RFP Part 1.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND, HAWAII

400 MARSHALL ROAD

JBPHH, HAWAII 96860-3139

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

NO. N62478-20-R-4042

FY20 P-033 MAGAZINE

CONSOLIDATION, PHASE 1,

WEST LOCH,

JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-

HICKAM (JBPHH), OAHU,

HAWAII

i

PART 1

PROPOSAL FORMS AND DOCUMENTS

DOCUMENT

PART 1

00010 STANDARD FORM 1442

00100 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

00110 EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

00600 REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

00700 CONTRACT CLAUSES

00800 SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

00830 CONSTRUCTION WAGE RATE REQUIREMENTS STATUTE WAGE DECISION

00900 APPENDIX A, DoD SAFE Instructions

APPENDIX B, SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN TEMPLATE

APPENDIX C, Photographs

PARTS 2 – 6 NAVFAC SPECIFICATION

SOLICITATION, OFFER

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

N62478-20-R-4042

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATIED (RFP)

3. DATE ISSUED

04/22/20

PAGE OF

PAGES

IMPORTANT - The “offer” section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror

4. CONTRACT NO. 5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO 6. PROJECT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE N62478 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

NAVFAC Hawaii Construction Acquisition Division (OPHA2) 400 Marshall Road

JBPHH, HI 96860-3139

Electronic proposal submission will be required and shall be submitted utilizing DoD SAFE: https://safe.apps.mil/

9. FOR INFORMATION

CALL:

A. NAME

Jody Muraoka

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT

CALLS)

(808)471-0318, FAX: (808)474-1543

SOLICITATION

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations “offer” and “offeror” mean “bid” and “bidder”.

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying no., date):

Request for Proposals No. N62478-20-R-4042, FY20 P-033 Magazine Consolidation, Phase 1, West Loch, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-

Hickam (JBPHH), Oahu, Hawaii.

This procurement is solicited on an unrestricted basis.

SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM): Offerors shall comply with FAR 52.204-7, System for Award Management (Oct 2018) to receive an award. Lack of registration in the SAM database will make an Offeror ineligible for award

11. The Contractor shall begin performance within 15 calendar days and complete it within * calendar days after receiving *See Document 00700, Clause 52.211-10 award, notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See Section 00700 FAR 52.211-10) 12.a THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If “YES”, indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

YES NO

12.B CALENDAR DAYS

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and (See Document 00100) copy to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by 2:00 PM HST, 06/08/20 (or as amended via SF30). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers will be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror’s name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than 120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

1442-102 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(d)

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror) N62478-20-R-4042

14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code) 15. TELEPHONE NO./FACSIMILE NO. (Include area code)

16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if different than Item 14)

DUNS NO. CAGE CODE

TIN NO.

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of the solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writing within ____ calendar days after the date offers are due. (Insert any number equal to or greater than the minimum requirement stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.

AMOUNTS

SEE ATTACHED PROPOSAL SCHEDULE

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZATION TO SIGN OFFER

(Type or print )

20B. SIGNATURE 20C. OFFER

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT

23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN

(4 copies unless otherwise specified) (See Section 00700 252.232-7006).

ITEM

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) ( ) 41 U.S.C.253(c) ( )

26. ADMINISTERED BY CODE N62478 27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY N68732

NAVFAC HAWAII

NAVFAC HI FEAD PRJ22

90 G St., Bldg 1200

JBPHH, HI 96853-5230

Defense Finance & Accounting Service - Cleveland Norfolk Accounts Payable

PO BOX 998022

Cleveland OH 44199

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT Contractor is required to sign this document and return copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees to furnish and deliver all items or perform all work requirements identified on this form an any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be governed by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual document is necessary.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED

TO SIGN (Type or print)

31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30B. SIGNATURE 30C. DATE

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

31C. AWARD

GPO : 1995 O - 469-79

STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

(REV. 4-8)

PROPOSAL SCHEDULE

FY20 P-033 MAGAZINE CONSOLIDATION, PHASE 1, WEST LOCH,

JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM (JBPHH), OAHU, HAWAII

Base Schedule

ITEM UNIT OF

NO. DESCRIPTION QTY ISSUE AMOUNT

0001 Construction of Magazine B, C & D 1 LS $______________

The basis for ITEM NO. 0001 is the price for construction of all work complete in accordance with the drawings and specifications associated with FY20 P-033 Magazine Consolidation, Phase 1, West Loch, Joint Base Pearl Harbor- Hickam (JBPHH), Oahu, Hawaii but not including work specified under Item No. 0002.

Option

0002 Construction of Magazine A 1 LS $______________ (Option 1)

Total Base Schedule plus Option (Item Nos. 0001 and 0002) $______________

THE FOLLOWING WILL BE COMPLETED BY THE CONTRACTING OFFICER UPON

AWARD:

TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (Base Schedule plus Option ____) $ ______________

NOTES TO PROPOSAL SCHEDULE:

1. Failure to provide an offer on all items in the Proposal Schedule may cause the offeror to be considered non-responsive.

2. See Document 00110, Paragraph 2.2 for Price Evaluation.

3. See FAR Provision 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options. By submission of an offer under the OPTION, Offeror agrees that the Government may exercise the OPTION at time of award or at any time within 90 calendar days following the date of award.

Document 00100

Section 00100

Instructions to Offerors

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2018 52.211-2 Availability of Specifications, Standards, and Data Item

Descriptions Listed in the Acquisition Streamlining and Standardization Information System (ASSIST)

APR 2014

52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition JAN 2017 52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990 52.222-5 Construction Wage Rate Requirements--Secondary Site of the

Work

MAY 2014

52.225-12 Notice of Buy American Requirement - Construction Materials Under Trade Agreements

MAY 2014

52.236-28 Preparation of Proposals--Construction OCT 1997 252.215-7008 Only One Offer JUL 2019

1.1 NUMBER OF COPIES/TIME OF RECEIPT

Electronic proposal submissions will be required and shall be submitted utilizing DoD SAFE: https://safe.apps.mil/ Electronic submissions sent via email or facsimile are not authorized and will not be accepted. Hard copy proposal submissions that are mailed, couriered, or hand delivered, etc. are not authorized and will not be accepted.

Electronic proposal must be submitted in Adobe PDF format, and the file size of the price and technical proposals together must not exceed 8GB. Submit all pages of the PRICE PROPOSAL as one complete file and all pages of the TECHNICAL PROPOSAL as another complete file. Multiple files of the PRICE PROPOSAL and multiple files of the TECHNICAL PROPOSAL will not be accepted. See Document 00900 Appendix A.

a. PRICE PROPOSAL: The PRICE PROPOSAL shall include the following:

(1) Signed and completed SF 1442 (Solicitation, Offer and Award)

(2) Price proposal schedule

(3) Bid Guarantee

(4) Representations and Certifications (Document 00600)

(5) Any teaming agreements, Joint Venture agreements, LLC Operating Agreements, see Document 00100, paragraph 1.4 JOINT VENTURES (JV), LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES (LLC), LIMITED

PARTNERSHIPS (LTD), ETC.

(6) Current company balance sheets (Will be used for responsibility determination, see Document 00100, paragraph

1.3, PREAWARD SURVEY/RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION)

b. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL: The TECHNICAL PROPOSAL shall include the following:

(1) All information required by FAR 52.215-1

(2) All information required by Factor I, Experience

(3) All information required by Factor II, Safety

(4) All information required by Factor III, Past Performance

Contractors shall also follow instructions in Document 00110.

1.2 AMENDMENTS

Amendments will normally be posted to the web site https://www.fbo.gov. It is the offeror's responsibility to check the web site periodically for any amendments to the solicitation.

1.3 PREAWARD SURVEY/RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION

FAR §9.104 requires prospective contractors to demonstrate, among other things, that they have adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or ability to obtain them, capability to comply with the required performance schedule, a satisfactory performance record, and be otherwise eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations. The pre-award survey is not a part of the technical evaluation. Please include, at a minimum, the following information as a part of your price proposal under a separate tab, entitled “Pre-Award Survey Information.” Other information may be requested as directed by the Contracting Officer and the information shall be submitted within three working days of the request.

a. Company financial statements (balance sheets and income statements) for past three years.

b. Financial resources available to perform the contract. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital that will be used for the performance of the contract. If the offeror plans to rely on financial support from other sources, identify the maximum lines of credit that will be available to include documentation to support the amounts. The maximum lines of credit should be based upon the inclusion of this contract effort. For joint ventures discuss the financial responsibilities among companies and provide same information for each partner.

c. Newly-formed entities (e.g. limited liability companies (“LLC’s”), limited partnerships (“LTD’s”) and newly-created corporate subsidiaries) that is the entity liable on the contract ordinarily have no record–or an insufficient record–of relevant experience, past performance, and financial capability to support a responsibility determination.

In such cases, the offeror may rely on the resources of the LLC member, parent, limited partner, or other entities related to the offeror for responsibility purposes where the offer submits a guaranty from the entity providing the resources.

d. Positive proof of your company’s maximum bonding capacity per year in the form of a letter from your surety.

1.4 JOINT VENTURES (JV), LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES (LLC), LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS (LTD), ETC.

Joint Ventures and Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships shall submit the following additional documentation regarding their business entities:

a. An executed copy of the JV, LLC or LTD agreement.

b. A detailed statement outlining the following in terms of percentages where appropriate:

1. The relationship of the team/partners/parties in terms of business ownership, capital contribution, profit distribution or loss sharing.

2. The management approach in terms of who will conduct, direct, supervise, and control.

3. The structure and decision-making responsibilities of the partners/parties in terms of who will control the manner and method of performance of work.

4. Identify (by name and title) the personnel having the authority to legally bind the partners/parties (including authority to execute the contract documents and bonds).

c. A list of partners/parties, to include company name, DUNS and CAGE Numbers, Address, Point of Contact, Email address, phone number and facsimile number.

1.5 INQUIRIES/REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI)

Contractors shall email all their inquiries and RFIs for this request for proposal (RFP) to jody.muraoka@navy.mil no later than 4:00 p.m., H.S.T., May 12, 2020. Point of contact for this RFP is Ms. Jody Muraoka, Construction Acquisition Division (ACQ31), (808) 471-0318, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Hawaii, 400 Marshall Road, Building A-13, JBPHH, Hawaii 96860-3139.

1.6 SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (Reference FAR 52.219-9 and DFARS 252.219-7003)

NAVFAC’s command-wide small business subcontracting targets are shown below. These may be higher or lower than percentages that would represent realistic, challenging small business subcontracting goals for this acquisition.

Offerors representing as other than small businesses shall establish small business subcontracting plan goals that are consistent with their small business participation and commitment strategies. The Subcontracting Plan shall be submitted prior to contract award. See the Small Business Subcontracting Plan Template (Document 00900 Appendix B) for format.

SB 40%

SDB 5%

HUBZone 3%

WOSB 9%

SDVOSB 3%

1.7 SITE VISIT

A site visit will not be held. Photographs will be provided in Document 00900, Appendix C.

1.8 MAGNITUDE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT

The estimated price range of this work is between $25,000,000 and $100,000,000.

52.211-14 NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, AND ENERGY PROGRAM USE (APR 2008)

Any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation will be DX rated order; X DO rated order certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) (15 CFR 700), and the Contractor will be required to follow all of the requirements of this regulation.

(End of provision)

52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)

The Government contemplates award of a firm-fixed price contract resulting from this solicitation.

52.222-23 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE EQUAL

EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSTRUCTION (FEB 1999)

(a) The offeror's attention is called to the Equal Opportunity clause and the Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction clause of this solicitation.

(b) The goals for minority and female participation, expressed in percentage terms for the Contractor's aggregate workforce in each trade on all construction work in the covered area, are as follows:

Goals for minority participation for each trade

Goals for female participation for each trade

69.1% 6.9%

These goals are applicable to all the Contractor's construction work performed in the covered area. If the Contractor performs construction work in a geographical area located outside of the covered area, the Contractor shall apply the goals established for the geographical area where the work is actually performed. Goals are published periodically in the Federal Register in notice form, and these notices may be obtained from any Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs office.

(c) The Contractor's compliance with Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4 shall be based on (1) its implementation of the Equal Opportunity clause, (2) specific affirmative action obligations required by the clause entitled "Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction,'' and (3) its efforts to meet the goals. The hours of minority and female employment and training must be substantially uniform throughout the length of the contract, and in each trade. The Contractor shall make a good faith effort to employ minorities and women evenly on each of its projects. The transfer of minority or female employees or trainees from Contractor to Contractor, or from project to project, for the sole purpose of meeting the Contractor's goals shall be a violation of the contract, Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4. Compliance with the goals will be measured against the total work hours performed.

(d) The Contractor shall provide written notification to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal Contract Compliance, U.S. Department of Labor, within 10 working days following award of any construction subcontract in excess of $10,000 at any tier for construction work under the contract resulting from this solicitation. The notification shall list the --

(1) Name, address, and telephone number of the subcontractor;

(2) Employer's identification number of the subcontractor;

(3) Estimated dollar amount of the subcontract;

(4) Estimated starting and completion dates of the subcontract; and

(5) Geographical area in which the subcontract is to be performed.

(e) As used in this Notice, and in any contract resulting from this solicitation, the "covered area" is Honolulu.

52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)

(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from NAVFAC HAWAII, Construction Acquisition Division, 400 Marshall Road, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, HI 96860-3139.

(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.

52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

https://www.acquisition.gov/browsefar https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfarspgi/current/ http://www.secnav.navy.mil/rda/Pages/NMCARS.aspx

Document 00110

DOCUMENT 00110

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

DOCUMENT 00110

EVALUATION FACTORS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. GENERAL

1.1 PROJECT SCOPE

1.2 PROPOSAL EVALUATION

1.3 ENFORCEABILITY OF THE PROPOSAL

PART II. EVALUATION CRITERIA

2.1 BASIS OF AWARD

2.2 EVALUATION FACTORS

ATTACHMENTS

(A) – CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET

(B) – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

(Am-0001)

EVALUATION FACTORS

PART I – GENERAL

1.1 PROJECT SCOPE

Construct four standard earth covered Type D Box Magazines without loading platforms, each equipped with electronically operated doors at ground level, lightning protection system, and grounding system. Paving and site improvements include concrete magazine apron and site demolition. Electrical utilities include primary and secondary electrical distribution systems, and transformers.

1.2 PROPOSAL EVALUATION

a. The Government intends to award without discussions to the Offeror with the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) proposal, in accordance with the provisions of this solicitation and applicable acquisition regulations. The Government will evaluate offers in accordance with the non-cost/price evaluation factors described in Paragraph 2.2 and the Offeror’s proposed total price.

b. Proposals are evaluated for technical acceptability but not ranked using the non-cost/price factors. Tradeoffs are not permitted.

c. The number of proposals to be evaluated for technical acceptability may be limited to the lowest priced offer at the discretion of the contracting officer. If the number of proposals to be evaluated is limited, the technical proposal shall be provided to the evaluator(s) without any identification of price. If the lowest priced proposal is not found to be technically acceptable then the next lowest price proposal shall be evaluated. If that proposal is also not found to be technically acceptable, then the process described will be conducted again as many times as necessary, until such time as the Government identifies a technically acceptable proposal. If the contracting officer later determines that discussions are necessary, the procedures in FAR 15.306 shall be followed.

d. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract.

e. The distinction between experience and past performance is experience pertains to the type of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

1.3 ENFORCEABILITY OF THE PROPOSAL

The proposals must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this solicitation. The Government will rely on such information in the award of the contracts. By submission of the offer, the Offeror agrees that all items proposed (e.g., key personnel, designers, subcontractors, etc.) will be utilized for the duration of the contract and any substitutions will be equal or better than as proposed and accepted for contract award and shall require prior Contracting Officer's approval.

PART II – EVALUATION CRITERIA

2.1 BASIS OF AWARD

a. The Government intends to award a contract resulting from this solicitation to that responsive responsible Offeror with the LPTA proposal based on the evaluation factors in the solicitation.

b. An overall non-price factor rating must be at least “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be eligible for award. An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any factor results in the overall non-price factors proposal being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions. An overall non-price factor rating of ‘UNACCEPTABLE” makes a proposal ineligible for award.

c. Since the LPTA methodology prohibits trade-offs, all evaluation factors are equally important. Proposals are evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using the non-cost and/or price factors.

2.2 EVALUATION FACTORS

The non-cost/price factors that will be evaluated as acceptable or unacceptable shall be as follows:

Factor 1 – Experience Factor 2 – Safety

Factor 3 – Past Performance

Price

a. NON-COST/PRICE EVALUATION FACTORS

Factor 1 – Experience:

1. Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(a) Submit a minimum of one (1) and a maximum of three (3) relevant construction projects, completed and performed by the Prime or Subcontractor(s), within the past ten (10) years of the date of issuance of the RFP, similar in size, scope and complexity to the RFP, valued at $10,000,000 or more using the Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) for each project. For purposed of this evaluation, a relevant project must include one or more of the following types of work: (1) Magazine construction, (2) Grounding and lightning protection system, (3) Probing and grouting for a coral subgrade which may have cavities and voids. Out of a maximum of three (3) relevant projects, at least (1) project must include all of the following types of work: Magazine construction; Grounding and lightning protection system.

(b) The Offeror must provide signed letters of commitment from the

Subcontractor(s), listed in Document 00110, Attachment A, that will perform the work. The letter must explain the involvement the subcontractor will have in performance of this contract. Identify the types of work that each subcontractor will be responsible for.

(c) A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

(d) The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Do not alter the Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) with the exception of expanding the individual blocks on this form; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided 8.5” x 11” page (or two (2) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages) and shall be Arial 10 font (minimum).

(e) For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e. unique features, area, complexities, construction methods).

2. Basis of Evaluation:

The requirement for acceptability will be based upon the projects submitted by the Offeror in its proposal. The Offeror must demonstrate experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements in Paragraph 2.2a, Factor 1 above. The Government will only review the first three (3) projects, in the order they were submitted in the proposal. Any projects submitted in excess of the first three (3) for will not be considered.

Factor 2 – Safety

(a) Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and sub-contractor performed work and the Offeror’s method for qualifying, evaluating, selecting all tiers of sub-contractors. The narrative shall include:

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): Include five previous complete calendar years’ (January 2015 through December 2019) worth of data. This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If the offeror has no EMR or premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of the factor submission.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates: Submit five previous complete calendar years’ (January 2015 through December 2019) worth of OSHA DART and TRC data. If an offeror cannot submit OSHA DART and TRC rates for any year, affirmatively state so and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART and TRC rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this factor submission.

(3) Technical Approach for Safety: Technical Approach for Safety should describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Fully describe the safety management system that will be used to oversee safety compliance and performance of self-performed and sub-contractor performed work. Also describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and all subcontractor levels. Additionally, describe the methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to one (1) double-sided 8.5” x 11” page or two (2) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages, Arial 10 font (minimum).

NOTE: For a partnership or JV, the EMR, OSHA DART, and TRC rates are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or JV; however, only one safety narrative is required.

Safety narratives for a partnership or JV may be up to one (1) double-sided 8.5” x 11” pages or two (2) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages in length, Arial 10 font (minimum).

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for its self-performed work and the work of its subcontractors. The Government will evaluate the EMR, OSHA DART and TRC Rates to determine if the offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward or downward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rates. The Government will not calculate the EMR, DART and TRC Rates. Offerors that do not submit EMR, DART, and TRC rates and do not explain why it did not submit the rates will be rated unacceptable for that element. If extenuating circumstances that affect the rates and negative trends are not clearly addressed, the element will be rated unacceptable. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety performance record, safety management system, and the methodology of qualifying, evaluating, selecting and overseeing its subcontractors. The Government may also consider other sources of information for evaluating safety that may include, but not limited to: OSHA, NAVFAC’s Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS) database, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), and other related databases. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror. The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project and the specific management practices that will be in place for providing deliberate safety program management and mishap prevention support.

Offeror’s EMR will be evaluated against the following Navy standards:

Risk EMR Very Low Risk Less than 0.6 Low Risk From 0.6 to less than 0.8 Moderate Risk From 0.8 to 1.0 High Risk Greater than 1.0 to 1.1 Extremely High Risk Greater than 1.1 Offeror’s DART and TRC rates will be evaluated against the following Navy standards:

Risk DART Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 1.0 Low Risk From 1.0 to 1.99 Moderate Risk From 2.0 to 2.99 High Risk From 3.0 to 4.0 Extremely High Risk Greater than 4.0

Risk TRC Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 2.49 Low Risk From 2.5 to 3.49 Moderate Risk From 3.5 to 4.49 High Risk From 4.5 to 5.99 Extremely High Risk Greater Than 6.0

Factor 3 – Past Performance:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

(1) If a completed Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS)/Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 1. If there is not a completed CCASS/CPAR evaluation then submit Past performance Questionnaire (Attachment B) for each project included in Factor 1. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Evidence of customer satisfaction shall be from the owner and/or their representative responsible for the construction contract administration. It shall not be from the designer on a design-build project nor shall it be from a prime construction contractor for a subcontractor. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, previously completed PPQs in full text submitted for other RFPs will be accepted. All previously completed PPQs shall include all information requested in Attachment B, NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (form PPQ-0) located at the end of Document 00110. All PPQs shall be complete, contain clients’ signature, and include all information requested in Attachment B located at the end of Document 00110. This does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Ms. Jody Muraoka, jody.muraoka@navy.mil.

(2) Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues. Explanations shall be Arial 10 font (minimum) and shall not exceed one (1) double-sided 8.5” x 11” pages (or two (2) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages) in total.

(3) The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past or current performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

(4) Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

(1) This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 1– Experience and may also consider an Offeror’s past and/or current performance on other projects, interim and/or final, documented in known sources.

Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown.

(2) The Government may consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends, interim and/or final, in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination.

(3) In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable.”.

b. PRICE EVALUATION

Price Proposal:

1. Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Offerors shall complete the Proposal Schedule.

2. Basis of Evaluation:

(a) The price will be evaluated based on total price (price for the base schedule plus option).

(b) One or more of the following techniques will be used to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation, against one another.

Comparison of proposed prices received with the independent Government estimate.

Comparison of proposed prices received with available historical information.

Comparison of information reports obtained from Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) or other outside agencies as required.

(c) A price that is found to be either unreasonably high or unrealistically low in relation to the proposed work may be indicative of an inherent lack of understanding of the solicitation requirements and may result in the overall proposal not being considered for award.

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION

DISCLOSURE LIMITATIONS AS OUTLINED IN FAR 2.101 & 3.104 APPLY

ATTACHMENT A

CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project No. (check one) : CON #1 CON #2 CON #3 CON #4 CON #5

1. Experience for: Offeror Joint-Venture Other (Explain)

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone Number:

DUNS Number:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain)

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Number: Delivery/Task Order Number:

Title:

Location:

4. Award Date (mm/dd/yy): Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

5. Type of work:

Magazine Construction Grounding and lightning protection system Probing and grouting for a coral subgrade which may have cavities and voids

6. Type of Contract/Task Order: (Check ALL that apply)

Firm-Fixed Price Cost/Time and Material Other (explain):

Complete Block 7 for Construction Projects.

7. Construction Project:

Award Amount: Final Price:

Type of Contract/Task Order: (Check ALL that apply)

Design-Build Design-Bid-Build Delivery/Task Order (IDIQ) Other (explain):

If Design-Build, identify the Lead Design Firm:______________________________________________

8. Not Used

9. Provide a detailed description of the project and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, square footage, construction methods). If design-build, include a description of the design-effort.

10. Provide a detailed description of what work your firm self-performed on this project:

11. Other Information:

Rev. Apr 2017 1

ATTACHMENT B

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: Entity Identifier Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO NAVFAC WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON NAVFAC SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO NAVFAC. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR NAVFAC POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT

RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

Rev. Apr 2017 2

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

Rev. Apr 2017 3

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U N

Rev. Apr 2017 4

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.

Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

Document 00600

Section 00600

Representations & Certifications

Request for Proposal No: RFP N62478-20-R-4042

Name and Address of Offeror: _______________________________________

Business Phone:(___)____________________ Facsimile No: (___)____________________

CEC/DUNS Number: _______________________ TIN NUMBER:_______________________

CAGE Number:____________________________ Email Address:____________________

AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATOR: ______________________________________________

Name and Title

Phone No: (___)____________________ Facsimile No.: (___)____________________

U.S. Owned Company: Yes

No Country___________________

These provisions are from the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS). Complete and return with the proposal forms.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting JUL 2016 52.204-22 Alternative Line Item Proposal JAN 2017 52.204-26 Covered Telecommunications Equipment or Services--

Representation.

DEC 2019

52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations

NOV 2015

252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD…