RFPM26006396 Q and A - With Answers.pdf

PDF 382 KB Posted

Attached to
MPA 421 - Statewide School Food Services Program
Solicitation number
RFPM26006396
Issued by
Providence County, Rhode Island

About this file

This document is a Questions and Answers addendum to Request for Proposal (RFP) RFPM26006396 issued by the Rhode Island Department of Education (RIDE) for Master Price Agreement (MPA) 421, a statewide school food services program. The RFP solicits proposals from qualified firms to provide comprehensive school food services program administration and support across multiple School Food Authorities (SFAs) and school sites throughout Rhode Island. The proposal submission deadline is March 27, 2026 at 2:00 PM EDT, with the vendor questions deadline of March 11, 2026 at 2:00 PM EDT having already passed. The initial contract term is one year beginning approximately July 1, 2026, with options for up to four additional 12-month renewal periods at RIDE's discretion, requiring written notice at least 90 days prior to each renewal year. The RFP utilizes a two-envelope evaluation system based on technical merit and cost evaluation. Vendor presentations and umbrella contract award are targeted for completion by the end of April 2026, with SFAs to negotiate individual contracts thereafter.

The cost proposal must include only the Management Services fee and General Support Services fee, with the SY25-26 maximum fees established at $0.0545 and $0.1430 respectively, subject to adjustment for Consumer Price Index in subsequent years. The awarded vendor must guarantee the surplus or deficit of each district to the extent of the management and administrative fees. The current statewide program operates across approximately 40+ participating SFAs serving approximately 150,000 students at approximately 350 schools, with total program costs based on current expenditures of approximately $32.5 million. All participants from SY24-25 renewed for SY25-26, and RIDE anticipates most or all current participants will continue with the statewide contract for SY26-27. The vendor must submit an MBE Utilization Plan upon contract award and is subject to a 0.33% contract administrative fee withheld from invoices. Participating districts currently experience significant deficits across the program totaling approximately $3.5 million, though historical financial performance is not an evaluation criterion. The awarded vendor is not prevented from submitting independent bids for other Rhode Island SFAs not participating in the statewide program.

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Q&A-RFPM26006396

Question 1: Performance Bonds: The RFP indicates that a performance bond is not required for this process. However, the sample contract states that a 10% performance bond is required in the first year. We assume this requirement would apply to all districts that elect to utilize the statewide agreement. Could you please provide a rough estimate of the total projected value of all participating contracts combined so bidders can better understand the potential scale of the 10% performance bond requirement?

Answer 1: The total cost (based on program expenditures plus FSMC fees) of current contracts operating under the statewide is approximately $32.5 Million.

Question 2: Given the number of questions submitted and the amount of information that may be provided in the responses, would the district consider extending the proposal due date to allow bidders sufficient time to properly review the information and make any necessary adjustments to their proposals?

Answer 2: No.

Question 3: Please provide the signed contracts and any renewals for all participating districts.

Answer 3: This information is not necessary to submit a proposal for this RFP.

Question 4: In Appendix P, of the roughly $68.4M of expenditures, how much of that is actually SFA spend and how much is the current incumbent's spend/contractual value?

Answer 4: This information is not collected by RIDE.

Question 5: In Appendix S, #2 is marked as optional. Does this mean checking any of the boxes is optional or does it mean providing descriptions of how we will meet the needs of the activities that get checked is optional?

Answer 5: Bidders are not required to complete #2, answering any part of the question is optional.

Question 6: Page 14 of the RFP states proposal documents shall be type-written. All proposal documents shall be formatted to single-space, with 1” margins on 8.5”x 11” paper setting using a font of 12-point Times New Roman. Is there also a page limit for each proposal requested?

Answer 6: There is no page limit.

Question 7: In the Price Evaluation upload are we to submit our own pricing pages or is there a standard financial form or document you would like all bidders to use?

Answer 7: This information can be submitted in any format as long as the Cost Proposal includes all requirements listed in Section 3 of the Proposal (“Cost Proposal”)

Question 8: Please confirm these are the maximum fees a bidder can charge:

General Support Services fee of $0.1430; Management Services fee of $0.0545.

Answer 8: This was the maximum for SY25-26, but it can change each year based on consumer price index.

Question 9: What percentage does the incumbent currently spend on local purchasing? How much is currently being spent with MBE partners? Could you please provide us with the MBE utilization plan that was submitted this year by the current incumbent?

Answer 9: The current operator of the statewide program reported spending $289,548 in local purchases (RI producers) in the 2024 – 2025 School Year. The MBE utilization plan submitted by the current holder of the statewide school food service contract is not necessary to submit a proposal for this RFP.

Question 10: Based on data in Appendix P, it appears many districts are experiencing annual deficits under the current provider, resulting in the depletion of their food fund balances. In several cases, the projections suggest that districts may soon need to supplement their food service operations from their general funds which could be as early as this year.

Additionally, it appears the total deficit across participating districts is roughly $3.5 million, and it may be even higher this year. This seems particularly relevant given page 12, item 6 of the Scope of Work, which states that the SFA’s School Food Service Program should operate as a self sufficient program. The results show this expectation is not currently being met.

Given that the incumbent provider has been selected through multiple RFP cycles, could you please clarify how historical financial performance and the provider’s inability to address ongoing program deficits will be considered as part of the evaluation process?

Answer 10: Historical financial performance is not part of the evaluation criteria for this RFP process. The factors affecting the balance of a Nonprofit School Food Service Account are many and vary SFA by SFA.

Question 11: The list of SFAs that have participated in the past reflects the 2024– 2025 school year. How many of those districts renewed their agreements for the 2025–2026 school year? More importantly, how many have committed to using the statewide contract for the 2026–2027 school year? My understanding is that some of the districts listed are planning to conduct their own RFP process this year rather than continuing under this agreement. Could you please clarify the current participation status?

Answer 11: All participants from 2024-2025 renewed for 2025-2026. We do not ask for formal commitments to continue with the statewide, however we anticipate most, if not all, of the current participants wish to continue with the statewide contract.

Question 12: Please confirm that FSMC is required to guarantee the surplus/deficit of each district to the extent of the management and administrative fees.

Answer 12: Yes.

Question 13: Given that the proposed fee structure is fixed, how should bidders approach situations where the SFA requests program modifications such as different menus, food options, labor structures, or other operational elements that may impact the financial model? Specifically, if the parties are unable to reach agreement on those program components, how should that scenario be addressed within the terms of the agreement?

Answer 13: One of the schedules associated with the contract is the projected food service budget with line items for food, labor, and other operational elements.

Question 14: If we are able to identify local MBE certified producers, farmers, or suppliers within the Farm Fresh Rhode Island network, would purchases from those producers through the Farm Fresh Rhode Island nonprofit food hub be eligible to count toward the MBE utilization plan? Would these purchases also count for local purchase spend as well?

Answer 14: Yes for each question.

Question 15: What are the priorities in selecting a FSMC for RIDE?

Answer 15: The priorities for a vendor to operate a statewide food services program are described in the Scope of Work.

Question 16: What is the fee or percentage returned back to RIDE for each contract?

Answer 16: RIDE receives no funding as part of this statewide contract. The purpose of this RFP is to identify a vendor who can best meet the scope of work described in the Request for Proposals so that individual SFAs can choose to contract with that vendor if they wish without going through their own full procurement process.

Question 17: Will the SFA's who are currently under the MPA contract which expires 6/30/26 automatically roll over to the new MPA?

Answer 17: Each School Food Authority (SFA) must choose annually to remain on the statewide program, or go out to bid on their own for a new food service provider.

Contracts between an SFA and a Food Service Management Company (FSMC) are renewed and approved annually, and there is no automatic rollover. The vendor who is awarded the statewide will be expected to serve all SFAs that wish to utilize the statewide contract, including all those currently participating.

Question 18: Please provide the current guarantee for each SFA who participates in the MPA agreement.

Answer 18: This information is not necessary to submit a proposal for this RFP.

Question 19: Please provide the school year food service financial statements for each SFA who participates in the MPA.

Answer 19: We are still in the process of reviewing financial statements for accuracy, so final reports are not available at this time.

Question 20: Of the SFA's on the State Contract which ones utilize FSMC labor and which ones have SFA labor?

Answer 20: This information is not collected by RIDE.

Question 21: What are the school attendance systems for enrollment and students eligibility at each SFA?

Answer 21: This information is not necessary to submit a proposal for this RFP.

Question 22: Please provide the commodity entitlement allocation for each SFA for SY25-26, and SY26-27

Answer 22: The entitlement allocation from SY25-26 is available in Appendix 22: We do not yet know the commodity entitlement allocation for SY26-27.

Question 23: What is the current point of service meal count system hardware in place at each site in each SFA, and is this hardware the property of the SFA(s) or the vendor?

Answer 23: This information is not collected by RIDE.

Question 24: Is the point of service meal count system to be implemented by the FSMC expected on the contract start date?

Answer 24: Yes Question 25: What is the current point of service meal count system used in each

SFA?

Answer 25: Anecdotally, we know most use Mosaic or Nutrikids, but we do not collect this level of detail.

Question 26: Are there any districts with any outstanding audit findings? Please provide up-to-date Audit Findings per district.

Answer 26: There are no districts with an outstanding audit finding.

Question 27: Are any districts participating in the FFVP program? If so, what are the current grant amounts by district?

Answer 27: The Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Grant awards vary year by year based on the allocation provided annually by the USDA. The current district awards are listed in Appendix 27 Question 28: Please provide eligible free, reduced, and paid enrollment by school site

Answer 28: Please refer to RFP Appendices O-1 and O-2. Please also refer to the most recent eligibility report posted on the RIDE website:

https://ride.ri.gov/child-nutrition/program-data-and-finances Question 29: From the District’s perspective, what are the greatest challenges or pain points with the current FSMC program?

Answer 29: This is not a question we can answer at the state level.

Question 30: Is a performance bond required?

Answer 30: A performance bond is not required to hold the statewide contract with the RI Department of Education. However, the contract between each SFA and the holder of the statewide contract must include a performance bond.

Question 31: Should the cost proposal include projected revenues and expenditures for each district or will this be negotiated at a later date with each district separately?

Answer 31: The cost proposal must only contain the items detailed in section 2 of the Proposal Section (“Cost Proposal, Detailed Budget and Budget Narrative”). Projected revenues and expenditures for each district are not required.

Question 32: What is the process and timeline for the vendor presentations, award of umbrella contract, and negotiation of sub-contracts with the individual districts?

Answer 32: We are aiming to hold vendor presentations and award the umbrella contract by the end of April 2026, and intend for SFAs to negotiate their individual contracts soon afterwards.

Question 33: Please provide staffing charts for each district under the statewide contract listing out positions, hours, wages, and benefits.

Answer 33: This information is not collected by RIDE.

Question 34: The RFP states that the awarded vendor will negotiate contracts with financial guarantees with each individual SFA. Can you please confirm that the financial proposal is only looking for the fee structure and not individual budgets/guarantee returns for each SFA?

a) Confirm that the proposed Fee Structure for FY26-27 is for the year stated and not for the entire life of the contract?

b) Confirm the SFY 26-27 fee structure cannot exceed the SFY 25-26 fee structure, https://ride.ri.gov/sites/g/files/xkgbur806/files/2026-02/Oct%202025%20Eligibility%20Report%20LEA_1.pdf https://ride.ri.gov/sites/g/files/xkgbur806/files/2026-02/Oct%202025%20Eligibility%20Report%20LEA_1.pdf adjusted for CPI. Which is currently at General Support Services fee of $0.1430 and Management Services fee of $0.0545.

Answer 34: Yes for each question.

Question 35: Please share a list of who will be on the evaluation team.

Answer 35: Our evaluation team will be made up of four RIDE state employees and one representative from a local school district.

Question 36: Please supply the detailed P&Ls of all districts that are currently on the state contract?

Answer 36: This information is not collected by RIDE.

Question 37: Confirming that the bidder must provide: A listing of clients served that reflects programs of approximately the same size as a Statewide program in Rhode Island (about 150,000 students at approximately 350 schools).

a) What is the current enrollment and number of schools that are currently served by the state contract?

Answer 37: Appendix N lists the SFAs currently on the statewide contract. Enrollment data is available on the RIDE Data Portal - https://datacenter.ride.ri.gov/ Question 38: Are any of the districts under the statewide contract represented by a union, if so, please provide copies of all CBA'?

Answer 38: This information is not collected by RIDE’s Child Nutrition Team.

Question 39: Will the awarded company, who operates the state contract, also be able to place an independent bid for all other RFPs within the state of RI for Food Service operations during the life of this contract?

Answer 39: Yes. Each district can choose each year to join the Statewide Program or go out to bid on their own. The winning vendor of this contract is not prevented from responding to requests for proposals for other SFAs not participating in the Statewide Program.

Question 40: Please identify which School Districts will remain on the state contract for FY27.

Answer 40: We cannot answer this question. Each District/SFA makes this choice annually.

Question 41: Do bidders have permission to use the Rhode Island Schools logo and images from websites in their proposal response?

Answer 41: No, because this may be construed as a RIDE supported proposal.

https://datacenter.ride.ri.gov/

Question 42: Would you provide a breakdown of each school and school district that utilizes SFA labor? Included with this request would you provide a lump sum total of wages, taxes, and benefits for each school and/or school district that utilizes SFA labor?

Answer 42: This information is not collected by RIDE.

Question 43: Would you provide copies of each school and school district's most recent food service financial report that includes their respective current food fund balance?

Answer 43: We are still in the process of reviewing financial statements for accuracy, so final reports are not available at this time.

Question 44: Would you provide site based information for each school and or school district that has multiple feeding sites?

Name of school site Enrollment by school site Average daily participation per school site for all free, reduced, and paid students.

Answer 44: Please refer to our most recent (2025) Eligibility Report https://ride.ri.gov/child-nutrition/program-data-and-finances Question 45:

With regard to RFPM26006396 - MPA 421 - Statewide School Food Services Program Appendix P appears to have a typo as the total revenue, total expenditures and net cash read the same for both East Greenwich and East Providence although they have totally different reimbursement, lunch match and breakfast subsidies.

In further reviewing Appendix P it seems like there may be additional calculation issues. In looking at Barrington for example – the form indicates $271,558.64 in federal reimbursement, plus $11,945.56 in state match lunch plus $1331.00 in breakfast subsidy. When I add those up (which I did in the manual total) column I get $285,835.20 however, the Total Revenues * (including local) column indicates the district had $1,183,530 in total revenue. What else is being added to the Total Revenues * (including local). There is a $898,694 variance. As you can see from the Var manual v total w local – there are several districts with significant variances. Am I missing something or is there a potential error in the data?

Answer 45:

The SEA is required annually to collect a very general report from the LEAs regarding the status of their food service account, which asks for the “opening cash balance” as of July 1, “total revenue”, “total expenditures”, and “claim months”. The purpose of the report is to do a quick assessment of whether they are maintaining a positive balance in their account, and if they are, does their ending balance exceed three months average https://ride.ri.gov/child-nutrition/program-data-and-finances expenditures. In the event that their ending balance is in excess of 3 months average expenditures, they are required to submit a spend down plan detailing how they will reinvest these funds in the program. The data in columns ‘C’, ‘G’, ‘H’, and ‘I’ are as reported by the districts. The SEA conducts a deeper analysis of this data in the audit which happens every 5 years.

The federal reimbursements, state match, and breakfast subsidy are the only data that we have on file and are only meant to represent a portion of the total revenue. Revenue can also include meal payments from families whose students are not eligible for free and reduced-price meals and a la carte sales (such as chips, cookies, etc.). In other words, the data in columns ‘D’, ‘E’, and ‘F’ are not meant to add up to the data in column ‘G’.

Appendices

Appendix 22: Commodity entitlement allocation for each SFA for SY25-26

School Food Authority Beginning Balance Barrington 114,930.28

Blackstone Valley Prep 94,333.33 Bradley School 2,831.59

Bristol / Warren Regional 105,455.10 Burrillville 78,678.58

Central Falls 240,490.90 Chariho 100,827.15

Coventry 139,539.91 Cranston 364,627.15

Cumberland 162,059.50 DCYF RI Training School 8,275.49

East Greenwich 67,187.75 East Providence 207,913.65

Exeter / West Greenwich 41,703.43 Foster 8,212.84

Foster / Glocester 43,799.35 Harmony Hill School 4,719.97 International Charter 22,205.35

Jamestown 11,514.32

Johnston 124,381.97 Lincoln 110,135.91

Little Compton 5,759.12 Meeting Street 19,506.90

Metropolitan Regional Career & Tech. Ctr 24,431.95 Middletown 81,143.06

Narragansett 31,701.09 New Shoreham 3,435.60

Newport 79,291.88 North Kingstown 97,293.17 North Providence 139,249.17 North Smithfield 59,281.32

Pawtucket 433,437.99 Portsmouth 73,525.42 Providence 1,184,881.98

Scituate 38,519.42 Smithfield 84,336.37

South Kingstown 92,414.61 Tiverton 61,272.00 Warwick 264,387.37

West Warwick 151,480.07 Westerly 69,072.70

William M.Davies Career & Tech. 36,533.15 Woonsocket 270,674.63

Appendix 27: FFVP Awards for FY26

District Name School Name FY26 FFVP Award

Bishop McVinney Regional School Bishop McVinney Regional School $ 14,475.00 Blackstone Valley Prep BVP Elementary School 1 $ 22,973.89 Blackstone Valley Prep BVP Elementary School 2 $ 23,134.91 Blackstone Valley Prep BVP Elementary School 3 $ 16,995.80 Blackstone Valley Prep Upper Elementary $ 21,888.05

Bristol Warren Colt Andrews School $ 20,733.38 Bristol Warren Hugh Cole School $ 28,316.19 Bristol Warren Rockwell School $ 13,450.00 Burrillville Public Schools William L. Callahan School $ 20,266.85 Burrillville Public Schools Austin T. Levy School $ 12,950.00 Burrillville Public Schools Steere Farm Elementary School $ 13,400.00 Central Falls Schools Ella Risk School $ 28,485.94 Central Falls Schools Raices Dual Language Academy $ 14,846.32

Central Falls Schools The Learning Community Charter

School $ 40,399.37 Central Falls Schools Veterans Memorial Elementary $ 28,864.76 Central Falls Schools Capt. G. Harold Hunt School $ 12,667.78 Central Falls Schools Segue Institute for Learning $ 22,786.79 Chariho Regional District Ashaway Elementary School $ 13,450.00 Chariho Regional District Charlestown Elementary School $ 18,000.00 Chariho Regional District Richmond Elementary School $ 26,600.00 Coventry Public Schools Blackrock Elementary $ 16,000.00 Coventry Public Schools Hopkins Hill School $ 16,200.00 Coventry Public Schools Tiogue School $ 16,550.00 Coventry Public Schools Western Coventry School $ 14,850.00 Coventry Public Schools Washington Oak School $ 29,350.00 Cranston Public Schools Gladstone Street School $ 20,050.00 Cranston Public Schools Arlington School $ 10,250.00 Cranston Public Schools Stadium School $ 11,450.00 Cranston Public Schools William R. Dutemple School $ 12,800.00 Cranston Public Schools Edgewood Highland School $ 14,100.00 Cranston Public Schools Eden Park School $ 12,150.00 Cranston Public Schools George J. Peters School $ 12,250.00 Cranston Public Schools Garden City School $ 26,800.00

Cranston Public Schools Horton School Theraputic Based

Program $ 4,200.00 Cranston Public Schools Edward S. Rhodes School $ 14,400.00 Cranston Public Schools Stone Hill School $ 11,650.00 Cranston Public Schools Woodridge School $ 12,900.00 Cranston Public Schools Glen Hills School $ 13,600.00 Cumberland Public Schools RISE Prep Mayoral Academy $ 28,500.00 Cumberland Public Schools Bradley School North $ 2,950.00 Cumberland Public Schools B.F. Norton Elementary School $ 18,950.00

Cumberland Public Schools Garvin Memorial School $ 21,100.00

Cumberland Public Schools John J. McLaughlin Cumberland Hill

School $ 20,700.00 E. Providence School Department Emma G. Whiteknact School $ 15,994.23 E. Providence School Department Agnes B. Hennessey School $ 16,719.01 E. Providence School Department Orlo Avenue School $ 18,036.96 E. Providence School Department Silver Spring School $ 15,715.64 E. Providence School Department Kent Heights School $ 18,645.03 E. Providence School Department Alice M. Waddington School $ 27,750.00 Exeter-W. Greenwich Schools Metcalf School $ 27,250.00 Exeter-W. Greenwich Schools Wawaloam School $ 11,150.00 Family Service of Rhode Island

Inc. Mount Pleasant Academy $ 2,250.00

Foster Public Schools Captain Isaac Paine Elementary

School $ 12,150.00 Highlander - Warren Highlander Charter School $ 20,250.00 International Charter International Charter School $ 23,016.44 Johnston Public Schools Thornton School $ 27,185.35 Johnston Public Schools Winsor Hill School $ 20,574.61 Johnston Public Schools Sarah Dyer Barnes School $ 14,047.67 Johnston Public Schools Early Childhood Center $ 15,418.32 Johnston Public Schools Brown Avenue School $ 12,896.40 Lifespan School Solutions Inc. The Bradley School $ 2,750.00 Lifespan School Solutions Inc. Bradley School-South $ 2,850.00 Lincoln Public Schools The Spurwink School $ 1,150.00

Lincoln Public Schools Northern Lincoln Elementary

School $ 26,432.01 Lincoln Public Schools Saylesville Elementary School $ 15,800.00 Lincoln Public Schools Lonsdale Elementary School $ 14,650.00 Meeting Street Center The Hope Academy $ 24,150.00

Middletown Public Schools Joseph H. Gaudet Learning

Academy $ 15,300.00 Middletown Public Schools Forest Avenue School $ 19,300.00 Middletown Public Schools Aquidneck School $ 18,150.00

N. Kingstown Public Schools Suzanne M. Henseler Quidnessett

Elementary School $ 15,824.40 N. Providence School Department Centredale School $ 19,449.06

N. Providence School Department Dr. Joseph A Whelan Elementary

School $ 20,535.24

N. Providence School Department James L. McGuire School $ 30,225.83 N. Providence School Department Stephen Olney School $ 21,400.00 N. Providence School Department Greystone School $ 16,550.00 Narragansett Public Schools Narragansett Elementary School $ 17,100.00 Newport Public Schools Pell School $ 37,854.37 Paul Cuffee Charter School Paul Cuffee Lower School $ 19,500.00 Pawtucket Public Schools Elizabeth Baldwin School $ 28,269.64 Pawtucket Public Schools Henry J. Winters School $ 23,221.24 Pawtucket Public Schools M. Virginia Cunningham School $ 19,696.51 Pawtucket Public Schools Agnes E. Little School $ 19,250.38 Pawtucket Public Schools Fallon Memorial School $ 24,636.48 Pawtucket Public Schools Nathanael Greene School $ 26,661.45 Pawtucket Public Schools Francis J. Varieur School $ 20,400.00 Pawtucket Public Schools Potter-Burns School $ 40,289.50 Pawtucket Public Schools Curvin-McCabe School $ 18,483.84 Pawtucket Public Schools Flora S. Curtis Memorial School $ 16,850.00 Portsmouth Howard Hathaway School $ 20,900.00 Portsmouth Melville Elementary $ 16,300.00

Providence Public Schools Alfred Lima Sr. Elementary

School/Fortes $ 36,366.35

Providence Public Schools Anthony Carnevale Elementary

School $ 29,563.07 Providence Public Schools Asa Messer Elementary School $ 30,931.75

Providence Public Schools Frank D. Spaziano Elementary

School/Annex $ 33,309.77 Providence Public Schools George J. West Elementary School $ 23,400.00 Providence Public Schools Harry Kizirian Elementary School $ 24,750.00 Providence Public Schools Leviton Dual Language School $ 15,852.18

Providence Public Schools Lillian Feinstein Elementary Sackett

Street $ 23,227.72 Providence Public Schools Mary E. Fogarty Elementary School $ 20,861.37 Providence Public Schools Reservoir Avenue School $ 15,504.84

Providence Public Schools Robert L Bailey IV Elementary

School $ 24,469.97

Providence Public Schools The Sgt. Cornel Young Jr &

Charlotte Woods Element $ 38,928.60 Providence Public Schools Veazie Street School $ 22,456.41 Providence Public Schools William D'Abate $ 20,000.00

Providence Public Schools Webster Avenue School $ 16,720.77

Providence Public Schools Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

Elementary School $ 24,979.74 Providence Public Schools Pleasant View School $ 25,436.68

Providence Public Schools Robert F. Kennedy Elementary

School $ 25,633.40

Providence Public Schools Vartan Gregorian Elementary

School $ 17,567.84 Rhode Island School for the Deaf RI School For the Deaf $ 5,767.06 Scituate Public Schools Hope Elementary School $ 8,150.00 Scituate Public Schools North Scituate Elementary School $ 12,000.00 Scituate Public Schools Clayville Elementary School $ 7,200.00 Smithfield Old County Road School $ 12,288.36 Smithfield Raymond C. LaPerche School $ 13,600.00 Smithfield Pleasant View Elementary School $ 27,600.00 SouthSide Elementary Charter

School Southside Elementary School $ 8,781.12 The Groden Center Inc. The Groden Center Inc. $ 3,140.99 Tiverton Public Schools Pocasset School $ 18,450.00 Tiverton Public Schools Walter E. Ranger School $ 12,650.00 W. Warwick Public Schools John F. Horgan Elementary School $ 26,407.98 W. Warwick Public Schools Wakefield Hills Elementary School $ 20,046.94 Warwick Public Schools Norwood School $ 13,250.00 Warwick Public Schools Oakland Beach Elementary School $ 16,600.00 Warwick Public Schools Lippitt School $ 11,150.00 Warwick Public Schools Cottrell F. Hoxsie School $ 14,680.30 Warwick Public Schools Harold F. Scott School $ 9,550.00 Warwick Public Schools Holliman School $ 13,900.00 Warwick Public Schools E. G. Robertson School $ 12,950.00 Warwick Public Schools Park School $ 11,100.00 Warwick Public Schools Sherman School $ 17,300.00 Warwick Public Schools Warwick Neck School $ 14,550.00 Warwick Public Schools Wyman School $ 13,000.00 Warwick Public Schools Greenwood School $ 12,800.00 Warwick Public Schools Cedar Hill School $ 15,100.00 Westerly Public Schools Springbrook Elementary School $ 11,600.00 Westerly Public Schools State Street School $ 10,050.00 Woonsocket Public Schools Globe Park School $ 26,150.00

Woonsocket Public Schools Harris School $ 18,900.00

Woonsocket Public Schools Kevin K. Coleman Elementary

School $ 13,350.00

Woonsocket Public Schools Pothier-Citizens Elementary

Campus $ 33,600.00 Woonsocket Public Schools Leo A. Savoie School $ 19,150.00 Woonsocket Public Schools Bernon Heights School $ 20,400.00

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .