R. Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 80 KB Posted

Attached to
Repair-Replace Overruns on Center Runway Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA309923R0001
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command

About this file

This document includes a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for runway repair work. The past performance questionnaire is a three page form for respondents to provide feedback on a contractor's previous work. It requests information on the contractor and respondent along with ratings and comments on performance criteria such as scheduling, management, quality control, and problem resolution.

The federal contract opportunity is to establish a firm fixed-price contract for repairing sections of the overrun areas and edge lighting on the center runway at Laughlin Air Force Base, Texas. The work includes repairing and replacing six overrun sections and upgrading edge lighting and thresholds at a cost between $2-6 million. An organized site visit will be held on January 21, 2023 and proposals are due by the specified date. The acquisition is set aside for small businesses with a NAICS code of 237310 and size standard of $39.5 million. Interested parties can access the solicitation online once released.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Repair-Replace Overruns on Center Runway, newest first.
File Type Posted
T. Pre-Bid Questions Revised GOV Response 10FEB23.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002 Pre-Bid QA Revise 27 and 57.pdf PDF
S. Pre-Bid Questions CE Response LATEST.pdf PDF
L. Schedule of Material Submittals LATEST 8FEB23.xls XLS spreadsheet
Amendment 0001 Pre-Bid QA - Ext Proposal Due Date.pdf PDF
S-3 Pre-Bid Photos.pdf PDF
S-1. Geotech Report.pdf PDF
S-2. Nets Data.pdf PDF
S-4 Superpave C PG70-22 Specs.pdf PDF
1. Amendment EAL Deadline Extension CO Signed.pdf PDF
J - Division 01 Specifications.docx DOCX document
B - 100 Design Specifications.pdf PDF
Q. AF 103 Work Clearance Request.pdf PDF
N. EAL Template.pdf PDF
K. Hazmat Usage Log.pdf PDF
F - UFC 3-250-03 Standard Practice for Flexible Pave.pdf PDF
A - 100 Design Drawings.pdf PDF
Solicitation - FA309923R0001.pdf PDF
M - Progress Schedule and Progress Report1.pdf PDF
L - Schedule of Material Submittals.xls XLS spreadsheet
G - UFC 3-535-01 Visual Air Navigation Facilities.pdf PDF
E - UFC 3-260-02 Pavement for Airfields.pdf PDF
D - UFC 3-260-04 Airfield and Heliport Marking.pdf PDF
P. Wage Determination Rate.pdf PDF
O. Notification of Compliance with Contract Insurance Requirements.pdf PDF
I - DD 1354 Real Property.pdf PDF
H - UFGS 32 12 15.13 Asphalt Paving for Airfields.pdf PDF
C - Environmental Quality Construction Specs.pdf PDF
Show all 28

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION A: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION

1. Contractor’s Name and Address:

2. Point of Contact:

3. Phone Number:

4. Contract Number: Contract Type:

5. Project Title:

6. Period of Performance:

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (To Be Completed By Evaluation Respondent)

1. Respondent’s Company Name & Address:

2. Respondent’s Name:

3. Phone Number: Fax Number:

E-Mail:

4. Contract Number: Contract Type:

5. Award Amount: Final Amount:

6. Project Title:

7. Period of Performance:

C. Email COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO: Ms. Tacy Boje at tacy.boje.1@us.af.mil or to Lt Candice Arcuri at candice.arcuri@us.af.mil

THIS FORM MUST BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN: Proposal due date at 2:30PM Central Standard Time.

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.

1 2 3 4 5 6 Unsatisfactory Marginal None Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional

Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

Performance did not meet some contractual requirements.

There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.

No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.

Performance met contract requirements.

There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.

Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner

1. Developed realistic progress schedules and completed the project within 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A the established schedule.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:________________________________________________________________________

2. Provided experienced superintendent, managers, and supervisors, with 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A the technical and administrative abilities to meet requirements.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:________________________________________________________________________

3. Adequately controlled performance of subcontractors. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A COMMENTS/REMARKS:________________________________________________________________________

4. Provided effective quality control which resulted in a quality finished product. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A COMMENTS/REMARKS:________________________________________________________________________

5. Provided submittals in a timely manner. Submittals were 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A well researched and clearly identified the proposed item.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:________________________________________________________________________

6. Identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to resolving problems. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A Displayed initiative and cooperation in solving problems. Provided adequate information and pricing for change orders and negotiated them in good faith.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:________________________________________________________________________

7. Provided timely resolution of punch list items and closeout documentation. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A COMMENTS/REMARKS:________________________________________________________________________

8. Was the contractor assessed liquidated damages? YES NO (If Yes, briefly explain the circumstances)

9. Based on the contractor’s overall performance, would you rehire this contractor? YES NO

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING ___________________________________________________

Signature of Rater: ________________________________________________________ Date: ________________

1 Contractors Name and Address 1:
1 Contractors Name and Address 2:
1 Contractors Name and Address 3:
1 Contractors Name and Address 4:
2 Point of Contact:
3 Phone Number:
4 Contract Number:
Contract Type:
e:
od of Performance:
1:
2:
3:
4:
2 Respondents Name:
3 Phone Number_2:
Fax Number:
EMail:
4 Contract Number_2:
Contract Type_2:
5 Award Amount:
Amount:
e_2:
od of Performance_2:
No record of past performance or the record s nconclusive:
c progress schedules and comp:
COMMENTSREMARKS:
and administrat:
COMMENTSREMARKS_2:
led performance of subcontractors:
COMMENTSREMARKS_3:
4 Provided effective quality control wh:
COMMENTSREMARKS_4:
l researched and clearly identified the proposed item:
COMMENTSREMARKS_5:
ng for change orders and negot:
COMMENTSREMARKS_6:
COMMENTSREMARKS 1:
COMMENTSREMARKS 2:
If Yes br 1:
If Yes br 2:
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING:
gnature of Rater:
Date:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .