Attachment 5 PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM.doc

DOC document 35 KB Posted

Attached to
HAWT
Solicitation number
N68335-11-R-0123
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 5 Past Performance Evaluation Form

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N68335-11-R-0123 Amendment 5.doc DOC document
N68335-11-R-0123 Amendment 4.doc DOC document
N68335-11-R-0123 Amendment 3.doc DOC document
Attachment 3 HAWT ALSSOW Revision B.doc DOC document
Attachment 1 HAWT Statement of Work Revision A.docx DOCX document
Attachment 3 HAWT ALSSOW Revision A.doc DOC document
N68335-11-R-0123 Amendment 2.doc DOC document
Exhibit L Revision A.PDF PDF
N68335-11-R-0123 Amendment 1.doc DOC document
RFP N68335-11-R-0123.doc DOC document
Exhibit A.PDF PDF
Exhibit L.PDF PDF
Attachment 1 HAWT Statement of Work.docx DOCX document
Attachment 3 HAWT ALSSOW.doc DOC document
Exhibit B.PDF PDF
Attachment 2 HAWT System Performance Specification 2011.pdf PDF
Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

1.Contractor:

2.Customer:

3.Contract Number:

Period of Performance:

4.Contract Type:

Negotiated

FORMCHECKBOX

Sealed Bid

FORMCHECKBOX

Fixed Price

Cost Reimbursement

IDIQ

Other

5.Complexity of Work:

Difficult:

FORMCHECKBOX

Routine:

FORMCHECKBOX

Ratings: Summarize contractor performance and circle the appropriate rating for each category.

Quality of Product and Processes: Rating:

Outstanding Highly Satisfactory Satisfactory

Marginal Unsatisfactory

(Compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, and technical excellence)

Comments:

Timeliness of Performance: Rating: Outstanding Highly Satisfactory Satisfactory

Marginal Unsatisfactory

(Met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical direction, and completed on time)

Comments:

Customer Satisfaction: Rating:

Outstanding Highly Satisfactory Satisfactory

Marginal Unsatisfactory

(Satisfaction of end user with contractor’s responsiveness to inquiries and services provided)

Comments:

Would you select this firm again? Please explain.

Interviewee Name:

FORMTEXT

Signature:

FORMTEXT

FORMTEXT

FORMTEXT

Phone Number:

FORMTEXT

FORMTEXT

Fax Number:

FORMTEXT

FORMTEXT

FORMTEXT

Date:

FORMTEXT

Interviewer Name:

FORMTEXT

FORMTEXT

Signature:

FORMTEXT

FORMTEXT

FORMTEXT

Phone Number:

FORMTEXT

FORMTEXT

Fax Number:

FORMTEXT

FORMTEXT

FORMTEXT

Date:

FORMTEXT

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .