Amendment 0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N62473-20-R-0069 P-391 F-35C HANGAR 6, PHASE 2 AT NAVAL AIR STATION LEMOORE, CALIFORNIA

The purpose of this amendment is to answ er RFIs

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 3

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 15-Oct-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247320R0069

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

17-Sep-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

15-Oct-2020

CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHWEST

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT CORE

CODE: CIMAR

1220 PACIFIC HIGHWAY

SAN DIEGO CA 92132-5190

N62473 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247320R0069

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0002 CONTINUATION

SOLICITATION: N62473-20-R-0069

TITLE: P-391 F-35C HANGAR 6, PHASE 2 AT NAVAL AIR STATION LEMOORE, LEMOORE,

CALIFORNIA

CS/PHONE: Crystal Irvin/ (619) 532-4239

SOLICITATION DATE: 17 SEPTEMBER 2020

1. The following are provided responses to Request for Information:

RFI0009-

FACTOR 2: The submission requirements for Factor 2 instructs Offerors as follows: “Offerors who submit relevant construction projects that demonstrate experience with a variety of the above examples of relevant construction project types may be considered more favorably than those that do not.” The wording of this evaluation criterion appears to be inconsistent with what would typically be evaluated as more relevant experience. For example, if an Offeror submitted (5) projects which included (1) Vehicle Maintenance Facility, (1) Military Operation Facility, (1) Communication Facility, (1) Academic/Applied Instructional Training Facility, and only (1) Aircraft Maintenance Hangars, then that “variety” of relevant projects would be rated more favorably than an Offeror that submitted (5) Aircraft Maintenance Hangars. Demonstrating successful experience with highly similar military Aircraft Maintenance Hangars would be certainly be considered more relevant than “less similar” Vehicle Maintenance Facilities, Military Operation Facilities, Communication Facilities, And Academic and Applied Instructional Training Facilities. Please confirm that Offerors that submit more similar military Aircraft Maintenance Hangars will be evaluated more favorably.

ANSWER-

Per Factor 2 Basis of Evaluation, proposals will be evaluated by “the Offeror’s Team’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements.” As part of the Basis of Evaluation, there are also multiple specific areas where proposals “may be considered more favorably” including the example listed in the RFI. There will be no changes to Factor 2 submission requirements.

RFI0010-

Is there a technical committee that has specified a baseline of acceptable Manufacture’s products for the Network Layer (Fiber and Copper Cabling), Wireless (CBRS, DAS, Wi-Fi) and Network Switches?

ANSWER-

A baseline of acceptable Manufacture’s products for the Network Layer, Wireless, and Network Switches will not be specified.

RFI0011-

The “Exhibit B – Offeror” word document that was issued in Amendment 0001 has 7 check boxes for projects.

Please confirm that the maximum number of projects that can be submitted for the Factor 2 – Experience factor for the Offeror (Construction) is five (5).

ANSWER-

N6247320R0069

The maximum number of projects that can be submitted for the Factor 2 – Experience factor for the Offeror is five as specified in the solicitation.

NOTE: ALL OTHER PARAGRAPHS, PROVISIONS, AND CONDITIONS TO N62473-20-R-0069 REMAIN

UNCHANGED.

THE OFFEROR MUST ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF ALL AMENDMENTS.

(End of Summary of Changes)