N6852022R0042 - RFP - Q_A - A2 - 10.25.2022.pdf
PDF 168 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6852022R0042
About this file
This document contains questions and answers regarding solicitation number N6852022R0042 for Fleet Readiness Center Southeast (FRCSE) support equipment maintenance services. The Navy seeks to award a fixed-price contract to provide intermediate, operational, and depot-level repair services for aviation support equipment at FRCSE facilities over a five-year period. Eligible vendors include small businesses classified under NAICS code 488190 with a size standard of $35 million. The solicitation is set aside 100% for competitive 8(a) small businesses. Offerors must submit all proposal volumes electronically through the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment by November 7th, 2022. Questions regarding the solicitation are due by October 14th.
View the file
Other files
Show all 29
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N6852022R0042
FRCSE ASE MRO - RFP QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
10/21/2022 Amendment 001
Reference: Amendment 1, Q&A #1, Reference: RFP 2.1.3 Attachment L-1- PP-Data Sheet
Discussion: Attachment L-1- PP-Data Sheet does not contain a “Contract Effort Description.”
Question: Where should the “Contract Effort Description” that includes relevant work effort and relevancy be placed on the L-1 PP Data Sheet?
Answer: Attachment L-1- PP-Data Sheet Block 13 has been revised to “Contract Effort Description”. See Amendment 1.
Reference: Amendment 1, Q&A #1, Reference: Attachment L-1- PP-Data Sheet
Discussion:
Question:
Data_Sheet, Instructions Tab, Line 40, Block 17 references Contractor's Relevancy Assessment; however, P1 Tab lists the Contractor's Relevancy Assessment as Block 18. Please clarify
Answer: Attachment L-1 PP-Data Sheet has been revised. It is Block 17. See Amendment 1.
Reference: Amendment 1, Q&A #1, Reference: Attachment L-1- PP-Data_Sheet, Instructions Tab, Line 40, instructions
Discussion:
Attachment L-1- PP-Data Sheet instructions state “The detailed information and comparative analysis of the past performance references to the solicitation requirements shall be provided in Part 3.3.a Relevancy of the offeror's proposal.”
Question: Please confirm Part 3.3.a Relevancy is the correct reference
Answer: Attachment L-1- PP-Data Sheet has been updated to remove the reference. See Amendment 1.
Reference: Amendment 1, RFP document, page 52 of 66, Paragraph 2.1.3
Discussion:
VOLUME 2: PAST PERFORMANCE requests a narrative detailing relevancy be completed on the Past Performance Information Form in the section titled Contract Effort Description
Question: Please clarify the correct block for entry of the Contract Effort Description on the Past Performance Information Form.
Answer: Attachment L-1- PP-Data Sheet Block 13 has been revised to “Contract Effort Description”. See Amendment 1.
Reference: DD254
Discussion:
Question: Is there a DD 254?
Answer: The requirement is for basic maintenance which does not require classified information or facility.
Reference: Amendment 1, Solicitation Section L 3.3.5.1
Discussion: The Government requests offerors provide (3) years of actual indirect rate information.
Question: Question 11a: If an entity doesn’t have three-years of experience, what should the entity provide?
Answer
Please submit the actual indirect rate information for the years of experience that you currently possess, if less than three years. Additionally, if DCAA has not reviewed or audited the rate information for an Offeror, the Offeror must submit a detailed justification of the proposed indirect rates.
Question: Question 11b: If the entity is a joint-venture, does the government request the rates of the members?
Answer Yes, please submit rates of the joint-venture members.
Reference: Amendment 1, Attachment L-3 Price Cost Summary, Instructions Tab Discussion: The column references do not appear to match the instructions Question: Please confirm the instructions are correct.
Answer Attachment L-3 Price Cost Summary Instructions are revised (blue font). See Amendment 1.
Reference: Amendment 1, Attachment L-3 Price Cost Summary, Instructions Tab
Discussion: There are some cell formula malfunctions and/or mismatched formula cell references
Question: Request the formulas be double-checked for verification prior to submittal to avoid submission of inconsistent data.
Answer Attachment L-3 Price Cost Summary Formula’s Corrected. See Amendment 1.
10 Reference: PWS 4.1.3.1
Discussion:
The government indicates the contractor shall provide “…PPE for team members.
Personal Protective Equipment, including but not limited to, personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, shall be provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact.
Question: What is the requirement for protective clothing? Does the government require uniforms be worn for contractor personnel?
Answer PWS 4.1.3.1 is updated to clarify the PPE requirement. See Amendment 1. As for uniforms, the Government does not require uniforms – that is a company-decision.
Reference: PWS 4.1.3.3
Discussion: The government indicates the contractor personnel shall obtain OSHA and Government-required physicals.
Question:
Please provide a check-list for the specific services and tests performed for these physicals as required by the Government that are in addition to the DOT requirements.
Answer PWS 4.1.3.3 is updated to clarify the Physical requirement. See Amendment 1.
Reference: Proposal Due Date Discussion:
Question: Request an extension of 10 days.
Answer The Government has extended the proposal due date by one week to 7 November 2022. See Amendment 1.
10/25/2022 Amendment 2
Reference: ATTACHMENT 4 - MANNING LEVEL; Solicitation Section L - 3.0 VOLUME 3:
PRICE/COST PROPOSAL, 3.2.1 Historical Manning Hours
Discussion: Historical manning hours for the period of 7/25/21-7/24/22 is 20,158.77 Question: Are the hours from MAXIMO total time or touch-time service labor only?
Answer The hours listed are touch-time service hours
Reference: ATTACHMENT 3 - GFP; ATTACHMENT 01 - PWS 4.1.5.1 GFE and Tools
Discussion:
The PWS references the GFP materials and equipment referencing ‘(Attachment 1
– GFP/GFE/TOOL)’. The government has provided GFP information in Attachment – 3 but no hand tool listing.
Question: Will the government provide the contractor with hand tools and a hand tool listing for the effort? Please also clarify the reference in PWS 4.1.5.1.
Answer ATTACHMENT 01 - PWS 4.1.5.1 GFE/Tools is revised. All required tools will be provided to include specialty tools. See Amendment 2
Reference: ATTACHMENT 4 - MANNING LEVEL; Solicitation Section L - 3.0 VOLUME 3: PRICE/COST PROPOSAL, 3.2.1 Historical Manning Hours
Discussion:
Attachment 4 indicates a FTE minimum manning of 28 FTEs for an estimated 53,760 hours. Historical manning hours for the period of 7/25/21-7/24/22 is 20,158.77
Question:
Are the hours in Attachment 4 per year values or for the total project?
Question – Has the workload and thus the manning hours increased by more than 250% from the period of 7/25/21-7/24/22 (20,158.77) to what is projected per each upcoming Option Year (53,760)?
Answer The Government is reassessing the FTE requirement. This will be addressed via Amendment 3 by 1 November.
Reference: ATTACHMENT L3 – PRICE COST SUMMARY
Discussion: Formulas in Cells G17, I17, and L17 have improper formatting or inconsistent formulas.
Question: Will the government correct these calculations errors in the template?
Answer ATTACHMENT L3 – PRICE COST SUMMARY is revised. See Amendment 2.
Reference: Solicitation Section K – Reps and Certs
Discussion: The effort is proposed in accordance with the Service Contract Act yet the government has not adopted FAR Clause 52.222-43 or 52.222-41.
Question: Will the government adopt these FAR Clauses into the current solicitation?
Answer FAR clauses 52.222-41 and 52.222-43 have been included in Section I of this solicitation. See Amendment 2.
Reference: ATTACHMENT L3 – PRICE COST SUMMARY
Discussion:
The government has used 1920 for FTE equivalent hours. The adopted Wage Determination though requires the following paid-time off benefits: 80 hours of vacation, 56 hours of sick, and 88 hours of holidays. Using 2080 annual hours, these guaranteed sums results in an effective FTE hours of 1856.
Question: Will the government adopt the SCA minimum required hours for the evaluation on this effort?
Answer
The FTE equivalent hours have been updated to 2080 annual hours. The government is using the SCA minimum required hours for the evaluation on this effort. ATTACHMENT L3 – PRICE COST SUMMARY is revised. See Amendment 2
Reference: ATTACHMENT 05 – WD
Discussion:
The government cites WD 2022-0141 for Florida County of Duval dated 06/30/2022 applicable to the current effort. The most recent SCA WD on Sam.gov is 2015-4539 dated 07/06/2022.
Question: Will the government provide WD 2022-0141 for offerors or modify the applicable WD to be 2015-4539?
Answer Per the DOL the Government will use WD 2022-014 Rev1. ATTACHMENT 05
– WD is revised. See Amendment 2
Reference: ATTACHMENT L-3 - PRICE COST SUMMARY
Discussion: The current format is ideal for a prime-subcontractor relationship given the hourly wage requirements and applicable rate mark-ups.
Question:
If the contractor proposing is an unpopulated Joint Venture through which the parties subcontract the positions through the partnered entities, how should the contractor reflect such arrangement in the current pricing template?
Answer
If Joint Ventures (JV) are included, and the JV member cost details are proprietary, the Prime Contractor shall identify each JV member fully-burdened cost in the Subcontractors section (yellow) of the ATTACHMENT L3 – PRICE COST SUMMARY. Then, each JV member is responsible for submitting their own cost build-up details, if proprietary, via a separate L-3 directly to the Government. See Amendment 2
21 Reference: ATTACHMENT L-3 - PRICE COST SUMMARY
Discussion:
The current format is ideal for a prime-subcontractor relationship given the hourly wage requirements and applicable rate mark-ups. Errors include:
a. Summary Tab:
i. F6 – Error in Reference
b. BP/OY Tab(s):
i. I17 – Total doesn’t total above cells but rather column F
ii. Column J – This is a subtotal column but doesn’t result in the right evaluation as it doesn’t include adjustments for proposed FTE (column D).
iii. Column L – This column is resetting column F where as it appears to need to state column G or Column F * Column D.
iv. Column M – Restates Column J which doesn’t account for additional FTEs as noted above.
Question: Does the government intend to update this format?
Answer ATTACHMENT L3 – PRICE COST SUMMARY is revised. See Amendment 2
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .