide ratings and feedback on the contractor's performance across quality of service, schedule, and business relations using an Acceptable (A) or Unacceptable (U) rating scale. The assessors are requested to complete and submit the questionnaire electronically or by mail to Martin Frazier by November 3, 2025, with the completed form being critical to evaluating proposals for the leased space project.
View the file
Other files
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Exhibit N
RLP: 36C24926R0002 Page 1 of 4
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Franklin County CBOC, Frankfort, Kentucky
PAST PERFORMANCE INSTRUCTIONS
The NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity, Murfreesboro, Tennessee has issued a solicitation to provide leased space for a Franklin County CBOC, Frankfort, Kentucky.
Past performance information will be used to evaluate proposals received. Section A is to be completed by the
Offeror. Section A of the enclosed questionnaire lists the contractor who has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance. Section A also authorizes release of this information to NCO 9 Network
Contracting Activity, Murfreesboro, Tennessee.
The Offeror must provide this entire document to each of its assessors. The Offeror shall only submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Section A of the questionnaire as provided to the assessors.
Section B in its entirety is to be completed by the assessor(s). An individual assessor knowledgeable of the contractor’s quality of supplies and services rendered is requested to verify, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. If evaluating more than one contract for the same contractor, use a separate questionnaire for each contract being evaluated.
Because this information is critical to the evaluation process, your time and effort in providing your assessment is greatly appreciated. The questionnaire should be completed as soon as possible but not later than
November 3, 2025.
Assessor is requested to send electronically to Martin.Frazier@va.gov, or mail to the following address:
Attn: Martin Frazier, 1639 Medical Center Parkway, Suite 204, Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37129.
Assessor: Please do not send this information to the Offeror being evaluated.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation and expeditious response to this request.
LESSOR___GOVERNMENT _______
mailto:Martin.Frazier@va.gov
RLP: 36C24926R0002
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)
Solicitation Number 36C24926R0002
Project/Requirement Franklin County CBOC, Frankfort, KY
Customer/Agency Department of the Veteran Affairs, NCO 9, Murfreesboro, TN 37219
1. Prospective Government Contractor’s
Name and Address:
2. Contractor Point of Contact:
3. Phone number (with area code):
4. Assessor Contract Award number:
5. Description of Services provided under contract:
6. Contract award date: Contract Amount: Initial Final
7. Period of Performance or Delivery Date:
ASSESSOR INFORMATION:
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to NCO 9 Network
Contracting Activity, Murfreesboro, Tennessee
(Signature)
(Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)
SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors.
RATING SCALE Definitions
Past Performance Evaluation Ratings
Rating Description
Acceptable (A) Based on the offeror’s performance record, the
Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)
Unacceptable (U) Based on the offeror’s performance record, the
Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale.
Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.
QUALITY OF SERVICE
1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual requirements. A U
2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service. A U
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
SCHEDULE
1. Delivery of service was within required time period specified by contract requirements. A U
2. Rate the contractor’s ability to control cost and submit invoices.
Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely? A U
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
BUSINESS RELATIONS
A U
A U
1. Overall rating of contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining
A positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively
Resolution of any problems, etc.)
2. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s management, and your company (i.e. contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer).
3. Rate the contractor's ability to submit required reports and/or invoices in a timely manner. A U
LESSOR___GOVERNMENT _______RLP: 36C24926R0002
RLP: 36C24926R0002
4. Rate the contractors responsiveness to customer complaint resolution. A U
5. Overall rating of contractor’s business relations. A U
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor?
Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor.
Would most likely award another contract to this contractor.
Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor but would do so if no better alternative existed.
Do not wish to award another contract to this contractor.
Would not award another contract to this contractor.
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (quality, schedule, business relations,) on contract being assessed.
Acceptable Unacceptable
VII. General Comments:
ASSESSOR:
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
✓ Role Period of Involvement
Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
OTHERS
(Signature) (Date)
(Typed or Printed Name) (Organization Name)
(Phone Number)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .