ATTACHMENT L-2 - PP QUESTIONNAIRE.docx
DOCX document 30 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6852022R0042
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a solicitation for aviation support equipment maintenance services. The Navy's Fleet Readiness Center Southeast is soliciting proposals for a firm-fixed-price contract to provide intermediate, operational, and depot-level maintenance and repair services for all aviation support equipment assigned to the facility. The base ordering period is five years. The solicitation is set aside on a competitive basis for small businesses under NAICS code 488190 for other support activities for air transportation, with a size standard of $35 million. Offerors must submit proposals electronically through the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment by the date and time specified in the RFP. Questions regarding the solicitation are due by October 14th and should be submitted to the named contracting specialist by email.
View the file
Other files
Show all 29
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N6852022R0042 Attachment L-2 30 September 2022
Past Performance Questionnaire
Offeror:
Point of Contact
Your Company/Organization Name:
Your Name:
Position Title:
Telephone:
E-mail:
General Contract Information
a. Contract Number:
Type of contact:
☐ Firm-Fixed-Price
☐ Cost-Reimbursement
b. Brief Description of Work:
c. Location of Work:
e. Contract Performance:
From: Click here to enter a date.
To: Click here to enter a date.
f. Total Contract Value (USD):
Quality
How do you assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, statements of work, and standards of good workmanship (i.e. commonly accepted technical, professional, and quality standards)?
| ☐ Exceptional |
| ☐ Very Good |
| ☐ Satisfactory |
| ☐ Marginal |
| ☐ Unacceptable |
Reasoning / Comments:
(Please provide a detailed, elaborative response. Recommend a minimum of one full paragraph.)
How do you assess the contractor’s processes to solve contract performance problems?
| ☐ Exceptional |
| ☐ Very Good |
| ☐ Satisfactory |
| ☐ Marginal |
| ☐ Unacceptable |
Reasoning / Comments:
Schedule
How do you assess the contractor’s timeliness in meeting contract delivery schedules?
| ☐ Exceptional |
| ☐ Very Good |
| ☐ Satisfactory |
| ☐ Marginal |
| ☐ Unacceptable |
Reasoning / Comments:
How do you assess the contractor’s processes to solve schedule performance problems?
| ☐ Exceptional |
| ☐ Very Good |
| ☐ Satisfactory |
| ☐ Marginal |
| ☐ Unacceptable |
Reasoning / Comments:
Safety
How do you assess the contractor’s adherence to safety requirement (including safety of flight, workplace safety, and adherence to environmental regulations)?
| ☐ Exceptional |
| ☐ Very Good |
| ☐ Satisfactory |
| ☐ Marginal |
| ☐ Unacceptable |
Reasoning / Comments:
| How do you assess the contractor’s processes to solve issues and deficiencies involving safety of flight, workplace safety, and adherence to environmental regulations? |
| ☐ Exceptional |
| ☐ Very Good |
| ☐ Satisfactory |
| ☐ Marginal |
| ☐ Unacceptable |
Reasoning / Comments:
Additional Comments
Please select your overall level of customer satisfaction, considering contract work performed, promptness, completeness, follow up to correct errors, and documentation and history of reasonable and cooperative behavior.
☐ Exceptional
| ☐ Very Good |
| ☐ Satisfactory |
| ☐ Marginal |
| ☐ Unacceptable |
Reasoning / Comments:
Wrap-up Question
All things considered, would you recommend this Contractor for performance on another contract?
| ☐ Yes |
| ☐ No |
We greatly appreciate your cooperation in this matter.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .