RFQ Attachment - PPQ.pdf
PDF 238 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 30287RFQ260000066
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template used by the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) to collect and evaluate contractor performance data from previous contracts.
Structure and Completion Requirements:
The questionnaire is divided into two sections: Blocks 1-4 are completed by the quoter/offeror, and Blocks 5-8 are completed by the client/reference. The offeror section requires standard identification information (firm name, CAGE code, UEI number, contact details) and work performance classification (prime contractor, subcontractor, joint venture, or other). Contract details include the contract number, delivery/task order number, contract type (firm fixed price, cost reimbursement, or other), contract title, award date, planned completion date, actual completion date, original contract price, and final contract price with explanations of any variances. The offeror must also describe project complexity (high, medium, or routine) and explain the project's relevance to the current solicitation, providing details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, and staffing.
Client Evaluation Criteria:
The client reference completes the questionnaire by providing their contact information and role in the project, then rates the contractor across four key performance areas: Overall Contractor Quality, Overall Contractor Timeliness/On Schedule, Overall Contractor Management/Staffing, and Overall Rating for Work Performed. Ratings use an adjective scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable) with specific definitions provided. The document includes a detailed rating matrix defining each performance level and the circumstances under which each rating is appropriate. Clients may provide additional comments regarding contractor performance. The completed questionnaire must be signed and dated by the client and submitted directly to the offeror, who then includes it with their quote submission. The USCG reserves the right to verify all information provided.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 0001 Attachment Pages.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001 SOW for Water Treatment Facility.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001 SF30.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001 SF-18 RFQ Milford Haven.pdf | ||
| Price Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFQ FAR Clauses and Deviations Services.pdf | ||
| SF-18 RFQ Milford Haven.pdf | ||
| SCA Poster.pdf | ||
| SOW for Water Treatment Facility 2026.pdf | ||
| Wage rate determination.pdf | ||
| Past Performance Information Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Rev 1 20251008
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Quoter to complete Blocks 1-4)
1. Offeror Information:
Firm name: _____________________________________ CAGE Code: ________________________
Address: _______________________________________ UEI Number: ________________________
Phone Number: _________________________________
Email Address: __________________________________
Point of Contact: _________________________________
Contact Phone Number: ___________________________
2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Subcontractor Joint Venture
Other (Explain): __________________________________________________________________
Percent of Project work performed: _____________%
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name): ____________________
Phone #: _____________________________
3. Contract Information
Contract Number: _____________________________________________
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable): _________________________
Contract type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (please specify):
Contract Title: _____________________________________________________________________
Award Date (mm/dd/yy): _____________________________________________________________
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): __________________________________________________
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): ____________________________________________________
Explain Differences: _________________________________________________________________
Rev 1 20251008
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE
Original Contract Price (Award Amount): _________________________________________________
Final contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): ________________________________
Explain Differences: _________________________________________________________________
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work High Med Routine
How is this project relevant to this solicitation’s requirements? (Please provide details, i.e., similar equipment, requirements, conditions, staffing etc.):
REFERENCE INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information:
Name: _________________________________
Title: __________________________________
Phone Number: _________________________
Email Address: __________________________
6. Describe the client’s role in the project: _____________________________________________
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE
See Ratings and Definitions on next page
Overall Contractor Quality: __________________________________________________________
Overall Contractor Timeliness/On Schedule: ___________________________________________
Overall Contractor Management/Staffing: ______________________________________________
Overall Rating for Work Performed: ___________________________________________________
Any additional comments regarding the contractor’s performance: _____________________________
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy): ________________________
8. Client’s Signature: ________________________________________________
NOTE: USCG REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNARIE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE QUOTER SHALL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNARIE WITH THEIR QUOTE. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS
FORM.
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL PERFORMANCE
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
(S) Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
(M) Marginal Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.
(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements, and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
(N) Not Applicable
Equivalent to Neutral Adjectival Rating
No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.
| USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE Form PPQ1: |
| CONTRACT INFORMATION Offeror to complete Blocks 14: |
| Firm name: |
| CAGE Code: |
| Address: |
| UEI Number: |
| Phone Number: |
| Email Address: |
| Point of Contact: |
| Contact Phone Number: |
| 2 Work Performed as: Off |
| Prime Contractor: Off |
| Subcontractor: Off |
| Joint Venture: Off |
| Other Explain: |
| Percent of Project work performed: |
| If subcontractor who was the prime Name: |
| Phone: |
| Contract Number: |
| DeliveryTask Order Number if applicable: |
| Firm Fixed Price: Off |
| Cost Reimbursement: Off |
| Other please specify: Off |
| Contract Title: |
| Award Date mmddyy: |
| Contract Completion Date mmddyy: |
| Actual Completion Date mmddyy: |
| Explain Differences 1: |
| Explain Differences 2: |
| Explain Differences 3: |
| Explain Differences 4: |
| Original Contract Price Award Amount: |
| Final contract Price to include all modifications if applicable: |
| Explain Differences 1_2: |
| Explain Differences 2_2: |
| Explain Differences 3_2: |
| Explain Differences 4_2: |
| Explain Differences 5: |
| High: Off |
| Med: Off |
| Routine: Off |
| equipment requirements conditions staffing etc 2: |
| REFERENCE INFORMATION Client to complete Blocks 58 5 Client Information Name Title Phone Number Email Address: |
| Name: |
| Title: |
| Phone Number_2: |
| Email Address_2: |
| 6 Describe the clients role in the project 1: |
| 6 Describe the clients role in the project 2: |
| 1: |
| 2: |
| 3: |
| 4: |
| 5: |
| See Ratings and Definitions on next page: |
| Overall Contractor Quality: |
| Overall Contractor TimelinessOn Schedule: |
| Overall Contractor ManagementStaffing: |
| Overall Contractor Satisfaction: |
| Overall Rating for Work Performed: |
| Any additional comments regarding the contractors performance 1: |
| Any additional comments regarding the contractors performance 2: |
| Any additional comments regarding the contractors performance 3: |
| Any additional comments regarding the contractors performance 4: |
| Any additional comments regarding the contractors performance 5: |
| Any additional comments regarding the contractors performance 6: |
| Any additional comments regarding the contractors performance 7: |
| Any additional comments regarding the contractors performance 8: |
| Any additional comments regarding the contractors performance 9: |
| 7 Date Questionnaire was completed mmddyy: |
| RATING: |
| E Exceptional: |
| VG Very Good: |
| A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the GovernmentOwner There should have been no significant weaknesses identified: |
| S Satisfactory: |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the GovernmentOwners benefit The contractual performance of the element or subelement contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory: |
| M Marginal: |
| A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the GovernmentOwner: |
| U Unsatisfactory: |
| No information or did not apply to your contract: |
| Rating will be neither positive nor negative: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .