Attachment 5 PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM.doc
DOC document 35 KB Posted
- Attached to
- HAWT
- Solicitation number
- N68335-11-R-0123
About this file
Attachment 5 Past Performance Evaluation Form
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N68335-11-R-0123 Amendment 5.doc | DOC document | |
| N68335-11-R-0123 Amendment 4.doc | DOC document | |
| N68335-11-R-0123 Amendment 3.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 3 HAWT ALSSOW Revision B.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 1 HAWT Statement of Work Revision A.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 3 HAWT ALSSOW Revision A.doc | DOC document | |
| N68335-11-R-0123 Amendment 2.doc | DOC document | |
| Exhibit L Revision A.PDF | ||
| N68335-11-R-0123 Amendment 1.doc | DOC document | |
| RFP N68335-11-R-0123.doc | DOC document | |
| Exhibit A.PDF | ||
| Exhibit L.PDF | ||
| Attachment 1 HAWT Statement of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 3 HAWT ALSSOW.doc | DOC document | |
| Exhibit B.PDF | ||
| Attachment 2 HAWT System Performance Specification 2011.pdf |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM
1.Contractor:
2.Customer:
3.Contract Number:
Period of Performance:
4.Contract Type:
Negotiated
FORMCHECKBOX
Sealed Bid
FORMCHECKBOX
Fixed Price
Cost Reimbursement
IDIQ
Other
5.Complexity of Work:
Difficult:
FORMCHECKBOX
Routine:
FORMCHECKBOX
Ratings: Summarize contractor performance and circle the appropriate rating for each category.
Quality of Product and Processes: Rating:
Outstanding Highly Satisfactory Satisfactory
Marginal Unsatisfactory
(Compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, and technical excellence)
Comments:
Timeliness of Performance: Rating: Outstanding Highly Satisfactory Satisfactory
Marginal Unsatisfactory
(Met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical direction, and completed on time)
Comments:
Customer Satisfaction: Rating:
Outstanding Highly Satisfactory Satisfactory
Marginal Unsatisfactory
(Satisfaction of end user with contractor’s responsiveness to inquiries and services provided)
Comments:
Would you select this firm again? Please explain.
Interviewee Name:
FORMTEXT
Signature:
FORMTEXT
FORMTEXT
FORMTEXT
Phone Number:
FORMTEXT
FORMTEXT
Fax Number:
FORMTEXT
FORMTEXT
FORMTEXT
Date:
FORMTEXT
Interviewer Name:
FORMTEXT
FORMTEXT
Signature:
FORMTEXT
FORMTEXT
FORMTEXT
Phone Number:
FORMTEXT
FORMTEXT
Fax Number:
FORMTEXT
FORMTEXT
FORMTEXT
Date:
FORMTEXT
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .