Questions and Answers Part 3.pdf
PDF 52 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 70Z08525RLREP0006
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers document for solicitation 70Z08525RLREP0006 related to Maintenance Procedure Card Development and Drafting Support for the Coast Guard's Long Range Enforcer Product Line.
The Q&A clarifies several key points: Letters of Intent are only required for Key Personnel; the staffing requirement is 8 full-time plus 1 part-time employee; the Project Manager position is not billable despite being listed as Key Personnel; and incumbent contractor information is considered proprietary. The government declined to provide specifics about changes in scope or level of effort from the incumbent contract, marking these questions as "Not applicable." Multiple questions sought clarification on proposal submission requirements and evaluation factors, but the government responded that "the solicitation is clear on face value" rather than providing additional details.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 2 -Schedule of Services Rv2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| SF30 Amendment 9.pdf | ||
| Solicitation 70Z08525RLREP0006.pdf | ||
| Questions and Answers Part 2.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 -Schedule of Services Rv1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| SF30 Amendment 8.pdf | ||
| SF30 Amendment 4.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4- Provisions and Clauses.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 -MPC SOW Rv1.pdf | ||
| SF30 Amendment 3.pdf | ||
| Questions and Answers Part 1.pdf | ||
| SF30 Amendment 7.pdf | ||
| SF30 Amendment 6.pdf | ||
| SF30 Amendment 5.pdf | ||
| SF30 Amendment 2.pdf | ||
| SF30 Amendment 1.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3- Past Performance Information Form- MPC Development.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions and Answers
Q1. The Solicitation Proposal Submission Requirements of Section 8 do not map to the Evaluation Requirements of Section 9. Evaluation, Section 9 references multiple Sub-factors for each of the Four Primary Factors identified. Will the Government please confirm what requirements and sub-factors offerors should respond to for each of the Four Primary Factors?
A1. The solicitation is clear on face value.
Q2. Will the Government please confirm Letters of Intent are only required for employees not currently employed by the offeror?
A2. Only for Key Personnel.
Q3. There is conflicting language from the Solicitation and SOW for who is considered Key Personnel. Will the Government please confirm the number of key personnel and which labor categories they map to?
A3. See Attachment 1 MPC SOW section 3.4 Key Personnel.
Q4. There is conflicting language from the Attachment 1 SOW and Attachment 2 Schedule of Services. Attachment 2 shows eight full time personnel while Attachment 1, Section 3 shows 8 full time plus 1 part time employee. Will the Government please confirm the number of personnel and which labor categories they map to for this effort?
A4. 8 full-time plus 1part-time employee. See Schedule of Services.
Q5. Will the Government confirm if the Project Manager is a billable position as this labor category is listed as a Key Personnel but is not listed on the Attachment 2 spreadsheet?
A5. Not billable position.
Q6. RFP instructions for past performance on page 12 states, “The Offeror shall provide three Past Performance references for relevant work, for previous contract experience listed under Technical section of Section 8.0, performed within the past five years from the solicitation closing date.” There are no areas listed within Section 8.0 for offerors to reference or show similar experience. Will the Government please confirm past performance should relate to SOW Section 2.1 –2.2.1?
A6. The solicitation is clear on face value.
Q7. Will the Government please provide the incumbent contractor’s name and contract number?
A7. Incumbent information is proprietary information.
Q8. Will the Government please confirm if the level of effort has altered from the incumbent contract to the current contract requirements?
A8. Not applicable.
Q9. Will the Government please confirm if the scope has altered from the incumbent contract to the current contract requirements?
A9. Not applicable.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .