J18_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 22 KB Posted

Attached to
Hull, Mechanical & Electrical (HM&E) Pierside Assists
Solicitation number
N50054-19-R-0003
Issued by

About this file

This document includes a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for Hull, Mechanical and Electrical (HM&E) Pierside Assists. The past performance questionnaire requests references from up to five previous contracts to assess schedule performance, technical performance, cost controls, quality, and management of subcontractors. It will be used to evaluate offerors for the HM&E Pierside Assists contract.

The federal contract opportunity is for HM&E Pierside Assists services at the Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center in Norfolk, Virginia. The work includes repairs, maintenance, installation and removal of machinery, equipment and systems onboard Navy and military vessels within 50 miles of Norfolk. The 100% small business set-aside contract has an estimated value of $100M over one base year and four option years. Proposals are due by December 2018 and awards will be made to the best value offerors. The incumbent contracts are N50054-14-D-1401 through 1405.

J18 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
BIDDER'S_QUESTIONS_001-037-AMEND_0005.pdf PDF
AMENDMENT_0005_SF-30_RFP_N50054-19-R-0003.pdf PDF
BIDDER'S_QUESTIONS_001-035-AMEND_0004.pdf PDF
AMENDMENT_0004_SF-30_RFP_N50054-19-R-0003.pdf PDF
BIDDER'S_QUESTIONS_001-034-AMEND_0003.pdf PDF
AMENDMENT_0003_SF-30_RFP_N50054-19-R-0003.pdf PDF
AMENDMENT_0002_SF-30_RFP_N50054-19-R-0003.pdf PDF
J17_-_Past_Performance_Information_Form_REV-AMEND_0002.docx DOCX document
J18_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_REV-AMEND_0002.docx DOCX document
BIDDERS_QUESTIONS_&_ANSWERS_001-030_AMEND_0002.pdf PDF
AMENDMENT_0001_SF-30_RFP_N50054-19-R-0003.pdf PDF
RFP_REV_N5005419R0003_AMEND_0001.pdf PDF
BIDDER'S_QUESTION_&_ANSWER_003_01-02-2019.pdf PDF
RFP_N50054-19-R-0003.pdf PDF
BIDDER'S_QUESTIONS_&_ANSWERS_001-002.pdf PDF
RFP_N50054-19-R-0003.pdf PDF
J16_-_Capacity_Evaluation_Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRL_EXHIBITS_A-E.zip ZIP file
J15_-_992-031,_Cleaning_and_Pumping;_accomplish.pdf PDF
J13_-_042-001,_Accountability_of_Manhour_and_Material_Reservation;.pdf PDF
J10_-_042-038,_General_Requirements_for_Work_Within_Naval_Station_Norfolk_and_Joint.pdf PDF
J17_-_Past_Performance_Information_Form.docx DOCX document
J6_-_042-006,_General_Occupational_Safety,_Health_and_Environment_(OSHE).pdf PDF
J12_-_992-001,_Heavy_Weather_Plan_(Demobilization);_accomplish.pdf PDF
J19_-_Request_for_Specification_Clarification.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J2_-_042-001,_Work_Completion_Certification_Data_for_CNO.pdf PDF
J4_-_042-005,_General_Requirements_for_Work_on_Submarines;_accomplish.pdf PDF
J7_-_042-007,_Security_Requirements_for_Work_Within_Norfolk_Naval_Shipyard;.pdf PDF
J14_-_077-001,_Hazardous_Waste_Produced_on_Naval_Vessels;_control.pdf PDF
J11_-_992-001,_Heavy_Weather_Plan_(Remobilization);_accomplish.pdf PDF
J1_-_042-001,_Work_Completion_Certification_Data_for_CMAV-EM.pdf PDF
J9_-_042-009,_General_Requirements_for_Work_Within_Norfolk_Naval_Shipyard.pdf PDF
J8_-_042-008,_General_Requirements_for_Work_on_Aircraft_Carriers;_accomplish.pdf PDF
J3_-_042-005,_Requirements_for_Work_Within_Norfolk_Naval_Shipyard_(NNSY);.pdf PDF
J5_-_042-005,_Norfolk_Naval_Shipyard_(NNSY)_Work_Authorization_Form_(WAF).pdf PDF
J20_-_Quality_Assurance_Surveillance_Plan_(QASP)_and_Matrix.pdf PDF
Show all 36

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment J18: Hull Mechanical and Electrical (HM&E) Pierside Assists

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions to Offeror: The Offeror shall complete PARTS I, II and III of this questionnaire. The Offeror shall then provide a copy of the partially completed questionnaire to the points of contact it identifies in PART II a. and instruct them to complete PART IV of the questionnaire and forward the questionnaire, by the proposal due date, to:

MID-ATLANTIC REGIONAL MAINTENANCE CENTER

ATTN: SUSAN ROSQUIST, CODE 412, CONTRACTING OFFICER

9727 AVIONICS LOOP

SOLICITATION NUMBER: N50054-19-R-0003

DO NOT OPEN IN MAIL ROOM

Or email to:

Susan Rosquist, C412, susan.rosquist@navy.mil Monica Hill-Turner, C412, monica.hill-turner@navy.mil

THE GOVERNMENT WILL ONLY EVALUATE A PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE IF PARTS I, II, III AND IV HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. ALL PARTS OF THE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO THE ADDRESS ABOVE BY THE PROPOSAL DUE DATE. FAILURE OF THE CUSTOMER TO SUBMIT THE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE TO THE NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND, AS ADDRESSED ABOVE, WITHIN THE REQUESTED TIMEFRAME MAY RESULT IN THE INABILITY OF THE GOVERNMENT TO EVALUATE THAT PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE. IN THE EVENT THAT A QUESTIONNAIRE IS SUBMITTED AFTER THE SOURCE SELECTION EVALUATION BOARD (SSEB) HAS COMPLETED ITS PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION THEN THAT PARTICULAR QUESTIONNAIRE WILL NOT BE EVALUATED. ALL PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY THE OFFEROR SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE GOVERNMENT USING THE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE.

The Offeror may submit up to five (5) questionnaires. PARTS I, II, and III of any questionnaire shall not exceed three (3) pages.

PART I: Title of Past Performance Effort and Identification of Performing Activity

a. Assign a tracking number to this questionnaire; e.g. Number 1 of 5 questionnaires prepared.

b. Provide an Offeror point of contact and phone number for the administrative handling of this questionnaire.

c. Provide a contract number and short title that encompasses the work that was performed.

d. Provide the company name, address, zip code, technical and management points of contact, and phone number of the performing activity.

PART II: Customer Information

a. Provide the customer name, address, zip code and phone number for the following individuals:

Contracting Officer Name:

Program Manager Name:

b. Provide the Contract Number.

c. Identify the type of Contract.

d. Identify the Period of Performance.

e. Summarize the scope of work and the responsibilities of the Contractor.

f. Explain the status of the contract.

g. Explain the relevancy to Marine Boat Yard and Industrial Support.

h. Provide the DUNS number and CAGE code of the Offeror to enable the Government to conduct accurate searches in the PPIRS database.

PART III: Contractor’s Self-Assessment

It is incumbent upon the Offeror to explain the relevance of the data provided to Hull, Mechanical and Electrical (HM&E) Pierside Asside.

a. Explain the schedule performance (award date, the contractually required delivery date(s), the actual delivery date(s) and explanations for differences in actual and contractually required delivery dates).

b. Explain the technical performance (explain in detail any performance shortcomings or customer dissatisfaction, such as CPARS evaluations.)

c. Explain the cost/price at award, the cost/price at completion or in the case of on-going efforts, and the estimated cost/price at completion. Provide an explanation for any differences in the cost/price at award and the cost/price at completion. Provide an explanation for any overruns and a summary of all CPRs.

d. Explain in detail any significant subcontracting/teaming required to successfully perform the contract.

PART IV: Customer Satisfaction

The following is to be completed by the offices of the cognizant Contracting Officer and Program Manager. For the areas identified below, please use the following ratings:

a. Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

b. Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

c. Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

d. Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

e. Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

f. Not Applicable (N/A): Please indicate if performance is Not Applicable in the comments section of each assessment elements.

Assessment Elements: Please select/circle the appropriate performance assessment value for each item on the questionnaire and provide supporting narrative.

a. Cost Control: Rate the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost (including reporting and analyzing variances) and ability to deliver at the agreed-to cost/price. Provide reasons for changes to the contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes).

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

Comments:

b. Schedule: Rate the contractor’s ability to deliver according to the agreed-to schedule. What were the causes of any schedule variances?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

c. Technical Performance: Ability to overcome technical challenges by applying sound engineering principles, complete required engineering analyses, and develop adequate technical reports and plans.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

d. Quality: Rate the contractor’s ability to provide a product or service that met your required level of quality.

Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards.)

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

e. Subcontract Management: Rate the contractor’s ability to meet the goals of the subcontracting plan, to include the ability to timely award and manage subcontracts. Please describe the offerors success in meeting planned goals and/or efforts made to overcome goal deficiencies and challenges as well as the offeror’s ability to successfully manage and integrate subcontractors.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

f. Business Relations: Rate the contractor’s ability to integrate and coordinate all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness, quality of problem resolution, corrective action plans, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, customer satisfaction, and ability to submit accurate invoices in a timely manner.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

g. Management of Key Personnel: Assess the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing, - when necessary – key personnel.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

h. Evaluate conditional, provisional, or late delivery in which consideration was provided back to the Government.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

i. Recommendation: To what extent would you recommend this contractor for additional contracts? Rate on the scale: 5 = Yes, definitely; 4 = Yes, likely; 3 = Maybe, 2 = No, not likely; 1 = No, not ever; 0 = N/A.

5
4
3
2
1
0

Comments:

Comments from: [ ] Contracting Office and [ ] Program Office

Reviewing Activity:

Name/Title of reviewer:

Phone number:

Signature/Date

Concur by:

Name/Title:

Signature/Date

CUSTOMERS: PLEASE DO NOT PROVIDE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES TO THE OFFEROR

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .