L-3__Past_Performance_Contract_Data_-_updated_09-12-19.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 13 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6134019R0061
About this file
This document contains a solicitation for contractor support services for the Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division in Orlando, Florida. The solicitation requests proposals for engineering, instructional systems, program management, and logistics support services with an anticipated award of an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract providing approximately 200,000 labor hours annually over a one year base period and four one-year options. Interested parties must be a Woman Owned Small Business with size standard of $38.5 million and personnel may require secret or top secret clearances. Proposals are due in late March 2019 and the contractor shall provide office space for employees who may need to report to the DeFlorez building within two hours as needed to support training requirements from concept to post-fielding support across the acquisition lifecycle for Navy training devices and systems.
L-3 Past Performance Contract Data - updated 09-12-19
View the file
Other files
Show all 37
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
P1
| Past Performance Contract Data | ||
| Background Information | ||
| 1 | 1 | Contractor Name and proposed role in the instant effort |
| 2 | 2 | Cage Code and DUNS |
Provide the CAGE Code and DUNS Number of the company identified in Row 1.
| 3 | 3 | Contractor’s Role in the Past Performance Contract (Prime or Sub) | |
| 4 | 4 | Title of Contract | |
| 5 | 5 | Contract Number | |
| 6 | 6 | Subcontract Number/PO Number, if applicable | |
| 8 | 7 | Procuring agency or commercial customer | |
| 9 | 8 | Description of product or service provided and a brief work description and/or program responsibility for this past contract | |
| 10 | 9 | Period of Performance | |
| RECENCY | |||
| 10 | Did Performance Take Place Within Five Years of RFP Issuance Date as shown in Block 5 of the SF33? | ||
| RELEVANCY | |||
| SCOPE | SCOPE | ||
| 11 | Describe the similarity of the tasks performed on the past performance record to the tasks required of the instant effort as described in the solicitation's SOW Section 4.0. These tasks cover six general task categories: Engineering, Program/Project Management, Instructional Systems Design, Finance, Logistics, and Cybersecurity. As part of this description, provide specific Paragraph/Section references from the past performance record's PWSs/SOWs, DD 254, and copy of the contract and formal contract attachments provided in Volume I, Annex A that demonstrate the similarities described for scope. | ||
| a | Engineering (Solicitation SOW references: 4.1.2 through 4.1.4, 4.3 through 4.18, 4.25, 4.27, 4.32 through 4.33, and 4.36) | ||
| b | Program/Project Management (Solicitation SOW references: 4.1, 4.2, and 4.34) | ||
| c | Instructional Systems Design (Solicitation SOW references: 4.1.5, 4.22 through 4.26, and 4.28) | ||
| d | Finance (Solicitation SOW references: 4.31 and 4.35) | ||
| e | Logistics (Solicitation SOW references: 4.1.1, 4.1.6, and 4.37) | ||
| f | Cybersecurity/Systems Security (Solicitation SOW references: 4.19 through 4.21, 4.29, 4.30) | ||
| MAGNITUDE | |||
| 12 | Average annual labor hours for the past performance record (Total number of labor hours performed during the Period of Performance divided by the number of months performed in the Period of Performance multiplied by twelve months) | ||
| 13 | Average annual labor hours actually performed by the offeror or principal team member on the past performance record | ||
| 14 | Average annual labor hours for the instant effort | 271,251 | |
| 15 | Average annual labor hours proposed to be performed by the offeror or principal team member on the instant effort | ||
| MAGNITUDE | COMPLEXITY | ||
| 16 | Describe the similarity of the complexity of the past performance record to the complexity of the instant effort as described below. As part of this description, provide specific Paragraph/Section references from the past performance record's PWSs/SOWs, DD 254, and copy of the contract and formal contract attachments provided in Volume I, Annex A that demonstrate the similarities described for complexity. | ||
| a | Type of contract (Cost Reimbursement, Firm Fixed-Price, etc.) | ||
| COMPLEXITY | b | Incrementally Funded? Y/N | |
| c | Effort provided for Department of Defense | ||
| d | Effort supported multiple phases of the acquisition cycle, i.e. requirements definition, development, production, and sustainment/support | ||
| e | Level of Facility Security Clearance (FCL) required on the past performance record, e.g. Secret, Top Secret, none required, etc. | ||
| DEMONSTRATED PAST PERFORMANCE | |||
| 13 | 17 | Date of last completed CPARs |
As part of its Past Performance Volume, the offeror shall provide printed CPARS available for each past performance record.
| 18 | Date past performance questionnaires were sent | ||
| 14 | 19 | Points of Contact who can validate performance on the contract referenced in Row 5 or subcontract/PO number referenced in Row 6 | |
| 20 | Gov't PCO or Commercial Purchasing Agent | Name: |
Phone:
Email:
15 21 Gov't ACO Name:
Phone:
Email:
16 22 Gov't PM or Commercial PM Name:
Phone:
Email:
17 23 Technical Point of Contact Name:
Title:
Phone:
Email:
| 18 |
| 19 |
| 20 |
| 21 |
Attachment L-3 Past Performance Contract Data (updated 12 Sept 19) N61340-19-R-0061
&"Times New Roman,Regular"&12 Past Performance Contract Data
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .