RFP_AttD_Reference Check~1.docx

DOCX document 35 KB Posted

Attached to
Cost-Benefit Evaluation of State Surplus Property Program
Solicitation number
S-10700-00010016
Issued by
Marion County, Oregon

About this file

This document is an Attachment D - Reference Check Form for a Request for Proposal (RFP) for a Cost-Benefit Evaluation of the State Surplus Property Program in the state of Oregon. The RFP is soliciting proposals from qualified vendors to provide these services. The form requests the reference entity to provide information on the proposer's overall quality of services, delivery of service, responsiveness to customer service issues, and likelihood of using the proposer's services again.

The related state and local contract opportunity involves the state of Oregon, as well as the jurisdictions of Marion County and the city of Salem. This evaluation project will assess the costs and benefits of the state's surplus property program across these local government entities.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP [###-####-##] – [RFP title]

ATTACHMENT F - REFERENCE CHECK FORM

RFP S-10700-00010016 – Cost-Benefit Evaluation of State Surplus Property Program Att D

ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM

Proposer Name:__________________________________________________
Reference Entity:__________________________________________________
Reference Contact Name:__________________________________________________

Reference Contact Telephone Number: ____________________________________________ Reference Contact Email Address: __________________________________________________

Describe Proposer’s overall quality of services provided and your overall relationship with the Proposer?

Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________

How was Proposer’s delivery of service?

Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________

Describe Proposer’s responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests (e.g., reported problems, changes billing, etc.)?

Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________

How likely would you be to use Proposer’s services again?

Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________

Version 1.0 - November 19, 2014Page 1 of 2
DAS Procurement ServicesPage 1 of 2

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .