NNC_Bid Documents_Narrative File 1 of 4_865CM3031.pdf

NASHVILLE NATIONAL CEMETERY

REPAIR ROADS

Davidson County, Tennessee

Bid Documents Project Number: 865CM3031

Prepared for:

US Department of Veterans Affairs National Cemetery Administration Contracting Services

July 24, 2023

Prepared by

Nashville National Cemetery Bid Documents - Basis of Design Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Introduction

2. Existing Conditions

3. Site Development

4. Geotechnical Review

5. Topographical Survey

6. Specifications

7. Cost Estimating

8. Appendices

· Appendix 1 – Roadway Condition Evaluation Report

· Appendix 2 – Geotechnical Summary

THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR DOUBLE SIDED PRINTING

1. Introduction

Project History The original scope for the Repair Roads project included improvements for improvements to approximately 20% of the cemetery’s roads. An additional contract was issued on May 30, 2023, to prepare construction documents for the entire cemetery road system.

Project Goals and Objectives This project will restore existing cemetery roads and repair associated drainage to establish a functional, safe, and cohesive appearance for Nashville National Cemetery. The design and documentation of this project will be accomplished following the National Cemetery Administration (NCA) Facilities Design Guide and the VA program Guide (PG-18-15, Volume D), A/E Submission Instructions for National Cemetery Projects.

The first phase of this project evaluated the existing road system, and associated drainage, and provide recommendations for repair or renovation. This evaluation was used to identify areas within the cemetery that are to be included in the project.

As documented in the report, most of the roads in the cemetery were found to be in poor condition.

Many sections of the roads contain substantial cracking and surface wear, rutting, potholes, and large cracks were also found in several portions of the cemetery roads. Recommendations for repair include Full Depth Pavement Reconstruction and Mill and Overlay Paving. Additionally, sections of curb and gutter were found to be in poor condition with multiple sections of curb requiring replacement to repair existing damage. Finally, storm drainage and the management system were evaluated and identified structures which require grate replacement, surrounding surface replacement, or complete structure replacement.

In the design development phase, the information collected during the pre-design period was developed into construction drawings and specifications.

The estimated construction period of performance for the improvements and repairs is six (6) months.

2. Existing Conditions

Nashville National Cemetery, located in Madison, Davidson County, Tennessee is a United States National Cemetery. The cemetery encompasses approximately 65 acres and was acquired in July of 1866. The site consists of burial sections, columbarium, administrative building, restrooms, maintenance building, committal service shelters and a rostrum. Approximately 13,500 feet of roadways connect the various sections of the cemetery. The CSX Rail Line runs north-south through the center of the Cemetery.

Each national cemetery is managed by VA National Cemetery Administration (NCA) personnel in conformance with national and regional (Southeast District) policies, priorities, goals, and objectives. Nashville National Cemetery is operated and maintained by staff supervised by the cemetery director. The functions of a national cemetery include the operation and maintenance of all aspects of the cemetery. Typically, this involves interment services for Veterans and eligible family members, the burial of casketed and cremated remains, and the placement and maintenance of headstones, niche covers and memorial markers. Cemetery operations include the conduct of Memorial Day and other special ceremonies, as well as the care of graves, structures, and grounds. Office operating hours are Monday through Friday, 8:00 am – 4:30 pm.

Office is closed for Federal Holidays except Memorial Day and Veterans Day. Cemetery visitation hours are daily Sunrise – Sunset.

Existing utility infrastructure consists of electric and telecommunications lines, storm sewer and associated storm facilities, irrigation, public water, and sewer connections servicing the existing admin and maintenance building areas.

3. Site Development

Full Depth Pavement Reconstruction The project includes demolishing and reconstruction of existing road segments that are in poor to failed condition. These sections require full-depth replacement and were identified during the onsite investigation.

Mill and Overlay Paving Mill and overlay operations are proposed along multiple sections of the cemetery to repair lesser deficiencies and to extend the functional life of the existing roads. These sections are in better condition than those requiring full-depth reconstruction and were identified through the onsite inspection.

Curbing improvements Based on the investigation, it was determined that multiple sections of curb and gutter require replacement to repair existing damage.

Storm Drainage Improvements Storm drainage and the management system were evaluated for condition and safety. Identified structures will require grate replacement, surrounding surface replacement, or complete structure replacement.

See Appendix 1 for the Roadway Condition Evaluation Report

4. Geotechnical Review

To assist with the preparation of the construction documents a geotechnical review has been prepared. The geotechnical review includes pavement cores throughout the cemetery to establish the pavement section. The pavements section consists of the following:

· Asphalt – the top layer of the roads is an asphalt surface. The thickness of this surface is designed to accommodate the typical traffic at the cemetery without the risk of damage.

Over time this layer wears down and can be damaged through movement in the base and subbase. Coring’s identified a pavement thickness ranging from 3 to 4 inches.

· Base – consisting of gravel / stone, this is a compacted layer placed under the asphalt and is designed to provide a solid base for the pavement. When this layer is absent or of insufficient depth it can subside, resulting in damage to the asphalt. Older roads may have no or limited base. Coring’s identified a base thickness ranging from 2 to 6 inches.

· Subbase – the native material under the asphalt and gravel base. It may be compacted, or it may consist of undisturbed earth. The soil characteristics provide the engineer information to determine the thickness of the aggregate base and asphalt. Subbase material is evaluated for its ability to be compacted and its plasticity, among other factors.

See Appendix 2 for Geotechnical Summary

5. Topographical Survey

Topographic information was compiled from a combination of an aerial topographic survey and conventional field survey prepared by L.I, Smith & Associates. Horizontal datum is referenced to the US state plane coordinate system, NAD83, Tennessee Zone 2113, international feet.

Vertical datum is referenced to NAVD 88.

6. Specifications

Construction Specifications are included with the Bid Documents.

7. Cost Estimating

A cost estimate is included with the Bid Documents.

8. APPENDICES

Appendix 1 – Roadway Condition Evaluation Report Appendix 2 – Geotechnical Summary

APPENDIX 1

ROADWAY CONDITION EVALUATION REPORT

Department of Veterans Affairs National Cemetery Administration 425 I Street NW Washington, DC 20001

Roadway Condition Assessment Report

VA Project Title: Repair Roads VA Project Number: 865CM3031

May 2022

Prepared by:

IFS Project No. 3311-0901

Roadway Condition Assessment – Nashville National Cemetery Task 1 Reports

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Nashville National Cemetery 1420 Gallatin Rd., S Madison TN, 37115

VA Project Title: Repair Roads VA Project Number: 865CM3031

Roadway Condition Assessment Report

Owner: Department of Veterans Affairs National Cemetery Administration 425 I Street NW Washington, DC 20001

Engineer: Integrity Federal Services, Inc.

148 South Queen St, Suite 201 Martinsburg, WV 25401

Project Manager: Ryan Perks, PE

1 INTRODUCTION

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs National Cemetery Administration have contracted Integrity Federal Services to provide a roadway condition assessment identifying deficiencies that need to be addressed. This report includes the evaluations and recommendations requested as part of the contract.

2 OBJECTIVE

The objective of the report is to identify areas of the roadway system that may require maintenance and rehabilitation efforts. Based on the deficiencies observed within the asphalt pavement, curb, and drainage infrastructure, recommendations have been developed for repair.

3 BACKGROUND

Nashville National Cemetery, located in the town of Madison, Tennessee is a United States National Cemetery. The cemetery was created out of necessity to bury the remains of soldiers lost during the Battle of Nashville and other skirmishes in Tennessee during the Civil War. The cemetery officially opened in July of 1866

The Nashville National Cemetery contains approximately 13,500 feet of roadways. Figure #1 shows the Cemetery and the project limits for this project.

4 CONDITION ASSESSMENT

4.1 INTRODUCTION

The Asphalt Roads Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating (PASER) MANUAL is a reference that has been used by transportation agencies as the basis for their condition assessments. The PASER system was produced by the Wisconsin Transportation Information Center with support from the Federal Highway Administration, the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, and the University of Wisconsin- Extension. This PASER system was used as the basis for this condition assessment report.

4.2 DISTRESS TYPES

Excerpted from the Asphalt PASER manual is a description of the types of distress and recommended rehabilitation methods as provided in the PASER System:

SURFACE DEFECTS

Raveling Raveling is progressive loss of pavement material from the surface downward, caused by stripping of the bituminous film from the aggregate, asphalt hardening due to aging, poor compaction especially in cold weather construction, or insufficient asphalt content. Slight to moderate raveling has loss of fines. Severe raveling has loss of coarse aggregate. Raveling in the wheel paths can be accelerated by traffic. Protect pavement surfaces from the environment with a sealcoat or a thin overlay if additional strength is required.

Flushing Flushing is excess asphalt on the surface caused by a poor initial asphalt mix design or by paving or sealcoating over a flushed surface. Repair by blotting with sand or by overlaying with properly designed asphalt mix.

Polishing Polishing is a smooth slippery surface caused by traffic wearing off sharp edges of aggregates.

Repair with sealcoat or thin bituminous overlay using skid-resistant aggregate.

SURFACE DEFORMATION

Rutting Rutting is displacement of material, creating channels in wheel paths. It is caused by traffic compaction or displacement of unstable material. Severe rutting (over 2”) may be caused by base or subgrade consolidation. Repair minor rutting with overlays. Severe rutting requires milling the old surface or reconstructing the roadbed before resurfacing.

Distortion Shoving or rippling is surfacing material displaced crossways to the direction of traffic. It can develop into washboarding when the asphalt mixture is unstable because of poor quality aggregate or improper mix design. Repair by milling smooth and overlaying with stable asphalt mix. Other pavement distortions may be caused by settling, frost heave, etc. Patching may provide temporary repair. Permanent correction usually involves removal of unsuitable subgrade material and reconstruction.

CRACKS

Transverse cracks A crack at approximately right angles to the center line is a transverse crack. They are often regularly spaced. The cause is movement due to temperature changes and hardening of the asphalt with aging. Transverse cracks will initially be widely spaced (over 50’). Additional cracking will occur with aging until they are closely spaced (within several feet). These usually begin as hairline or very narrow cracks; with aging they widen. If not properly sealed and maintained, secondary or multiple cracks develop parallel to the initial crack. The crack edges can further deteriorate by raveling and eroding the adjacent pavement. Prevent water intrusion and damage by sealing cracks which are more than 1⁄4” wide.

Reflection cracks Cracks in overlays reflect the crack pattern in the pavement underneath. They are difficult to prevent and correct. Thick overlays or reconstruction is usually required.

Slippage cracks Crescent or rounded cracks in the direction of traffic, caused by slippage between an overlay and an underlying pavement. Slippage is most likely to occur at intersections where traffic is stopping and starting. Repair by removing the top surface and resurfacing using a tack coat.

Longitudinal cracks Cracks running in the direction of traffic are longitudinal cracks. Center line or lane cracks are caused by inadequate bonding during construction or reflect cracks in underlying pavement.

Longitudinal cracks in the wheel path indicate fatigue failure from heavy vehicle loads. Cracks within one foot of the edge are caused by insufficient shoulder support, poor drainage, or frost action. Cracks usually start as hairline or vary narrow and widen and erode with age. Without crack filling, they can ravel, develop multiple cracks, and become wide enough to require patching. Filling and sealing cracks will reduce moisture penetration and prevent further subgrade weakening. Multiple longitudinal cracks in the wheel path or pavement edge indicate a need for strengthening with an overlay or reconstruction.

Block cracks Block cracking is interconnected cracks forming large blocks. Cracks usually intersect at nearly right angles. Blocks may range from one foot to approximately 10’ or more across. The closer spacing indicates more advanced aging caused by shrinking and hardening of the asphalt over time. Repair with sealcoating during early stages to reduce weathering of the asphalt.

Overlay or reconstruction required in the advanced stages.

Alligator cracks Interconnected cracks forming small pieces ranging in size from about 1” to 6”. This is caused by failure of the surfacing due to traffic loading (fatigue) and very often also due to inadequate base or subgrade support. Repair by excavating localized areas and replacing base and surface.

Large areas require reconstruction. Improvements in drainage may often be required.

PATCHES AND POTHOLES

Patches Original surface repaired with new asphalt patch material. This indicates a pavement defect or utility excavation which has been repaired. Patches with cracking, settlement or distortions indicate underlying causes remain. Recycling or reconstruction are required when extensive patching shows distress.

Potholes Holes and loss of pavement material caused by traffic loading, fatigue and inadequate strength.

Often combined with poor drainage. Repair by excavating or rebuilding localized potholes.

Reconstruction required for extensive defects.

4.3 SCORING PROCESS

The PASER system uses the rating system shown in Table 1.

Table 1: PASER Rating System

Surface Rating Visible Distress* General condition/ treatment measures

Excellent None. New construction

Excellent None. Recent overlay. Like new.

Very Good

No longitudinal cracks except reflection of paving joints.

Occasional transverse cracks, widely spaced (40’ or greater).

All cracks sealed or tight (open less than 1⁄4”).

Recent sealcoat or new cold mix.

Little or no maintenance required.

Good

Very slight or no raveling, surface shows some traffic wear.

Longitudinal cracks (open 1⁄4”) due to reflection or paving joints.

Transverse cracks (open 1⁄4”) spaced 10’ or more apart, little or slight crack raveling. No patching or very few patches in excellent condition.

First signs of aging. Maintain with routine crack filling.

Good

Slight raveling (loss of fines) and traffic wear.

Longitudinal cracks (open 1⁄4”– 1⁄2”), some spaced less than 10’.

First sign of block cracking. Sight to moderate flushing or polishing.

Occasional patching in good condition.

Shows signs of aging. Sound structural condition. Could extend life with sealcoat.

Fair

Moderate to severe raveling (loss of fine and coarse aggregate).

Longitudinal and transverse cracks (open 1⁄2”) show first signs of slight raveling and secondary cracks. First signs of longitudinal cracks near pavement edge. Block cracking up to 50% of surface. Extensive to severe flushing or polishing. Some patching or edge wedging in good condition.

Surface aging. Sound structural condition. Needs sealcoat or thin non-structural overlay (less than 2”)

Fair

Severe surface raveling. Multiple longitudinal and transverse cracking with slight raveling. Longitudinal cracking in wheel path. Block cracking (over 50% of surface). Patching in fair condition.

Slight rutting or distortions (1⁄2” deep or less).

Significant aging and first signs of need for strengthening. Would benefit from a structural overlay (2” or more).

Poor

Closely spaced longitudinal and transverse cracks often showing raveling and crack erosion. Severe block cracking. Some alligator cracking (less than 25% of surface). Patches in fair to poor condition.

Moderate rutting or distortion (1” or 2” deep). Occasional potholes.

Needs patching and repair prior to major overlay. Milling and removal of deterioration extends the life of overlay.

Very Poor

Alligator cracking (over 25% of surface).

Severe distortions (over 2” deep) Extensive patching in poor condition.

Potholes.

Severe deterioration. Needs reconstruction with extensive base repair. Pulverization of old pavement is effective.

Failed Severe distress with extensive loss of surface integrity. Failed. Needs total reconstruction.

* Individual pavements will not have all the types of distress listed for any particular rating. They may have only one or two types.

4.4 SITE VISIT

The information found within this report is based upon a site visit conducted by Richard Pish of IFS on April 15, 2022. The IFS team walked the entire roadway system, conducted a video survey and made detailed observations along with capturing photos of problem areas. The roadway system was divided into segments to facilitate the assessment review. These segments are shown in Figure #2.

ADMINISTRATION

BUILDING

MAINTENANCE

COMPLEX

RESTROOM

ROSTRUM

COMMITTAL

SHELTER

COLUMBARIUM

ENTRANCE &

ARCH

WALTON LANE

GA

LL

AT

IN

P

IK

E S

CS

X

RA

IL

LIN

E

INTEGRITY

FEDERAL SERVICES

CIVIL ENGINEERING ● LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ● PLANNING

148 S. Queen Street, Suite 201 Martinsburg, WV 25401

Phone: 304-725-8456 www.ifs-ae.com

SERV I CES

IN

TEGRI TY FEDERAL

GRAPHICAL SCALE: 1"=200'

200 100 0 200 400 600

FIGURE #1

OVERALL MAP

25 26

ADMINISTRATION

BUILDING

MAINTENANCE

COMPLEX

RESTROOM

ROSTRUM

COMMITTAL

SHELTER

COLUMBARIUM

ENTRANCE &

ARCH

WALTON LANE

GA

LL

AT

IN

P

IK

E S

CS

X

RA

IL

LIN

E

INTEGRITY

FEDERAL SERVICES

CIVIL ENGINEERING ● LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ● PLANNING

148 S. Queen Street, Suite 201 Martinsburg, WV 25401

Phone: 304-725-8456 www.ifs-ae.com

SERV I CES

IN

TEGRI TY FEDERAL

GRAPHICAL SCALE: 1"=200'

200 100 0 200 400 600

FIGURE #2

ROADWAY SEGMENT EXHIBIT

LEGEND

PASER RATING 7-10

PASER RATING 5-6

PASER RATING 4

PASER RATING 1-3

REPLACE CURB

REPLACE STORM

INLET

PROVIDE CURB CUT

NEW STORM INLET

4.5 RESULTS OF CONDITION ASSESSMENT

Most of the roads in the cemetery were found to be in poor condition based on the observations made in the field. Many sections of the roads contain substantial cracking and surface wear. Rutting, potholes, and large cracks were also found in several portions of the cemetery roads. These deficiencies may be caused by old age of the wearing course and in some instances, failure of the base course.

Table 2 provides the condition assessment for each roadway segment:

Table 2: Roadway Condition Assessment Road

Segment Length of

Roadway (ft)

PASER

RATING

1 260 5

2 850 4

3 170 5

4 715 5

5 600 5

6 115 4

7 850 5

8 360 5

9 850 5

10 750 4

11 65 7

12 660 5

13 250 3

14 260 5

15 190 4

16 120 8

17 200 3

18 310 8

19 480 3

20 430 5

21 350 4

22 700 4

23 215 3

24 100 4

25 115 5

26 750 4

27 415 4

28 25 7

29 700 4

30 350 4

31 1320 4

Appendix A includes a more detailed table with a general description of the deficiencies encountered within each road segment. Appendix B includes a full site report with photographs documenting the roadway conditions.

4.6 REHABILITATION OPTIONS

There are multiple options to select for pavement maintenance. The options to be considered are full depth replacement, mill and overlay, patching, and sealcoating. The following describes each method in detail:

Full-Depth Replacement Full-depth replacement is the entire reconstruction of a roadway. The entire roadway, including all surface course and base course material, is removed and reconstructed. For this project, this would also include over-excavation to accommodate a more robust subbase underlain by geotextile fabric.

Mill and Overlay Mill and Overlay is the process of removing the top layer of the existing asphalt surface, usually a minimum of 2”, and placing a new layer of bituminous pavement to bond with the existing surface.

Patching Patching is the process of pouring and compacting a selected asphalt mixture to fill cracks, potholes, and other roadway deficiencies.

Sealing Sealing is the process of applying a protective coating to the asphalt cracks to seal the pavement and provide protection and stability.

4.7 RECOMMENDATIONS

Table 3 provides recommendations for rehabilitations of the roadway segments. Rehabilitation should be performed on segments in order from lowest PASER rating to highest.

Table 3: Recommended Rehabilitation and Costs

Road Segment

PASER

Rating Recommended Rehabilitation

1 5 · 1.5” Mill and Overlay (5,650 SF.)

· Replace curb (20 LF)

2 4 · 2” Mill and Overlay (13,500 SF)

· Replace curb (40 LF)

3 5

· 1.5” Mill and Overlay (1,000 SF)

· Replace curb (20 LF)

· Add curb cut

4 5 · 1.5” Mill and Overlay (13,000 SF.)

5 5

· 1.5” Mill and Overlay (10,000 SF)

· Replace Curb (60 LF)

· Replace Storm Inlets (2)

6 4

· 2” Mill and Overlay (2,000 SF)

· Replace Curb (40 LF)

· Replace Storm Inlets (1)

7 5

· 1.5” Mill and Overlay (13,000 SF)

· Replace Curb (60 LF)

· Replace Storm Inlet (1)

8 5 · 1.5” Mill and Overlay (9,500 SF)

9 5

· 1.5” Mill and Overlay (16,500 SF)

· Replace Curb (70 LF)

· Replace Storm Inlets (3)

10 4

· 2” Mill and Overlay (18,250 SF)

· Replace Curb (80 LF)

· Replace Storm Inlets (3)

11 7 · Seal Coat (1,000 SF)

12 5

· 1.5” Mill and Overlay (13,000 SF.)

· Replace Curb (50 LF)

· Replace Storm Inlets (2)

13 3 · Full Depth Replacement (3,500 SF)

· Replace Curb (130 LF)

14 5 · 1.5” Mill and Overlay (6,000 SF)

· Replace Curb (60 LF)

15 4 · 2” Mill and Overlay (3,500 SF)

16 8 · No Improvements needed.

17 3 · Full Depth Replacement (6,250 SF)

· Replace Curb (40 LF)

18 8 · No improvements needed

19 3

· Full Depth Replacement (7,000 SF)

· Replace Curb (50 LF)

· Replace Storm Inlets (1)

20 5 · 1.5” Mill and Overlay (6,500 SF)

21 4 · 2” Mill and Overlay (5,500 SF)

· Replace Curb (50 LF)

22 4

· 2” Mill and Overlay (10,750 SF)

· Replace Curb (40 LF)

· Replace Storm Inlet (1)

23 3

· Full Depth Replacement (3,250 SF)

· Replace Curb (20 LF)

· Add Storm Inlet

24 4 · 2” Mill and Overlay (1,500 SF)

25 5 · 1.5” Mill and Overlay (1,750 SF)

· Replace Curb (20 LF)

26 4 · 2” Mill and Overlay (11,000 SF)

· Replace Curb (30 LF)

27 4

· 2” Mill and Overlay (6,000 SF)

· Replace Curb (20 LF)

· Replace Storm Inlet (1)

28 7 · 2” Mill and Overlay (500 LF.)

29 4

· 2” Mill and Overlay (10,000 SF)

· Replace Curb (50LF)

· Replace Storm Inlets (2)

30 4

· 2” Mill and Overlay (5,750 SF)

· Replace Curb (40 LF)

· Replace Storm Inlet (1)

31 4 · 2” Mill and Overlay (17,000 SF)

Rehabilitation recommendations consist of the following:

· Seal cracks – clean out crack and seal with appropriate asphaltic sealing compound (PASER Rating 7 or higher)

· Non-structural mill and overlay – mill 1.5” of surface paving, patch & seal any damaged areas, place tack coat and 1.5” hot mix asphalt surface course. (PASER Rating 5-6)

· Structural mill and overlay – mill 2.0” of surface paving, patch & seal any damaged areas, place tack coat and 2.0” hot mix asphalt surface course. (PASER Rating 4)

· Full-depth pavement replacement – saw cut and remove damaged asphalt courses and aggregate base, over excavate to accommodate new full pavement section, compact subgrade place geotextile fabric for separation, place and compact 8” stone subbase, 3” hot mix asphalt base course and 2” hot mix asphalt surface course. (PASER Rating 3 or lower)

· Replace curb – Saw cut and remove damaged curb to nearest joints. Saw cut and remove adjacent 2’ wide pavement section. Reconstruct curb from joint-to-joint. Reconstruct adjacent aggregate subbase and asphalt base course.

· Replace storm inlet – Saw cut and remove adjacent curb (10 LF). Saw cut and remove adjacent pavement (100 SF). Remove existing inlet and replace with new. Reconnect storm pipes.

Reconstruct curb (10 LF). Reconstruct full depth pavement patch.

· Curb-Cut – Saw cut and remove section of curb (10 LF), cuts are to be made at curb joints.

Portion of roll curb is to be replaced with asphalt to allow water to runoff pavement into the surrounding grass.

· Add storm inlet – Sawcut and remove existing curb (20 LF). Sawcut and remove existing pavement (100 SF). Excavate for installation of new storm inlet. Sawcut existing pavement and excavate for installation of new 15” HDPE pipe (100 LF). Tie new pipe into existing pipe or structure.

See Appendix C for the project for Cost Estimate.

4.8 PROJECT CHALLENGES

There are a number of challenges with road projects that can be addressed in the design and the bid process. Direction is requested from NCA on the following.

Unsuitable Soils

For many road rehabilitation projects, the soils under the existing roads are determined to be unsuitable by the geotechnical engineer during construction. This determination generally related to the inability of the soil to be compacted to the percentage required by the specifications.

Unsuitable soils typically lead to a request by the contractor for a modification to their bid.

The challenge for NCA is that the geotechnical evaluation prepared as part of the design is inherently limited in its scope and cannot be used to universally determine that all soils onsite are suitable or unsuitable. During the schematic design review the design engineer and NCA need to determine what requirements for unsuitable soils will be included with the project and how these soils will be treated during the bid process. Examples of this discussion would include:

· Set a percentage of the soils under the roads as unsuitable and have the contractor include in their bid.

· Have the bid include a separate line item for the removal and replacement of unsuitable soils.

The line item would be related to a specific quantity so that unit prices can be derived from the contractor bid.

· A number of methods for remediating the unsuitable soils are available, including undercutting and replacement or the mixture of cement into the soil. To the maximum extent possible the construction methods used to achieve a suitable road base will be left up to the contractor, contingent upon acceptance by NCA.

Pavement Depth The recommendation for Mill and Overlay is based on an assumption that the pavement section includes a minimum of 2” of asphalt. If the milling of the asphalt gets into the sub-base layer full depth replacement of the road section will be required. To the best of our ability we will confirm the depth of the existing asphalt from the road borings completed by the geotechnical engineer. If thinner asphalt thicknesses are found additional borings will be recommended in the mill and overlay sections.

4.9 SUMMARY

The following summary points are provided.

1. A majority of the road sections in the cemetery show signs of excessive wear and aging.

2. The storm structures throughout the cemetery appear to have been replaced in the past, large pavement patches surround many of the inlets. Many of the inlets are in poor condition: broken grates, pavement cracking around inlets, holes in pavement, broken curb.

3. The pavement in the southwest portion of the cemetery is in the worst condition, pavement has excessive raveling and areas of possible structural damage.

4. Curb damage was minimal throughout the cemetery. Most damage was found around storm inlets.

APPENDIX A

Fort Custer National Cemetery Roadway Condition Assessment Summary

ROAD

SEGMENT

LENGTH

(FT) DISTRESS TYPE COMMENTS

1 260 Some block cracking, cracking at pavement joints.

Main entrance and exit of cemetery. Some evidence of ponding water in area.

2 850 Some rutting in wheel path.

Minor Cracking

Previous sealcoat that is cracking, surface looks aged due to surface cracking of sealcoat. Rutting in area not deep.

3 170 Major drainage issue.

Large area of ponding water and sediment on road surface.

4 715 Cracking at pavement joints, patching, transverse cracking.

Previous sealcoat that shows age, Patches are in decent condition. Inlets along section have pavement patches surrounding them.

5 600

Minor rutting, wheel path cracking, transverse cracking, pavement patching, Cracking along edge of pavement.

Rutting in area is minor, patches surrounding drainage structures are mostly in poor condition.

6 115 Wearing course separating from base course, wheel path cracking

Wearing course is separating from base course, most damage starts near pavement joint.

7 850 Patching cracking around inlets, longitudinal cracks, wheel path cracking.

Areas around drainage inlets are in poor condition, previous seal coating that is aged.

8 360

Pavement patch in fair condition, transverse cracking, cracking at pavement joints. Centerline cracking.

Previously seal coated, pavement shows age but in fair condition.

9 850 Transverse and longitudinal cracking, cracking in wheel path, patching, some raveling

Previously seal coated, section shows age and patches around inlets in poor condition.

10 750

Transverse and longitudinal cracking. Some block cracking. Damage around storm inlets. Patches near inlets and cracking along edge of pavement. Flushing is present.

Patching around some of the inlet structures is in poor condition.

11 65 Minor cracking along edge of pavement.

Pavement along EP beginning to crack, section if good condition otherwise.

12 660

Some block cracking, cracking along edge of pavement, transverse cracking, crackling around inlets.

Pavement around drainage inlets in poor condition.

13 250 Block and some alligator cracking.

Block cracking up to 50% of area.

14 260 Transverse and longitudinal cracking. Block cracks beginning to form.

Parking area, most damage is in the drive aisle of the lot.

15 190

Wheel path cracking, transverse and longitudinal cracking, some block cracking.

Section borders concrete slab, large separation between pavement and concrete.

16 120 No visible damage Section in good condition

17 200 Block and alligator cracking, Contractor storage area, pavement in poor condition.

18 310 No visible damage. Section in good condition.

19 480 Transverse cracks, block and alligator cracking.

Extensive damage at pavement joints, cracking in wheel path.

20 430 Transverse and longitudinal cracking, minor raveling.

Section previously seal coated, shows age but is in fair condition.

21 350 Pavement patching, small area of alligator cracking.

Section has multiple pavement patches that are in fair condition, cracking is isolated to areas surrounding patches.

22 700

Severe raveling, some longitudinal cracking, patching between storm structures in poor condition.

Damage to storm structures ion section, patching near inlets failing.

23 215 Severe raveling and cracking, large ruts, ponding water.

Area where water is ponding along gutter pan.

24 100 Severe raveling and cracking

25 115 Pavement patch for utility, cracking along edge of pavement.

Previously sealed pavement that shows ageing. Damage to pavement around inlet.

26 750 Severe raveling, wheel path cracking. .

27 415 Severe raveling and cracking.

Storm structures are damaged in road section, pavement in poor condition.

28 25 Cracking at pavement joint. Section in good condition.

29 700 Raveling and minor cracking. Damage to storm structures and surrounding pavement.

30 350 Severe raveling and cracking, pavement patching

Evidence of ponding water, patch around storm inlet in poor condition.

31 1320 Transverse, and longitudinal cracking. Raveling.

Multiple utilities along road section.

APPENDIX B

1420 Gallatin Pike S, Madison , TN

Prepared by IFS 1 Created with PlanGrid

Nashville National Cemetery Roadway Assessment Prepared by IFS

May 23, 2022

Description

Integrity Federal Services conducted an on-site inspection of the roadway conditions at Nashville National Cemetery on April 15, 2022. This assessment looks at the condition of the existing curb and gutter, pavement, and drainage structures. The type and location of any damage were recorded during the investigation.

Contents

#8 Curb Evaluation

#9 Curb Evaluation

#17 Curb Evaluation

#23 Curb Evaluation

#26 Curb Evaluation

#28 Curb Evaluation

#29 Curb Evaluation

#36 Curb Evaluation

#44 Curb Evaluation

#56 Curb Evaluation

#57 Curb Evaluation

#62 Curb Evaluation

#66 Curb Evaluation

#67 Curb Evaluation

#68 Curb Evaluation

#72 Curb Evaluation

#74 Curb Evaluation

#76 Curb Evaluation https://app.plangrid.com/projects/0b40d6da-5bd5-474a-2fb8-5281623e275d/home

Prepared by IFS 2 Created with PlanGrid

#81 Curb Evaluation

#87 Curb Evaluation

#89 Curb Evaluation

#90 Curb Evaluation

#91 Curb Evaluation

#94 Curb Evaluation

#95 Curb Evaluation

#98 Curb Evaluation

#100 Curb Evaluation

#109 Curb Evaluation

#118 Curb Evaluation

#119 Curb Evaluation

#123 Curb Evaluation

#125 Curb Evaluation

#127 Curb Evaluation

#128 Curb Evaluation

#131 Curb Evaluation

#137 Curb Evaluation

#143 Curb Evaluation

#146 Curb Evaluation

#150 Curb Evaluation

#157 Curb Evaluation

#167 Curb Evaluation

#168 Curb Evaluation

#171 Curb Evaluation

#177 Curb Evaluation

Prepared by IFS 3 Created with PlanGrid

#182 Curb Evaluation

#184 Curb Evaluation

#187 Curb Evaluation

#189 Curb Evaluation

#191 Curb Evaluation

#192 Curb Evaluation

#193 Curb Evaluation

#198 Curb Evaluation

#208 Curb Evaluation

#211 Curb Evaluation

#215 Curb Evaluation

#24 Low Point

#96 Low Point

#102 Low Point

#113 Low Point

#130 Low Point

#132 Low Point

#142 Low Point

#161 Low Point

#180 Low Point

#2 Roadway Evaluation

#6 Roadway Evaluation

#7 Roadway Evaluation

#12 Roadway Evaluation

#13 Roadway Evaluation

#18 Roadway Evaluation

Prepared by IFS 4 Created with PlanGrid

#27 Roadway Evaluation

#30 Roadway Evaluation

#32 Roadway Evaluation

#34 Roadway Evaluation

#40 Roadway Evaluation

#43 Roadway Evaluation

#47 Roadway Evaluation

#52 Roadway Evaluation

#55 Roadway Evaluation

#58 Roadway Evaluation

#59 Roadway Evaluation

#60 Roadway Evaluation

#61 Roadway Evaluation

#63 Roadway Evaluation

#65 Roadway Evaluation

#73 Roadway Evaluation

#78 Roadway Evaluation

#84 Roadway Evaluation

#88 Roadway Evaluation

#92 Roadway Evaluation

#93 Roadway Evaluation

#97 Roadway Evaluation

#99 Roadway Evaluation

#101 Roadway Evaluation

#105 Roadway Evaluation

#108 Roadway Evaluation

Prepared by IFS 5 Created with PlanGrid

#112 Roadway Evaluation

#116 Roadway Evaluation

#121 Roadway Evaluation

#124 Roadway Evaluation

#129 Roadway Evaluation

#134 Roadway Evaluation

#135 Roadway Evaluation

#140 Roadway Evaluation

#141 Roadway Evaluation

#145 Roadway Evaluation

#149 Roadway Evaluation

#152 Roadway Evaluation

#156 Roadway Evaluation

#163 Roadway Evaluation

#166 Roadway Evaluation

#169 Roadway Evaluation

#175 Roadway Evaluation

#176 Roadway Evaluation

#181 Roadway Evaluation

#183 Roadway Evaluation

#185 Roadway Evaluation

#186 Roadway Evaluation

#190 Roadway Evaluation

#195 Roadway Evaluation

#196 Roadway Evaluation

#197 Roadway Evaluation

Prepared by IFS 6 Created with PlanGrid

#199 Roadway Evaluation

#201 Roadway Evaluation

#204 Roadway Evaluation

#209 Roadway Evaluation

#210 Roadway Evaluation

#213 Roadway Evaluation

#214 Roadway Evaluation

#216 Roadway Evaluation

#217 Roadway Evaluation

#219 Roadway Evaluation

#222 Roadway Evaluation

#224 Roadway Evaluation

#1 Storm Structure

#5 Storm Structure

#10 Storm Structure

#11 Storm Structure

#14 Storm Structure

#15 Storm Structure

#19 Storm Structure

#20 Storm Structure

#22 Storm Structure

#25 Storm Structure

#31 Storm Structure

#35 Storm Structure

#38 Storm Structure

#42 Storm Structure

Prepared by IFS 7 Created with PlanGrid

#45 Storm Structure

#46 Storm Structure

#49 Storm Structure

#50 Storm Structure

#51 Storm Structure

#53 Storm Structure

#54 Storm Structure

#64 Storm Structure

#70 Storm Structure

#71 Storm Structure

#75 Storm Structure

#77 Storm Structure

#79 Storm Structure

#80 Storm Structure

#82 Storm Structure

#83 Storm Structure

#85 Storm Structure

#86 Storm Structure

#103 Storm Structure

#104 Storm Structure

#106 Storm Structure

#107 Storm Structure

#110 Storm Structure

#111 Storm Structure

#114 Storm Structure

#115 Storm Structure

Prepared by IFS 8 Created with PlanGrid

#117 Storm Structure

#120 Storm Structure

#136 Storm Structure

#138 Storm Structure

#139 Storm Structure

#147 Storm Structure

#148 Storm Structure

#154 Storm Structure

#155 Storm Structure

#158 Storm Structure

#159 Storm Structure

#160 Storm Structure

#162 Storm Structure

#164 Storm Structure

#165 Storm Structure

#173 Storm Structure

#174 Storm Structure

#178 Storm Structure

#179 Storm Structure

#188 Storm Structure

#194 Storm Structure

#200 Storm Structure

#202 Storm Structure

#203 Storm Structure

#206 Storm Structure

#207 Storm Structure

Prepared by IFS 9 Created with PlanGrid

#212 Storm Structure

#3 Utility

#4 Utility

#16 Utility

#21 Utility

#33 Utility

#37 Utility

#39 Utility

#41 Utility

#48 Utility

#122 Utility

#133 Utility

#144 Utility

#153 Utility

#170 Utility

#205 Utility

#218 Utility

#220 Utility

#221 Utility

#223 Utility

#225 Utility

Prepared by IFS 10 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Curb damage

Created Apr 15, 2022 11:32 AM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 11:32 AM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#8 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_103243_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 11:32 AM

20220415_103230_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 11:32 AM

Prepared by IFS 11 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Curb damage

Created Apr 15, 2022 11:33 AM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 11:33 AM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#9 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_103334_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 11:33 AM

20220415_103321_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 11:33 AM

Prepared by IFS 12 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Damaged section.

Created Apr 15, 2022 11:43 AM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 11:43 AM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#17 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_104326_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 11:43 AM

20220415_104317_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 11:43 AM

Prepared by IFS 13 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Damaged curb undermining of curb

Created Apr 15, 2022 11:48 AM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 11:49 AM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#23 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_104935_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 11:49 AM

20220415_104859_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 11:49 AM

Prepared by IFS 14 Created with PlanGrid

20220415_104850_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 11:48 AM

Prepared by IFS 15 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description 3 damaged curb sections

Created Apr 15, 2022 11:51 AM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 11:52 AM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#26 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_105224_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 11:52 AM

20220415_105216_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 11:52 AM

Prepared by IFS 16 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description 2 damaged sections of curb

Created Apr 15, 2022 11:55 AM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 11:56 AM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#28 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_105605_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 11:56 AM

20220415_105546_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 11:55 AM

Prepared by IFS 17 Created with PlanGrid

20220415_105539_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 11:55 AM

20220415_105530_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 11:55 AM

Prepared by IFS 18 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description 2 damaged sections of curb

Created Apr 15, 2022 11:56 AM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 11:57 AM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#29 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_105703_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 11:57 AM

20220415_105654_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 11:56 AM

Prepared by IFS 19 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Damaged section of curb

Created Apr 15, 2022 12:06 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 12:06 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#36 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_110550_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:05 PM

20220415_110535_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:05 PM

Prepared by IFS 20 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Damaged section of curb.

No expansion joimts

Created Apr 15, 2022 12:14 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 12:15 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#44 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_111520_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:15 PM

20220415_111511_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:15 PM

Prepared by IFS 21 Created with PlanGrid

20220415_111459_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:15 PM

Prepared by IFS 22 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description 2 damaged sections

Created Apr 15, 2022 12:27 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 12:28 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#56 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_112818_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:28 PM

20220415_112809_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:28 PM

Prepared by IFS 23 Created with PlanGrid

20220415_112801_photo

IFS

Prepared by IFS 24 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description 2 damaged sections

Created Apr 15, 2022 12:28 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 12:29 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#57 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_112858_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:29 PM

20220415_112843_photo

IFS

Prepared by IFS 25 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Damaged section

Created Apr 15, 2022 12:37 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 12:37 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#62 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_113724_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:37 PM

20220415_113714_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:37 PM

Prepared by IFS 26 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Damaged

Created Apr 15, 2022 12:40 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 12:41 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#66 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_114106_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:41 PM

20220415_114045_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:40 PM

Prepared by IFS 27 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description 2 damaged sections

Created Apr 15, 2022 12:41 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 12:42 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#67 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_114219_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:42 PM

20220415_114212_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:42 PM

Prepared by IFS 28 Created with PlanGrid

20220415_114202_photo

IFS

Prepared by IFS 29 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Cracking

Created Apr 15, 2022 12:42 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 12:42 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#68 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_114244_photo

IFS

Prepared by IFS 30 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Damaged section

Created Apr 15, 2022 12:46 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 12:47 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#72 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_114703_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:47 PM

20220415_114651_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:46 PM

Prepared by IFS 31 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description 3 patched sections of curb

Created Apr 15, 2022 12:48 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 12:48 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#74 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_114829_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:48 PM

20220415_114821_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:48 PM

Prepared by IFS 32 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description 2 damaged sections

Created Apr 15, 2022 12:49 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 12:50 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#76 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_115017_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:50 PM

20220415_115010_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:50 PM

Prepared by IFS 33 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Damaged sections

Created Apr 15, 2022 12:56 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 12:57 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#81 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_115710_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:57 PM

20220415_115701_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:57 PM

Prepared by IFS 34 Created with PlanGrid

20220415_115643_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:56 PM

20220415_115634_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 12:56 PM

Prepared by IFS 35 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Damaged section

Created Apr 15, 2022 1:01 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 1:01 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#87 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_120109_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:01 PM

Prepared by IFS 36 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description 2 damaged sections

Created Apr 15, 2022 1:01 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 1:01 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#89 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_120145_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:01 PM

Prepared by IFS 37 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Damaged section

Created Apr 15, 2022 1:03 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 1:03 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#90 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_120313_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:03 PM

Prepared by IFS 38 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description 2 damaged sections

Created Apr 15, 2022 1:04 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 1:04 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#91 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_120445_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:04 PM

20220415_120434_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:04 PM

Prepared by IFS 39 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Damaged

Created Apr 15, 2022 1:07 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 1:08 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#94 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_120753_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:08 PM

Prepared by IFS 40 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Cracking

Created Apr 15, 2022 1:08 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 1:08 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#95 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_120827_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:08 PM

20220415_120820_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:08 PM

Prepared by IFS 41 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description 2 damaged sections

Created Apr 15, 2022 1:11 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 1:12 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#98 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_121215_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:12 PM

20220415_121203_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:12 PM

Prepared by IFS 42 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Minor damage

Created Apr 15, 2022 1:13 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 1:14 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#100 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_121350_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:13 PM

Prepared by IFS 43 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Multiple damaged sections.

Created Apr 15, 2022 1:22 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 1:22 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#109 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_122238_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:22 PM

20220415_122223_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:22 PM

Prepared by IFS 44 Created with PlanGrid

20220415_122209_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:22 PM

Prepared by IFS 45 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Damage to curb

Created Apr 15, 2022 1:31 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 1:31 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#118 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_123135_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:31 PM

Prepared by IFS 46 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Old post

Created Apr 15, 2022 1:32 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 1:33 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#119 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_123303_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:33 PM

Prepared by IFS 47 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Damage to 4 sections of curb

Created Apr 15, 2022 1:38 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 1:39 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#123 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_123901_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:39 PM

20220415_123847_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:38 PM

Prepared by IFS 48 Created with PlanGrid

20220415_123834_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:38 PM

Prepared by IFS 49 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Cracked curb

Created Apr 15, 2022 1:40 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 1:40 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#125 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_124040_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:40 PM

Prepared by IFS 50 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Crckimg

Created Apr 15, 2022 1:41 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 1:41 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#127 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_124152_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:41 PM

20220415_124145_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:41 PM

Prepared by IFS 51 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Larg cracks near irrigation boxes

Created Apr 15, 2022 1:42 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 1:42 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#128 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_124210_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:42 PM

Prepared by IFS 52 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Damaged section

Created Apr 15, 2022 1:47 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 1:48 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#131 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_124751_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:47 PM

Prepared by IFS 53 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Multiple sections of cracked curbing

Created Apr 15, 2022 1:52 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 1:52 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#137 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_125243_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:52 PM

20220415_125235_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:52 PM

Prepared by IFS 54 Created with PlanGrid

20220415_125225_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:52 PM

20220415_125220_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:52 PM

Prepared by IFS 55 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Dmage

Created Apr 15, 2022 1:59 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 2:00 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#143 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_130005_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 2:00 PM

20220415_125945_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 1:59 PM

Prepared by IFS 56 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Damage

Created Apr 15, 2022 2:02 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last Updated Apr 15, 2022 2:02 PM

Sheet Roadway and Curb Assessment

#146 Curb Evaluation

Photos

20220415_130222_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 2:02 PM

20220415_130215_photo

IFS

Apr 15, 2022 2:02 PM

Prepared by IFS 57 Created with PlanGrid

Status Open

Type Issue

Description Damage

Created Apr 15, 2022 2:06 PM rpish@ifs-ae.com

Last…