California Department of Aging Contractor Name Contract Number:

SB1249 Consulting

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)

RFP Number: RFP-2526-04

“SB1249Consulting”

Posting Date May 5, 2026

You are invited to review and respond to this California Department of Aging (CDA) solicitation. The CDA is seeking proposals for a contractor to create and deliver Older American’s Act Area Agency on Aging designation process mapping, risk analysis mapping, and contract development services, pursuant to:

A. the requirements of the Older Americans Act, Senate Bill 1249, and

B. information and research gathered through CA2030 planning and engagement efforts.

In submitting a proposal, Proposers agree that they have read, understood, and will comply with the instructions found herein. Failure to comply with any of the requirements may result in rejection of a Proposer’s proposal. By submitting a response, Proposers agree to the terms and conditions stated in this solicitation and any resulting agreement. The anticipated term of this contract is One (1) year. In submitting your proposal, you must comply with these instructions.

All agreements entered into with the State of California will include by reference the state’s General Terms and Conditions and Contractor Certification Clauses that may be viewed and downloaded at: https://www.dgs.ca.gov/OLS/Resources/Page- Content/Office-of-Legal-Services-Resources-List-Folder/Standard-Contract-Language.

The State’s General Terms and Condition are non-negotiable. If you do not have Internet access, a hard copy can be provided by contacting the following person below.

This solicitation is published at the Cal e-Procure website at:

https://caleprocure.ca.gov/pages/index.aspx. To ensure receipt of any addenda that may be issued and answers to questions received, you must register online at https://caleprocure.ca.gov/pages/bidder-vendor.aspx https://www.dgs.ca.gov/OLS/Resources/Page-Content/Office-of-Legal-Services-Resources-List-Folder/Standard-Contract-Language https://www.dgs.ca.gov/OLS/Resources/Page-Content/Office-of-Legal-Services-Resources-List-Folder/Standard-Contract-Language https://caleprocure.ca.gov/pages/index.aspx https://caleprocure.ca.gov/pages/bidder-vendor.aspx

SB1249 Consulting

The CDA encourages potential proposers to read this entire RFP and all attachments thoroughly and carefully.

In the opinion of CDA, this RFP is complete and without need of explanation. This RFP is complete and without need of explanation. However, if you have questions or need clarifying information, submit your question(s) no later than 4:00 p.m. Pacific Time (PT) on May 13, 2026, in accordance with the RFP instructions to bmspurchasing@aging.ca.gov. If you experience technical difficulties contact:

Jacques Sapp Senior Acquisitions Analyst

Department of Aging

(916) 391-0131 bmspurchasing@aging.ca.gov

Please note that no verbal information given will be binding upon the State unless such information is issued in writing as an official addendum.

Attachment(s) mailto:bmbstateops@aging.ca.gov mailto:bmbstateops@aging.ca.gov

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. GENERAL INFORMATION

A. Introduction:

B. Purpose of this RFP…………………………………

C. Background / History

D. Agreement Term and Security Provisions

2. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS (MQ)

A. The Awardee Will

B. Project Deliverables Will Include

C. Description of Firm

D. References

E. Proof of Legal Right to Do Business:

F. Agreement to Sign:

G. Work Product Samples

H. Experience:

I. Location:

3. GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (GENAI) REQUIREMENTS

4. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION

A. Key Action Dates:

B. Proposer’s Questions:

C. Submission of Proposals:

D. Technical Proposal Content

5. PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND AWARD

A. Description of Evaluation Process

B. Review of Proposal Requirements:

C. Cost Proposal Requirements:

D. False Statements Disclaimer:

E. Intention to Award:

F. Breaking Tie Proposals:

G. Award and Protest: ……

H. Disposition of Proposals:

I. Standard Conditions of Service:

J. Tax Delinquency Disclaimer

6. PREFERENCE AND INCENTIVE PROGRAMS

A. Small Business Preference:

B. Non-Small Business Preference:

C. Ties Between Certified Small Business and DVBE Business:

D. Maximum Allowable Preferences:

E. Commercially Useful Function:

F. Proposer Commercially Useful Function Requirements:

G. Pending Small Business Certification:

H. Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise Program and Incentive:

I. Calculation of Multiple Preferences:

J. Additional Small Business and Disabled Veteran Enterprise Information:

K. Other Preference Programs:

7. REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS

A. Listing of Attachments:

1) Attachment 1 Proposal Submission Checklist

2) Attachment 2 Proposer’s Technical Response

(provided by proposer)

3) Attachment 3 Resumes, Bio-Sketch, or Curriculum Vitae (CV) (provided by proposer)

4) Attachment 4 Proposer’s Certification

5) Attachment 5 Minimum Qualifications Response

6) Attachment 6 Proposer’s References

7) Attachment 7 Proposer’s Rate Sheets

8) Attachment 8 California Civil Rights Certification (CDA 9026)

9) Attachment 9 Proposer Declaration Form (GSPD-05-105)

10) Attachment 10 DVBE Declaration Form (Std. 843) (complete and return even if it does not apply)

11) Attachment 11 Payee Data Record (STD 204)

12) Attachment 12 Insurance Certifications

13) Attachment 13 Financial Solvency Certification

14) Attachment 14 Contractor Certification Clauses (CCC 04/2017).

15) Attachment 15 TACPA Preference Form (STD 830) (as it applies)

16) Attachment 16 DVBE Program Requirements

Note: Attachment 16 is included for reference and information only.

Only the successful Proposer will submit these documents when requested by the CDA.

17) Attachment 17 Sample Standard Agreement (Std. 213 and Exhibits)

1. GENERAL INFORMATION

A. INTRODUCTION

Under the umbrella of the California Health and Human Services Agency (CalHHS), the California Department of Aging (CDA) administers programs that serve older adults, adults with disabilities, family caregivers, and residents in long-term care (LTC) facilities throughout the State. These programs are funded through the federal Older Americans Act (OAA), the Older Californians Act (OCA), through the Medi-Cal program, state Special Funds, and various federal grants. Below is a summary of the major program areas under CDAs purview.

1) CDA contracts with a network of 33 Area Agencies on Aging (AAAs), who directly manage a wide array of federal and state-funded services which provide meals; job/skills training and assistance with securing employment;

health insurance counseling; information, assistance, and navigation; various types of supportive services to assist older adults and people with disabilities to live as independently as possible; promote healthy aging and community involvement; and support family members in their vital caregiving role(s).

2) CDA also contracts with 38 providers that operate the Multipurpose Senior Services Programs (MSSP) through the Medi-Cal Home and Community- Based (HCBS) Waiver for older adults.

3) CDA certifies approximately 318 Adult Day Health Care Centers for participation in the Medi-Cal funded Community Based Adult Services (CBAS) Program.

4) The Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (OSLTCO) oversees 35 local LTC Ombudsman Programs (LTCOPs), that are supported by approximately 700 local LTC Ombudsman (LTCO) Representatives throughout the state. LTC Ombudsman Representatives support and empower consumers by seeking resolution to individual complaints involving LTC services. Additionally, LTCO Representatives advocate for the rights of over 8,000 LTC facility residents with the goal of ensuring their dignity, quality of life, and quality of care. The OSLTCO operates a statewide, 24-hour, toll free, CRISIS line to receive complaints and relay requests for local LTCOP services. These services are free, confidential, and available to the over 300,000 residents in LTC facilities across California.

5) To promote the Department’s goal of every Californian having the opportunity to enjoy wellness, longevity, and quality of life in strong healthy communities, CDA actively collaborates with many other State departments (and other entities) on behavioral health, transportation, housing, accessibility, emergency preparedness and response, nutrition, and wellness, fall and injury prevention, improving services to persons with dementia, reducing fraud and abuse, and many other issues.

B. PURPOSE OF THIS RFP:

The focus of this RFP is to develop the County Right of First Refusal process pertaining to Senate Bill 1249. This RFP also seeks to enforce and support Senate Bill 1249 through risk assessment and streamlining local administrative tools.

The California Department of Aging is soliciting proposals from qualified organizations to:

1) Create analysis and process mapping for California’s Area Agencies on Aging. Analysis and process mapping should be pursuant to:

a) the county right of first refusal requirements of the Older Americans Act, Senate Bill 1249, and

b) information and research gathered through CA2030 planning and engagement efforts.

2) Develop a comprehensive risk assessment tool. This should analyze existing monitoring tools along with emerging designation requirements. This new tool should combine these three aspects:

a) fiscal monitoring,

b) program monitoring, and

c) auditing requirements and reports.

3) Conduct a gap analysis review to identify duplication and potential gaps.

Focus should be made on duplication and gaps caused by designation changes.

4) Develop contract templates for use by Area Agencies on Aging for their subcontractors. These templates shall help CDA implement the provisions of Senate Bill 1249. Services noted in the templates should include the following:

a) structured virtual and in-person meeting sessions,

b) practical tools, and

c) measurement activities.

C. BACKGROUND / HISTORY

California 2030 (CA2030) was launched in late 2022 to develop strategies and tactics to ready the California Aging Network for the future. In light of resources and attention devoted to aging and aging issues through the development of the state Master Plan for Aging, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the increasing number of Californians aged 60 years and older, the time had come to recognize the importance of a nearly 50-year old aging network and identify how it can evolve to meet the challenges of a future that looks very different than the past.

The CA 2030 project was implemented over 12 months with over 253 aging stakeholders and subject matter experts, interviews of experts from across the nation, research conducted on trends and projections that influence the California Aging Network, a statewide Community Assessment Survey of Older Adults, and development of actionable recommendations.

As insights were identified through the research and engagement with the CA 2030 Steering Committee and CDA leadership, the areas of focus evolved into the following categories, structuring the recommendations for a future-ready California Aging Network; Strategic Planning, Communications, Performance, Funding, Programs & Services, Workforce, Advocacy, Data & Information Technology (IT), Planning and Service Areas (PSAs) & Designations.

Adjacent to the CA2030 research and analysis, Senate Bill 1249 chaptered September 21, 2024 which requires the department to take various actions, including, developing an application process to determine an area agency on aging designation, the criteria used for an area agency on aging designation, and the criteria used to remove an area agency on aging designation.

CA2030 and Senate Bill 1249 have opened an opportunity to enhance the AAA right of first refusal process and strengthen risk management to enforce program integrity.

The map of AAAs was drawn in 1978. AAAs have been designated at different organizations, including county government, nonprofits, and multicounty joint powers authorities. Service areas range from single counties to as many as eight. Much has changed since 1978, including a dramatic rise in the population and demographic diversity, the development of new local, state, and federal health and human services policies and programs, and growth in county government budgets and health and human services activities. Given these changes, it is prudent to re-evaluate if the current PSA map and AAA designations are optimal for a future-ready California Aging Network.

Performance standards for health and human services systems have advanced, demanding greater attention on value, outcomes, and return on investments from the public, policymakers, and funders. The California Aging Network’s performance measures are outdated and emphasize outputs instead of outcomes. This limits its ability to communicate to the public, policymakers, and funders the efficacy of its activities. The California Aging Network needs to improve its performance measurement and management.

A future-ready California Aging Network is a system that is aware of the demographic changes underway and is savvy in its understanding of the trends and changes across social, technological, environmental, economic, and political trends - locally, statewide, and nationally. It builds novel programmatic and business solutions, advancing its capabilities and advocating for inclusion, investment, outcomes, and growth.

The Master Plan for Aging, CA2030, and Senate Bill 1249 offer a once-in-a-generation opportunity for the California Aging Network to envision, plan, and implement changes to prepare for a future that will undoubtedly be more complex and challenging. To meet these challenges, the California Aging Network will need to think, plan, and operate in ways that are more user-friendly, performance-based, entrepreneurial, and systems-integrated.

D. AGREEMENT TERM AND SECURITY PROVISIONS:

1) If an agreement results from this RFP, the term is anticipated to be July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027. Any agreement (and/or amendment) resulting from this RFP shall have no force or effect until it is signed by both parties and approved by the Department of General Services (DGS) if such approval is required. Performance shall start no later than on the express date set by the awarding agency and after all approvals have been obtained and the agreement is fully executed.

2) All performance under the agreement shall be completed on or before the termination date of the agreement.

3) Should the Contractor fail to commence work at the agreed upon time, the

CDA reserves the right to terminate the agreement upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to the Contractor.

2. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS (MQ)

The successful Proposer will be selected on a competitive basis to provide services as described in detail in the Sample Agreement, Exhibit A, Scope of Work (Attachment 17).

The selected proposer must meet all requirements and expectations listed in this RFP, including having submitted evidence of a minimum of two years of experience in providing consultant services for project management, strategic planning, change management, and stakeholder engagement, as well as general contractual requirements mandated by CDA.

All proposers must explain thoroughly how their offer meets the minimum service and deliverable expectations specified in the RFP. CDA reserves the right to reject all proposals.

Award of the contract, if any, will be to the Proposer whose proposal best complies with the criteria set forth herein.

A. THE AWARDED CONTRACTOR WILL:

1) Develop a detailed project plan for engaging stakeholders in designing the county designation process.

2) Identify strategic options for implementing CA2030 vision, principles, goals, and strategies within the designation process, risk mapping and assessment process, and contract templates.

3) Facilitate decision-making with CDA around strategic options and opportunities for all deliverables.

4) Facilitate stakeholder discussions to inform strategic recommendations for implementation.

5) Develop a county right of first refusal designation process, including criteria for approval or denial and specific regulatory steps for implementation.

6) Develop a risk mapping and assessment process including a quantitative scoring matrix that can be aligned with designation requirements to determine the strength of the Area Agency on Aging.

7) Develop recommendations for regulatory changes that support Senate Bill

1249 and CA 2030 strategic goals.

8) Identify resources necessary for implementation of the Senate Bill 1249 designation process.

9) All deliverables are works made for hire. Contractor assigns all rights, title, and interest to CDA.

10) All deliverables will adhere to state and federal rules, guidelines, and regulations to ensure proper legal authority and usability by CDA and aging partners. Deliverables will include detailed information for each step of the process for use by CDA with defined start and end points.

B. PROJECT DELIVERABLES WILL INCLUDE:

1) County designation process

2) Risk mapping and assessment process

3) Contract templates

4) Meeting facilitation/deliverables

C. DESCRIPTION OF FIRM

Proposers must submit a description of their business.

1) Provide a description of the specializations of your firm.

2) Provide a description of safeguards that your firm employs to ensure that confidential information is safely maintained and accessed only for the purpose of providing services subject to this RFP.

a) These safeguards must meet or exceed those outlines in Attachment 17, Sample Scope of work, Exhibit D, Attachment 1, Information Confidentiality and Security.

D. REFERENCES

Proposer must provide three (3) references from other entities, agencies, or organizations for whom the Proposer has provided services of the same nature and type as those outlined in this solicitation. We will not accept references of any CDA staff. Each reference must be someone who had direct experience with the provision of services. References must include name, company, title, email, and phone number.

E. PROOF OF LEGAL RIGHT TO DO BUSINESS:

Proposers must submit proof of their legal right to do business in the State of California:

1) Proposers must submit a copy of their license to do business in the State of California, where applicable.

2) Proposers must certify that they are and will continue to meet all terms and conditions for operating a business in the city/county in which the business is headquartered.

3) Proposers which are corporations, regardless of where they are incorporated, shall submit a print-out from the California Secretary of State website https://bizfileonline.sos.ca.gov/search/business which shows that their corporation is registered and is currently in good standing.

4) Proposer must certify financial solvency or stability and provide proof (e.g., audited financial statements, balance sheets and income statements for one year or more.)

F. AGREEMENT TO SIGN:

1) The Proposer shall certify that, if awarded an agreement, they shall sign and return two (2) originals of the Standard Agreement signature pages (Std.

213), to be received by the CDA no later than seven (7) calendar days from the date the CDA e-mails the agreement to the email address provided by Proposer on the Minimum Qualifications Response Form (Attachment 5);

a) OR that Contractor shall provide electronic signature in DocuSign as initiated by CDA, no later than seven (7) calendar days from the date the CDA sends the DocuSign envelope.

b) The CDA reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to require documentation to be submitted in addition to the Std. 213-Signature Page.

If the CDA exercises that right, the contractor must submit all required documentation within the timeframes noted here.

2) The Proposer shall further certify that they understand the insurance requirements in Attachment 18, Sample Agreement, Exhibit E, Insurance Requirements, and if awarded an agreement, shall provide the CDA with all required insurance documents as may be applicable, in a timely manner.

https://bizfileonline.sos.ca.gov/search/business

3) Proposer shall certify their understanding that all agreements entered with the

State of California are required to comply with Governor's Executive Order (EO) N-6-22: https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/3.4.22- Russia-Ukraine-Executive-Order.pdf.

4) The CDA reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to cancel the proposed award to a Proposer who does not submit the required documentation described herein. Should the CDA cancel a proposed award for this reason, the CDA reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to award the contract to the next highest-scoring, responsive and responsible Proposer.

G. WORK PRODUCT SAMPLES

Proposers must submit two completed work samples like the work requested in this RFP.

1) Samples must be actual work products produced by the firm while providing services to its clients.

2) If necessary, Samples may be redacted to maintain confidentiality but shall not be altered from original work product in any other manner.

H. EXPERIENCE:

1) Proposers must submit evidence that they and/or their subcontractors have the following experience:

a) Proposer must have a minimum of two years’ experience in providing consultant services in project management, strategic planning, change management, and stakeholder engagement. Experience working with State Departments and communities preferred.

2) CDA requires one (1) primary contractor. If your agency does not have sufficient expertise in each of these disciplines, CDA may consider having the Proposer serve as the lead with strategic alliance partners (i.e., subcontractors) to deliver services.

3) Proposer must provide resumes or Biosketches (CVs) for each of the key personnel that would be assigned to CDAs account. CVs must also include any relevant education, certifications, and/or credentials and the length of time each has been held.

I. LOCATION:

Proposers must have an office and/or staff located in California.

3. GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (GENAI) REQUIREMENTS

The State of California seeks to realize the potential benefits of GenAI, through the development and deployment of GenAI tools, while balancing the risks of these new technologies.

Bidder / Offeror must notify the State in writing if it: (1) intends to provide GenAI as a deliverable to the State; or (2), intends to utilize GenAI, including GenAI from third parties, to complete all or a portion of any deliverable that materially impacts: (i) functionality of a State system, (ii) risk to the State, or (iii) Contract performance.

For avoidance of doubt, the term “materially impacts” shall have the meaning set forth in State Administrative Manual (SAM) § 4986.2 Definitions for GenAI.

Failure to report GenAI to the State may result in disqualification. The State reserves the right to seek any and all relief to which it may be entitled to as a result of such nondisclosure.

Upon notification by a Bidder / Offeror of GenAI as required, the State reserves the right to incorporate GenAI Special Provisions into the final contract or reject bids/offers that present an unacceptable level of risk to the State.

Bidder / Offeror must comply with regulations of AI use as set forth in State Administrative Manual (SAM) § 4986.12, subsection B, articles 2-7, 9, and 10.

Government Code 11549.64 defines Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) as an artificial intelligence system that can generate derived synthetic content, including text, images, video, and audio that emulates the structure and characteristics of the system’s training data.

4. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION

A. KEY ACTION DATES:

Event Date Pacific Standard

Time

RFP Available to Prospective Proposers May 5, 2026 12:00 PM

Deadline for Submission of Proposer's Questions

May 13, 2026 4:00 PM

Anticipated Addendum posted (Questions answered in writing)

May 19, 2026 4:00 PM

Final Date for Proposal Submission June 2, 2026 4:00 PM

Anticipated Evaluation of Submitted Proposals

June 3, 2026 – June 12, 2026

Anticipated Notice of Intent to Award Posted

June 15, 2026 4:00 PM

Deadline for Notice of Intent to Protest* June 22, 2026 4:00 PM

Anticipated Award Date June 23, 2026

Anticipated Start Date July 1, 2026 - N/A

* See PCC 10345 and the State Contracting Manual (SCM) Volume 1, Chapter 6 (CA SCM Vol1, Ch 6: Contract Award Protests) for more information.

https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/public-contract-code/pcc-sect-10345/ https://share.google/dWAUMGJmBhZBUIaCU

A. PROPOSER’S QUESTIONS:

1) Proposers must notify the CDA immediately via email to Bmspurchasing@aging.ca.gov

a) The following MUST be included in the subject line:

(1) RFP-2526-04-SB1249Consulting

b) if they need clarification about the services being sought or have questions about the RFP instructions or requirements. The level of detail that shall be provided in response is subject to the availability of CDA resources. The CDA will respond to all questions via an addendum to the solicitation with all questions and answers posted on Cal e-Procure (www.caleprocure.ca.gov).

2) Note: It is the responsibility of the proposer to check Cal e-Procure for any changes within the RFP, as all questions, answers, and addenda will be posted there. The CDA will not be held responsible for inaccurate proposals due to Proposer’s oversight in reviewing all information via Cal e-Procure.

3) Verbal comments regarding this RFP are unofficial and are not binding on the CDA unless later confirmed in writing as an official addendum.

4) Proposers who fail to report a known or suspected problem with the RFP or fail to seek clarification and/or correction of the RFP, submit a proposal at their own risk.

B. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS:

1) PROPOSAL SUBMISSION:

All proposals shall be submitted via email following the instructions listed in a) below.

b) ALL PROPOSALS MUST BE SUBMITTED VIA EMAIL TO:

Bmspurchasing@aging.ca.gov (for emailed submission)

SUBJECT: SUBMITTAL – RFP-2526-04-SB1249Consulting – [Proposer Name]

Email to: Bmspurchasing@aging.ca.gov

c) Proposals should provide straightforward and concise descriptions of the proposing firm’s ability to satisfy the requirements of this RFP.

mailto:BMBStateOps@aging.ca.gov http://www.caleprocure.ca.gov/ mailto:BMBStateOps@aging.ca.gov

d) If the proposal is made under a fictitious name or business title, the actual legal name of the proposing firm must be provided.

e) All proposals must include signatures on the following documents:

Proposal/Proposing firm Certification Sheet, Contractor Certification Clauses, and any other documents specified in this RFP.

f) Proposals which do not include the documents identified in the Proposal Checklist will be deemed non-responsive and will be rejected.

g) The emailed Proposal(s) must be received no later than the due date and time listed in Section 3, A – Key Action Dates.

h) The emailed proposal must be sent with your request for a read-receipt from the recipient (so that you know it was received).

i) The emails submissions will not be opened until after the 4:00 PM PST deadline. If emailed proposals are received after 4:00 PM PDT they will not be opened or evaluated.

j) Emailed proposals must not be encrypted or otherwise password protected. To meet size limits, proposals may need to be split into several PDF documents.

k) All proposals submitted must clearly and legibly show the name and address of the Proposer’s firm.

l) It is the Proposer’s responsibility to ensure that their proposal is submitted in a manner that enables the CDA to easily locate all response descriptions and exhibits for each requirement of this RFP.

m) Proposals must be submitted for the entire service described within the Scope of Work. Deviations from the specifications will not be considered and will be cause for rejection of the proposal.

n) CDA does not accept alternate language from the proposing firm. A proposal with such language will be considered a counter proposal and will be rejected. The State’s General Terms and Conditions (GTC) are not negotiable.

o) Costs for developing proposals and preparation of award of the Contract are entirely the responsibility of the proposing firm and will not be chargeable to CDA.

p) Paper submissions will not be accepted. The electronic documentation sent via this email transmission shall not be altered in any manner. The State’s copy of the electronic documentation developed for this RFP, is for the purposes of issuing a binding contract, and shall be considered the

ORIGINAL.

2) SIGNATURE REQUIREMENTS:

a) All documents requiring a signature must bear an electronic/digital signature or wet signature of a person authorized to bind the proposing firm/organization.

b) An individual who is authorized to bind the Proposer contractually shall sign the Proposer Certification Sheet. The signature must indicate the title or position that the individual holds in the firm. An unsigned proposal may be rejected.

c) Electronic/digital signatures or wet signatures of individuals authorized to bind the Proposer are required.

d) All documents requiring a signature must bear the original signature of a person authorized to bind the proposing firm. An individual who is authorized to bind the Proposer contractually shall sign the Proposer Certification Sheet. The signature must indicate the title or position that the individual holds in the firm. An unsigned proposal may be rejected.

3) GENERAL CONTENTS:

a) All proposals shall include all the documents identified in Section 5, Required Attachments, Attachment 1, Proposal Submission Checklist.

b) Proposals must provide straightforward and concise descriptions of the Proposer's ability to satisfy the requirements of this RFP. The proposal must be complete and accurate. Omissions, inaccuracies, or misstatements will be sufficient cause for rejection of a proposal.

c) Proposals must be submitted for the performance of all the services described herein. Any deviation from the work specifications will not be considered and shall cause a proposal to be rejected.

d) A proposal shall be rejected if it is conditional or incomplete, or if it contains any alterations of form or other irregularities of any kind. The state may reject any or all proposals and may waive an immaterial deviation in a proposal. The state’s waiver of an immaterial deviation or defect shall in no way modify the RFP document or excuse the Proposer from full compliance with all requirements if awarded the agreement.

e) Before submitting a response to this solicitation, Proposers should review, correct all errors, and confirm compliance with the RFP requirements.

f) Where applicable, Proposers must carefully examine work sites and specifications. Proposers shall investigate conditions, character, and quality of surface or subsurface materials or obstacles that might be encountered. No additions or increases to the agreement amount will be made due to a lack of careful examination of work sites and specifications.

4) GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS:

a) No verbal understanding or agreement shall be binding on either party.

b) Costs for developing proposals in anticipation of award of the agreement are entirely the responsibility of the Proposer and shall not be charged to the State of California.

5) WITHDRAWING AND RESUBMITTING:

a) Proposers may modify a proposal after its submission by withdrawing their original proposal package and resubmitting a new proposal package to the email address prior to the proposal submission deadline. Proposer’s modifications offered in any other manner, verbal or written, will not be considered.

b) Proposers may withdraw their proposal by submitting a written withdrawal request to the CDA State Operations Purchasing Team (SOPT) to the email address below, signed by the Proposer or an authorized agent. A Proposer may thereafter submit a new proposal package prior to the proposal submission deadline.

c) Proposals may not be withdrawn without cause after the proposal submission deadline. Communications will be sent to Bmspurchasing@aging.ca.gov

(1) The following MUST be included in the subject line:

RFP-2526-04-SB1249Consulting

d) A copy of any proposal submitted in response to this RFP may be returned only at the applicant’s expense, unless CDA, in its sole discretion, should waive such expense.

6) MODIFICATION AND REJECTIONS:

a) The CDA may modify the RFP, prior to the solicitation due date and time, by the issuance of an addendum to all parties who received a solicitation package. All Addenda will be posted on the Cal e-Procure with the original advertisement.

b) The CDA reserves the right to reject all proposals. The CDA is not required to award an agreement pursuant to this RFP.

c) If all proposals are too high, CDA is not required to award a Contract

d) Proposing firms are cautioned not to rely upon CDA during the evaluation to discover and report all defects and errors in the proposal documents.

Proposing firms should carefully proofread documents for errors and adherence to the RFP requirements prior to proposal submittal.

e) The proposals submitted, including costs, will become public in accordance with the Public Records Act when CDA has completed its evaluation and announces the award of the contract.

f) If a Proposer believes that one or more of the RFP requirements is onerous, unfair, or imposes unnecessary constraints to the Proposer in proposing less costly or alternate solutions, the Proposer may request a change to the RFP by submitting, in writing, the recommended change(s) and the facts substantiating this belief and reasons for making the recommended change. Such requests must be submitted Bmspurchasing@aging.ca.gov by the date specified in the Key Action Dates – Deadline to Submit Written Questions. Such changes will be made at the sole option of the CDA. If the CDA determines that any requested change is in the best interest of the state, all Proposers will be notified of the change by the issuance of an Addendum to this RFP (without revealing the identity of the Proposer who requested the change).

g) A proposal submitted with alternate contract language will be considered a counteroffer and will be rejected. The State’s General Terms and Conditions (GTC) are not negotiable. Proposers are hereby advised that proposals of alternate contract language or attempts to negotiate the State’s Terms and Conditions after the selection of a proposed awardee shall be considered a counteroffer for the purposes of this solicitation. In such a situation, the CDA shall notify the proposed awardee that they must accept the state’s language, and terms as offered or be disqualified from being awarded a contract.

h) Should a contractor fail to accept the language, and terms offered, the CDA shall disqualify that vendor and award the contract to another proposer and issue a revised Letter of Intent to Award, if applicable.

i) No more than one proposal from an individual, firm, partnership, corporation, or association under the same or different names, will be considered. Reasonable grounds for believing that any proposing firm has submitted more than one proposal for the work contemplated herein will cause the rejection of all proposals submitted by that firm. If there is reason to believe that collusion exists among the proposing firm, none of the participants in such collusion will be considered in this or future procurements.

C. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL CONTENT

The Proposer shall provide a section in their proposal entitled “Technical Proposal” that addresses each section under the following headings in the order shown below:

1) COVER SHEET

The Cover Sheet must be completed as indicated in Attachment 1.

2) TABLE OF CONTENTS

The proposal must have a table of contents with page numbers referenced.

3) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Include a summary of the entire proposal (maximum 2 (two) pages, with one-inch margins and 1.5 line spacing).

a) Include experience in providing consultant services in project management, strategic planning, change management, and stakeholder engagement.

4) PROJECT KEY PERSONNEL

Proposers are invited to include organizational information and key personnel introductions for those professionals who would represent the proposers in services to CDA.

a) Identify all key staff (executive, administrative, and service providers), their primary responsibilities, and the percentage of time that each member of staff will spend on the project.

b) Proposer must provide resumes (CVs) for each of the key personnel that would be assigned to CDAs account. CVs must also contain any relevant experience, education, certifications, and/or credentials and the length of time each has been held.

5) PROPOSER’S APPROACH:

Each proposer must review the draft SOW to ensure responses address and provide a strategic approach for delivering the services listed therein by the dates/timeline outlined in Exhibit A, Attachment 1 Key Action Dates and Proposed Timeline. Additionally, proposers must also review CDA’s introduction, background, and purpose of this RFP to further inform their strategic approach.

6) WORK SAMPLES:

Proposers must provide descriptions of the two work samples submitted with the proposal and how each work sample demonstrates experience in providing services similar to this RFP. Samples must be actual work products produced by the firm while providing services to its clients. If necessary, samples may be redacted to maintain confidentiality but shall not be altered from original work product in any other manner.

7) COST PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

a) Proposal Costs - All costs and expenses incurred by each respective proposer are the sole responsibility of that respective proposer and cannot be charged to the CDA.

b) All submissions must use the provided template (RFP-FYFY-##

Attachment 7 – Proposer’s Rate Sheets) and include estimated pricing for all categories listed. Estimated costs must account for all work, services, products, licensing, hosting, implementation, consulting, training, maintenance, and related expenses as defined in the draft SOW and Attachment 7 – Proposer’s Rate Sheets. The proposer must guarantee the rates stated in their submitted proposal will not increase during the term of this contract.

c) Proposals should include costs to ensure documents produced through the project are ADA accessible. This includes documents and the facilitation of forums/meetings for stakeholder engagement.

5. PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND AWARD

A. DESCIPTION OF EVALUATION PROCESS

1) At the time of proposal opening, each proposal will be checked for the presence or absence of required information in conformance with the submission requirements of this RFP.

2) The State will put each proposal through a process of evaluation to determine the responsiveness of proposing firms to the State's needs. The final selection will be made on the basis of the highest scoring proposal meeting the specifications.

3) Proposals containing false or misleading statements or providing references that do not support an attribute or condition claimed by the proposing firm may be rejected. If, in the opinion of CDA, information was intended to mislead CDA in its evaluation of the proposal, and the attribute, condition, or capability is a requirement of this RFP, it will be the basis for rejection of the proposal.

4) If there are tied bids, representatives of CDA will flip a coin to pick the winning Proposer. The drawing will be witnessed and documented by two or more State employees.

5) The evaluation process will consist of two phases.

a) In Phase One, proposals are reviewed to ensure that all documentation has been submitted in compliance with the requirements of this RFP. CDA will review all of the following documents to determine that each is enclosed and properly completed. Failure to meet these administrative requirements will cause a proposal to be deemed non-responsive and therefore ineligible for the next step of the RFP evaluation process.

b) Phase Two (2) will consist of an evaluation of the Work Plan and Work

Schedule/Technical Proposal based upon the criteria and scoring method described below. It will be used to determine which of the proposals meet the minimum technical requirements.

B. REVIEW OF PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS:

1) PHASE 1 – ADMINISTRATIVE EVALUATION

The CDA will conduct an administrative evaluation in accordance with the RFP requirements to determine a Proposer’s responsiveness and responsibility. Each proposal will be checked for completeness and/or absence of all required information and to ensure that the Proposer meets the minimum qualifications in conformance with the submission requirements.

During evaluation period, if an item is unclear, or needs further clarification, Proposers may be requested to provide additional documentation. Proposals that contain false or misleading statements may be rejected.

a) DEFINITIONS OF RESPONSIVE AND RESPONSIBLE PROPOSERS

A responsive Proposer is one who submits a proposal that meets all the submission requirements and minimum qualification requirements stated in the RFP.

A responsible Proposer is one that is trustworthy and possesses the necessary quality, fitness, and capacity to satisfactorily perform the proposed work. Proposers who are determined not to be responsible or who submit non-responsive proposals shall have the proposals rejected.

b) DETERMINING RESPONSIVE PROPOSERS

(1) Each proposal will first be reviewed to determine whether the Proposer is responsive. This includes but is not limited to, ensuring that the proposal was received by the date and time specified; contains all the required documents; meets the minimum qualifications; meets the format requirements specified; and that there is no material deviation from the terms and conditions of the proposed contract.

(2) A non-responsive proposal is one that does not meet the requirements stated in the RFP, fails to provide all required documents/ attachments, or proposals that deviate substantially from requirements. A proposal that changes the terms and conditions of the RFP or the contract provisions will be considered a counterproposal and will be rejected as non-responsive.

c) DETERMINING RESPONSIBLE PROPOSERS

Responsive proposals shall be considered evidence of the Proposer’s responsibility. The CDA reserves the right to reevaluate a Proposer’s responsibility prior to award and is in no way limited to submitted proposal packages in deciding as to a Proposer’s responsibility. In determining whether a Proposer is responsible, the CDA may require Proposers to submit evidence of their qualifications at such times, and under such conditions, as it may require.

1) PHASE 2 – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION

The CDA will conduct an evaluation of each proposal not rejected in Phase 1 by an Evaluation Committee consisting of CDA employees. CDA reserves the right to request clarification from the proposers regarding their proposal to the extent it deems necessary.

a) RATING CRITERION GUIDELINES

(1) After studying the RFP, each panel member will review each proposal and assign points for each criterion discussed below. The reviewers will then meet either in person or by teleconference to discuss in detail the strengths, weaknesses, and ratings of each proposal.

(2) The criteria in the Sample Score Sheet of this RFP will be used by reviewers evaluating proposals submitted in response to this RFP. In addition to what is stated below, in scoring the proposal, each criterion will be rated based on completeness, responsiveness, clarity of response, and weighed in the context of its contribution to the product.

(3) Members of the evaluation committee will independently review each proposal submitted and numerically score each rating/scoring category in the Technical Requirements section.

(4) All evaluators’ scores will then be compiled and averaged to arrive at the final score for each rating/scoring category.

Rating/Scoring Criteria Maximum Possible Points

Education 10

Experience 25

Work Plan and Work Schedule/ Technical Proposal

Effective Timeframes 15

Total Possible Points 100

2. CDA Evaluation Team will score the submittals based on percentages for levels of quality for each scoring criterion. The percentages will then be translated to points based upon the weight for each particular factor. For example, under “Effective Timeframes,” if a proposing firm’s response is considered “Excellent,” it will receive 9 points (0.9 x 10). The same approach will be used for all categories, except the scoring of the Cost Proposal.

Percentage of maximum points Description

Non-Compliant 0%

Fails to address the component or the proposing firm does not describe any experience related to the component.

Poor 30%

Minimally addresses the section, but one or more major considerations of the component are not addressed, or so limited that it results in a low degree of confidence in the proposing firm’s response.

Fair 70%

The response addresses the section, but minor considerations may not be addressed. Acceptable degree of confidence in the proposing firm’s response.

Good 80%

The response fully addresses the section and provides a good quality solution. Good degree of confidence in the proposing firm’s response.

Excellent 90%

All considerations of the section are addressed with a high degree of confidence in the proposing firm’s response.

Outstanding 100%

All considerations of the section are addressed with the highest degree of confidence in the firm’s response or proposed solution. The response exceeds the requirements in providing a superior experience and creative approach.

SAMPLE SCORE SHEET

MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS PASS FAIL

PROOF OF LEGAL RIGHT TO DO BUSINESS:

1. Proposer has provided a copy of their license to do business in the State of

California, (as applicable).

2. Proposer has signed to certify that they are and will continue to meet all terms and conditions for operating a business in the city/county in which the business is headquartered.

3. Proposers, which are corporations, have provided a printout from the California Secretary of State website which shows that their corporation is currently in good standing.

4. Proposer has signed to certify that they are and will maintain financial solvency, by completing and signing Attachment 13, Certification of Financial Solvency.

AGREEMENT TO SIGN:

1. The Proposer has certified that they understand the insurance requirements. If awarded an agreement, shall sign, and submit electronically via DocuSign (or wet sign and return two (2) originals) of the Standard Agreement signature pages (Std.

213) and any required insurance documents as directed.

2. The Proposer has certified their understanding that all agreements entered with the State of California are required to comply with Governor's Executive Order (EO) N- 6-22

EXPERIENCE:

1. Proposer must have a minimum of two years’ experience in providing consultant services in project management, strategic planning, change management, and stakeholder engagement. Experience working with State Departments and communities preferred.

2. Proposer must provide resumes (CVs) for each of the key personnel that would be assigned to CDAs account. CVs must also include any relevant education, certifications, and/or credentials and the length of time each has been held.

REFERENCES:

1. Proposer has provided three (3) references from customers as described in Section

2. Minimum Qualifications, Subsection D, References. We will not accept letters from any CDA staff.

WORK SAMPLES

1. Proposer has provided two completed work samples of a similar scope to this RFP.

LOCATION

Proposer (including subcontractors) has an office and/or staff located in California.

Only those Proposers who pass all Minimum Qualifications will have their proposals evaluated and scored.

PROPOSER NAME:

Pass

Yes No

Only those Proposers who Pass all Minimum Qualifications will have their proposals scored.

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORING

Maximum

Points Possible

Points Awarded

Executive Summary: (Max 10 points)

1. Proposer’s Executive Summary describes their agency’s experience providing consultant services in project management, strategic planning, change management, and stakeholder engagement.

A. Excellent Understanding & Summary – 5 points B. Satisfactory Understanding & Summary – 3 points C. Unsatisfactory Summary – 1 point

2. Proposer’s Executive Summary provides a clear understanding of the project scope, the proposed approach, and the necessary elements to complete the project deliverables.

A. Excellent Understanding & Summary – 5 points B. Satisfactory Understanding & Summary – 3 points C. Unsatisfactory Summary – 1 point

Total Possible Points for Executive Summary: 10

Proposer’s Key Personnel: (Max 20 points)

1. Proposed staff have professional qualifications and experience in project management, strategic planning, change management, and stakeholder engagement.

A. 10+ years of experience (average) – 10 points B. 6-9 years of experience (average) – 7 points C. 3-5 years of experience (average) – 5 points D. 1-2 years of experience (average) – 1 point

2. Proposed staff and resumes demonstrate an appropriate match to the tasks to be performed in the delivery of the requested services, as can be determined when reviewing CVs:

A. Excellent match – 10 points B. Above average match – 7 points C. Satisfactory match – 5 points D. Unsatisfactory match – 1 point

Total Possible Points for Key Personnel: 20

Proposer’s Approach: (Max 80 points)

1. Proposer’s Approach demonstrates an understanding of CDA’s major program areas, the history of CDA, AAAs, CA 2030, Senate Bill 1249, and the purpose of the project.

A. Excellent – 20 points B. Above average – 14 points C. Satisfactory – 10 points D. Unsatisfactory – 2 points

2. Proposer’s Approach includes a timeline of proposed milestones, deliverables, and work products that result in a final business plan by June 30, 2027.

A. Excellent – 20 points B. Above average – 14 points C. Satisfactory – 10 points D. Unsatisfactory – 2 points

3. Proposer’s Approach describes their agency’s strategy for developing a detailed project plan for engaging stakeholders and developing the designation, risk assessment, and administrative efficiency tools.

A. Excellent – 10 points B. Above average – 7 points C. Satisfactory – 5 points D. Unsatisfactory – 1 point

4. Proposer’s Approach describes their…