RFP 2027-1200-0020 Applicant Medical Examinations.pdf

PDF 4 MB Posted

Attached to
RFP 2027-1200-0020 Applicant Medical Examinations
Solicitation number
RFP 2027-1200-0020 Applicant Medical Examinations
Issued by
Anchorage Municipality, Alaska

About this file

This Request for Proposals (RFP 2027-1200-0020) is issued by the State of Alaska Department of Public Safety, Division of Administrative Services, seeking licensed medical professionals to provide pre-employment medical examinations, fitness-for-duty evaluations, and drug testing services on an as-needed basis. The solicitation requires offerors to provide services in two Alaska locations: Anchorage and Fairbanks. Services will include pre-employment medical examinations for Alaska State Trooper Recruits, Court Services Officers, and Deputy Fire Marshals, with examinations encompassing medical history reviews, physical assessments including vision and hearing tests, cardiovascular evaluations, musculoskeletal examinations, laboratory urinalysis, tuberculosis screening, drug profile testing, and breath alcohol testing. The RFP was issued on July 31, 2026, with proposals due by 4:30 p.m. Alaska Standard Time on August 17, 2026. The state anticipates proposal evaluations to be completed the week of August 17, 2026, with notice of intent to award issued the week of August 24, 2026, and contract issuance on September 1, 2026. The contract will begin approximately September 1, 2026, and may be renewed for four one-year renewal options at the state's sole discretion.

Pricing for this firm fixed-price contract is subject to available appropriated funds, with payment made within 30 days of invoice receipt, and the state is eligible to receive a 5% discount for invoices paid within 15 business days. The minimum prior experience requirement mandates that individual practitioners must be practicing adult primary care physicians, physician assistants, or advanced practice registered nurses with a minimum of two years' recent experience performing medical evaluations and fit-for-duty assessments within the previous four years; proposals failing to meet this requirement will be rejected as non-responsive. Evaluation criteria allocate 40% to qualifications and understanding (10% each for experience, project understanding, methodology, and management plan), 50% to contract cost, and 10% to Alaska Offeror Preference. Offerors must hold valid Alaska business licenses and applicable professional licenses prior to the proposal deadline. Subcontractors and joint ventures are not permitted, and all work must be performed in the United States by the contractor's own staff. The successful contractor must maintain all required insurance including workers' compensation, commercial general liability at $300,000 minimum, commercial automobile liability at $300,000 minimum, and professional liability based on contract value.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STATE OF ALASKA

REQUEST FOR

PROPOSALS

OFFERORS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO RETURN THIS FORM.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF YOU RECEIVED THIS SOLICITATION FROM THE STATE OF ALASKA’S

“ONLINE PUBLIC NOTICE” WEB SITE, YOU MUST REGISTER WITH THE PROCUREMENT OFFICER

LISTED IN THIS DOCUMENT TO RECEIVE NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS. FAILURE

TO CONTACT THE PROCUREMENT OFFICER MAY RESULT IN THE REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.

ISSUED BY:

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

PRIMARY CONTACT:

CALIN LOGAN

PROCUREMENT SPECIALIST 2

CALIN.LOGAN@ALASKA.GOV

(907) 269-0599

APPLICANT MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS

RFP 2027-1200-0020

ISSUED JULY 31, 2026

THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY IS SOLICITING FOR PROPOSALS FOR LICENSED

PROFESSIONALS TO PROVIDE PRE-EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS

STATE OF ALASKA – REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP 2027-1200-0020

2 Rev. 8/24

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION & INSTRUCTIONS

SEC. 1.01 PURPOSE OF THE RFP

SEC. 1.02 BUDGET

SEC. 1.03 DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS

SEC. 1.04 PRIOR EXPERIENCE

SEC. 1.05 REQUIRED REVIEW

SEC. 1.06 QUESTIONS PRIOR TO DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS

SEC. 1.07 RETURN INSTRUCTIONS

SEC. 1.08 ASSISTANCE TO OFFERORS WITH A DISABILITY

SEC. 1.09 AMENDMENTS TO PROPOSALS

SEC. 1.10 AMENDMENTS TO THE RFP

SEC. 1.11 RFP SCHEDULE

SEC. 1.12 ALTERNATE PROPOSALS

SEC. 1.13 NEWS RELEASES

SECTION 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION

SEC. 2.01 BACKGROUND INFORMATION

SECTION 3. SCOPE OF WORK & CONTRACT INFORMATION

SEC. 3.01 SCOPE OF WORK

SEC. 3.02 CONTRACT TERM AND WORK SCHEDULE

SEC. 3.03 DELIVERABLES

SEC. 3.04 CONTRACT TYPE

SEC. 3.05 PROPOSED PAYMENT PROCEDURES

SEC. 3.06 PROMPT PAYMENT FOR STATE PURCHASES

SEC. 3.07 CONTRACT PAYMENT

SEC. 3.08 CONTRACT PRICE ADJUSTMENTS

SEC. 3.09 LOCATION OF WORK

SEC. 3.10 SUBCONTRACTORS

SEC. 3.11 JOINT VENTURES

SEC. 3.12 RIGHT TO INSPECT PLACE OF BUSINESS

SEC. 3.13 CONTRACT PERSONNEL

SEC. 3.14 INSPECTION & MODIFICATION - REIMBURSEMENT FOR UNACCEPTABLE DELIVERABLES

SEC. 3.15 CONTRACT CHANGES - UNANTICIPATED AMENDMENTS

SEC. 3.16 NONDISCLOSURE AND CONFIDENTIALITY

SEC. 3.17 INDEMNIFICATION

SEC. 3.18 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

SEC. 3.19 TERMINATION FOR DEFAULT

SECTION 4. PROPOSAL FORMAT AND CONTENT

SEC. 4.01 INTRODUCTION

SEC. 4.02 PROPOSAL CONTENTS

SEC. 4.03 EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS

SEC. 4.04 UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT

SEC. 4.05 METHODOLOGY USED FOR THE PROJECT

SEC. 4.06 MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE PROJECT

SEC. 4.07 COST PROPOSAL

SEC. 4.08 EVALUATION CRITERIA

SECTION 5. EVALUATION CRITERIA AND CONTRACTOR SELECTION

SEC. 5.01 SUMMARY OF EVALUATION PROCESS

SEC. 5.02 EVALUATION CRITERIA

SEC. 5.03 SCORING METHOD AND CALCULATION

SEC. 5.04 EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS (10%)

SEC. 5.05 UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT (10%)

SEC. 5.06 METHODOLOGY USED FOR THE PROJECT (10%)

SEC. 5.07 MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE PROJECT (10%)

SEC. 5.08 CONTRACT COST (50%)

SEC. 5.09 ALASKA OFFEROR PREFERENCE (10%)

SECTION 6. GENERAL PROCESS AND LEGAL INFORMATION

SEC. 6.01 INFORMAL DEBRIEFING

SEC. 6.02 ALASKA BUSINESS LICENSE AND OTHER REQUIRED LICENSES

SEC. 6.03 SITE INSPECTION

SEC. 6.04 CLARIFICATION OF OFFERS

3 Rev. 8/24

SEC. 6.05 DISCUSSIONS WITH OFFERORS

SEC. 6.06 EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS

SEC. 6.07 CONTRACT NEGOTIATION

SEC. 6.08 FAILURE TO NEGOTIATE

SEC. 6.09 OFFEROR NOTIFICATION OF SELECTION

SEC. 6.10 PROTEST

SEC. 6.11 APPLICATION OF PREFERENCES

SEC. 6.12 ALASKA BIDDER PREFERENCE

SEC. 6.13 ALASKA VETERAN PREFERENCE

SEC. 6.14 ALASKA MILITARY SKILLS PROGRAM PREFERENCE

SEC. 6.15 STANDARD CONTRACT PROVISIONS

SEC. 6.16 QUALIFIED OFFERORS

SEC. 6.17 PROPOSAL AS PART OF THE CONTRACT

SEC. 6.18 ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

SEC. 6.19 HUMAN TRAFFICKING

SEC. 6.20 RIGHT OF REJECTION

SEC. 6.21 STATE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARATION COSTS

SEC. 6.22 DISCLOSURE OF PROPOSAL CONTENTS

SEC. 6.23 ASSIGNMENT

SEC. 6.24 FORCE MAJEURE (IMPOSSIBILITY TO PERFORM)

SEC. 6.25 DISPUTES

SEC. 6.26 SEVERABILITY

SEC. 6.27 SUPPLEMENTAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

SEC. 6.28 SOLICITATION ADVERTISING

SEC. 6.29 FEDERALLY IMPOSED TARIFFS

SECTION 7. ATTACHMENTS

SEC. 7.01 ATTACHMENTS

4 Rev. 8/24

SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION & INSTRUCTIONS

SEC. 1.01 PURPOSE OF THE RFP

The Department of Public Safety (DPS), Division of Administrative Services (DAS), is soliciting proposals for licensed physicians, advanced practice registered nurse(s), and/or physician assistants to provide pre-employment medical examinations; fitness-for-duty examinations; drug testing, urinalysis, and consultation services on an as-needed basis to the department. Offerors must offer services in the following Alaska locations: Anchorage area and Fairbanks, Alaska.

SEC. 1.02 BUDGET

Payment for the contract is subject to funds already appropriated and identified.

SEC. 1.03 DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS

Proposals must be received no later than 4:30 p.m. prevailing Alaska Standard Time on August 17, 2026, as indicated by email timestamp and late proposals will not be considered.

SEC. 1.04 PRIOR EXPERIENCE

In order for offers to be considered responsive offerors must meet these minimum prior experience requirements:

• Individual(s) must be a practicing adult primary care physician/physician assistant with a minimum of two years of recent experience performing medical evaluations of applicants/employees for essential job functions and fit-for-duty evaluations. Two years’ experience shall be in the previous four years.

An offeror's failure to meet these minimum prior experience requirements will cause their proposal to be considered non-responsive and rejected.

SEC. 1.05 REQUIRED REVIEW

Offerors should carefully review this solicitation for defects and questionable or objectionable material.

Comments concerning defects and questionable or objectionable material should be made in writing and received by the procurement officer at least ten days before the deadline for receipt of proposals. This will allow time for the issuance of any necessary amendments. It will also help prevent the opening of a defective proposal and exposure of offeror's proposals upon which award could not be made.

SEC. 1.06 QUESTIONS PRIOR TO DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF

PROPOSALS

All questions must be in writing and directed to the procurement officer by August 11, 2026, at 4:30 p.m.

AKST. The interested party must confirm telephone conversations in writing.

Two types of questions generally arise. One may be answered by directing the questioner to a specific section of the RFP. These questions may be answered over the telephone. Other questions may be more complex and may require a written amendment to the RFP. The procurement officer will make that decision.

5 Rev. 8/24

PROCUREMENT OFFICER: Calin Logan

PHONE: (907) 269-0599

EMAIL: calin.logan@alaska.gov

SEC. 1.07 RETURN INSTRUCTIONS

Bidders must submit one complete copy of the proposal via email, the technical proposal and cost proposal must be saved as separate PDF documents and emailed to dps.das.solicitations@alaska.gov as separate, clearly labeled attachments, such as “Vendor A – Technical Proposal.pdf” and “Vendor A – Cost Proposal.pdf” (Vendor A is the name of the offeror). The email must contain the RFP number in the subject line.

The maximum size of a single email (including all text and attachments) that can be received by the state is 20mb (megabytes). If the email containing the proposal exceeds this size, the proposal must be sent in multiple emails that are each less than 20 megabytes and each email must comply with the requirements described above.

Please note that email transmission is not instantaneous. Similar to sending a hard copy proposal, if you are emailing your proposal, the state recommends sending it with enough time to ensure the email is delivered by the deadline for receipt of proposals.

It is the offeror’s responsibility to contact the issuing agency at (907) 269-0599 to confirm that the proposal has been received. The state is not responsible for unreadable, corrupt, or missing attachments.

SEC. 1.08 ASSISTANCE TO OFFERORS WITH A DISABILITY

Offerors with a disability may receive accommodation regarding the means of communicating this RFP or participating in the procurement process. For more information, contact the procurement officer no later than ten days prior to the deadline for receipt of proposals.

SEC. 1.09 AMENDMENTS TO PROPOSALS

Amendments to or withdrawals of proposals will only be allowed if acceptable requests are received prior to the deadline that is set for receipt of proposals. No amendments or withdrawals will be accepted after the deadline unless they are in response to the state's request in accordance with 2 AAC 12.290.

SEC. 1.10 AMENDMENTS TO THE RFP

If an amendment is issued before the deadline for receipt of proposals, the amendment will be posted on the State of Alaska Online Public Notice (OPN) website. The link to the posting of the amendment will be provided to all who were notified of the RFP and to those who have registered with the procurement officer after receiving the RFP from the OPN.

After receipt of proposals, if there is a need for any substantial clarification or material change in the RFP, an amendment will be issued. The amendment will incorporate the clarification or change, and a new date and time established for new or amended proposals. Evaluations may be adjusted as a result of receiving new or amended proposals.

mailto:dps.das.solicitations@alaska.gov

6 Rev. 8/24

SEC. 1.11 RFP SCHEDULE

RFP schedule set out herein represents the state’s best estimate of the schedule that will be followed. If a component of this schedule, such as the deadline for receipt of proposals, is delayed, the rest of the schedule may be shifted accordingly. All times are Alaska Standard Time.

ACTIVITY TIME DATE

Issue Date / RFP Released July 31, 2026 Deadline for Receipt of Proposals / Proposal Due Date 4:30 p.m. AKST August 17, 2026 Proposal Evaluations Complete Week of August 17, 2026 Notice of Intent to Award Week of August 24, 2026 Contract Issued September 1, 2026

This RFP does not, by itself, obligate the state. The state's obligation will commence when the contract is approved by the Commissioner of the Department of Public Safety, or the Commissioner's designee. Upon written notice to the contractor, the state may set a different starting date for the contract. The state will not be responsible for any work done by the contractor, even work done in good faith, if it occurs prior to the contract start date set by the state.

SEC. 1.12 ALTERNATE PROPOSALS

Offerors may only submit one proposal for evaluation. In accordance with 2 AAC 12.830 alternate proposals (proposals that offer something different than what is asked for) will be rejected.

SEC. 1.13 NEWS RELEASES

News releases related to this RFP will not be made without prior approval of the project director.

7 Rev. 8/24

SECTION 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION0

SEC. 2.01 BACKGROUND INFORMATION

The Alaska Police Standards Council (APSC) is a regulatory and quasi-judicial body that was created by Senate Bill 1, Chapter 178, and enacted by the State Legislature, effective July 7, 1972. Alaska Statute

18.65.140 created the Alaska Police Standards Council (APSC) under the Alaska Department of Public Safety. The Legislature granted for employment as police officers, as well as other regulations for the administration of the act.

The Alaska Administrative Code 13 AAC 85.210 regulates the minimum qualifications for the selection of the positions listed above to include the APSC Health Questionnaire and a medical examination by a licensed physician.

The State of Alaska, Department of Public Safety (DPS), requires licensed physicians, advanced practice registered nurse(s), and/or physician assistants (offeror/contractor) to provide pre-employment medical examinations; fitness-for-duty examinations; drug testing, urinalysis, and consultation services on an as-needed basis to the department. The contractor may also be asked to provide fitness-for-duty or return-to-duty evaluations for Alaska State Troopers under special circumstances.

DPS currently uses pre-employment medical examinations as part of its selection process for Alaska State Trooper Recruits, the entry-level law enforcement officer job class, as well as applicants for the Court Services Officer and Deputy Fire Marshall job classes. This screening and examination consist of a written portion and virtual interview. All selection procedures utilized by DPS must conform to the federal Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures.

The Alaska State Trooper Recruit selection process is multi-phased; applicants may be screened out during any phase of the process. The phase impacted by this proposal includes the pre-employment medical examinations. Recruitment cycles occur at least six times each calendar year for the Spring and Fall DPS Academy.

8 Rev. 8/24

SECTION 3. SCOPE OF WORK & CONTRACT INFORMATION

SEC. 3.01 SCOPE OF WORK

The Department of Public Safety (DPS), Division of Administrative Services (DAS), is soliciting proposals for licensed physicians, advanced practice registered nurse(s), and/or physician assistants (offeror/contractor) to provide pre-employment medical examinations; fitness-for-duty examinations;

drug testing, urinalysis, and consultation services on an as-needed basis to the department. Offerors must offer services in the following Alaska locations: Anchorage area and Fairbanks, Alaska.

The physician(s), advanced practice registered nurse(s), and/or physician assistant(s) assigned to perform the majority of the exams shall review and understand the essential functions of the State Trooper, Court Services Officer, and Deputy Fire Marshal positions in the department. This is the contractor’s responsibility and not billable to the department. Continued review is critical for both the pre-employment examinations as well as the fit-for-duty evaluations. For consistency in recommendations, it is preferred that the contractor assign one or two physicians and/or physician assistants to perform the majority of the examinations. The contractor shall review the various position descriptions and essential functions lists and the list of duties on the Medical Examination Report Form F2-B. The department’s Recruitment Unit will act as the project manager.

The contractor shall perform the following Tasks on an as-needed basis:

Task #1 – Pre-Employment Medical Examinations (PEME)

The contractor shall conduct examinations on new job applicants referred from the project manager. The contractor will review medical history questionnaires, perform medical examinations, and complete medical examination reports. Completion of the Alaska Police Standards Council forms is required for new hires and will be provided by the project manager and/or the applicants.

The examinations shall include, but are not limited to:

a. Review of individual Health Questionnaires (APSC Form F2-A) on all applicants.

b. Medical Examination of referrals to include vision and hearing, cardiovascular system at rest and after exercise, musculoskeletal, laboratory urinalysis only, and TB testing.

c. Completion of the Medical Examination Reports, summary of findings, and determination of whether applicant is physically capable of performing the essential functions of the job (APSC Form F2-A&B).

d. All applicants are to receive a purified protein derivative (PPD) and tuberculosis (TB) screening test or a blood test (QuantiFERON TB GOLD Plus) alternative blood test option to TB. If TB is indicated, the physician shall note test results on the APSC Form F2-B, Question 10. In the event a chest x-ray is necessary to confirm results, the offeror will email the project manager with a request for approval and the quoted price of the x-ray prior to performing the test. The results of the X-ray shall be noted in Section 12.

9 Rev. 8/24

The contractor shall only conduct a hepatitis blood test on an applicant if their history and screening indicate the possibility of hepatitis. This test is not required as part of the standard examination and is only needed if indicated. Pre-approval of the testing cost needs to be received from the project manager in advance of testing.

e. The Alaska Police Standards Council (APSC) Form F2-B may be certified (signed) by a physician, physician assistant, or advanced practice registered nurse who qualifies under Alaska Administrative Code 12 AAC 12.40.410.

f. It is the State’s responsibility to make a final determination of the applicant’s ability to perform the essential functions. Requirement not listed on the APSC F2-A&B:

g. All applicants are to provide a urine sample for 6-panel Drug Profile test to include the following:

amphetamines, acetylmorphines, cannabinoids, cocaine, opiates, and phencyclidine. Chain-of-custody documentation is required. Further testing may be required before a determination of eligibility can be made. In cases where the contractor finds that test results are inconclusive or borderline, and the physician cannot, in good conscience, make a positive recommendation for the applicant without additional testing, the physician shall make a negative recommendation.

h. All applicants are to provide a breath alcohol non-DOT breath test. Further testing may be required before a determination of eligibility can be made. In cases where the contractor finds the test results are inconclusive or borderline, and the physician cannot, in good conscience, make a positive recommendation for the applicant without additional testing, the physician shall make a negative recommendation.

Task #2 – Fitness for Duty Evaluations (FFDE)

The contractor shall conduct medical evaluations on employees referred to by the department’s project manager for fitness for duty evaluation and/or a functional analysis and assessment. The physician will not use the APSC F2-A/B form. There is no form to use for these evaluations. The project manager shall provide the physician with a referral letter detailing the medical injury or condition. The department will provide a list of essential job functions, observations of workplace functioning, and any additional information assumed to be pertinent, and may make specific queries relevant to determining the permanency of impairment.

The examinations shall include, but not be limited to:

a. The physician will have access to medical history, to medical records, and to consult with the employee’s medical providers (as necessary).

b. Intake medical history and review of medical records (may need to request copies of records from other providers using the release provided by the department) and conduct any interviews with relevant individuals if deemed necessary or appropriate by the contractor.

c. Perform medical examination on referrals, including any of the following tests deemed necessary or appropriate by the contractor to make a determination: vision and hearing, cardiovascular system at rest and after exercise, musculoskeletal, and laboratory (blood and urine).

10 Rev. 8/24

d. Complete a functional assessment report. This report may include any restrictions and limitations on the employee’s physical ability to perform the essential functions of the job, the duration of those restrictions, and the reasons supporting the findings.

e. A physician is required to perform the Fitness-for-Duty Evaluation and sign the report.

f. It is the State’s responsibility to make a final determination of the employee’s ability to perform the essential functions.

Testing beyond that which is detailed above may be required before a fitness-for-duty determination can be made. In cases where the contractor finds that test results are inconclusive and cannot decide without additional testing, the contractor will contact the project manager for direction. If authorized by the project manager, the additional testing may be done by the contractor if appropriate, or if not, the contractor will coordinate with an appropriate provider to obtain this testing. Any additional testing performed by another provider will be forwarded to the contractor for review and consideration in making a final determination.

Task #3 – Consultation

The contractor shall provide a physician, advanced practice registered nurse(s), health practitioner, physician assistant(s), and LPN for consulting services upon request. There shall be no charge when the project manager requests a consultation with the contractor to explain his/her evaluation recommendations under Tasks 1–2. The consulting services shall be scheduled only through the project manager.

Examples of consulting topics the department may request are described below, but not limited to:

a. Review an employee’s health care provider’s plan of treatment, findings, or limited duty or workplace modification recommendations, and confirm or recommend alternative plans of treatment, findings, or limited duty or workplace modification recommendations, and provide the reasons supporting the recommendation.

b. Recommend workplace modifications based on the medical examination and functional assessment and the reasons supporting the recommendation(s).

c. The contractor shall meet once or twice annually with the department’s Recruitment Program Manager, in Anchorage, Alaska, to discuss the essential functions of the various jobs and the physical standards the State Troopers, Court Services Officers, and Deputy Fire Marshalls must meet. This meeting will additionally provide an opportunity to observe actual physical training and firearms training administered through the Department’s Advanced Training Unit. The contractor may also be given an orientation of the various job functions. No time or travel costs incurred by the contractor for orientation purposes (essential functions review, discussions with Program Manager and/or onsite visits) will be billable to the department.

Continuing Education

11 Rev. 8/24

The successful Contractor shall assure, at no additional cost to the State, that all persons working under the terms of the contract meet and maintain any and all legal requirement for licensing and Continuing Education.

The use of physicians and physician assistants in performing pre-employment medical examinations and return-to-duty/fit-for-duty evaluations will be restricted as follows:

Physicians and Physicians Assistants may be used in performing pre-employment medical examinations.

However, according to the State of Alaska Regulation 13AAC 85.210, the Alaska Police Standards Council Form F2A-B is required to be certified (signed) by a licensed physician.

SEC. 3.02 CONTRACT TERM AND WORK SCHEDULE

The length of the contract will be from the date of award, approximately September 1, 2026, with four one-year renewal options to be exercised at the sole discretion of the State of Alaska.

Unless otherwise provided in this RFP, the State and the successful offeror/contractor agree: (1) that any extension of the contract excluding any exercised renewal options, will be considered as a month-to-month extension, and all other terms and conditions shall remain in full force and effect and (2) the procurement officer will provide notice to the contractor of the intent to cancel such month-to-month extension at least 30 days before the desired date of cancellation. A month-to-month extension may only be executed by the procurement officer via a written contract amendment.

SEC. 3.03 DELIVERABLES

The contractor will be required to provide the following deliverables:

A. Pre-employment medical examinations (PEME)

B. Fitness for Duty Evaluations (FFDE)

C. Consultation Services

SEC. 3.04 CONTRACT TYPE

This contract is a Firm Fixed Price contract.

SEC. 3.05 PROPOSED PAYMENT PROCEDURES

The state will make payments based on a negotiated payment schedule. Each billing must consist of an invoice and progress report. No payment will be made until the progress report and invoice has been approved by the project director.

SEC. 3.06 PROMPT PAYMENT FOR STATE PURCHASES

The state is eligible to receive a 5% discount for all invoices paid within 15 business days from the date of receipt of the commodities or services and/or a correct invoice, whichever is later. The discount shall be taken on the full invoice amount. The state shall consider payment being made as either the date a printed warrant is issued or the date an electronic funds transfer (EFT) is initiated.

12 Rev. 8/24

SEC. 3.07 CONTRACT PAYMENT

No payment will be made until the contract is approved by the Commissioner of the Department of Public Safety or the Commissioner's designee. Under no conditions will the state be liable for the payment of any interest charges associated with the cost of the contract. The state is not responsible for and will not pay local, state, or federal taxes. All costs associated with the contract must be stated in U.S. currency.

Payment for agreements under $500,000 for the undisputed purchase of goods or services provided to a state agency, will be made within 30 days of the receipt of a proper billing or the delivery of the goods or services to the location(s) specified in the agreement, whichever is later. A late payment is subject to 1.5% interest per month on the unpaid balance. Interest will not be paid if there is a dispute or if there is an agreement that establishes a lower interest rate or precludes the charging of interest.

Any single contract payment of $1 million or higher must be accepted by the contractor via Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT).

SEC. 3.08 CONTRACT PRICE ADJUSTMENTS

Consumer Price Index (CPI): Contract prices will remain firm through September 30, 2027.

The Contractor or State may request price adjustments, no sooner than 12 months from the Contract execution date, and no more than once per contract year. Contractors must submit a request to the State at least thirty (30) days prior to the end of the current term. All Requests must be in writing and must be received 30 days prior to the Contract renewal date.

a. If the Contractor or State fail to request a CPI price adjustment 30 days prior to the Contract renewal date, the adjustment will be effective 30 days after the State or Contractor receives their written request.

b. Price adjustments will be made in accordance with the percentage change in the U.S.

Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor and Statistics, Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) for All Urban Consumers, All Items, Urban Alaska.

c. The price adjustment rate will be determined by comparing the percentage difference between the CPI in effect for the base year reported HALF1 (January through June 2023) (depends on the timing, may be HALF2 for July-December); and each HALF1 (or HALF2) thereafter. The percentage difference between those two CPI issues will be the price adjustment rate. No retroactive contract price adjustments will be allowed. All price adjustments must be approved by the Procurement Officer prior to the implementation of the adjusted pricing. Approval shall be in the form of a Contract Amendment issued by the Procurement Officer.

d. Approval for all price increases is dependent upon full compliance with the terms of the Contract including reporting requirements.

SEC. 3.09 LOCATION OF WORK

The location(s) the work is to be performed, completed, and managed are at the contractor’s place of business.

13 Rev. 8/24

The state will not provide workspace for the contractor. The contractor must provide its own workspace.

By signature on their proposal, the offeror certifies that all services provided under this contract by the contractor and all subcontractors shall be performed in the United States.

If the offeror cannot certify that all work will be performed in the United States, the offeror must contact the procurement officer in writing to request a waiver at least 10 days prior to the deadline for receipt of proposals.

The request must include a detailed description of the portion of work that will be performed outside the United States, where, by whom, and the reason the waiver is necessary.

Failure to comply with these requirements may cause the state to reject the proposal as non-responsive, or cancel the contract.

SEC. 3.10 SUBCONTRACTORS

Subcontractors will not be allowed.

SEC. 3.11 JOINT VENTURES

Joint ventures will not be allowed.

SEC. 3.12 RIGHT TO INSPECT PLACE OF BUSINESS

At reasonable times, the state may inspect those areas of the contractor's place of business that are related to the performance of a contract. If the state makes such an inspection, the contractor must provide reasonable assistance.

SEC. 3.13 CONTRACT PERSONNEL

Any change of the project team members named in the proposal must be approved, in advance and in writing, by the project director or procurement officer. Changes that are not approved by the state may be grounds for the state to terminate the contract.

SEC. 3.14 INSPECTION & MODIFICATION - REIMBURSEMENT FOR

UNACCEPTABLE DELIVERABLES

The contractor is responsible for the completion of all work set out in the contract. All work is subject to inspection, evaluation, and approval by the project director. The state may employ all reasonable means to ensure that the work is progressing and being performed in compliance with the contract. The project director or procurement officer may instruct the contractor to make corrections or modifications if needed in order to accomplish the contract’s intent. The contractor will not unreasonably withhold such changes.

Substantial failure of the contractor to perform the contract may cause the state to terminate the contract.

In this event, the state may require the contractor to reimburse monies paid (based on the identified portion of unacceptable work received) and may seek associated damages.

SEC. 3.15 CONTRACT CHANGES - UNANTICIPATED AMENDMENTS

During the course of this contract, the contractor may be required to perform additional work. That work will be within the general scope of the initial contract. When additional work is required, the project

14 Rev. 8/24 director will provide the contractor a written description of the additional work and request the contractor to submit a firm time schedule for accomplishing the additional work and a firm price for the additional work. Cost and pricing data must be provided to justify the cost of such amendments per AS 36.30.400.

The contractor will not commence additional work until the procurement officer has secured any required state approvals necessary for the amendment and issued a written contract amendment, approved by the Commissioner of the Department of Public Safety or the Commissioner's designee.

SEC. 3.16 NONDISCLOSURE AND CONFIDENTIALITY

Contractor agrees that all confidential information shall be used only for purposes of providing the deliverables and performing the services specified herein and shall not disseminate or allow dissemination of confidential information except as provided for in this section. The contractor shall hold as confidential and will use reasonable care (including both facility physical security and electronic security) to prevent unauthorized access by, storage, disclosure, publication, dissemination to and/or use by third parties of, the confidential information. “Reasonable care” means compliance by the contractor with all applicable federal and state law, including the Social Security Act and HIPAA. The contractor must promptly notify the state in writing if it becomes aware of any storage, disclosure, loss, unauthorized access to or use of the confidential information.

Confidential information, as used herein, means any data, files, software, information or materials (whether prepared by the state or its agents or advisors) in oral, electronic, tangible or intangible form and however stored, compiled or memorialized that is classified confidential as defined by State of Alaska classification and categorization guidelines provided by the state to the contractor or a contractor agent or otherwise made available to the contractor or a contractor agent in connection with this contract, or acquired, obtained or learned by the contractor or a contractor agent in the performance of this contract.

Examples of confidential information include, but are not limited to: technology infrastructure, architecture, financial data, trade secrets, equipment specifications, user lists, passwords, research data, and technology data (infrastructure, architecture, operating systems, security tools, IP addresses, etc).

Additional information that the contractor shall hold as confidential during the performance of services under this contract include:

• Applicant Information

If confidential information is requested to be disclosed by the contractor pursuant to a request received by a third party and such disclosure of the confidential information is required under applicable state or federal law, regulation, governmental or regulatory authority, the contractor may disclose the confidential information after providing the state with written notice of the requested disclosure ( to the extent such notice to the state is permitted by applicable law) and giving the state opportunity to review the request.

If the contractor receives no objection from the state, it may release the confidential information within 30 days. Notice of the requested disclosure of confidential information by the contractor must be provided to the state within a reasonable time after the contractor’s receipt of notice of the requested disclosure and, upon request of the state, shall seek to obtain legal protection from the release of the confidential information.

The following information shall not be considered confidential information: information previously known to be public information when received from the other party; information freely available to the

15 Rev. 8/24 general public; information which now is or hereafter becomes publicly known by other than a breach of confidentiality hereof; or information which is disclosed by a party pursuant to subpoena or other legal process and which as a result becomes lawfully obtainable by the general public.

SEC. 3.17 INDEMNIFICATION

The contractor shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the contracting agency from and against any claim of, or liability for error, omission, or negligent act of the contractor under this agreement. The contractor shall not be required to indemnify the contracting agency for a claim of, or liability for, the independent negligence of the contracting agency. If there is a claim of, or liability for, the joint negligent error or omission of the contractor and the independent negligence of the contracting agency, the indemnification and hold harmless obligation shall be apportioned on a comparative fault basis.

“Contractor” and “contracting agency”, as used within this and the following article, include the employees, agents and other contractors who are directly responsible, respectively, to each. The term “independent negligence” is negligence other than in the contracting agency’s selection, administration, monitoring, or controlling of the contractor and in approving or accepting the contractor’s work.

SEC. 3.18 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

Without limiting contractor's indemnification, it is agreed that contractor shall purchase at its own expense and maintain in force at all times during the performance of services under this agreement the following policies of insurance. Where specific limits are shown, it is understood that they shall be the minimum acceptable limits. If the contractor's policy contains higher limits, the state shall be entitled to coverage to the extent of such higher limits.

Certificates of Insurance must be furnished to the procurement officer prior to beginning work and must provide for a notice of cancellation, non-renewal, or material change of conditions in accordance with policy provisions. Failure to furnish satisfactory evidence of insurance or lapse of the policy is a material breach of this contract and shall be grounds for termination of the contractor's services. All insurance policies shall comply with and be issued by insurers licensed to transact the business of insurance under

AS 21.

Workers' Compensation Insurance: The contractor shall provide and maintain, for all employees engaged in work under this contract, coverage as required by AS 23.30.045, and where applicable, any other statutory obligations including but not limited to Federal U.S.L. & H. and Jones Act requirements. The policy must waive subrogation against the State.

Commercial General Liability Insurance: covering all business premises and operations used by the Contractor in the performance of services under this agreement with minimum coverage limits of $300,000 combined single limit per claim.

Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance: covering all vehicles used by the contractor in the performance of services under this agreement with minimum coverage limits of $300,000 combined single limit per claim.

Professional Liability Insurance: covering all errors, omissions, or negligent acts in the performance of professional services under this agreement. Limits required per the following schedule:

16 Rev. 8/24

Contract Amount Minimum Required Limits

Under $100,000 $300,000 per Claim/Annual Aggregate $100,000-$499,000 $500,000 per Claim/Annual Aggregate $500,000-$999,999 $1,000,000 per Claim/Annual Aggregate $1,000,000 or over Refer to Risk Management

SEC. 3.19 TERMINATION FOR DEFAULT

a. If the Project Director or Procurement Officer determines that the contractor has refused to perform the work or has failed to perform the work with such diligence as to ensure its timely and accurate completion, the state may, by providing written notice to the contractor, terminate the contractor's right to proceed with part or all the remaining work.

b. The Procurement Officer may also, by written notice, terminate this contract under Administrative Order 352 if the contractor supports or participates in a boycott of the State of Israel.

This clause does not restrict the state's termination rights under the contract provisions of Appendix A, attached in SECTION 7. ATTACHMENTS.

17 Rev. 8/24

SECTION 4. PROPOSAL FORMAT AND CONTENT

SEC. 4.01 INTRODUCTION

Proposals must include the complete name and address of offeror’s firm and the name, mailing address, and telephone number of the person the state should contact regarding the proposal.

Proposals must confirm that the offeror will comply with all provisions in this RFP; and, if applicable, provide notice that the firm qualifies as an Alaskan bidder. Proposals must be signed by a company officer empowered to bind the company. An offeror's failure to include these items in the proposals may cause the proposal to be determined to be non-responsive and the proposal may be rejected.

The state discourages overly lengthy and costly proposals, however, in order for the state to evaluate proposals fairly and completely, offerors must follow the format set out in this RFP and provide all information requested.

SEC. 4.02 PROPOSAL CONTENTS

The following information must be included in all proposals.

(a) AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE All proposals must be signed by an individual authorized to bind the offeror to the provisions of the RFP.

Proposals must remain open and valid for at least 90-days from the date set as the deadline for receipt of proposals.

(b) OFFEROR'S CERTIFICATION By signature on the proposal, offerors certify that they comply with the following:

A. the laws of the State of Alaska;

B. the applicable portion of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964;

C. the Equal Employment Opportunity Act and the regulations issued thereunder by the federal government;

D. the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the regulations issued thereunder by the federal government;

E. all terms and conditions set out in this RFP;

F. a condition that the proposal submitted was independently arrived at, without collusion, under penalty of perjury; and

G. that the offers will remain open and valid for at least 90 days.

If any offeror fails to comply with [a] through [g] of this paragraph, the state reserves the right to disregard the proposal, terminate the contract, or consider the contractor in default.

(c) VENDOR TAX ID A valid Vendor Tax ID must be submitted to the issuing office with the proposal or within five days of the state's request.

18 Rev. 8/24

(d) CONFLICT OF INTEREST Each proposal shall include a statement indicating whether or not the firm or any individuals working on the contract has a possible conflict of interest (e.g., currently employed by the State of Alaska or formerly employed by the State of Alaska within the past two years) and, if so, the nature of that conflict. The procurement officer reserves the right to consider a proposal non-responsive and reject it or cancel the award if any interest disclosed from any source could either give the appearance of a conflict or cause speculation as to the objectivity of the contract to be performed by the offeror.

(e) FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS The offeror must identify all known federal requirements that apply to the proposal, the evaluation, or the contract.

SEC. 4.03 EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS

Offerors must provide an organizational chart specific to the personnel assigned to accomplish the work called for in this RFP; illustrate the lines of authority; designate the individual responsible and accountable for the completion of each component and deliverable of the RFP.

Offerors must provide a narrative description of the organization of the project team and a personnel roster that identifies each person who will actually work on the contract and provide the following information about each person listed:

• title,

• resume,

• location(s) where work will be performed,

• itemize the total cost and the number of estimated hours for each individual named above.

Offerors must provide reference names and phone numbers for similar projects the offeror’s firm has completed.

SEC. 4.04 UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT

Offerors must provide comprehensive narrative statements that illustrate their understanding of the requirements of the project and the project schedule.

SEC. 4.05 METHODOLOGY USED FOR THE PROJECT

Offerors must provide comprehensive narrative statements that set out the methodology they intend to employ and illustrate how the methodology will serve to accomplish the work and meet the state’s project schedule.

SEC. 4.06 MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE PROJECT

Offerors must provide comprehensive narrative statements that set out the management plan they intend to follow and illustrate how the plan will serve to accomplish the work and meet the state's project schedule.

19 Rev. 8/24

SEC. 4.07 COST PROPOSAL

Offerors must complete and submit this Submittal Form. Proposed costs must all direct and indirect costs associated with the performance of the contract, including, but not limited to, total number of hours at various hourly rates, direct expenses, payroll, supplies, overhead assigned to each person working on the project, percentage of each person's time devoted to the project, and profit. The costs identified on the cost proposal are the total amount of costs to be paid by the state. No additional charges shall be allowed.

SEC. 4.08 EVALUATION CRITERIA

All proposals will be reviewed to determine if they are responsive. Proposals determined to be responsive will be evaluated using the criterion that is set out in SECTION 5. EVALUATION CRITERIA AND

CONTRACTOR SELECTION.

20 Rev. 8/24

SECTION 5. EVALUATION CRITERIA AND CONTRACTOR

SELECTION

THE TOTAL NUMBER OF POINTS USED TO SCORE THIS PROPOSAL IS 100

After receipt of proposals, if there is a need for any substantial clarification or material change in the RFP, an amendment will be issued. The amendment will incorporate the clarification or change, and a new date and time established for new or amended proposals. Evaluations may be adjusted as a result of receiving new or amended proposals.

SEC. 5.01 SUMMARY OF EVALUATION PROCESS

The state will use the following steps to evaluate and prioritize proposals:

1) Proposals will be assessed for overall responsiveness and responsibility. Proposals deemed non-responsive or non-responsible will be eliminated from further consideration.

2) A proposal evaluation committee (PEC), made up of at least three state employees or public officials, will evaluate the Technical portion of all responsive proposals.

3) Each responsive Technical Proposal will be sent to the PEC. No cost information will be shared or provided to the PEC.

4) The PEC will independently evaluate and score the proposals based on the degree to which they meet the stated evaluation criteria.

5) After independent scoring, the PEC will have a meeting, chaired by the procurement officer, where the PEC may have a group discussion prior to finalizing their scores.

6) The evaluators will submit their final individual scores to the procurement officer, who will then compile the scores and calculate awarded points as set out in Section 5.03.

7) The procurement officer will calculate scores for cost proposals as set out in Section 5.08 and add those scores to the awarded points along with factoring in any Alaska preferences.

8) The procurement officer may ask for best and final offers from offerors susceptible for award and revise the cost scores accordingly.

9) The state will then conduct any necessary negotiations with the highest scoring offeror and award a contract if the negotiations are successful.

SEC. 5.02 EVALUATION CRITERIA

Proposals will be evaluated based on their overall value to state, considering both cost and non-cost factors as described below. Note: An evaluation may not be based on discrimination due to the race, religion, color, national origin, sex, age, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, disability, or political affiliation of the offeror.

Overall Criteria Weight Responsiveness Pass/Fail

21 Rev. 8/24

Qualifications Criteria Weight Experience and Qualifications 10 Understanding of the Project 10 Methodology Used for the Project 10 Management Plan for the Project 10

Total 40

Cost Criteria Weight Cost Proposal 50 Total 50

Preference Criteria Weight Alaska Offeror Preference (if applicable) 10 Total 10

TOTAL EVALUATION POINTS AVAILABLE: 100

SEC. 5.03 SCORING METHOD AND CALCULATION

Each Proposal Evaluation Committee (PEC) member will individually evaluate and score each responsive proposal using the criteria set out in Sections 5.04 through 5.07 and assign a single score of 1 through 10, with 10 representing the highest score and 1 representing the lowest score. Using only whole numbers, PEC members should start with a score of 5 on each section. The score may either increase or decrease depending on the offeror’s response to each question for that section. As an example, if the Offeror provided responses over and above the evaluation questions in a section, they would receive a higher score. However, if the Offeror’s response fails to address all questions of a section or demonstrates some lack of understanding or competency as it relates to a question for that section, the Offeror would then receive a lower score.

After the PEC has scored, the scores for each section will be totaled and the following formula will be used to calculate the total amount of points awarded for each section:

Offeror Total Score x Max Points = Points Awarded Highest Total Score Possible

Example (Max Points for the Section = 100):

22 Rev. 8/24

PEC

Member 1

Score

PEC

Member 2

Score

PEC

Member 3

Score

PEC

Member 4

Score Combined Total Score

Points

Awarded Offeror

1 10 5 5 10 30 75

Offeror 2 5 5 5 5 20 50

Offeror

10 10 10 10 40 100

Offeror 1 was awarded 75 points:

Offeror Total Score (30) x Max Points (100) = Points Awarded (75) Highest Total Score Possible (40)

Offeror 2 was awarded 50 points:

Offeror Total Score (20) x Max Points (100) = Points Awarded (50)

Offeror 3 was awarded 100 points:

Offeror Total Score (40) x Max Points (100) = Points Awarded (100)

SEC. 5.04 EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS (10%)

Proposals will be evaluated against the questions set out below:

1) Questions regarding the personnel:

a) Do the individuals assigned to the project have experience on similar projects?

b) Are resumes complete and do they demonstrate backgrounds that would be desirable for individuals engaged in the work the project requires?

c) How extensive is the applicable education and experience of the personnel designated to work on the project?

2) Questions regarding the firm and subcontractor (if used):

a) How well has the firm demonstrated experience in completing similar projects on time and within budget?

23 Rev. 8/24

b) How successful is the general history of the firm regarding timely and successful completion of projects?

c) Has the firm provided Client Reference Forms from previous clients?

SEC. 5.05 UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT (10%)

Proposals will be evaluated against the questions set out below:

1) How well has the offeror demonstrated a thorough understanding of the purpose and scope of the project?

2) How well has the offeror identified pertinent issues and potential problems related to the project?

3) To what degree has the offeror demonstrated an understanding of the deliverables the state expects it to provide?

4) Has the offeror demonstrated an understanding of the state's time schedule and can meet it?

SEC. 5.06 METHODOLOGY USED FOR THE PROJECT (10%)

Proposals will be evaluated against the questions set out below:

1) How comprehensive is the methodology and does it depict a logical approach to fulfilling the requirements of the RFP?

2) How well does the methodology match and achieve the objectives set out in the RFP?

3) Does the methodology interface with the time schedule in the RFP?

SEC. 5.07 MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE PROJECT (10%)

Proposals will be evaluated against the questions set out below:

1) How well does the management plan support all of the project requirements and logically lead to the deliverables required in the RFP?

2) How well is accountability completely and clearly defined?

3) Is the organization of the project team clear?

4) How well does the management plan illustrate the lines of authority and communication?

5) To what extent does the offeror already have the hardware, software, equipment, and licenses necessary to perform the contract?

6) Does it appear that the offeror can meet the schedule set out in the RFP?

7) Has the…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .