Am1.pdf

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT J 1 8

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

Am-0001 5/26/20

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

NAVFAC Hawaii Construction Acquisition Division (OPHA2) 400 Marshall Road See Item 6 JBPHH, Hawaii 96860-3139

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State, and Zip Code) X 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

N62478-20-R-4042

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

22 Apr 20

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

[ X ]The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers [ ] is extended, [x ] is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning ____ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) NA

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

(x) A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF: FAR CLAUSE 52.243-4, CHANGES

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor [ ] is not, [ ] is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

N62478-20-R-4042, FY20 P-033 Magazine Consolidation, Phase 1, West Loch, Joint Base Pearl Harbor- Hickam (JBPHH), Oahu, Hawaii

See page 2

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE

30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Am-0001 Standard Form 30 Item No. 14 (Continued) Page 2 of 8

1. CHANGES TO THE SOLICITATION. Attached hereto are new and revised pages to the solicitation. The revision mark “(Am-0001)” is shown on each page.

a. REVISED SECTIONS/PROVISIONS/CLAUSES/PAGES/PARAGRAPHS/ITEMS. The following are revised provisions/clauses/paragraphs/pages to the solicitation. Changes are indicated in bold print. Although the entire documents are being re-issued under Am-0001, only the following pages/paragraphs/items changed in the following documents.

Document 00100

Paragraph 1.1, Number of Copies/Time of Receipt

Document 00110

Paragraph 2.2a, Factor 1 – Experience, 1(a)

b. REVISED PARAGRAPHS/SECTIONS/PAGES TO THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS.

Following are revisions to the solicitation. Revised technical specification pages are not being issued with this amendment.

(1) SECTION 01 57 19 TEMPORARY ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS, Paragraph 3.9

Revise notation to current paragraph to read:

“PCB testing data is not available for the transformer and concrete pad to be removed by the project. The transformer and concrete pad were installed after 2006. For bidding purposes assume the concrete pad and transformer will contain PCBs at levels less than 50 parts per million. Inspect the transformer and conduct sampling in accordance with 40 CFR 761 as necessary to determine presence of PCBs. Inspect the concrete pad for staining or evidence of leakage. If staining is observed, conduct sampling of the concrete pad in accordance with 40 CFR 761. Manage and dispose of PCB-contaminated waste in accordance with 40 CFR 761 and Section 02 84 33 REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS).”

(2) SECTION 01 57 19 TEMPORARY ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS, Paragraph 3.11.1

Add to Paragraph 3.11.1 after 1st paragraph to read:

If used oil is drained from any electrical equipment or old equipment in which the source of lubricating oil, hydraulic fluid, heat-transfer fluid, mineral or refrigeration oil, etc. is unknown, test the used oil for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).

a. If the used oil contains greater than or equal to 50 parts per million (ppm) PCBs, manage and dispose as PCB waste in accordance with 02 84 33 REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF POLYCHLORINATED

BIPHENYLS (PCBS).

b. If the used oil contains greater than or equal to 2 ppm and less than 50 ppm, manage in accordance with 40 CFR 279, as incorporated and amended in HAR 11-279.1. Dispose of the used oil to marketers or burners that are able to follow 40 CFR 761 requirements.

(3) SECTION 26 12 21, Paragraph 2.2.1.1 High Voltage

Revise the first sentence as indicated by bold and underlined below:

“High-voltage portion contains: the incoming line, insulated high-voltage load-break connectors, bushing well inserts, four high-voltage bushing wells configured for loop feed application, load-break switch handle, Item No. 14 (Continued) Page 3 of 8 access to oil-immersed fuses, dead-front surge arresters, tap changer handle, connector parking stands, and ground pad.”

(4) SECTION 26 12 21, Paragraph 2.2.1.1 High Voltage, Oil-immersed current-limiting fuses description under sub-paragraph (f)

Revise as indicated by bold and underlined below:

“Oil-immersed current-limiting fuses: IEEE C37.47; 50,000 rms amperes symmetrical interrupting rating at the system voltage specified. Connect current-limiting fuses ahead of the radial-feed load-break switch.”

(5) SECTION 26 12 21, Paragraph 2.2.1.1 High Voltage

Add sub-paragraph (g) after sub-paragraph (f):

“g. Load-break switch: Radial-feed oil-immersed type rated at 15 kV, 95 kV BIL, with a continuous current rating and load-break rating of 200 amperes, and a make-and-latch rating of 12,000 rms amperes symmetrical. Locate the switch handle in the high-voltage compartment.”

(6) SECTION 26 20 00, Paragraph 3.1.3 Wiring Methods

Replace Paragraph 3.1.3 in its entirety with the following:

“3.1.3 Wiring Methods

Provide insulated conductors installed in galvanized rigid steel conduit, except where specifically indicated or specified otherwise or required by NFPA 70 to be installed otherwise. Grounding conductor: separate from electrical system neutral conductor. Provide insulated green equipment grounding conductor for circuit(s) installed in conduit and raceways. Minimum conduit size: 3/4 inch in diameter for low voltage lighting and power circuits. Vertical distribution in multiple story buildings: made with metal conduit in fire-rated shafts, with metal conduit extending through shafts for minimum distance of 6 inches.”

(7) SECTION 33 71 01, 1.4 SUBMITTALS, SD-06 Test Reports

Add the following Test Reports:

“Medium-Voltage Preassembled Cable Test; G

Sag and Tension Test; G”

(8) Section 33 71 01, Paragraph 2.12 CUTOUTS

Replace Paragraph 2.12 in its entirety with the following:

“2.12 CUTOUTS

Open type cutouts rated 600 amperes at 15 kV, disconnecting, hook operated, galvanized.”

(9) SECTION 33 71 01, Paragraph 3.1.3.2 Backfilling Near Anchors

Replace Paragraph 3.1.3.2 in its entirety with the following:

“3.1.3.2 Anchor Backfilling

Item No. 14 (Continued) Page 4 of 8

Backfill concrete deadman guy anchor and anchor rod excavations with properly compacted satisfactory material as indicated. See Section 31 23 00.00 20 EXCAVATION AND FILL for satisfactory material properties, and placement and compaction requirements.”

(10) SECTION 33 71 01, Paragraph 3.1.3.3 Guy Installation

Revise the last sentence as indicated by bold and underlined below:

“Provide strain insulators at a point on guy strand 14.5 feet minimum from the ground and 6 feet minimum from the surface of pole.”

(11) SECTION 33 71 01, Paragraph 3.1.5.2 Grounding Electrode Conductors

Replace Paragraph 3.1.5.2 in its entirety with the following:

“3.1.5.2 Grounding Electrode Conductors Provide a grounding electrode conductor for the surge arrester and equipment grounding conductors, a separate grounding electrode conductor for the shield wires of power circuits, and a separate grounding electrode conductor for communication cable messengers. Staple grounding electrode conductors to wood poles in creosoted wood moulding at intervals not exceeding 2 feet. Size grounding electrode conductors as indicated. Bends greater than 45 degrees in grounding electrode conductor are not permitted.”

(12) SECTION 33 71 01, Paragraph 3.1.6.6 Reinstalling Conductors

Add the following sentence to the end of the paragraph:

“The contractor shall verify the existing overhead conductor type and size.”

(13) SECTION 33 71 01

Add Paragraph 3.4.7 Medium-Voltage Preassembled Cable Test:

“3.4.7 Medium-Voltage Preassembled Cable Test

After installation, prior to connection to an existing system, and before the operating test, the medium-voltage preassembled cable system must be given a high potential test. Apply direct-current voltage on each phase conductor of the system by connecting conductors at one terminal and connecting grounds or metallic shieldings or sheaths of the cable at the other terminal for each test. Prior to the test, the cables must be isolated by opening applicable protective devices and disconnecting equipment. The method, voltage, length of time, and other characteristics of the test for initial installation must be in accordance with NEMA WC 74/ICEA S-93-639 for the particular type of cable installed, and must not exceed the recommendations of IEEE 404 for cable joints unless the cable and accessory manufacturers indicate higher voltages are acceptable for testing. Should any cable fail due to a weakness of conductor insulation or due to defects or injuries incidental to the installation or because of improper installation of cable, cable joints, terminations, or other connections, the Contractor must make necessary repairs or replace cables as directed. Repaired or replaced cables shall be retested.”

(14) SECTION 33 71 01

Add Paragraph 3.4.8 Sag and Tension Test:

“3.4.8 Sag and Tension Test

The Contracting Officer must be given prior notice of the time schedule for stringing conductors or cables serving overhead medium-voltage circuits and reserves the right to witness the procedures used for ascertaining that initial

Item No. 14 (Continued) Page 5 of 8 stringing sags and tensions are in compliance with requirements for the applicable loading district and cable weight.”

(15) SECTION 31 23 00.00 20 EXCAVATION AND FILL, 1.1 REFERENCES, ASTM

INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)

Add Reference:

ASTM D5334 Standard Test Method for Determination of Thermal Conductivity of Soil and Soft Rock by Thermal Needle Probe Procedure

(16) SECTION 31 23 00.00 20 EXCAVATION AND FILL, 1.1 REFERENCES

Add Reference:

INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS (IEEE)

IEEE 442 Guide for Thermal Resistivity Measurements of Soils and Backfill Materials

(17) SECTION 31 23 00.00 20 EXCAVATION AND FILL, 1.3 SUBMITTALS, SD-06 Test Reports

Add Test Report:

“Thermal CLSM Mix Design with Strength and Thermal Resistivity Tests; G”

(18) SECTION 31 23 00.00 20 EXCAVATION AND FILL, Paragraph 2.3.c:

Revise the paragraph as indicated by bold and underlined below:

“c. 28-day unconfined compressive strength between 50 and 150 pounds per square inch (psi) for CLSM placed in dry or dewatered trenches or excavations. CLSM placed below footings shall have an unconfined compressive strength of at least 500 psi in accordance with ASTM D4832 and shall be placed by tremie methods with the end of the tremie pipe maintained at least 12 inches below the top of the CLSM surface during placement. A chemical admixture shall be added to the CLSM mix to reduce shrinkage to a maximum of 0.05 percent.”

(19) SECTION 31 23 00.00 20 EXCAVATION AND FILL, Paragraph 2.3.d

Add notation to current paragraph d as indicated by the bold and underlined below:

“d. Aggregate shall conform to fine aggregate for concrete as specified inSection 03 30 00 CAST-IN PLACE

CONCRETE of this specification and shall be free of organic matter and deleterious substances. Recycled materials for aggregate shall not be used. Maximum coarse aggregate size must not exceed 3/8 inch.”

(20) SECTION 31 23 00.00 20 EXCAVATION AND FILL

Add Paragraph 2.10 THERMAL CONTROLLED LOW-STRENGH MATERIAL (CLSM):

“2.10 THERMAL CONTROLLED LOW-STRENGH MATERIAL (CLSM)

Thermal CLSM is a self-consolidating, cementing material used primarily as a backfill as an alternative to compacted fill and also acts as an efficient heat conducting medium. Thermal CLSM requirements include:

a. All requirements for CLSM in Paragraph 2.3.

Item No. 14 (Continued) Page 6 of 8

b. Thermal resistivity: Range of 45 C-cm/W when moist to 110 C-cm/W when totally dry.

2.10.1 Thermal CLSM Mix Design

The mix design shall contain a unique identification, and shall include the mix proportions per cubic yard, the proposed sources, admixtures, the average 28-day compressive strength (as per ASTM C873), thermal resistivity testing including thermal dry graphs (as per ASTM D5334 or IEEE 442), and the water cement ratio. Test results for compressive strength and thermal resistivity included in the mix design submittal shall not be more than 60 days old.”

(21) SECTION 32 13 13 06 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT FOR ROADS AND

SITE FACILITIES, Paragraph 2.1.3

Replace Paragraph 2.1.3 in its entirety with the following:

“Coarse aggregate must consist of crushed or uncrushed gravel, crushed stone, or a combination thereof. Aggregates, as delivered to the mixers, must consist of clean, hard, uncoated particles. Coarse aggregate must be washed. Washing must be sufficient to remove dust and other coatings. Fine aggregate must consist of natural sand, manufactured sand, or a combination of the two, and must be composed of clean, hard, durable particles. Both coarse and fine aggregates must meet the requirements of ASTM C33/C33M.”

c. DELETED PARAGRAPHS/SECTIONS/PAGES TO THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. The following items are deleted from the solicitation.

01 33 00, SUBMITTAL REGISTER

03 30 00, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE

31 23 00.00 20, EXCAVATION AND FILL

d. NEW PAGES/PROVISIONS/CLAUSES/PARAGRAPHS/ITEMS. The following item is added to the solicitation.

Document 00900

Appendix D, Page D.1 through D.6

e. NEW PAGES TO THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. The following items are added to the solicitation.

Technical Specifications

01 33 00, SUBMITTAL REGISTER

03 30 00, CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE

31 23 00.00 20, EXCAVATION AND FILL

2. CHANGES TO DRAWINGS.

a. REVISED DRAWINGS (NOT ISSUED) The following are revised drawings to the solicitation. The revised drawings will not be issued with this amendment.

(1) SHEET C-104

Revise Sheet Note 2 as follows:

Delete “THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH A DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR STORAGE

OF THE SALVAGED RAILROAD TRACKS AND APPURTENANCES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT

OF CONSTRUCTION.” and replace with “THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STORE THE SALVAGED

Item No. 14 (Continued) Page 7 of 8

RAILROAD TRACKS AND APPURTENANCES ON THE PAVEMENT NEXT TO BUILDING 57 (LOCATED

NEAR THE CORNER OF FIRST STREET AND D AVENUE). COORDINATE WITH THE CONTRACTING

OFFICER.”

(2) SHEET C-503, DETAILS A1, C1 AND C3

Revise “1/8” to 1/4"” to “3/4” to 7/8””

(3) SHEET ES504

Replace Sheet Note 2 in its entirety with the following:

“2. STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF MANHOLES, MANHOLE FRAMES, AND MANHOLE COVERS,

SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CRITERIA IN SPECIFICATION SECTION SECTION 33 71 02

AND ANY ADDITIONAL LOADS INDICATED ON DRAWING S-001.”

(4) SHEET ES504, Sheet Note 9 is deleted.

(5) SHEET ES506, on the diagram for “EMH WL11”

Revise the note “TO UTILITY POLE “LW1A”” as indicated by bold and underlined below:

“TO NEW UTILITY POLE “LW1””

(6) Drawing Sheet ES506, on the diagram for “EMH WL14”

Revise the note “TO UTILITY POLE “LW6A”” as indicated by bold and underlined below:

“TO NEW UTILITY POLE “LW6””

(7) SHEET ES507

Replace Sheet Note 2 in its entirety with the following:

“2. STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF HANDHOLES, HANDHOLE FRAMES, AND HANDHOLE COVERS,

SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CRITERIA IN SPECIFICATION SECTION SECTION 33 71 02

AND ANY ADDITIONAL LOADS INDICATED ON DRAWING S-001.”

(8) SHEET ES507, Sheet Note 11 is deleted.

(9) SHEET E-001

Add General Note 5:

“5. ALL INTERIOR EQUIPMENT SHALL HAVE ENCLOSURES RATED NEMA 1, AND ALL EXTERIOR

EQUIPMENT SHALL HAVE STAINLESS STEEL ENCLOSURES RATED NEMA 4X, UNLESS OTHERWISE

NOTED.”

(10) SHEET E-001, Interior Electrical Legend

Revise the first sentence of the item below “WATT-HOUR DEMAND METER” indicated by bold and underlined as follows:

“INDICATES 3/4" SURFACE MOUNTED RGS CONDUIT UON.

Item No. 14 (Continued) Page 8 of 8

(11) SHEET S-001, DESIGN SOIL CRITERIA

Revise as indicated by bold `below:

“A. DESIGN SOIL BEARING PRESSURE

1. MAGAZINE AND WING WALLS - 4,000 PSF

2. MANHOLES AND HANDHOLES - 3,000 PSF

B. DESIIGN DYNAMIC RESPONSE FACTOR (SOIL BEARING) - 2.5

C. DESIGN LATERAL SOIL PRESSURE

1. MAGAZINE WALLS - 40 PCF

2. WING WALLS - 45 PCF

3. MANHOLE AND HANDHOLE WALLS - 60 PCF

D. DESIGN COEF. OF FRICTION (CONC. ON HARD CORAL) - 0.50

E. MODULUS OF SUBGRADE REACTION - 250 PCI”

b. REVISED DRAWINGS (ISSUED). The following are revised drawings to the solicitation.

DRAWING NO. TITLE

E-102 POWER PLANS

ES001 ELECTRICAL NOTES, LEGEND, ABBREVIATIONS

ES101 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN

ES102 ELECTRICAL DEMOLITION PLAN – E AVE.

ES105 ELECTRICAL NEW PLAN – E AVE.

ES501 UTILITY POLE DETAILS

ES503 DUCT SECTION DETAILS

ES505 ELECTRICAL MANHOLE DETAILS – PULLING IRON, CABLE RACK

ES508 TRANSFORMER AND EQUIPMENT FRAME DETAIL

ES602 ONE LINE DIAGRAM – NEW AND MDP PANEL SCHEDULE

3. The proposal due date of June 8, 2020, 2:00 P.M., Hawaiian Standard Time, remains unchanged.

Document 00100

(Am-0001)

Section 00100

Instructions to Offerors

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2018 52.211-2 Availability of Specifications, Standards, and Data Item

Descriptions Listed in the Acquisition Streamlining and Standardization Information System (ASSIST)

APR 2014

52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition JAN 2017 52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990 52.222-5 Construction Wage Rate Requirements--Secondary Site of the

Work

MAY 2014

52.225-12 Notice of Buy American Requirement - Construction Materials Under Trade Agreements

MAY 2014

52.236-28 Preparation of Proposals--Construction OCT 1997 252.215-7008 Only One Offer JUL 2019

1.1 NUMBER OF COPIES/TIME OF RECEIPT

Electronic proposal submissions will be required and shall be submitted utilizing DoD SAFE: https://safe.apps.mil/ Electronic submissions sent via email or facsimile are not authorized and will not be accepted. Hard copy proposal submissions that are mailed, couriered, or hand delivered, etc. are not authorized and will not be accepted.

Electronic proposal must be submitted in Adobe PDF format, and the file size of the price and technical proposals together must not exceed 8GB. Submit all pages of the PRICE PROPOSAL as one complete file and all pages of the TECHNICAL PROPOSAL as another complete file. Multiple files of the PRICE PROPOSAL and multiple files of the TECHNICAL PROPOSAL will not be accepted. See Document 00900 Appendix A.

a. PRICE PROPOSAL: The PRICE PROPOSAL shall include the following:

(1) Signed and completed SF 1442 (Solicitation, Offer and Award)

(2) Price proposal schedule

(3) Bid Guarantee. (The original hard copy bid guarantee shall be forwarded to this office following the electronic proposal submission.)

(4) Representations and Certifications (Document 00600)

(5) Any teaming agreements, Joint Venture agreements, LLC Operating Agreements, see Document 00100, paragraph 1.4 JOINT VENTURES (JV), LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES (LLC), LIMITED

PARTNERSHIPS (LTD), ETC.

(6) Current company balance sheets (Will be used for responsibility determination, see Document 00100, paragraph

1.3, PREAWARD SURVEY/RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION)

b. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL: The TECHNICAL PROPOSAL shall include the following:

(1) All information required by FAR 52.215-1

(2) All information required by Factor I, Experience

(3) All information required by Factor II, Safety

(4) All information required by Factor III, Past Performance

Contractors shall also follow instructions in Document 00110.

(Am-0001)

1.2 AMENDMENTS

Amendments will normally be posted to the web site https://www.fbo.gov. It is the offeror's responsibility to check the web site periodically for any amendments to the solicitation.

1.3 PREAWARD SURVEY/RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION

FAR §9.104 requires prospective contractors to demonstrate, among other things, that they have adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or ability to obtain them, capability to comply with the required performance schedule, a satisfactory performance record, and be otherwise eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations. The pre-award survey is not a part of the technical evaluation. Please include, at a minimum, the following information as a part of your price proposal under a separate tab, entitled “Pre-Award Survey Information.” Other information may be requested as directed by the Contracting Officer and the information shall be submitted within three working days of the request.

a. Company financial statements (balance sheets and income statements) for past three years.

b. Financial resources available to perform the contract. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital that will be used for the performance of the contract. If the offeror plans to rely on financial support from other sources, identify the maximum lines of credit that will be available to include documentation to support the amounts. The maximum lines of credit should be based upon the inclusion of this contract effort. For joint ventures discuss the financial responsibilities among companies and provide same information for each partner.

c. Newly-formed entities (e.g. limited liability companies (“LLC’s”), limited partnerships (“LTD’s”) and newly-created corporate subsidiaries) that is the entity liable on the contract ordinarily have no record–or an insufficient record–of relevant experience, past performance, and financial capability to support a responsibility determination.

In such cases, the offeror may rely on the resources of the LLC member, parent, limited partner, or other entities related to the offeror for responsibility purposes where the offer submits a guaranty from the entity providing the resources.

d. Positive proof of your company’s maximum bonding capacity per year in the form of a letter from your surety.

1.4 JOINT VENTURES (JV), LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES (LLC), LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS (LTD), ETC.

Joint Ventures and Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships shall submit the following additional documentation regarding their business entities:

a. An executed copy of the JV, LLC or LTD agreement.

b. A detailed statement outlining the following in terms of percentages where appropriate:

1. The relationship of the team/partners/parties in terms of business ownership, capital contribution, profit distribution or loss sharing.

2. The management approach in terms of who will conduct, direct, supervise, and control.

3. The structure and decision-making responsibilities of the partners/parties in terms of who will control the manner and method of performance of work.

4. Identify (by name and title) the personnel having the authority to legally bind the partners/parties (including authority to execute the contract documents and bonds).

(Am-0001)

c. A list of partners/parties, to include company name, DUNS and CAGE Numbers, Address, Point of Contact, Email address, phone number and facsimile number.

1.5 INQUIRIES/REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI)

Contractors shall email all their inquiries and RFIs for this request for proposal (RFP) to jody.muraoka@navy.mil no later than 4:00 p.m., H.S.T., May 12, 2020. Point of contact for this RFP is Ms. Jody Muraoka, Construction Acquisition Division (ACQ31), (808) 471-0318, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Hawaii, 400 Marshall Road, Building A-13, JBPHH, Hawaii 96860-3139.

1.6 SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (Reference FAR 52.219-9 and DFARS 252.219-7003)

NAVFAC’s command-wide small business subcontracting targets are shown below. These may be higher or lower than percentages that would represent realistic, challenging small business subcontracting goals for this acquisition.

Offerors representing as other than small businesses shall establish small business subcontracting plan goals that are consistent with their small business participation and commitment strategies. The Subcontracting Plan shall be submitted prior to contract award. See the Small Business Subcontracting Plan Template (Document 00900 Appendix B) for format.

SB 40%

SDB 5%

HUBZone 3%

WOSB 9%

SDVOSB 3%

1.7 SITE VISIT

A site visit will not be held. Photographs will be provided in Document 00900, Appendix C.

1.8 MAGNITUDE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT

The estimated price range of this work is between $25,000,000 and $100,000,000.

52.211-14 NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, AND ENERGY PROGRAM USE (APR 2008)

Any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation will be DX rated order; X DO rated order certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) (15 CFR 700), and the Contractor will be required to follow all of the requirements of this regulation.

(End of provision)

52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)

The Government contemplates award of a firm-fixed price contract resulting from this solicitation.

52.222-23 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE EQUAL

EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSTRUCTION (FEB 1999)

(a) The offeror's attention is called to the Equal Opportunity clause and the Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction clause of this solicitation.

(b) The goals for minority and female participation, expressed in percentage terms for the Contractor's aggregate workforce in each trade on all construction work in the covered area, are as follows:

Goals for minority participation for each trade

Goals for female participation for each trade

69.1% 6.9%

These goals are applicable to all the Contractor's construction work performed in the covered area. If the Contractor performs construction work in a geographical area located outside of the covered area, the Contractor shall apply the goals established for the geographical area where the work is actually performed. Goals are published periodically in the Federal Register in notice form, and these notices may be obtained from any Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs office.

(c) The Contractor's compliance with Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4 shall be based on (1) its implementation of the Equal Opportunity clause, (2) specific affirmative action obligations required by the clause entitled "Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction,'' and (3) its efforts to meet the goals. The hours of minority and female employment and training must be substantially uniform throughout the length of the contract, and in each trade. The Contractor shall make a good faith effort to employ minorities and women evenly on each of its projects. The transfer of minority or female employees or trainees from Contractor to Contractor, or from project to project, for the sole purpose of meeting the Contractor's goals shall be a violation of the contract, Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4. Compliance with the goals will be measured against the total work hours performed.

(d) The Contractor shall provide written notification to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal Contract Compliance, U.S. Department of Labor, within 10 working days following award of any construction subcontract in excess of $10,000 at any tier for construction work under the contract resulting from this solicitation. The notification shall list the --

(1) Name, address, and telephone number of the subcontractor;

(2) Employer's identification number of the subcontractor;

(3) Estimated dollar amount of the subcontract;

(4) Estimated starting and completion dates of the subcontract; and

(5) Geographical area in which the subcontract is to be performed.

(e) As used in this Notice, and in any contract resulting from this solicitation, the "covered area" is Honolulu.

52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)

(Am-0001)

(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from NAVFAC HAWAII, Construction Acquisition Division, 400 Marshall Road, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, HI 96860-3139.

(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.

52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

https://www.acquisition.gov/browsefar https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfarspgi/current/ http://www.secnav.navy.mil/rda/Pages/NMCARS.aspx

DOCUMENT 00110

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

DOCUMENT 00110

EVALUATION FACTORS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. GENERAL

1.1 PROJECT SCOPE

1.2 PROPOSAL EVALUATION

1.3 ENFORCEABILITY OF THE PROPOSAL

PART II. EVALUATION CRITERIA

2.1 BASIS OF AWARD

2.2 EVALUATION FACTORS

ATTACHMENTS

(A) – CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET

(B) – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

EVALUATION FACTORS

PART I – GENERAL

1.1 PROJECT SCOPE

Construct four standard earth covered Type D Box Magazines without loading platforms, each equipped with electronically operated doors at ground level, lightning protection system, and grounding system. Paving and site improvements include concrete magazine apron and site demolition. Electrical utilities include primary and secondary electrical distribution systems, and transformers.

1.2 PROPOSAL EVALUATION

a. The Government intends to award without discussions to the Offeror with the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) proposal, in accordance with the provisions of this solicitation and applicable acquisition regulations. The Government will evaluate offers in accordance with the non-cost/price evaluation factors described in Paragraph 2.2 and the Offeror’s proposed total price.

b. Proposals are evaluated for technical acceptability but not ranked using the non-cost/price factors. Tradeoffs are not permitted.

c. The number of proposals to be evaluated for technical acceptability may be limited to the lowest priced offer at the discretion of the contracting officer. If the number of proposals to be evaluated is limited, the technical proposal shall be provided to the evaluator(s) without any identification of price. If the lowest priced proposal is not found to be technically acceptable then the next lowest price proposal shall be evaluated. If that proposal is also not found to be technically acceptable, then the process described will be conducted again as many times as necessary, until such time as the Government identifies a technically acceptable proposal. If the contracting officer later determines that discussions are necessary, the procedures in FAR 15.306 shall be followed.

d. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract.

e. The distinction between experience and past performance is experience pertains to the type of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

1.3 ENFORCEABILITY OF THE PROPOSAL

The proposals must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this solicitation. The Government will rely on such information in the award of the contracts. By submission of the offer, the Offeror agrees that all items proposed (e.g., key personnel, designers, subcontractors, etc.) will be utilized for the duration of the contract and any substitutions will be

(Am-0001) equal or better than as proposed and accepted for contract award and shall require prior Contracting Officer's approval.

PART II – EVALUATION CRITERIA

2.1 BASIS OF AWARD

a. The Government intends to award a contract resulting from this solicitation to that responsive responsible Offeror with the LPTA proposal based on the evaluation factors in the solicitation.

b. An overall non-price factor rating must be at least “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be eligible for award. An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any factor results in the overall non-price factors proposal being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions. An overall non-price factor rating of ‘UNACCEPTABLE” makes a proposal ineligible for award.

c. Since the LPTA methodology prohibits trade-offs, all evaluation factors are equally important. Proposals are evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using the non-cost and/or price factors.

2.2 EVALUATION FACTORS

The non-cost/price factors that will be evaluated as acceptable or unacceptable shall be as follows:

Factor 1 – Experience Factor 2 – Safety

Factor 3 – Past Performance

Price

a. NON-COST/PRICE EVALUATION FACTORS

Factor 1 – Experience:

1. Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(a) Submit total of three (3) relevant construction projects, completed and performed by the Prime or Subcontractor(s), within the past ten (10) years of the date of issuance of the RFP, similar in size, scope and complexity to the RFP, using the Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) for each project. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project must include one or more of the following types of work: (1) Magazine construction (valued at $10,000,000 or more), (2) Installation of

(Am-0001) electrical utility poles and overhead medium voltage power lines (valued at $2,000,000 or more), or (3) Probing and grouting for a coral subgrade which may have cavities and voids (valued at $2,000,000 or more). Magazine construction must have been performed as a Prime Contractor. Installation of electrical utility poles and overhead medium voltage power lines and Probing and grouting for a coral subgrade which may have cavities and voids may be performed by a subcontractor to a prime contractor. Out of a total of three (3) relevant projects, at least (1) project must include Magazine construction and at least one (1) project must include Installation of electrical utility poles and overhead medium voltage power lines.

(b) The Offeror must provide signed letters of commitment from the

Subcontractor(s), listed in Document 00110, Attachment A, that will perform the work. The letter must explain the involvement the subcontractor will have in performance of this contract. Identify the types of work that each subcontractor will be responsible for.

(c) A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

(d) The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Do not alter the Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) with the exception of expanding the individual blocks on this form; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided 8.5” x 11” page (or two (2) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages) and shall be Arial 10 font (minimum).

(e) For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e. unique features, area, complexities, construction methods).

2. Basis of Evaluation:

The requirement for acceptability will be based upon the projects submitted by the Offeror in its proposal. The Offeror must demonstrate experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements in Paragraph 2.2a, Factor 1 above. The Government will only review the first three (3) projects, in the order they were submitted in the proposal. Any projects submitted in excess of the first three (3) for will not be considered.

Factor 2 – Safety

(a) Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance

(Am-0001) of self-performed and sub-contractor performed work and the Offeror’s method for qualifying, evaluating, selecting all tiers of sub-contractors. The narrative shall include:

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): Include five previous complete calendar years’ (January 2015 through December 2019) worth of data. This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If the offeror has no EMR or premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of the factor submission.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates: Submit five previous complete calendar years’ (January 2015 through December 2019) worth of OSHA DART and TRC data. If an offeror cannot submit OSHA DART and TRC rates for any year, affirmatively state so and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART and TRC rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this factor submission.

(3) Technical Approach for Safety: Technical Approach for Safety should describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Fully describe the safety management system that will be used to oversee safety compliance and performance of self-performed and sub-contractor performed work. Also describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and all subcontractor levels. Additionally, describe the methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to one (1) double-sided 8.5” x 11” page or two (2) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages, Arial 10 font (minimum).

NOTE: For a partnership or JV, the EMR, OSHA DART, and TRC rates are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or JV; however, only one safety narrative is required.

Safety narratives for a partnership or JV may be up to one (1) double-sided 8.5” x 11” pages or two (2) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages in length, Arial 10 font (minimum).

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for its self-performed work and the work of its subcontractors. The Government will evaluate the EMR, OSHA DART and TRC Rates to determine if the offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward or downward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rates. The Government will not calculate the EMR, DART and TRC Rates. Offerors that do not submit EMR, DART, and TRC rates and do not explain why it did not submit the rates will be rated unacceptable for that element. If extenuating circumstances that affect the rates and negative trends are not clearly addressed, the element will be rated unacceptable. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety performance record, safety management system, and the methodology of qualifying, evaluating, (Am-0001) selecting and overseeing its subcontractors. The Government may also consider other sources of information for evaluating safety that may include, but not limited to: OSHA, NAVFAC’s Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS) database, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), and other related databases. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror. The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project and the specific management practices that will be in place for providing deliberate safety program management and mishap prevention support.

Offeror’s EMR will be evaluated against the following Navy standards:

Risk EMR Very Low Risk Less than 0.6 Low Risk From 0.6 to less than 0.8 Moderate Risk From 0.8 to 1.0 High Risk Greater than 1.0 to 1.1 Extremely High Risk Greater than 1.1 Offeror’s DART and TRC rates will be evaluated against the following Navy standards:

Risk DART Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 1.0 Low Risk From 1.0 to 1.99 Moderate Risk From 2.0 to 2.99 High Risk From 3.0 to 4.0 Extremely High Risk Greater than 4.0

Risk TRC Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 2.49 Low Risk From 2.5 to 3.49 Moderate Risk From 3.5 to 4.49 High Risk From 4.5 to 5.99 Extremely High Risk Greater Than 6.0

Factor 3 – Past Performance:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

(1) If a completed Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS)/Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 1. If there is not a completed CCASS/CPAR evaluation then submit Past performance Questionnaire (Attachment B) for each project included in Factor 1. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Evidence of customer satisfaction shall

(Am-0001) be from the owner and/or their representative responsible for the construction contract administration. It shall not be from the designer on a design-build project nor shall it be from a prime construction contractor for a subcontractor. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, previously completed PPQs in full text submitted for other RFPs will be accepted. All previously completed PPQs shall include all information requested in Attachment B, NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (form PPQ-0) located at the end of Document 00110. All PPQs shall be complete, contain clients’ signature, and include all information requested in Attachment B located at the end of Document 00110. This does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Ms. Jody Muraoka, jody.muraoka@navy.mil.

(2) Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues. Explanations shall be Arial 10 font (minimum) and shall not exceed one (1) double-sided 8.5” x 11” pages (or two (2) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages) in total.

(3) The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past or current performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

(4) Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

(1) This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 1– Experience and may also consider an Offeror’s past and/or current performance on other projects, interim and/or final, documented in known sources.

Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown.

(2) The Government may consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends, interim and/or final, in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination.

(3) In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable.”.

b. PRICE EVALUATION

Price Proposal:

1. Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Offerors shall complete the Proposal Schedule.

2. Basis of Evaluation:

(a) The price will be evaluated based on total price (price for the base schedule plus option).

(b) One or more of the following techniques will be used to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation, against one another.

Comparison of proposed prices received with the independent Government estimate.

Comparison of proposed prices received with available historical information.

Comparison of information reports obtained from Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) or other outside agencies as required.

(c) A price that is found to be either unreasonably high or unrealistically low in relation to the proposed work may be indicative of an inherent lack of understanding of the solicitation requirements and may result in the overall proposal not being considered for award.

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION

DISCLOSURE LIMITATIONS AS OUTLINED IN FAR 2.101 & 3.104 APPLY

ATTACHMENT A

CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project No. (check one) : CON #1 CON #2 CON #3 CON #4 CON #5

1. Experience for: Offeror Joint-Venture Other (Explain)

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone Number:

DUNS Number:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain)

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Number: Delivery/Task Order Number:

Title:

Location:

4. Award Date (mm/dd/yy): Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

5. Type of work:

Magazine Construction Grounding and lightning protection system Probing and grouting for a coral subgrade which may have cavities and voids

6. Type of Contract/Task Order: (Check ALL that apply)

Firm-Fixed Price Cost/Time and Material Other (explain):

Complete Block 7 for…