PPI Responses_13MAY2020.pdf
PDF 197 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6945020R0036
About this file
This document contains a pre-proposal inquiry log for a solicitation seeking a job order contract for construction and repair services at Naval Station Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The log details questions received from potential offerors and amendments made to the solicitation in response. Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southeast is soliciting proposals for a single-award indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity job order contract with a firm-fixed price to perform work solely at Naval Station Guantanamo Bay. Through this contract and subsequent task orders, the Navy intends to obtain construction, repair, and renovation services for various facilities and infrastructure assets at the installation.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N6945020R0036_Amend 0004.pdf | ||
| PPI Responses_9JUN2020_FINAL.pdf | ||
| N6945020R0036_Amend 0003.pdf | ||
| N6945020R0036_Amend 0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment E (rev.1) - Safety Data Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| N6945020R0036_Amend 0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment B - AMAG.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment F - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment A - PPI Log.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Solicitation N6945020R0036.pdf | ||
| Attachment D - Construction Experience Project Data Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment H - Seed Project Photos.pdf | ||
| Attachment C - SECNAV 5512.pdf | ||
| Attachment G - Seed Project SOW.pdf | ||
| Attachment E - Safety Data Sheet.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N69450-20-R-0036 Pre Proposal Inquiry (PPI) LOG
The PPI log is for informational purposes only. It does not amend the RFP. If a revision to the RFP is required, a formal amendment will be issued.
PPI # RFP Section Paragraph Number Page Number Drawing Number Question Government Response
RFP /
Solicitation
Attachment
Provided
(Yes or No)
RFP Change
(Yes or No)
ACQ
Amend #
Proposal Delivery
Information
It has been brought to our attention that the Department of Navy has updated their travel policy relating to COVID-19 safety protocols. This has included cancellations of project site visits and in-person conferences. To aid in this regard, would the
Government consider allowing electronic submission of this proposal?
Yes. See solicitation amendment 0001. No Yes 0001
2 Factor 1 - Experience 223 of 227
Factor 1 - Experience states: For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as a construction or repair/renovation project with a contract value between $20,000 and $1,000,000. Would the Government consider relevant similar type projects with a value greater than $1,000,000 as acceptable?
Yes. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as a construction or repair/renovation project with a contract value between $20,000 and $2,000,000. See revision to
Factor 1 - Experience, provided in solicitation amendment 0001.
No Yes 0001
3 General General
We intend to bid for the above mentioned project. Can an offeror utilize a subcontractor's experience to be considered for FACTOR 1, EXPERIENCE and NON‐PRICE FACTOR 4, PAST PERFORMANCE of technical proposal?
No. No No N/A
10 General General General Kindly clarify if an offeror can submit the experience of key subcontractors with letter of commitment to be considered for proposal evaluation?
No. No No N/A
Schedule of prices -
N/A
6 N/A In the Schedule of Prices, the table and narrative contradict each other. Is B.6 JTF
Camps $2.5M or Non Pre-Prices? Please confirm.
B.6 is the Non Pre-Priced Coefficient Factor. See revised Schedule of Prices narrative provided in solicitation amendment 0001.
No Yes 0001
29 Section L
3. Proposal
Submission
Instructions
226 N/A Can the Government confirm copies of CPARS have no page limit?
Confirmed. Copies of CPARS do not have a page limit.
No No N/A
30 Section L
3. Proposal
Submission
Instructions
226 N/A Can the Government confirm completed copies of the PPQ have no page limit?
Confirmed. Completed copies of the Past
Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) do not have a page limit.
No No N/A
Section L, Attachment E -
Safety Data Sheet
Factor 2: Safety, Item (3) 224 N/A
The proposal submittal requirements state the Offeor shall submit Attachment E
(Safety Data Sheet / Safety Narrative) under Tab 2. The Instructions under Factor 2
- Safety, Item 3 includes "The Offeor shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor work performed". However, the
Attachment E form does not include an area for this response.
Can the Government confirm Offerors are to address this requirement in
Attachment E? If so, can the Government modify Attachment E so that it is included?
Yes, Offerors shall include a narrative that describes the safety management system that the
Offeror will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work in Attachment E -
Safety Data Sheet. See revised Attachment E -
Safety Data Sheet provided in solicitation amendment 0001.
Yes Yes 0001
32 Section L
3. Proposal
Submission
Instructions
214 N/A
Due to the current conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic and stay at home guidelines, will the Government consider electronic proposal submission rather than hard copy submission? A hard copy submission requires employees to travel to the office to produce the proposal for delivery.
If so, can the Government provide instructions for electronic delivery?
Yes. See solicitation amendment 0001. No Yes 0001
N69450-20-R-0036 Pre Proposal Inquiry (PPI) LOG
The PPI log is for informational purposes only. It does not amend the RFP. If a revision to the RFP is required, a formal amendment will be issued.
PPI # RFP Section Paragraph Number Page Number Drawing Number Question Government Response
RFP /
Solicitation
Attachment
Provided
(Yes or No)
RFP Change
(Yes or No)
ACQ
Amend #
Section L, Instructions
Conditions and
Notices to Bidders
Instructions to
Offerors, 3. Proposal
Submission
Instructions
214 of 227 N/A
Given the current social-distancing situation, will the government allow email only
(or electronic) submission of the Price Proposal and Non-Price Proposal rather than submitting hard copies?
Yes. See solicitation amendment 0001. No Yes 0001
Section L, Clauses
Incorporated By
Reference
N/A 204 of 227 N/A
Section L, incorporates FAR 252.215-7009, Proposal Adequacy Checklist. This specific FAR requires offerors to complete a 36-item checklist providing the location of requested information, or an explanation of why the requested information is not provided. This checklist is not identified to be a part of the proposal contents as required by Section L Instructions to Offerors or Section M, Evaluation Factors for
Award. Please confirm that offerors are in fact required to include and complete the
Proposal Adequacy Checklist as part of the proposal response? If so, in what volume and section should the Proposal Adequacy Checklist be included?
DFARS 252.215-7009 does not apply to this solicitation and has been deleted from Section L.
See solicitation amendment 0001.
No Yes 0001
Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award
C. Evaluation Factors for Award 221, 224-225 N/A
Section M, C. Evaluation Factors for Award (page 221) lists Factor 2 – Past
Performance and Factor 3 – Safety. However, later in Section M (pages 224 and
225) show Factor 2 as Safety and Factor 3 as Past Performance. Please confirm that page 221 is inaccurate.
Confirmed; the reference to the non-price factors on the top of page 221 is incorrect. Factor 2 is Safety and Factor 3 is Past Performance. See solicitation amendment 0001.
No Yes 0001
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .