N6247318R5003_Solicitation.pdf

SEE ADDENDUM

(No Collect Calls)

N6247318R5003 15-Feb-2018

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER

619-532-2456

8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME

02:00 PM 19 Mar 2018

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012)

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

(TYPE OR PRINT)

(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)

ADDENDA ARE

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )

23.

CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS

SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT

BELOW IS CHECKED

TELEPHONE NO.

N624739. ISSUED BY

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME

MARIANGELA J. MONSALVE

2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER

(TYPE OR PRINT)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

20.

ADDITIONAL SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED.

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

ARE NOT ATTACHED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

. YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN

% FOR:SET ASIDE:UNRESTRICTED OR X

SMALL BUSINESSX

17a.CONTRACTOR/ CODE FACILITY

OFFEROR CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHWEST

PW CONTRACTS CORE - PPV

CODE RAQ10-PPV

1220 PACIFIC HWY

SAN DIEGO CA 92132-5190

18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

RATED ORDER UNDER

DPAS (15 CFR 700)

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A

13b. RATING

CODE15. DELIVER TO CODE N62473 16. ADMINISTERED BY

12. DISCOUNT TERMS11. DELIVERY FOR FOB DESTINA-

TION UNLESS BLOCK IS

MARKED

SEE SCHEDULE

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

RFQ IFB RFPX

NAVFAC SOUTHWEST

LISA D. DELA PENA

PW CONTRACTS CORE - PPV

CODE RAQ10-PPV

1220 PACIFIC HWY

SAN DIEGO CA 92132-5190

TEL: 619-532-1949 FAX: 619-532-3358

FAX:

TEL: SERVICE-DISABLED

VETERAN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS

8(A)

HUBZONE SMALL

BUSINESS

SIZE STANDARD:

$38,500,000

NAICS:

561210

X

OFFER DATED

29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REF.

DELIVER ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY

COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND

EMAIL:

TEL:

31c. DATE SIGNED

SEE SCHEDULE

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICESITEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

24.22.21.19.

WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS (WOSB)

ELIGIBLE UNDER THE WOMEN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM

EDWOSB

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(CONTINUED)

PAGE 2 OF213

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE

36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER

FINAL

33. SHIP NUMBER

PARTIAL

38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT

41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012) BACK

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

SEE SCHEDULE

20.

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES

21.

QUANTITY UNIT

22. 23.

UNIT PRICE

24.

AMOUNT

19.

ITEM NO.

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS

Table of Contents

PART I – THE SCHEDULE

GENERAL INFORMATION

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

FAR 52.212-3 REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

TASK ORDER ISSUANCE PROCEDURES & CONTRACTOR REPORT REQUIREMENTS

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

SUPPLIES/SERVICES

PWS 0100000 GENERAL INFORMATION

PWS 0200000 MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION

PWS 1401000 FAMILY HOUSING

PWS 1402000 BACHELOR QUARTERS

PWS 1501000 FACILITY MANAGEMENT

PWS 1501001 FACILITY MANAGEMENT (RELOCATABLE FACILITY)

PWS 1502000 FACILITY INVESTMENT

PART II CONTRACT CLAUSES

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

PART III LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS, AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

EXHIBIT “A” – OFFEROR EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET

EXHIBIT “B” – NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (FORM PPQ-0)

EXHIBIT “C” – SAFETY DATA ANDGOO NARRATIVE

EXHIBIT “D” – MANAGEMENT APPROACH

EXHIBIT “E” – FINANCIAL QUESTIONNAIRE

EXHIBIT “F” – REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI)

PROPOSED TASK ORDER (PTO) 0001 FOR HVAC SERVICES AT CAMP PENDLETON

PART IV- REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

Incorporated under Part-I The schedule

INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS/GENERAL INFORMATION

1. Inquiries: Inquiries regarding the Request for Proposal (RFP) shall be submitted electronically using the Request for Proposal Information (RFI) form provided as Exhibit F of this Solicitation. The Point of Contact (POC) for inquiries is Mariangela Monsalve at (619) 532-2476, or email mariangela.monsalve@navy.mil. The Government cannot guarantee a response to inquiries received less than 10-days before proposals receipt date. The RFI due date is 1 March 2018.

2. Proposal due date and delivery location: Proposal due date information is identified in block 8 on the SF 1449 and/or as amended on the SF 30. Refer tothese documents for date and time of proposal submission.

Proposals shall be delivered to the following address and clearly marked with the RFP number on the outside of the package:

NAVFAC Soutwest

1220 Pacific Highway, Building 128, Mail Room

San Diego, CA 92132-5190.

Attn: Mariangela Monsalve, Code AQC2.MM

Facility Support Contracts (FSC) Acquisition team

The Offeror must respond to all of the tasks solicited under this Request for Proposal (RFP). Proposal must be submitted via U.S. Postal Service or other delivery service, such as FedEx or UPS. Offeror must comply with mailto:mariangela.monsalve@navy.mil the detailed instructions for the format and content of the proposal; if the proposal does not comply with the detailed instructions for the format and content of the proposal may be considered non-responsive and may render the offeror ineligible for award.

3. Proposal Format/Submission Requirements

(a) General: Proposals submitted in response to the solicitation shall be formatted as follows and furnished in the number of copies stated herein. CD’s shall be placed in binder sleeves in the 3-ring binder.

(b) The acceptable electronic format for proposals includes Microsoft 2007, Word and Excel, or latest version, and Adobe Acrobat 9.0 Pro, or latest version. Price Proposal is to be submitted in Microsoft Excel 2007 or latest version, with all formulas and links to detail worksheets intact.

PAPER PAGES SHALL BE STANDARD 8.5” X 11” SHEETS. A DOUBLE-SIDED/DUPLEX PRINTED

SHEET WILL BE COUNTED AS TWO (2) PAGES.

(c) Electronic mail is not an acceptable media format for submission of proposals. Firms shall ensure that proposal disks are virus free, and free of password protection. If access to proposal data is prohibited due to viruses, passwords, or incorrect format, the proposal may be rejected.

(d) Page limits, if stipulated, must be adhered to. Proposal submittal page sizes shall be 8.5" x 11" and 1 inch margins. Font size shall be 10 or 12 point. A table of contents, list of acronyms, and any relevant/associated tables or figures is required.

4. Period of Acceptance of Offers: The offeror agrees to hold its offer firm until 31 October 2018, including its offer to perform Proposed Task Order (PTO) 0001. Note that the Basic contract may be awarded separately, prior to any award of PTO 0001. Adendum to FAR Clause 52.212-1(11)(c)

5. Pre-proposal conference and site visit: There will be no pre-proposal conference. Pre-proposal power point is posted as a separate document in NECO and FedBizOps under this solicitation.

A site visit for the proposed PTO 0001 will be conducted at FEAD Camp Pendleton on 7 March 2018 at

09:00am , Pacific Standard Time (PST). Those wishing to attend the site visit must register via e-mail at mariangela.monsalve@navy.mil by 12:00pm Pacific Standard Time (PST) on or before 20 February 2018. Please submit each attendees full name a date of birth. Each firm is limited to three attendees.

MEETING LOCATION AND INFORMATION

WHEN: 21 February 2018 at 0930 hrs.

WHERE: Facilities Support Contracts (FSC) Kitchen Conference Room

Bldg 2291, West End, at 6th Street and C Avenue (22 Area)

MCB, Camp Pendleton, CA 92055

POC: Shannan Ward

(760) 763-6625; Shannan.ward@usmc.mil

NOTE: Each location requires a 35-40 minute drive. Due to security issues and time constraints, only those who register by 20 February 2018 deadline will be allowed to attend the site visit.

A valid Government-issued photo identification will be required (driver’s license, passport, etc.)

6. Proposed Task Order (PTO) 0001:

This is a new requirement for the Basic Award MASC. The following information pertains to the PTO 0001 only.

Incumbent information for PTO 0001:

Contract N62473-14-D-3805

Task Order (TO): 0003

Contractor: WOLF CREEK FEDERAL SERVICES, INC.

mailto:mariangela.monsalve@navy.mil

DANIEL W. FENZA

3800 CENTERPOINT DR STE 700

ANCHORAGE AK 99503-5801

Request for information regarding the above contract must be submitted in writing under the Freedom of

Information Act (FOIA).

The following Sections are included in the Solicitation, as separate attachment , for the PTO 0001 for Camp

Pendleton, California:

Exhibit Line Item Numbers (ELINs) and Unit Prices for Seed Project (PTO 0001)

ANNEX 0200000 MCTSSA and NEMTI HVAC Maintenance Contract

ANNEX 1502000 MCTSSA and NEMTI HVAC Maintenance Contract

Attachment J – MCTSSA and NEMTI HVAC Maintenance Contract

Contractors selected for this procurement will be required to have the management, technical capability, and ability to execute multiple projects. Contractors will also be required to perform minor construction incidental to services associated with the technical annexes: Annex 1401000 Family Housing, Annex 1402000 Bachelor Quarters, Annex

1501000 Facility Management, Annex 1501001 Facility Management (Relocatable Facility) and Annex 1502000

Facility Investment as described on the solicitation.

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 2017)

(a) North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code and small business size standard. The NAICS code and small business size standard for this acquisition appear in Block 10 of the solicitation cover sheet (SF

1449). However, the small business size standard for a concern which submits an offer in its own name, but which proposes to furnish an item which it did not itself manufacture, is 500 employees.

(b) Submission of offers. Submit signed and dated offers to the office specified in this solicitation at or before the exact time specified in this solicitation. Offers may be submitted on the SF 1449, letterhead stationery, or as otherwise specified in the solicitation. As a minimum, offers must show--

(1) The solicitation number;

(2) The time specified in the solicitation for receipt of offers;

(3) The name, address, and telephone number of the offeror;

(4) A technical description of the items being offered in sufficient detail to evaluate compliance with the requirements in the solicitation. This may include product literature, or other documents, if necessary;

(5) Terms of any express warranty;

(6) Price and any discount terms;

(7) "Remit to" address, if different than mailing address;

(8) A completed copy of the representations and certifications at FAR 52.212-3 (see FAR 52.212-3(b) for those representations and certifications that the offeror shall complete electronically);

(9) Acknowledgment of Solicitation Amendments;

(10) Past performance information, when included as an evaluation factor, to include recent and relevant contracts for the same or similar items and other references (including contract numbers, points of contact with telephone numbers and other relevant information); and

(11) If the offer is not submitted on the SF 1449, include a statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation. Offers that fail to furnish required representations or information, or reject the terms and conditions of the solicitation may be excluded from consideration.

(c) Period for acceptance of offers. The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm until 31 October 2018 from the date specified for receipt of offers, unless another time period is specified in an addendum to the solicitation.

(d) Product samples. When required by the solicitation, product samples shall be submitted at or prior to the time specified for receipt of offers. Unless otherwise specified in this solicitation, these samples shall be submitted at no expense to the Government, and returned at the sender's request and expense, unless they are destroyed during preaward testing.

(e) Multiple offers. Offerors are encouraged to submit multiple offers presenting alternative terms and conditions, including alternative line items (provided that the alternative line items are consistent with subpart 4.10 of the

Federal Acquisition Regulation), or alternative commercial items for satisfying the requirements of this solicitation.

Each offer submitted will be evaluated separately.

(f) Late submissions, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers:

(1) Offerors are responsible for submitting offers, and any modifications, revisions, or withdrawals, so as to reach the Government office designated in the solicitation by the time specified in the solicitation. If no time is specified in the solicitation, the time for receipt is 4:30 p.m., local time, for the designated Government office on the date that offers or revisions are due.

(2)(i) Any offer, modification, revision, or withdrawal of an offer received at the Government office designated in the solicitation after the exact time specified for receipt of offers is “late” and will not be considered unless it is received before award is made, the Contracting Officer determines that accepting the late offer would not unduly delay the acquisition; and--

(A) If it was transmitted through an electronic commerce method authorized by the solicitation, it was received at the initial point of entry to the Government infrastructure not later than 5:00 p.m. one working day prior to the date specified for receipt of offers; or

(B) There is acceptable evidence to establish that it was received at the Government installation designated for receipt of offers and was under the Government's control prior to the time set for receipt of offers; or

(C) If this solicitation is a request for proposals, it was the only proposal received.

(ii) However, a late modification of an otherwise successful offer, that makes its terms more favorable to the

Government, will be considered at any time it is received and may be accepted.

(3) Acceptable evidence to establish the time of receipt at the Government installation includes the time/date stamp of that installation on the offer wrapper, other documentary evidence of receipt maintained by the installation, or oral testimony or statements of Government personnel.

(4) If an emergency or unanticipated event interrupts normal Government processes so that offers cannot be received at the Government office designated for receipt of offers by the exact time specified in the solicitation, and urgent

Government requirements preclude amendment of the solicitation or other notice of an extension of the closing date, the time specified for receipt of offers will be deemed to be extended to the same time of day specified in the solicitation on the first work day on which normal Government processes resume.

(5) Offers may be withdrawn by written notice received at any time before the exact time set for receipt of offers.

Oral offers in response to oral solicitations may be withdrawn orally. If the solicitation authorizes facsimile offers, offers may be withdrawn via facsimile received at any time before the exact time set for receipt of offers, subject to the conditions specified in the solicitation concerning facsimile offers. An offer may be withdrawn in person by an offeror or its authorized representative if, before the exact time set for receipt of offers, the identity of the person requesting withdrawal is established and the person signs a receipt for the offer.

(g) Contract award (not applicable to Invitation for Bids). The Government intends to evaluate offers and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, the offeror's initial offer should contain the offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. The Government may reject any or all offers if such action is in the public interest; accept other than the lowest offer; and waive informalities and minor irregularities in offers received.

(h) Multiple awards. The Government may accept any item or group of items of an offer, unless the offeror qualifies the offer by specific limitations. Unless otherwise provided in the Schedule, offers may not be submitted for quantities less than those specified. The Government reserves the right to make an award on any item for a quantity less than the quantity offered, at the unit prices offered, unless the offeror specifies otherwise in the offer.

(i) Availability of requirements documents cited in the solicitation. (1)(i) The GSA Index of Federal Specifications, Standards and Commercial Item Descriptions, FPMR Part 101-29, and copies of specifications, standards, and commercial item descriptions cited in this solicitation may be obtained for a fee by submitting a request to--GSA

Federal Supply Service Specifications Section, Suite 8100, 470 East L'Enfant Plaza, SW, Washington, DC

20407, Telephone (202) 619-8925, Facsimile (202) 619-8978.

(ii) If the General Services Administration, Department of Agriculture, or Department of Veterans Affairs issued this solicitation, a single copy of specifications, standards, and commercial item descriptions cited in this solicitation may be obtained free of charge by submitting a request to the addressee in paragraph (i)(1)(i) of this provision.

Additional copies will be issued for a fee.

(2) Most unclassified Defense specifications and standards may be downloaded from the following ASSIST websites:

(i) ASSIST (https://assist.dla.mil/online/start/).

(ii) Quick Search (http://quicksearch.dla.mil/).

(iii) ASSISTdocs.com (http://assistdocs.com).

(3) Documents not available from ASSIST may be ordered from the Department of Defense Single Stock Point

(DoDSSP) by--

(i) Using the ASSIST Shopping Wizard (https://assist.dla.mil/wizard/index.cfm);

(ii) Phoning the DoDSSP Customer Service Desk (215) 697-2179, Mon-Fri, 0730 to 1600 EST; or

(iii) Ordering from DoDSSP, Building 4, Section D, 700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094, Telephone

(215) 697-2667/2179, Facsimile (215) 697-1462.

(4) Nongovernment (voluntary) standards must be obtained from the organization responsible for their preparation, publication, or maintenance.

(j) Unique entity identifier. (Applies to all offers exceeding $3,500, and offers of $3,500 or less if the solicitation requires the Contractor to be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database.) The Offeror shall enter, in the block with its name and address on the cover page of its offer, the annotation ``Unique Entity Identifier'' followed by the unique entity identifier that identifies the Offeror's name and address. The Offeror also shall enter https://assist.dla.mil/online/start/ http://quicksearch.dla.mil/ http://assistdocs.com/ https://assist.dla.mil/wizard/index.cfm its Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) indicator, if applicable. The EFT indicator is a four-character suffix to the unique entity identifier. The suffix is assigned at the discretion of the Offeror to establish additional SAM records for identifying alternative EFT accounts (see subpart 32.11) for the same entity. If the Offeror does not have a unique entity identifier, it should contact the entity designated at www.sam.gov for unique entity identifier establishment directly to obtain one. The Offeror should indicate that it is an offeror for a Government contract when contacting the entity designated at www.sam.gov for establishing the unique entity identifier.

(k) System for Award Management. Unless exempted by an addendum to this solicitation, by submission of an offer, the offeror acknowledges the requirement that a prospective awardee shall be registered in the SAM database prior to award, during performance and through final payment of any contract resulting from this solicitation. If the Offeror does not become registered in the SAM database in the time prescribed by the

Contracting Officer, the Contracting Officer will proceed to award to the next otherwise successful registered

Offeror. Offerors may obtain information on registration and annual confirmation requirements via the

SAM database accessed through https://www.acquisition.gov.

(l) Debriefing. If a post-award debriefing is given to requesting offerors, the Government shall disclose the following information, if applicable:

(1) The agency's evaluation of the significant weak or deficient factors in the debriefed offeror's offer.

(2) The overall evaluated cost or price and technical rating of the successful and the debriefed offeror and past performance information on the debriefed offeror.

(3) The overall ranking of all offerors, when any ranking was developed by the agency during source selection.

(4) A summary of the rationale for award;

(5) For acquisitions of commercial items, the make and model of the item to be delivered by the successful offeror.

(6) Reasonable responses to relevant questions posed by the debriefed offeror as to whether source-selection procedures set forth in the solicitation, applicable regulations, and other applicable authorities were followed by the agency.

(End of provision)

52.212-2 EVALUATION

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

1. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Factor 1 – Recent, Relevant Experience of the Firm

Factor 2 – Management Approach Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4 – Past Performance on Recent, Relevant Projects http://www.sam.gov/ https://www.acquisition.gov/

Note: The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a offeror that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a offeror has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non- price evaluation factors is the technical factors (Factor 1, 2, and 3) are of equal importance to each other and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 4). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the offerors’ non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the Best Value (BV) to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor. Proposals submitted in response to this solicitation shall be formatted as follows, in the number of copies stated:

Submit original, and four (4) copies, and one CD Rom for each of the Price Proposal and Technical Proposal. The proposal shall be submitted in two separate volumes (Volume 1-Price and Volume 2- Technical) with content as specified below:

(a) Price (Volume 1 – Submit original & four (4) copies):

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Submit original and four (4) copies. The price proposals will be evaluated to determine that proposed prices are reasonable, realistic, balanced, and complete. Price proposal shall be submitted in separate binders from the Technical Proposal, and clearly marked “Volume 1 – Price Proposal.” Include a separate tab for each item shown below:

TAB #1: Cover Letter, and Standard Form (SF) 1449 Solicitation/Contract/Order for Commercial Items (Offeror to complete blocks 12, 17, 23, 24 and 30a thru 30c). Include telephone number, facsimile (fax) number, email address, tax identification number (TIN), DUNs Number, and Cage Code on the SF 1449, in Block 17a. Include the following on the cover letter:

Solicitation Number N62473-18-R-5003.

Name, address, telephone, and fax numbers, and email address of offeror.

Point(s) of contact with title, telephone, fax, email address of person(s) authorized to negotiate on the offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation.

The cover letter signed by an authorized representative

Note: The Offeror contact information should match what is shown on the Offeror’s System for Award Management (SAM) profile.

TAB #2: Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) Pricing: Complete a paper copy of Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) Pricing PTO 0001 Pricing, and an electronic version on a CD-ROM using Excel worksheets that the government will post online at the following website: https://www.neco.navy.mil/ and/or http://www.fbo.gov . Electronic version must be compatible with Microsoft Office 2010. Leave all excel formulas open in the spreadsheet.

TAB #3: Completed Exhibit E, “Financial Questionnaire” from banking institution.

TAB #4: Copy of the Online Representations and Certifications from the SAM, at the following website: www.sam.gov, including all completed applicable sections of the FAR Clause 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications – Commercial Items (Mar 2015).

https://www.neco.navy.mil/ http://www.fbo.gov/

TAB #5: If offeror is proposing as a joint venture (JV) and/or Mentor-Protégé, offeror shall provide a copy of the JV agreement and, if the JV is with a mentor-protégé, a copy of the relevant mentor-protégé agreement approved by the SBA.

TAB #6: Submit a copy of the VETS-4212 annual report. Legislatively mandated under 38 U.S.

Code, Section 4212, codified at 41 CFR Section 61-300, respectively, contractors and subcontractors who enter into, or modify a contract or subcontract with the federal government, and whose contract meets the criteria set forth in the above legislation/regulations, are required to report annually on their affirmative action efforts in employing veterans. VETS has a legislative requirement to collect, and make available to OFCCP, reported data contained on the VETS-4212 report for compliance enforcement.

http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price for Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) recurring services and IDIQ (non-recurring service work). Total price consists of all requirements and all option items for the PTO 0001/seed project. The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

(3) A price that is found to be either unreasonably high or unrealistically low in relation to the proposed work may result in the overall proposal being considered unacceptable. Any inconsistency, whether real or apparent, between proposed performance and price must be clearly explained in the price proposal. For example, if unique and innovative approaches are the basis for an apparently unbalanced/ inconsistently priced proposal, the nature of these approaches and their impact on price must be completely documented. The burden of proof of price reasonableness rests solely with the offeror. If a price realism analysis is required, the analysis may address whether prices are realistic in relation to the work to be performed, reflect a clear understanding of the requirements, and are consistent with other portions of the offeror’s proposal. Proposals may be analyzed for unbalanced pricing. An offer may be rejected if the Contracting Officer (KO) determines that a lack of balanced pricing poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

(b) Non-price Factors (Volume 2 – Submit Original & four (4) copies):

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Submit original & four (4) copies, plus one CD (with documents in Microsoft Word). Technical proposal copies shall be submitted in three ring binders separate from price proposals, and clearly marked: “Volume 2- Technical Proposal.” The technical proposal shall address each evaluation factor in accordance with the criteria shown below under Factors 1 through 4. Provide a separate tab within Volume 2 for each factor shown below:

TAB #1: Factor 1 – Recent, Relevant Experience of the Firm TAB #2: Factor 2 – Management Approach TAB #3: Factor 3 – Safety TAB #4: Factor 4 – Past Performance on Recent, Relevant Projects

(2) A copy of the Technical Proposal shall be placed on one (1) CD-ROM and inserted in the original Technical Proposal Binder – Volume 2.

(3) Failure to acknowledge any "material" amendments to the solicitation may cause an Offeror's proposal to be rejected as unacceptable.

TAB #1: Factor 1 - Recent, Relevant Experience of the Firm:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Submit Exhibit “A” (Recent, Relevant Experience of Firm Project Data Sheets) for each project under Tab “1”. Exhibit A is MANDATORY. The Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total page limit for each project data sheet shall not exceed three single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages.

NOTE: Projects submitted under Factor 1 - Recent, Relevant Experience of the Firm must be the same projects submitted for Factor 4 - Past Performance on Recent, Relevant Projects.

(a) Submit a minimum of three (3) projects and a maximum of five (5) relevant projects for the offeror as the prime contractor that best describes the offeror’s experience on projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the projects that may be order under the solicited contract. For purposes of this evaluation, relevant projects are further defined as Government or commercial projects similar in size, scope, and complexity to the projects that may be ordered under this contract with a total award value of $2 million or more (at the date of contract award).

(b) Project experience is defined as a project performed under a single task order (TO) or contract. For multiple award contracts and IDIQ type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather offeror shall submit the work performed under a task order project.

(c) For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as follows:

(i) A Government or commercial contract, project or TO that is at least 50% self-performed in terms of the cost of contract performance;

(ii) At least 50% complete within the last five (5) years prior to the RFP issuing date;

(iii) A total award value of $2 million or more (at the date of contract award);

(iv) Services related to recurring maintenance and minor repairs similar to the scope requirements in the solicitation technical annexes.

(v) Relevant projects shall demonstrate offeror’s experience in all technical annexes or a combination of the annex described in the solicitation. The offeror may submit experience, under a single project or multiple projects, so long as the offeror can demonstrate experience for all Annexes. Offers are still limited to five (5) projects. Offerors who submit experience for all JV members may be rated higher.

(d) The Government will not consider any project submitted for experience that was performed by a firm other than the offeror, except that:

(i) If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience shall be submitted for project(s) completed by the JV entity. If the JV does not have shared experience, relevant projects shall be submitted for each JV member provided the JV offeror’s proposal includes a copy of the supporting JV agreement identifying the firm in question as a member of the JV for this procurement in the Price Proposal under Tab #5.

(ii) The Government will consider otherwise relevant projects that were performed by the offeror’s proposed key personnel; however, experience of proposed subcontractor employees, key or otherwise, will not be considered; and,

(iii) The Government will consider otherwise relevant projects performed by affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (i.e. any office(s) of the Offeror other than the one submitting the current proposal as stated on the SF1449), provided the proposal clearly explains that the affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of this contract.

Regarding such submitted project(s), if the Offeror fails to demonstrate the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/ LLC/LTD meaningful involvement in the performance of this contract, the project may not be considered relevant and may not be evaluated. The Government will not consider the experience of proposed subcontractors.

(iv) Exhibit A, Offeror Recent, Relevant Experience of Firm Project Data Sheets submitted that exceed the maximum, three single-sided 8.5” x 11” page limit will be removed prior to evaluation.

Exhibit A, Project Data Sheets submitted for multiple award contracts and/or IDIQ type contracts as a whole will be removed prior to evaluation.

Exhibit A, Project Data Sheets submitted for projects that are not at least 50% complete within five (5) years prior to the RFP issuing date will be deemed not similar in scope and not relevant.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The basis of evaluation will include the offeror’s demonstrated experience in performing relevant recurring service maintenance projects as defined in the solicitation technical annexes. The assessment of the offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the ability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the solicitation. The Government will only review five (5) projects; any projects submitted in excess of the limitation will not be considered.

(a) Offeror who proposes to self-perform more than 75% percent of the cost of contract performance may be rated higher.

(b) Relevant projects submitted that demonstrate experience in all of the technical annexes described in the solicitation under a single project may be rated higher.

(c) Projects submitted with award value of $5 million or more (i.e. contract price), may be rated higher.

(d) Offerors that fail to properly complete Exhibit A, Project Data Sheets and do not provide all requested data, with a point of contact that is accessible, (e.g. incorrect contact information number and/or email address) may be rated lower. Note: the Government may contact references for the submitted projects to verify information presented in Exhibit A, Project Data Sheets.

(e) For JV offerors – Proposals that fail to provide relevant experience for the JV entity or relevant experience for each JV member may be rated lower. Offeror’s are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

(f) Offeror’s submitting less than the minimum requirement of three (3) relevant projects will be rated unacceptable.

(g) Projects submitted using other than the mandatory Exhibit A, Project Data Sheet form as included in the RFP will not be evaluated.

(h) Information submitted that exceed the three (3) page limitation on the mandatory Exhibit A, Project Data Sheet will be removed and will not be evaluated.

*Self-Performed: Refers to the offeror who performs relevant work that is the same or similar in size, scope and complexity of the work requirements in the solicitation, by in-house workforce and not by sub-contractor(s). This does not include administrative or management functions.

TAB #2: Factor 2- Management Approach:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Submit Exhibit D under Tab #2 of the Technical Proposal Volume 2. Exhibit D is mandatory. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total page limit shall not exceed five single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages. The offeror shall submit the information described below of the proposed approach to meeting the requirement of this solicitation.

(a) Workload Management Plan: Provide the proposed plan that is detailed, specific, and demonstrates how the Offeror has the necessary capability to successfully manage surges in workload and perform multiple TO concurrently at various locations within the NAVFAC SW AOR.

(b) Subcontractor Management Plan: Provide a detailed and structured plan with methods for monitoring and controlling subcontractors and methods to be implemented to correct poor performing subcontractors. Offeror shall address how it will ensure that high quality services are provided that meet or exceed contract requirements.

(c) Quality Control Management Plan: Offeror shall provide a detailed and structured plan for addressing customer complaints and marginal or unsatisfactory performance. Offeror shall address quality control methods that will be implemented to ensure performance meets or exceeds contract requirements.

(d) Self-Performance Management Plan: Offeror shall provide the proposed plan to ensure not less than 50% percent of the total cost of contract performance, per TO is expended for employees of the offeror in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting (Nov 2014). Offeror shall explain the process for correcting non-compliance of 50% subcontracting limitations reported semi-annually to the KO. Offeror shall identify a timeline for implementing corrective action for non-compliance of 50% percent subcontracting limitations reported semi-annually to the KO.

(e) Corporate Management Plan: Identify key personnel, such as the Senior Program Manager, responsible for performance oversight, inventory controls, contract capacity monitoring and all other contract management requirements. Provide a one-page resume that demonstrates experience and qualifications for the key personnel. Resumes shall include name, position title, position description, work history and applicable education and certifications.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Offeror’s proposal shall demonstrate to the Government that the Offeror has a plan and the ability to carry out that plan to manage and control the execution of work as outlined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Failure to provide any of the elements described within the Management Approach may result in a lower rating.

(a) Self-Performance Management Plan: Offerors who propose to self-perform more than 75% percent of the total cost of contract performance, per TO may result in a higher rating.

(b) Key personnel: Offerors who propose key personnel who have significant experience on managing and overseeing projects that are similar in scope, size (project dollar value range of $500 - $7 Million), type and complexity to this solicitation may receive a higher rating.

(c) Information submitted that exceed the five (5) page limitation on the mandatory

Exhibit D form will be removed and will not be evaluated.

TAB #3: Factor 3 - Safety:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Submit Exhibit C (Safety Data Sheet/Safety Narrative) under Tab #3. The offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership or JV; the following submittal requirements are required for each offeror who is part of the partnership or joint venture;

however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR and DART Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.) Exhibit C is mandatory and shall be used to submit safety information. The safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) 8.5” x 11” pages.

(a) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): include three previous complete calendar years’ (2014, 2015 and 2016) worth of data. This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If the offeror has no EMR or premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why.

Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends shall be addressed as part of the factor submission.

(b) OSHA DART Rate and TRC: submit three previous complete calendar years’ (2014, 2015 and 2016) worth of data. If an offeror cannot submit an OSHA DART and TRC rates, for any year, affirmatively state so and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA, DART, and TRC rate data negatively shall be addressed as part of this factor submission.

(c) Technical Approach for Safety: describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. The offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work. The offeror will describe any innovative methods that will employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and/or all subcontractor levels. Additionally, the contactor will describe their methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to two pages (8”x11”).

Note: For a partnership or joint venture, the submittal requirements (above) are required for each offeror who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one technical approach for safety narrative is required.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The safety factor evaluation will collectively consider the following three submittal requirements:

EMR – For the three previous complete calendar years (2014, 2015 and 2016) the offeror will submit EMR. If no EMR exists, the offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate explaining why not. If an insurance company-provided equivalent rate is provided, it will be treated the same as an EMR. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and negative trends shall be addressed as part of this selection factor. The board will evaluate the EMR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

OSHA DART and TRC rates – For the three previous complete calendar years (2014, 2015 and 2016), the offeror will submit their OSHA DART and TRC, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If unable to submit OSHA DART and TRC rates, affirmatively state so, and an explanation shall be provided.

Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART and TRC rate data and negative trends shall be addressed as part of this element. The board will evaluate the OSHA DART and TRC rates to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.

Offeror Technical Approach to Safety – The offeror will describe their plan to evaluate their safety performance and that of potential subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative shall be limited to two 8” x 11”pages. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement and validate the contractor has addressed methodology to be used in the execution of an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques/processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. Those Offerors whose plan demonstrates a commitment to hire subcontractors with a culture of safety and who propose innovative methods to enhance a safe working environment may be given greater weight in the evaluation.

Other sources of information available to the Government – Other sources for safety may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) in Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and other related databases.

TAB 4 - Factor 4, Past Performance on Recent, Relevant Projects:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Submit Exhibit B (Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) and CPARS evaluations under Tab #4 of the Technical Proposal Volume 2.

NOTE: Projects submitted for Factor 4 – Past Performance on Recent, Relevant Projects must be the same projects submitted under Factor 1 – Recent, Relevant Experience of the Firm.

IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION (interim or final) IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the PPQ form included in the solicitation is provided for the Offeror to submit to the Client Point of Contact (POC)/reference for each submitted project for the applicable Factor Insert applicable factor number and , factor title (e.g. Factor 1, Corporate Experience). AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A

COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client POC/reference. Completed PPQs shall be submitted and included in the proposal package. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a Client POC/reference for a project before the RFP issued date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the first page of the PPQ (Exhibit B) that includes the contract and client POC/reference information for the respective project(s).

The offeror shall follow up the client POC/reference to confirm that the PPQ has been submitted directly to the Government. The PPQ(s) shall be submitted to the Government POC below on or before the RFP issued date.

Mariangela Monsalve, Contract Specialist PPQ can be submitted by email to: Mariangela.monsalve@navy.mil Phone Number: (619) 532-2456

Send PPQ by mail to the following address:

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND, SOUTHWEST

PW, FSC ACQ TEAM

ATTN: MARIANGELA MONSALVE, CODE ACQ2, BUILDING 127, ROOM 115

1220 PACIFIC HIGHWAY, SAN DIEGO, CA 92132-5190

Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

mailto:Mariangela.monsalve@navy.mil

Offerors may provide any information on performance problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 – Recent, Relevant Experience of Firm.

Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues. Explanations shall not exceed one (1) double-sided 8.5” x 11” pages (or two single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages).

The Government reserves the right to contact client POC/references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the offeror’s client POC/references or the client POC/reference’s unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this Factor 4.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate, and complete past performance information rests with the offeror.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 Recent, Relevant Experience of Firm, and past performance on other projects that are at least 50% completed within five (5) years prior to the RFP issued date, currently documented in known sources.

More emphasis will be placed on relevant projects. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government.