N6274224R6713_0005 Released.pdf

PDF 397 KB Posted

Attached to
DB Simulation Facility, at Fort Magsaysay (FMSS), Nueva Ecija, Philippines
Solicitation number
N6274224R6713
Issued by

About this file

This document is an amendment to a solicitation (N6274224R6713) for a design-build construction project at Fort Magsaysay, Palayan City, Philippines. The project involves constructing a single-story concrete masonry unit (CMU) simulation facility structure with a steel roof, as well as a concrete road network.

The key changes in this amendment include: extending the proposal due date from August 23, 2024 to September 9, 2024; revising the evaluation criteria for Offeror Experience to allow projects with reinforced concrete structures, steel structures, or pre-engineering buildings (PEB) of at least 300 square meters, and concrete pavement projects of at least 200 meters; and clarifying the requirements for the Technical Solution submittal, such as the road network drawings and facility floor plans. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N6274224R6713_0004 PPIs and SOW.pdf PDF
N6274224R6713_0003 Extend Due Date.pdf PDF
N6274224R6713 _0002 Extend due date.pdf PDF
N6274224R6713-0001_080724.pdf PDF
Exhibit A Pre Proposal Inquiry Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit D Blank BOQ - 24R6713.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N6274224R6713 released.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT A-D.pdf PDF
PHIL_BAR_Base Access Request Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ACQR6064890

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N6274224R6713 D/B UFC FMSS Simulation Facility and Concrete Road, Fort Magsaysay, Palayan City, Nueva Ecija, Philippines.

Detail of Amendment 0005 begins on the follow ing page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 5

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 04-Sep-2024

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X N6274224R6713

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09-Jul-2024

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

03-Sep-2024

CODE

NAVFAC ROICC THAILAND (US EMBASSY)

7 SATHORN TAI ROAD

BANGKOK THAILAND 10120

N62742 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6274224R6713

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMD 0005 NCF

The following changes will be considered part of this solicitation:

A. Proposal due date is changed from 23 August 2024 to 9 September 2024, no later than 11:00 a.m. Thailand time.

B. The following changes are hereby incorporated to this solicitation, Part 1 under this solicitation.

AMENDMENT 0005

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

PART 1

PROPOSAL FORMS AND DOCUMENTS

1. Section 00 22 00 - 2.3 EVALUATION FACTORS AND PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, Volume 2:

(2.1) Non-Cost Factor 1 - Offeror Experience:

Change from:

(a) Submittal Requirements: Submit a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates Offeror experience on relevant projects that are similar size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as similar design-build construction with the following relevant characteristics:

i. Similar in Size: Construction Projects between $250,000 and $5,000,000 in final construction cost.

One project must be at least $1,000,000. Any project outside this range may not be considered.

ii. Similar in Scope: Design build construction of a steel structure or pre-engineering building (PEB) with a minimum size of 300 SM.

a. At least one (1) design-build concrete pavement project with minimum length of 500 meter.

iii. Similar In Complexity: Construction projects involving multiple trades, constructing various projects simultaneously, or managing multiple work sites performed in Southeast Asia, Nepal, Maldives, and Timor Leste.

To:

(a) Submittal Requirements: Submit a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates Offeror experience on relevant projects that are similar size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as similar design-build construction with the following relevant characteristics:

i. Similar in Size: Construction Projects between $250,000 and $5,000,000 in final construction cost.

One project must be at least $1,000,000. Any project outside this range may not be considered.

ii. Similar in Scope: Design build construction of reinforced concrete structure, steel structure or pre-engineering building (PEB) with a minimum size of 300 SM.

a. At least one (1) design-build concrete pavement project with minimum length of 500 200 meter.

iii. Similar In Complexity: Construction projects involving multiple trades, constructing various projects simultaneously, or managing multiple work sites performed in Southeast Asia, Nepal, Maldives, and Timor Leste.

2. Section 00 22 00 - 2.3 EVALUATION FACTORS AND PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, Volume 2:

(2.4) Non-Cost Factor 4 – Technical Solution:

Change from:

(a) Submittal Requirements:

i. Provide a narrative describing the technical solution to the project that meets the requirements of the RFP. Include the following:

1. Construction sequence of road network and simulation facility.

2. Exterior façade describing how the proposed construction integrates with the surrounding area and existing Base facilities design or architectural theme.

3. Site layout including a description of the building orientation, roadways, parking (include ingress and egress), emergency vehicle access, and ATFP standoff distances.

Narrative shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages).

ii. Provide the following conceptual design drawing details:

1. Road network showing the road plan from start to finish, including the bridge and critical section.

2. Site layout plan showing footprint of proposed building, perimeter fence, entrance gates, internal road, locations of transformer, generator house, pump house, septic tank, and existing road within 50 m radius from the proposed buildings. The drawing shall also include connecting point of main water supply system, connecting point of main power supply system, and discharge point of wastewater treatment system].

3. Floor plan and roof plan of the simulation facility. The drawings shall include dimensions, doors, interior windows, ceiling level, stairs, and fire exit stairs, to illustrate understanding of the statement of requirements.

(b) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate the narrative, and conceptual drawings considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the architectural and engineering requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the Offeror's technical solution to determine adherence to the technical requirements of the RFP.

i. Acceptable. Narrative, and all required drawings, are submitted; the narrative accurately describes the requirements, the drawings address all key aspects of the project and are adequate to use for creating detailed design drawings, The Offeror illustrates understanding of the statement of the requirements.

ii. Unacceptable. The Offeror did not submit a narrative, all required drawings or the drawings submitted do not address all key aspects of the project or are not adequate to use for creating detailed design drawings. The Offeror did not illustrate understanding of the statement of the requirements.

To:

(a) Submittal Requirements:

i. Provide a narrative describing the technical solution to the project that meets the requirements of the RFP. Include the following:

1. Construction sequence of road network and simulation facility.

2. Exterior façade describing how the proposed construction integrates with the surrounding area and existing Base facilities design or architectural theme.

3. Site layout including a description of the building orientation, roadways, parking, emergency vehicle access, and ATFP standoff distances.

Narrative shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages).

ii. Provide the following conceptual design drawing details:

1. Road network showing the road plan from start to finish, including the bridge and critical section. connecting to the building.

2. Site layout plan showing footprint of proposed building, perimeter fence, entrance gates, internal road, locations of transformer, generator house, pump house, septic tank, and existing road within 50 m radius from the proposed buildings. The drawing shall also include connecting point of main water supply system, connecting point of main power supply system, and discharge point of wastewater treatment system].

3. Floor plan and roof plan of the simulation facility. The drawings shall include dimensions, and main doors, interior windows, ceiling level, stairs, and fire exit stairs, to illustrate understanding of the statement of requirements.

(b) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate the narrative, and conceptual drawings considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the architectural and engineering requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the Offeror's technical solution to determine adherence to the technical requirements of the RFP.

i. Acceptable. Narrative, and all required conceptual drawings, are submitted; the narrative accurately describes the requirements, the drawings address all key aspects of the project and are adequate to use for creating detailed design drawings. The Offeror illustrates understanding of the statement of the requirements.

ii. Unacceptable. The Offeror did not submit a narrative, all required drawings or the conceptual drawings submitted do not address all key aspects of the project or are not adequate to use for creating detailed design drawings. The Offeror did not illustrate understanding of the statement of the requirements.

C. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The required response date/time has changed from 23-Aug-2024 11:00 AM to 09-Sep-2024 11:00 AM.

(End of Summary of Changes)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .