SIOP Industry Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 51 KB Posted

Attached to
INDUSTRY DAY FOR FY23 MCON P-209 DRY DOCK 3 REPLACEMENT, JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, HAWAII
Solicitation number
N62742SIOPINDUS
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
P-209 Industry Questionnaire.pdf PDF
210730 IndustryDayResponse.pdf PDF
2021-07-22 35pct Dwgs Package A (ContractorPackage)_Part1.pdf PDF
2021-07-22 35pct Dwgs Package B (ContractorPackage)_Part3.pdf PDF
2021-07-22 35pct Dwgs Package B (ContractorPackage)_Part4.pdf PDF
2021-07-22 35pct Dwgs Package A (ContractorPackage)_Part4.pdf PDF
2021-07-22 35pct Dwgs Package B (ContractorPackage)_Part1.pdf PDF
2021-07-22 35pct Dwgs Package B (ContractorPackage)_Part2.pdf PDF
2021-07-22 35pct Dwgs Package B (ContractorPackage)_Part5.pdf PDF
2021-07-22 35pct Dwgs Package B (ContractorPackage)_Part9.pdf PDF
2021-07-22 35pct Dwgs Package B (ContractorPackage)_Part7.pdf PDF
2021-07-22 35pct Dwgs Package A (ContractorPackage)_Part2.pdf PDF
2021-07-22 35pct Dwgs Package A (ContractorPackage)_Part3.pdf PDF
2021-07-22 35pct Dwgs Package B (ContractorPackage)_Part6.pdf PDF
2021-07-22 35pct Dwgs Package A (ContractorPackage)_Part5.pdf PDF
210723 IndustryDayResponse.pdf PDF
2021-07-22 35pct Dwgs Package B (ContractorPackage)_Part8.pdf PDF
Industry Day Presentation.pdf PDF
Industry Day Attendee List.pdf PDF
SIOP Revised Pre-Proposal Flyer.pdf PDF
SIOP IndustryP209Dwgs.pdf PDF
SIOP Pre-Proposal Flyer.pdf PDF
P-209 Industry Day Flyer.pdf PDF
Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND PACIFIC

258 MAKALAPA DR STE 100

PEARL HARBOR HI 96860-3134

INDUSTRY FEEDBACK QUESTIONNAIRE

SPECIAL NOTICE N62742SIOPINDUS

WATERFRONT MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT PRIMARILY

FOR THE SHIPYARD INFRSTRUCTURE OPTIMIZATION PROGRAM AT HAWAII,

WASHINGTON AND OTHER AREAS UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF NAVFAC

BACKGROUND. NAVFAC Pacific intends to solicit an $8,000,000,000 Waterfront Multiple Award Construction Contract (SIOP MACC). This SIOP MACC is intended for two primary construction task orders:

- P-209 Dry Dock #3 Replacement, Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard. Approximate Task Order value between $1,000,000,000 to $3,000,000,000.

- P-454 Multi-Mission Dry Dock, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard. Approximate Task Order value between $3,000,000,000 to $5,000,000,000.

In addition to these primary construction task orders, the SIOP MACC will be utilized for a series of pre-construction services task orders. The intent of the pre-construction services task orders is to engage SIOP MACC holders in optimizing the constructability of the P-209 and P- 454 construction contracts, as well as increase the readiness of the SIOP MACC holders to accomplish these mega-waterfront projects. Task orders may also be issued for construction of waterfront facilities such as warehouses, dry docks, piers/wharves, site improvements, dredging and incidental design, environmental, and services related to the waterfront facilities at the Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Puget Sound Naval Base and other areas under NAVFAC cognizance.

SCHEDULE. Below is the tentative schedule for the SIOP MACC acquisition.

Week of 13 June 2021 Issue Synopsis for SIOP MACC

2 July 2021 Issue Request for Proposals (RFP) for SIOP MACC Issue conceptual design for P-209 Dry Dock #3 Replacement

6 July 2021 RSVP to Pre-Proposal Conference and One-on-One Sessions

9 July 2021 Questionnaire Due Date

13 August 2021 SIOP MACC Proposals Due

Late-November 2021 SIOP MACC Award

QUESTIONAIRE. Your feedback is important. Please respond to below questions. Note that some of the questions pertain to the SIOP MACC RFP and conceptual design for P-209 – both will be issued no later than 2 July 2021. This questionnaire is due on 9 July 2021.

Firm Name:

Firm Address:

Phone Number:

DUNS #:

Name/Title of Person Completing Questionnaire:

1. Concerning the SIOP MACC and project P-209 and P-454: Would your Company more likely be (circle one):

a. Prime Contractor.

b. Joint Venture (JV) partner of a Prime Contractor.

c. Subcontractor.

d. Other:

2. Based on your review of the background, schedule, SIOP MACC RFP and conceptual design for P-209 – do you have any concerns about this procurement and award process?

3. If you are a Prime Contractor, What percentage of work would you self-perform for a greater than one billion-dollar waterfront project in Pearl Harbor or Puget Sound? %

What percentage of the total contract value would you expect to be performed by small business through teaming or subcontracting? %

4. The proposal preparation period for the $8,000,000,000 SIOP MACC will be 42 calendar days. Do you have any comments on the feasibility of this proposal period? We are specifically interested in the feasibility of obtaining necessary letters from surety(ies) and establishment of legal partnerships.

5. Based on your review of the conceptual design for P-209: What project components do you see as particularly challenging or difficult?

6. Based on your review of the conceptual design for P-209: Is the range provided for the construction value of the project realistic ($1,000,000,000 to $3,000,000,000)?

Yes / No (circle one). Comments:

7. Based on your review of the conceptual design for P-209: Do you see opportunities for improvement or innovation with respect to?

a. Means or methods of construction.

b. Support of excavation.

c. Provision of temporary utilities.

d. Security restrictions.

e. Laydown area availability.

f. Regulatory limitations.

8. Based on your review of the conceptual design for P-209: Is it your opinion that the local labor pool can support the construction of these projects, along with other anticipated construction projects in Hawaii? If additional labor needs to be brought onto the island, are the current housing resources available sufficient to support the incoming labor?

9. Based on your review of the conceptual design for P-209: What would be the approximate crew size and hours/day required to support the project?

10. Based on your review of the conceptual design for P-209: Please provide your opinion on a construction contract period of performance between 44-48 months. Is this a viable expectation for construction contract completion; including mobilization and logistics for labor, equipment and materials? (YES, NO, Multiple Choice if NO)

_____ YES, viable construction between 44-48 months

_____ NO, not viable

If NO, please indicate a more viable range for construction contract completion:

_____ < 44 months

_____ 48-60 months

_____ > 60 months

If NO, please provide explanation of primary reasons why.

11. Based on your review of the conceptual design for P-209: Please rank the following potential pre-construction services that could be accomplished by SIOP multiple MACC contractors via Task Order prior to construction award, in order of having the most positive impact in minimizing the eventual construction cost and schedule risk (1 – most positive impact, 10 – least impactful):

_____ Prepare Construction Baseline Network Analysis Schedule (NAS)

_____ Prepare construction job-site plans for mobilization, laydown areas, temporary buildings, trailers, etc.

_____ Prepare material logistics plans (haul routes, barging, harbor operations, etc.)

_____ Prepare temporary utility and connection plans

_____ Develop concept for on-site concrete batch plant

_____ Develop marine concrete mix designs

_____ Develop shop-drawings for long-lead items

_____ Prepare other pre-construction submittals (Health and Safety Plan(s), Construction

Quality Control Plan, Special Inspections Project Manual, Environmental Protection Plan(s), Stormwater Pollution Protection Plan, Dirt and Dust Control Plan, Construction Waste Management Plan(s), Excavation Permits, etc.

_____ Other:

_____ Other:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .