Section L Attachment L-1 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 25 KB Posted

Attached to
CH-53K Program O-Level Bag Group E
Solicitation number
N68335-26-R-1025
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template designed for evaluating contractor performance on federal contracts.

The questionnaire captures essential contract information including contractor name, customer identity, contract number, period of performance, and contract type (negotiated, sealed bid, fixed price, cost reimbursement, IDIQ, or other). It requires evaluators to rate contractor performance across three critical categories: Quality of Product and Processes (assessing compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, personnel appropriateness, and technical excellence); Timeliness of Performance (evaluating interim milestone achievement, reliability, responsiveness to technical direction, and on-time completion); and Customer Satisfaction (measuring end-user satisfaction with contractor service and product). Each category uses a five-point rating scale from Unsatisfactory to Outstanding, with space for supporting comments. The questionnaire also includes a question regarding likelihood of future contractor selection with explanatory space. The document requires signatures, contact information, and dates from both the interviewee (customer representative) and interviewer (government evaluator), creating a formal record of past performance assessment. This template was attached to solicitation N68335-26-R-1025 for the CH-53K Program O-Level Peculiar Support Equipment procurement, a 100% small business set-aside requiring offerors to submit past performance documentation as part of their proposal evaluation.

View the file

Other files

Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SECTION L ATTACHMENT (L-1)

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE

1.Contractor:

2.Customer:

3.Contract Number: Period of Performance:

4.Contract Type:Negotiated|_|Sealed Bid|_|
Fixed Price|_|Cost Reimbursement|_|
IDIQ|_|Other|_|

5.Complexity of Work: Difficult: |_| Routine: |_|

Ratings: Summarize contractor performance and circle the appropriate rating for each category.

Quality of Product and Processes: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory

Highly Satisfactory Outstanding

(Compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, and technical excellence)

Comments:

Timeliness of Performance: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory

Highly Satisfactory Outstanding

(Met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical direction, and completed on time)

Customer Satisfaction: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory

Highly Satisfactory Outstanding

(Satisfaction of end users with contractor’s service and product)

Would you select this firm again? Please explain.

Interviewee Name:Signature:
Phone Number: Fax Number:
Date:
Interviewer Name:Signature:
Phone Number:Fax Number:
Date:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .