RFQ_FY26 Airpark Restoration_FA440726QSK01.pdf

14 August 2026

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

375TH CONTRACTING SQUADRON (AMC)

REQUEST FOR QUOTATION (RFQ)

Purchase Request Reference: F3S1176107A001– FY26 Airpark Restoration Scott AFB, IL

Solicitation #: FA440726QSK01

Contracting Activity: 375 CONS/PKB

205 E WINTERS ST BLDG 52

SCOTT AFB IL 62225-5015

Government Representatives: Andrew Kleiser– Contracting Officer andrew.kleiser.1@us.af.mil

(618) 256-9299

Shawna Kuebler – Contract Specialist shawna.kuebler.1@us.af.mil

(618) 256-3088

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO) Part 12, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; this is a Request for Quotation (RFQ), numbered FA440726QSK01, and a written solicitation will not be issued. This solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2026-01.

The selection for the award will be made based on technical acceptance by the Government of the resultant quote and the Contracting Officer’s (CO) ability to deem pricing fair and reasonable.

From this RFQ, a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP), single award is anticipated.

This acquisition is being solicited as a 100% Small Business Set-Aside utilizing NAICS Code 488190 – Other Support Activities for Air Transportation, Small Business Standard $40M, and PSC code J015 - Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment: Aircraft and Airframe Structural Components. This solicitation incorporates provisions and clauses by reference. The full text of provisions and clauses may be accessed electronically at www.acquisition.gov.

Please use the subject line “RFQ FA440726QSK01 – Scott AFB Airpark Restoration” and include both Government representatives in all e-mail correspondence.

https://www.google.com/url?q=mailto%3Ashawna.kuebler.1%40us.af.mil http://www.acquisition.gov/

Description of Requirement:

The 375 OSS requires aircraft washing, painting and restoration services for four static display aircraft (C-141B, C-130E, C-9A, and KC-135E) located in the airpark near Scott Air Force Base.

The work includes high-pressure washing, stripping and repainting the noses of three aircraft with specific types of primer and paint, applying aircraft wax, and repairing bird mitigation systems. The work will be performed in accordance with the provided Statement of Work (SOW) and includes, but is not limited to, the following tasks:

• Aircraft Washing: Wash the exterior surfaces of all four aircraft (C-141B, C-9A, KC- 135E, C-130E) with high-pressure water and an approved aircraft cleaning solution.

• Surface Preparation and Painting:

• Strip the noses of the C-141B, C-9A, and C-130E aircraft to a solid substrate.

• Prepare and apply specified epoxy primer and urethane paint to the noses, adhering to AMS-STD-595 color standards (FS 37038 Lusterless Black for C- 9A/C-141B; FS 16473 ADC Gray for C-130E).

• Aircraft Waxing: Apply aircraft wax and buff to a shine on the C-141B and C-9A aircraft.

• Component Repair: Repair or replace any existing or missing bird mitigation components (e.g., chicken wire, bird spikes).

• Site Maintenance and Environmental Control:

• The contractor is responsible for providing all necessary equipment and materials. Note: Water and electricity are not available on site.

• Adhere to strict environmental controls for paint chip and debris containment and disposal.

• Perform daily site cleanup.

*Contractor shall exercise reasonable care when washing the aircraft. Contractor is not liable for paint damage, fading, or deterioration resulting from the wash process unless caused by Contractor’s gross negligence or willful misconduct. Government acknowledges that aircraft paint may be susceptible to damage from water, detergents, or pressure and accepts this risk.

CLIN Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Price

C-141B - Washing and nose only painting per the SOW 1 lot

C-9A - Washing and nose only painting per the SOW 1 lot

OPTION

C-130E - Washing and nose only painting per the Sow 1 lot

OPTION

0004 KC-135E - Washing per the SOW 1 lot

GRAND TOTAL

*NOTE* For optional CLINs, the Government reserves the right to award ALL, SOME, or NONE. Pricing for option CLINs shall be valid through 13 November 2026. After 13 November, the option CLINs will expire.

Offers (Quote and Technical Plan) are due No Later Than (NLT) Noon (12:00 pm) CST on Monday, 24 August 2026 via email to: shawna.kuebler.1@us.af.mil and andrew.kleiser.1@us.af.mil . Offers submitted via email must include in the subject line “RFQ FA440726Q1114 – Scott AFB Airpark Restoration” and include both Government representatives in all e-mail correspondence. Questions are due NLT 4:00pm CST on Tuesday, 18 August 2026 via email to Shawna Kuebler and Andrew Kleiser.

PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION WITH YOUR

QUOTE:

1. Contractor Name:

2. Contractor Address:

3. Point of Contact:

4. Phone Number:

5. Email Address:

mailto:shawna.kuebler.1@us.af.mil mailto:andrew.kleiser.1@us.af.mil

6. UEI Number:

7. CAGE Code:

8. Business Type (i.e. Small, Women-Owned, SDVOSB, etc.):

9. Offer Date and Expiration Date:

10. GSA Contract Number:

11. Proposed Payment Terms or Discount:

12. Delivery Date: Performance must begin prior to 30 September 2026.

RFO 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors-Commercial Products and Commercial Services

(a) Submission of offers. Submit signed and dated offers to the office specified in this solicitation at or before the exact time specified in this solicitation. As a minimum, offers shall include—

(1) The solicitation number;

(2) The name, address, telephone number of the Offeror;

(3) The Offeror’s Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) and, if applicable, Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) indicator;

(4) Information necessary to evaluate the factors contained in the provision at 52.212-2 or as described in the solicitation;

(5) Responses to provisions that require Offeror completion of information, representations, and certifications (other than those collected via the System for Award Management (SAM)); and

(6) A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and any solicitation amendments.

(b) Period for acceptance of offers. The Offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm until 13 November 2026 unless another time period is specified in an addendum to the solicitation.

(c) Late submissions, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers.

(1) Offerors are responsible for submitting offers and any modifications or revisions to the Government office designated in the solicitation by the time specified in the solicitation.

(2) Any offer, modification, or revision received after the time specified for receipt of offers is “late” and will not be considered unless it is received before award is made and the CO determines that accepting the late offer would not unduly delay the acquisition. However, a late modification of an otherwise successful offer that makes its terms more favorable to the Government will be considered at any time it is received and may be accepted.

(3) If an emergency or unanticipated event interrupts normal Government processes so that offers cannot be received at the Government office designated for receipt of offers by the exact time specified in the solicitation, and urgent Government requirements preclude amendment of the solicitation or other notice of an extension of the closing date, the time specified for receipt of offers will be deemed to be extended to the same time of day specified in the solicitation on the first work day on which normal Government processes resume.

(4) Offerors may withdraw their offers by written notice to the Government received at any time before award.

(d) Contract award. The Government intends to evaluate offers and award a contract without interchanges with Offerors. Therefore, the Offeror’s initial offer should contain the Offeror’s best terms. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct interchanges, if necessary.

The Government may reject any or all offers if such action is in the public interest, accept other than the lowest offer, and waive informalities and minor irregularities in offers received.

(e) Debriefings. If a post award debriefing is given to requesting Offerors, the Government will disclose the following information, if applicable:

(1) The agency’s evaluation of the significant weak or deficient factors in the debriefed Offeror’s offer.

(2) The overall evaluated cost or price and technical rating of the successful Offeror and the debriefed Offeror and past performance information on the debriefed Offeror.

(3) The overall ranking of all Offerors when any ranking was developed by the agency during source selection.

(4) A summary of the rationale for award.

(5) For acquisitions of commercial products, the make and model of the product to be delivered by the successful Offeror.

(6) Reasonable responses to relevant questions posed by the debriefed Offeror as to whether the agency followed source-selection procedures set forth in the solicitation, applicable regulations, and other applicable authorities.

(End of provision)

ADDENDUM TO RFO 52.212-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS—COMMERCIAL

PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES

The following is tailored to this acquisition and is hereby added via addendum. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of the quote, the offeror shall follow the instructions contained herein.

The offeror is required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offeror being ineligible for award. The offeror must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale in the cover letter.

1. GENERAL AND SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

All questions regarding this RFQ must first be directed to the Contract Specialist, Shawna Kuebler, via e-mail at shawna.kuebler.1@us.af.mil, with the Contracting Officer, Andrew Kleiser, CC’d at andrew.kleiser.1@us.af.mil. The deadline for questions is Tuesday, August 18, 2026 at 4:00 PM (central).

Offers must be e-mailed to both above email addresses no later than the required quote due date and time specified on page one of this RFQ document. Email submissions shall include the subject line " RFQ FA440726Q1114 – Scott AFB Airpark Restoration ". If electronic submission issues are encountered, contact Shawna Kuebler at 618-256-3088 or Andrew Kleiser at 618-256-9299.

Only electronic copies shall be submitted in response to this solicitation. Indicate volume number, title, and use separate files to permit rapid location of information. The electronic copy of the quote shall be submitted in a format readable by the Microsoft (MS) Office suite of applications or as a standard PDF. Your email submission must be checked and determined to be "virus free" prior to submission. After receipt of your quote, the CS or CO will email a confirmation to the sender. If you do not receive a confirmation of receipt prior to the due date and time, you are encouraged to contact the CS and CO to ensure the quote was received.

This acquisition does not require certified cost or pricing data. However, if deemed necessary, the CO may request other than certified cost and pricing data to determine price fair and reasonable. To avoid delays, the offeror is encouraged to submit documentation deemed appropriate to support the proposed solution and pricing.

Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI): At the time of submitting a quote, the offeror must state affirmatively whether or not it has OCI issues and must submit an OCI Identification and Mitigation Plan with the quote if OCI issues exist. The Government-accepted OCI Identification and Mitigation Plan shall be incorporated by reference into any resultant contract. If no OCI exists, the offeror shall provide a statement stating no OCI exists.

SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR QUOTE SUBMISSION

The offeror is required to submit the following volumes in response to this solicitation:

VOLUME 1 – ADMINISTRATIVE (COVER LETTER)

The Cover Letter shall include the Offeror’s points of contact with e-mail addresses and phone numbers who are authorized to contractually obligate the company, CAGE Code, UEI Number, and large/small business status/categories.

The Cover Letter must contain a statement that the company understands the requirements specified and will meet the performance standards and requirements therein.

The Cover Letter must also contain a statement that the company does or does not take exception to any of the requirements of this RFQ. Any exceptions shall be clearly outlined with supporting rationale.

Finally, the Cover Letter must provide the following administrative information:

• Expiration Date of Quote (must be valid through at least 13 November 2026)

• Proposed Payment Terms or Discount (i.e., Net 30, 1% 10 days)

• Performance Begin and Complete Dates (Performance must begin prior to 30 September 2026)

VOLUME 2 – FACTOR I: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Please provide a summary of your technical approach on how you will perform the Airpark Restoration requirement in accordance with the Statement of Work (SOW).

Offerors shall not simply copy and paste the information directly from the Statement of Work but rather shall provide their proposed approach for accomplishing the required service. The summary must include a timeline for work to begin prior to 30 September 2026.

The technical proposal shall utilize Times New Roman font, 12 pt font sizing, with standard single spacing. The maximum length of the Technical proposal will be 10 pages. If the Technical proposal is over 10 pages, please contact the CS and CO.

The Technical Proposal must explicitly address the following elements:

• Technical Plan: In accordance with the Statement of Work (SOW), the offeror shall submit a detailed technical plan describing their technical methodology and approach to performing all requirements. This plan must explicitly demonstrate how the offeror will approach the work required to accomplish the Airpark Restoration as specified in the Statement of Work.

VOLUME 3 – FACTOR II: PAST PERFORMANCE

The offeror must complete the Attachment 2 Past Performance Information (PPI) Sheet. Provide three (3) past performance examples of recent and relevant work.

- Recent is defined as work performed within the past five (5) years.

- Relevant is defined as work involving similar scope as the Airpark Restoration requirement. Similar scope would include restoration painting of historical aircraft with exterior paint and finishing materials. Similar scope would also include restoration work on military vehicles and equipment that require the use of pressure cleaning and refinishing with durable exterior paint.

For each example, complete a Past Performance Information Sheet (PPIS), which should include:

• Customer name and contact information

• Dollar value of the work performed

• Contract number (if applicable)

• Period of performance

• Brief description of the work performed

• Customer assessment of performance (e.g., CPARS rating, letter of recommendation, and point of contact willing to be interviewed)

In addition to the PPIs, offerors may submit no more than one (1) page of additional information for each of the three (3) past performance examples submitted.

VOLUME 4 – FACTOR III: PRICE

The offeror shall submit pricing by completing the pricing tables provided within the solicitation package (CLIN structure). The proposed pricing must be complete, reasonable, and fully support the requirements. Pricing must be submitted for all CLIN 0001 through 0005.

The pricing information submitted shall fully support the Statement of Work (SOW) requirements for each element specified. Information shall be segregated by the total price for each CLIN as specified in the solicitation. The extended amounts must equal the whole dollar unit price multiplied by the number of units (e.g., 1 Lot). All unit and total dollar amounts provided shall be rounded to the nearest dollar. All proposed pricing shall be inclusive of all costs necessary to perform the services described in the Statement of Work (SOW), including brand name equipment, hardware, software licenses, labor, shipping, materials, and overhead.

VOLUME 5 – SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

The offeror shall submit completed copies of all standard solicitation provisions and contract clauses that require representations, certifications, or fill-in information from the offeror, unless those representations and certifications are fully completed and up-to-date within the offeror's SAM.gov profile.

Addendum to 52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Products and Commercial Services This is a best value source selection utilizing the subjective tradeoff process to determine the offeror who gives the Air Force the greatest confidence it will best meet, or exceed, the requirements as stated in this solicitation.

Award will be made to the offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the RFO, as supplemented, whose quote conforms to the solicitation's requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by the 52.212-1 addendum of this solicitation) and is judged, based on an integrated assessment of Technical, Past Performance, and Price, to represent the best value to the Government.

The Government seeks to award to the offeror who gives the Air Force the greatest confidence that it will best meet, or exceed, the requirements. This may result in an award to a higher rated, higher priced offeror, where the decision is consistent with the evaluation factors, and the requirement owner and CO reasonably determine that the superior past performance outweighs the cost difference.

The following factors will be used to evaluate the Scott AFB Airpark Restoration requirement:

FACTOR 1 – TECHNICAL

Measures of merit for this factor are evaluated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis. To be rated Acceptable, the technical approach must meet the minimum requirements for all of the following essential elements derived from the Statement of Work (SOW):

Technical Plan: A detailed methodology describing how the offeror will perform the Scott AFB Airpark Restoration requirement in accordance with the SOW. The technical plan must include a date at which the offeror is available to begin work.

FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

Offerors are evaluated on their ability to successfully execute similar requirements based on recent and relevant past performance. To be considered relevant, the submitted past performance references must demonstrate work involving exterior painting and power washing of historical aircraft and/or historical military equipment.

FACTOR 3 – PRICE

The Total Evaluated Price (TEP) will be calculated as the sum of the Offeror’s proposed prices for all Firm-Fixed-Price Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) to include Option CLINs. The Government's intent is to award all CLINs; however, the Government reserves the right to award all, some, or none.

By submission of your quote, the offeror agrees to all solicitation requirements including terms and conditions and representations and certifications. The offeror shall clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale.

The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation with no obligation to the offeror.

A. FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL EVALUATION

The Government will evaluate the Technical Proposal on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis, assigning a rating of Acceptable or Unacceptable, as defined below:

Acceptable: The submitted proposal is compliant with RFQ and SOW requirements and meets all measures of merit listed under Factor 1.

Unacceptable: The submitted proposal is non-compliant with RFQ and SOW requirements, rendering it ineligible for award due to the presence of one or more deficiencies.

B. FACTOR 2: PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s Past Performance to determine whether the offeror’s past performance is recent and relevant as defined in RFO 52.212-1. The Government will also evaluate how well the offeror performed on prior contracts/projects.

In addition to the submitted Past Performance Information Sheets, the government reserves the right to use other sources of past performance information in determining a reliability rating.

These sources include but are not limited to: CPARS, internet searches, Better Business Bureau, Google and other online reviews, etc.

Step 1: Recency Assessment The Government will first review the past performance information sheets provided by the vendor and those found in other sources (e.g., CPARS) to determine if they are recent. A past performance reference is considered recent if the work was performed within five (5) years prior to the issuance date of this RFQ. References that are not recent will not be evaluated further.

Step 2: Relevancy Assessment For all recent past performance references, the Government will assess their relevance to the work required by the Statement of Work (SOW). The Government will consider the scope, magnitude, and complexity of the prior work specifically as it relates to Scott AFB Airpark Restoration requirement. A relevancy rating of Highly Relevant, Relevant, or Not Relevant will be assigned.

Highly Relevant: The work performed was virtually the same as the SOW requirements for Scott AFB Airpark Restoration.

Relevant: The work performed was similar to the SOW requirements for Scott AFB Airpark Restoration.

Not Relevant: The work was not similar to the SOW requirements for Scott AFB Airpark Restoration.

Step 3: Performance Quality and Reliability Assessment The Government will evaluate the quality of performance on contracts deemed recent and relevant to assign an overall confidence rating as defined below:

High Confidence: Based on the vendor’s performance quality on recent and relevant efforts, the Government has a high degree of confidence that the vendor will successfully perform the required effort. The vendor's record indicates performance was of high quality.

Adequate Confidence: Based on the vendor’s performance quality on recent and relevant efforts, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the vendor will successfully perform the required effort. The vendor's record indicates performance was of acceptable quality.

Neutral Confidence: No recent and relevant performance record is available for review, or the record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment can be made. This rating is not viewed favorably or unfavorably.

Low Confidence: Based on the vendor’s performance quality on recent and relevant efforts, the Government has a low expectation that the vendor will be able to successfully perform the required effort. The record may indicate performance issues on one or more contracts.

C. FACTOR 3: PRICE EVALUATION

The Government will evaluate the quote submitted in response to this solicitation to ensure that the proposed price is complete, reasonable, and balanced. The Government reserves the right to reject an offer if the CO determines that the proposed price does not meet the criteria of completeness, reasonableness, and balance.

Completeness: The offeror's price and other supporting information will be evaluated to ensure continuity and traceability of prices to the proposed technical plan and between initial quotes and any revisions thereto. The review will determine the adequacy of the offeror's quote in addressing and fulfilling the solicitation requirements.

Reasonableness: The quote will be reviewed to determine the reasonableness of price and the offeror's understanding of and ability to perform the requirement. Price reasonableness will be determined through the use of competition. In the event adequate price competition is not received, the CO will use one or more of the price analysis techniques described at RFO 15.404- 1.

Balance: In accordance with RFO 15.404, unbalanced pricing may increase performance risk and could result in payment of unreasonably high prices. All separately priced line items will be analyzed to determine if the prices are unbalanced. The offer may be rejected if the CO determines the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

The Total Evaluated Price (TEP) will be calculated as the sum of the Offeror’s proposed prices for all Firm-Fixed-Price Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs), which includes Option CLINs.

The TEP will be based on CLINs 0001 through 0004 to ensure the price is fair and reasonable.

After any interchanges or quote revisions, if necessary, the Government will evaluate the Final

TEP.

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

The quote must comply in all material respects with the requirements of law, regulations, and conditions set forth in the solicitation. To be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible as defined in RFO 9.104-1.

A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed, or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

The Government reserves the right to conduct interchanges with offerors. These interchanges may be used to clarify aspects of quotes, resolve minor deficiencies, or allow offerors to revise their quotes (including price). The Government is not obligated to conduct interchanges with all offerors and may award without conducting interchanges.

BASIS OF AWARD

Award will be made on a best value tradeoff basis. Award will be made IAW the procedures specified in this Request for Quote (RFQ). A contract may be awarded to the offeror who is deemed responsible IAW RFO Subpart 9.1, as supplemented, whose quote conforms to the solicitation requirements and is judged to represent the best value to the Government.

To ensure an efficient and logical evaluation process, the Government will evaluate quotes sequentially using the following phases:

Phase 1. Technical Evaluation:

All timely quotes will initially be evaluated for Technical acceptability (Factor 1). Technical will be evaluated on a strict Acceptable/Unacceptable basis per the criteria described in this addendum. If a quote is deemed Unacceptable and not easily made acceptable, the proposal will be ineligible for award and removed from further consideration.

Phase 2. Past Performance Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate the Past Performance Proposals (Factor 2) for all offerors who received an "Acceptable" rating in Phase 1. Past performance will be graded on the Performance Quality and Confidence criteria as described in this addendum.

Phase 3. Price Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate the Price Proposals (Factor 3) for all technically acceptable offerors remaining from Phase 2. Price will be evaluated for reasonableness, completeness, and balance as described in this addendum. The Government will determine prices fair and reasonable through the use of competition. In the event adequate price competition is not received, the CO will use one or more of the price analysis techniques described at RFO 15.404- 1 to ensure the price to the Government for the initial task order is fair and reasonable.

Phase 4. Award Decision:

The CO will make a final best value tradeoff decision among the fully evaluated offerors. In making this decision, Past Performance (Factor 2) is significantly more important than Technical (Factor 1) and Price (Factor 3) combined. The Government reserves the right to award to a higher rated, higher priced offeror where the decision is consistent with the evaluation factors outlined in the solicitation and the Government reasonably determines that the superior past performance of the higher priced offeror outweighs the cost difference. In the event multiple offerors receive equal past performance ratings (and are technically acceptable), the tradeoff will be made between those tied offerors, with the award decision representing the best value to the Government.

The Government reserves the right to conduct interchanges with offerors. These interchanges may be used to clarify aspects of quotes, resolve minor deficiencies, or allow offerors to revise their quotes (including price). The Government is not obligated to conduct interchanges with all offerors and intends to award without conducting interchanges

Ombudsman

(a)An ombudsman has been appointed to hear and facilitate the resolution of concerns from offerors, potential offerors, and others for this acquisition. When requested, the ombudsman will maintain strict confidentiality as to the source of the concern. The existence of the ombudsman does not affect the authority of the program manager, contracting officer, or source selection official. Further, the ombudsman does not participate in the evaluation of proposals, the source selection process, or the adjudication of protests or formal contract disputes.

(b)The ombudsman may refer the interested party to another official who can resolve the concern.

Before consulting with an ombudsman, interested parties must first address their concerns, issues, disagreements, and/or recommendations to the contracting officer for resolution.

Consulting an ombudsman does not alter or postpone the timelines for any other processes (e.g., agency level bid protests, GAO bid protests, requests for debriefings, employee-employer actions, contests of OMB Circular A-76 competition performance decisions).

(c)If resolution cannot be made by the contracting officer, the interested party may contact the ombudsman, Ms. Lisa A. Gross, 510 POW/MIA Drive, Scott AFB IL 62225-5022, 618-229- 0267, lisa.gross@us.af.mil, AFICC/KM. Concerns, issues, disagreements, and recommendations that cannot be resolved at the Center/MAJCOM/FLDCOM/DRU ombudsman level, may be brought by the interested party for further consideration to the Department of the Air Force ombudsman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary (ADAS) (Contracting), SAF/AQC, 1060 Air Force Pentagon, Washington DC 20330-1060, phone number (571) 256-2395, facsimile number

(571) 256-2431.

(d) Do not contact the ombudsman to request copies of the solicitation, verify offer due date, or clarify technical requirements. Such inquiries shall be directed to the contracting officer.

(End of clause)

Contractor Access Air Force Installations

Access to Scott Air Force Base is not required for the performance of this contract. The place of performance is located outside the Shiloh Gate of Scott Air Force Base. If base access is required, temporary bases can be coordinated through the contract specialist or contracting officer.

Attachment List:

Attachment 1 – RFO, R-DFARS and DAF Clauses and Provisions Attachment 2 – Statement of Work Attachment 3 - Past Performance Information Sheet Attachment 4 - Wage Determination