Reference_-_Draft_EVALUATION_RATINGS_AND_DEFINITIONS_3.docx
DOCX document 23 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- DOIEFBO230002
View the file
Other files
Show all 34
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EVALUATION RATING DEFINITIONS
The following evaluation rating definitions apply to FACTOR A, B, C, D, F:
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| Excellent |
| Proposal demonstrates an excellent understanding of requirements and approach that significantly exceeds performance or capability standards. Has exceptional strengths that will significantly benefit the Government. No significant weaknesses indicated. No deficiencies indicated. |
| Good |
| Proposal demonstrates a good understanding of requirements and approach that exceeds performance or capability standards. Has one or more strengths that will benefit the Government. No more than one significant weakness indicated. No deficiencies indicated. |
| Acceptable |
| Proposal demonstrates an acceptable understanding of requirements and approach that meets performance or capability standards necessary for minimal but acceptable contract performance. Few or no strengths. Several weaknesses indicated. No deficiencies indicated. |
| Poor |
| Fails to meet performance or capability standards. Requirements can only be met with major changes to the proposal. No strengths indicated. Multiple weaknesses indicated in addition to significant deficiencies. |
The following evaluation rating definitions apply to Past Performance
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| Excellent |
| Based on the offeror’s record of past performance, no issues, concerns, or risks are associated with receiving quality products, timely services and full contract performance. Past Performance information indicates that the offeror is capable of significantly exceeding the requirements of the solicitation. |
| Good |
| The offeror’s record of past performance indicates there is very little risk associated with receiving quality products, timely services, and full contract performance. Past performance information indicates that the offeror is capable of exceeding the requirements of the solicitation. |
| Acceptable |
| The offeror’s record of past performance indicates there is some potential risk associated with receiving quality products, timely services, and full contract performance. Past performance information indicates that the offeror is capable of exceeding the requirements of the solicitation. |
| Poor |
| The offeror’s record of past performance indicates there is significant risk associated with receiving quality products, timely services, and full contract performance. Past performance information indicates that the offeror will have significant problems meeting the requirements of the solicitation. |
| Unknown/Neutral |
| No past performance information is available for evaluation. Offeror has asserted that is has no directly related or relevant past performance experience. Proposal receives no merit or demerit for this factor. |
Definitions of Words Strength – “Strength” is an element of a proposal that increases the likelihood of successful contract performance, or provides an approach directly related to the requirement that exceeds the minimum expectation.
Significant Strength – “Significant Strength” is an aspect of the proposal that exceeds the government’s requirements in a way that provides a substantial additional benefit. If applicable, the substantial additional benefit must be clearly shown to be achievable.
Weakness –“Weakness” means a flaw in the proposal that increases the chance of unsuccessful contract performance.
Significant Weakness – “Significant Weakness” is an aspect of the proposal that introduces a significant degree of doubt that the government’s requirements can be achieved at an acceptable level of quality and timeliness. A Significant Weakness is indicative of a risk to the government that is only minimally acceptable.
Deficiency –“Deficiency” is a material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.
Risk – “Risk” is a measure of the inability to achieve program objectives within defined cost and schedule constraints. Risk is associated with all aspects of the program. It has two components, the probability of failing to achieve a particular outcome, and the consequences of failing to achieve that outcome.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .