N4523A-16-R-0003-0009_GRIDLEY.pdf
PDF 88 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USS GRIDLEY FY16 DSRA Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N4523A-16-R-0003
About this file
Amendment N4523A-16-R-0003-0009
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N4523A-16-R-0003-0013_GRIDLEY.pdf | ||
| N4523A-16-R-0003-0012_GRIDLEY.pdf | ||
| N4523A-16-R-0003-0011_GRIDLEY.pdf | ||
| N4523A-16-R-0003-0010_GRIDLEY.pdf | ||
| N4523A-16-R-0003-0008_GRIDLEY.pdf | ||
| N4523A-16-R-0003-0007_GRIDLEY.pdf | ||
| N4523A-16-R-0003-0006_GRIDLEY.pdf | ||
| AMDT_5.pdf | ||
| N4523A-16-R-0003-0004_GRIDLEY.pdf | ||
| N4523A-16-R-0003-0003_GRIDLEY.pdf | ||
| N4523A-16-R-0003-0002_GRIDLEY.pdf | ||
| GRIDLEY_J A.pdf | ||
| N4523A-16-R-0003-0001_GRIDLEY.pdf | ||
| J-17_Shipyard_Access.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| N4523A-16-R-0003_GRIDLEY.pdf |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
This amendment is being issued to answ er Pre-Proposal Inquiries, update Section J and Section L.
Section J:
J-1 Work Package - ADDENDUM1 - ERRATA 2
J-14 GRIDLEY PRICING WORKBOOK SPREADSHEET
J-19 Seatlle Fire Department Administrative Rule 26.10.14-Hot Work Permits Section L PPI Due Date changed from 10 March 2016 change to 23 March 2016.
Proposal Due Date changed from 23 March 2016 change to 06 Aprl 2016.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
J 1 16
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 10-Mar-2016
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4523A-16-R-0003
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
20-Jan-2016
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
10-Mar-2016
CODE
PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYARD CODE 400
2000 WEST MARINE VIEW DR CODE 440
EVERETT WA 98207-2400
N4523A 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
N4523A-16-R-0003
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS
The following have been modified:
DOCUMENTS/EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
The following document(s) exhibits, and other attachment(s) form a part of this solicitation and will form a part of the contract resulting from this solicitation.:
Attachment No. Document J-1 Work Package – ADDENDUM 1 – Errata 2 J-2 References J-3 Key Events and Milestone Listing J-4 Event Readiness List (ERL) J-5 S/A 82710 Hybrid Electric Drive SIDS for DDG 106 J-6 SPAWAR Information Brief
J-7 AIT POA&M
J-8 Contractor’s Proposal Guide J-9 Naval Station Everett Environmental Process Instruction J-10 Local Standard Item 099-01NW J-11 S0570-AC-CCM-010/8010 NAVSEA Tech Manual 8010 - Chapter 12 J-12 Pre Proposal Information Form (PPI) J-13 Eligibility Factor Data Sheet J-14 Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet containing Work Item Pricing, Material Burden Rates and
Total Evaluated Price
J-15 RESERVED
J-16 Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) J-17 Shipyard Access J-18 Contract Security Classification Specification (DD Form 254) J-19 Seattle Fire Department Administrative Rule 26.10.04-Hot Work Permits
SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS
The following have been modified:
SECTION L
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This solicitation is a Request for Proposals (RFP) that will result in the award of a single Fixed-Price contract for the FY16 Docking Selected Restricted Availability (DSRA) for USS GRIDLEY (DDG-101). The Government anticipates awarding a single contract through a Best Value Source Selection Trade-Off Procedures described in
FAR 15.101-1.
ALL INQUIRIES shall be made in writing and directed to Eric Niemann, Contracting Officer, and Valerie Heart Broker, Contract Specialist, at eric.c.niemann2@navy.mil and valerie.k.heartbroke@navy.mil. To ensure the Government is able to adequately address and respond to offeror requests for information (RFIs) via amendment, it is requested questions be submitted no later than 23 March 2016 at 3:00pm Pacific Standard Time (PST). The Navy reserves the right to not answer any requests received after 23 March 2016 at 3:00 pm PST. Furthermore, offerors should note that the proposal due date will not be extended solely on the basis of requests received after 23 March 2016. RFIs should reference a solicitation and/or specification page and paragraph number and be submitted on the Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) form (Attachment J-12) provided with this solicitation. PPI form (Attachment J-12) is to be submitted for each inquiry and question.
This acquisition will be accomplished in accordance with FAR Part 15 and is full and open competition with execution performed in the Puget Sound Region, NAICS 336611. The award will be based on a “Best Value trade-off” determination.
Estimated Award Date: The Government anticipates making a single award on or around 05 August 2016. Offerors must provide a period of 150 calendar days from the proposal due date for Government acceptance of the offer (Complete block 12 of the Standard Form (SF) 33).
2.0 INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF OFFERS
Proposal Due Date: NAVSEA will not accept electronic submission of proposals. All copies of the proposals (Volumes I & II) shall be submitted to the PCO no later than 1:00 pm PST, on 06 April 2016 at the address below.
Late proposals will not be considered. Partial proposals or attachments submitted late will not be considered.
Proposals shall be sent United States Post Office (USPS) certified mail, other methods (FEDEX, UPS, or etc) with signature required upon delivery or hand deliveried.
Proposals shall be sent to:
PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYARD & INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE FACILITY, DETACHMENT
EVERETT
ATTN: ERIC NIEMANN / VALERIE HEART BROKER
NAVAL STATION EVERETT
BUILDING 2200
2000 WEST MARINE VIEW DRIVE
EVERETT, WASHINGTON 98207
Hand Deliveried Proposals:
ATTN: ERIC NIEMANN / VALERIE HEART BROKER
NAVAL STATION EVERETT
BUILDING 2200 RM167
2000 WEST MARINE VIEW DRIVE
EVERETT, WASHINGTON 98207
Offerors shall mark all submittals “DO NOT OPEN PACKAGE IN MAIL ROOM—FORWARD UNOPENED DIRECTLY TO CODE 444”. The outside of the package shall clearly indicate the offeror’s name, the solicitation number, and the contents of the package.
Offerors shall submit:
Volume Title Number of
Paper Originals Number of
Paper Copies Number of CDs
I Price Proposal 1 3 3 II Technical Proposal 1 4 4
Note 1: The CDs must be scanned to ensure that the files contained on them do not contain any computer viruses.
The CDs shall be labeled to indicate the Offeror’s name, the solicitation number and the associated volume numbers.
Note 2: The files on the CD shall be in a format that is compatible with and capable of being opened in Microsoft Office Suite 2007 or Adobe Acrobat. The material presented in electronic format shall be identical to the paper copy of the proposal. In cases where the hard copy and the electronic copy of the proposal conflict, the hard copy shall take precedence. All spreadsheets shall be in Microsoft Excel format such that each mathematical equation is obvious. No fields shall be password protected. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included.
Note 3: Originals may be shipped in the same boxes as the copies to eliminate excess shipping costs. However, originals should be separately wrapped inside the container, and clearly labeled “ORIGINAL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL” or “ORIGINAL PRICE PROPOSAL.” The exterior of each box must clearly indicate its contents.
3.0 GENERAL INFORMATION
Ship Checks: The USS GRIDLEY (DDG 101) will be available for a ship check in San Diego, CA, prior to the proposal submission due date. Offerors, including significant subcontractors, may inspect the USS GRIDLEY (DDG 101) on 10-11 February 2016 and 23 February 2016. To schedule a ship check, offerors shall email a request for ship check to Eric Niemann, Contracting Officer, eric.c.niemann2@navy.mil and Valerie Heart Broker, Contract Specialist, valerie.k.heartbroke@navy.mil no later than 2:00 pm PST on 22 February 2016. Participants will be provided additional information to the ship check and will be subject to security, safety, and other applicable regulations established by Southwest Regional Maintenance Center (SWRMC) and the Commanding Officer of the USS GRIDLEY (DDG 101). Subject to the Commanding Officer USS GRIDLEY (DDG 101) final approval, photography is anticipated to be authorized during the six (6) ship checks on 10-11 February 2016 and 23 February 2016; between 8:30 am to 3:00 pm PST. Schedule of ship checks are the following:
1. 10 February 2016 at 8:30 am to 11:30 am PST
2. 10 February 2016 at 1:00 pm to 3:00 pm PST
3. 11 February 2016 at 8:30 am to 11:30 am PST
4. 11 February 2016 at 1:00 pm to 3:00 pm PST
5. 23 February 2016 at 8:00 am to 3:00 am PST
Information required to be granted access for ship check is listed in attachment J-17 Shipyard Access.
Specifications and associated reference documentation: Offerors shall request a CD by contacting to Eric Niemann, Contracting Officer, or Valerie Heart Broker, Contract Specialist, at eric.c.niemann2@navy.mil and valerie.k.heartbroke@navy.mil. Offerors are required to provide the following in the request for the CD of the RFP for the USS GRIDLEY FY16 DSRA:
1. Subject Line: N4523A-16-R-0003 USS GRIDLEY FY16 DRSA
2. Company Name
3. Attn: Responsible Person/Party
4. Mailing Address
5. City, State Zip-Code
6. Phone Number
7. Email Address
8. Offeror shall indicate one of the following:
- Mail CD to the address provided
- Representative to pick up CD at the contracting office
The Government will provide a CD, upon request. The CDs shall include the solicitation, amendments, and attachments; which includes Section J attachments.
Alteration of Solicitation: Offerors shall respond to the solicitation as posted. Offerors who alter the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications) may be considered non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.
Proposal Information: Offerors shall not presume the Government has knowledge outside of information provided in the proposal. Additionally, offerors are advised that statements such as: “the offeror understands”, “the offeror has a long history of outstanding support”, “standard procedures shall be used”, “well known techniques shall be employed”, or any paraphrasing of the solicitation, shall be considered inadequate to demonstrate experience, knowledge of, or compliance with solicitation requirements. Offerors are encouraged to provide specific and concise information to validate all assertions.
Amendments: The Government may revise the solicitation at any time by means of an Amendment. It is an offeror’s responsibility to ensure it is accessing the Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) website to view potential amendments and procurement notifications for this solicitation.
Teaming Arrangements: Proposals must be submitted by one (1) prime contractor. An Offeror may be listed as a subcontractor in multiple proposals but may only submit one (1) proposal as a prime contractor with a unique Commercial and Government Entity code and Taxpayer Identification Number. To be evaluated as a Joint Venture (JV), offerors must provide a notarized agreement (with the price proposal) delineating roles and responsibilities for all proposed work.
4.0 PROPOSAL FORMAT
To facilitate efficiency and consistency in proposal evaluation the following is mandatory. Proposals which do not follow this direction may be rejected as non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.
Hard Copy Proposals: All pages shall be double-sided on 8.5 x 11 inch paper with a one-inch margin. The text used shall be Times New Roman with a minimum font size of 12-point. Each side of the page will count as one “page”.
Any type contained on graphics pages will not be smaller than 10-point font. Any pages that may be revised as a result of discussions (if required) shall contain revision numbers and date of the proposal revision submission.
Offerors shall use the attachments provided with this solicitation for their proposal content as specified in Section
5.0 where required.
Page Limits:
The cover letter is limited to three (3) pages Non-price proposals submitted as Volume II shall be limited to one hundred (100) pages, which is inclusive of the Eligibility Factor Data Sheet (Attachment J-13) for Factor 1 – There are no other page limitations
5.0 PROPOSAL CONTENT
VOLUME I
Price Proposal: The price proposal shall not contain non-price factor information. The price proposal shall be comprised of the following documentation:
a. Cover Letter (page limit of 3 pages)
b. Signed SF 33 with all amendments acknowledged,
c. Small Business Subcontracting plan per FAR Part 19 (large businesses only),
d. Any Joint Venture / teaming agreements (if applicable),
e. Completed Section B carrying forward information from J-14, and
f. Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet containing Work Item Pricing, Labor & Material Burden Rates, and Dry Dock daily rate (J-14)
Cover Letter: The cover letter, which shall not exceed three (3) pages, shall meet all the requirements of the “first page of the proposal” outlined in FAR 52.215-1(c)(2)(i-v). In addition to those requirements, the offeror shall include the following in the cover letter:
Identification of all enclosures included with the proposal, CAGE and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) numbers for the Prime contractor, Notice of any alterations to the solicitation, such as “fill-in” blocks and certifications, and Notice of any alterations to the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications).
Standard Form 33 (SF 33): As part of the price proposal package, the offeror shall submit the completed SF 33 with blocks 12 through 18 completed, as well as all sections with applicable “fill-ins” filled in and shall acknowledge all amendments. The representative who signs this form must be authorized to contractually bind the company providing the offer. Section B CLIN pricing must also be completed for ALL CLINs. The Offeror shall complete and provide all Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements included in Section K of the solicitation.
Submission of a signed offer to the Government constitutes agreement and acceptance of the terms and conditions of the solicitation in a FFP contracting environment.
Subcontracting Plan: An acceptable subcontracting plan is required to be submitted by large business concerns. A subcontracting plan is NOT REQUIRED from small business concerns and will not be evaluated.
Completed Section B and Attachment J-14 : Offerors must propose on all contract line items (CLINs), complete the clause entitled “SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED)” in Section B, complete the Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet containing Work Item Pricing, Labor & Material Burden Rates and Dry Dock daily rate (J-14) to be considered responsive. Offerors shall enter zero dollar value for CLIN 0002 Section B and include the price associated with CLIN 0002 as part of the total price entered for CLIN 0001.
The contractor must submit prices on both CLIN 0001 Section and J-14 Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet in the format provided. Attachment J-14 contains a total of four (4) worksheets. There are two (2) worksheets for Work Item Pricing and Labor & Material Burden Rates which will automatically populate a total price on a third Summary worksheet. The total price listed on the Summary work sheet shall be entered by the Contractor under CLIN 0001, Section B, and Offerors are to ensure these two total prices match. If there is a discrepancy between the total price on the Summary worksheet of attachment J-14 and the amount entered in CLIN 0001 Section, the summary price listed CLIN 0001 Section B shall govern. The contractor is also required to enter their Dry dock day rate on the fourth worksheet of attachment J-14. For Attachment J-14, offerors are to insert pricing in all yellow shaded fields.
The RFP specified 58,303 labor hours and $1,029,422 included for material in the Labor & Material Burden Rate worksheet contained in Attachment J-14 are for evaluation purposes only. The proposed labor and material burden rates included in Attachment J-14 and inserted in Section B, Note A paragraph (7) shall be the fixed rates and be used for negotiating growth and new work during the entire availability regardless of how many labor hours and material dollars are procured and negotiated. Additionally, Offerors shall breakout and provide the dry dock day rate as prescribed in Section B, Note C and in J-14 Pricing Workbook.
VOLUME II
Non-Price Proposal: The non-price proposal shall be limited to one hundred (100) pages and is inclusive of the Eligibility Factor Data Sheet (Attachment J-13) for Factor 1; – Technical Capabilities narrative and resumes for Factor 2; Resource Capacity narrative for Factor 3 as follows:
Factor 1 – Eligibility Factor: Offerors must provide the following to demonstrate eligibility:
Eligibility Factor Data Sheet (Attachment J-13). If any criteria cannot be met on Attachment J-13, the Offeror shall provide a mitigation plan to meet the needed services. Any mitigation plan will be included as part of the evaluation.
A letter signed by the Principal identifying and confirming ownership or committed access (in the form of a letter signed by the subcontractor identifying and confirming committed access) to a pier capable of berthing the DDG-101 and a dry-dock capable of docking the DDG-101. Offerors shall include any teaming agreements, commercial contracts or other arrangements as necessary to demonstrate capability and committed access to pier and dry-dock facilities.
Co-signed Master Ship Repair Agreement or proof of MSRA Equivalency to demonstrate capability
MSRA Equivalency (Applicable to Non-MSRA holders only): Offerors that do not hold an MSRA must submit MSRA equivalency documentation to demonstrate sufficient organization and facilities’ capabilities. (Specific documentation requirements provided upon inspection request).
To be eligible for the this award, a prospective contractor must possess a MSRA as described in DFARS 217.71 Master Agreement for Repair and Alteration of Vessels (MARAV) or demonstrate organization and facilities equivalent to that reflected in a MSRA prior to contract award anticipated on or about 05 August 2016. To ensure sufficient time in evaluating a non-MSRA’s eligibility, Offerors meeting this eligibility requirement with documents and evidence outside of a MSRA are encouraged to contact the Eric Niemann, Contracting Officer, eric.c.niemann2@navy.mil and Valerie Heart Broker, Contract Specialist, valerie.k.heartbroke@navy.mil no later than 03 February 2016 to further schedule an on-site inspection. All inspections will be completed by a representative from Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Center (CNRMC) independently of this solicitation process. The on-site inspection will be used by the Offeror and the Government supplement documentation provided with the offeror’s proposal to determine MSRA equivalency. Failure to request an inspection, receive a satisfactory inspection or gain MSRA equivalency by the designated time will result in a negative determination of offeror eligibility.
The Government reserves the right to conduct a pre-award survey or to require other evidence of technical, production, managerial, financial, and similar abilities to perform prior to the award of any proposed contracts;
regardless of whether the offeror has an existing MSRA. There is no page limit associated with this documentation.
Factor 2 - Technical Capabilities: The Offeror shall provide a written description and supporting documents that outlines their plan to complete the maintenance and modernization of the vessel. Factor 2 consists of three (3) sub-factors as outlined with submission requirements listed for each sub-factor. As outlined in Section M, each of the three sub-factors will be rated independently, and then consequently those ratings combined to determine the overall Factor 2 rating.
Sub Factor 2.a – Management Capabilities:
Provide a written plan that delineates and demonstrates the ability to provide a management organization geared toward completing highly complex ship repair requirements.
Additionally, provide an organizational chart and a list of proposed personnel with their associated resumes for the following management positions at a minimum: Project Manager, Quality Manager, Contracting Manager, Hull Manager, AIT Zone Manager, two (2) General Zone Managers, Scheduler and Sub-Contracting Manager. Resumes submitted shall count against the 100 page limit for Volume II. The Resumes should demonstrate the following abilities based on their qualifications, credentials and experience (years):
o Demonstrate ability to provide engineering and design support capabilities with sufficient capability to diagnose and evaluate technical problems and issues, and to make competent technical recommendations o Demonstrate ability to provide project management expertise for the establishment of tools and processes to manage complex availabilities o Demonstrate ability to provide scheduling expertise to include estimating, progressing, and integrating complex ship repair requirements o Demonstrate ability to provide purchasing, monitoring, receiving, inspecting, segregating, issuing, determining nonconformance, and disposing of material o Demonstrate ability to manage subcontractors successfully, including successfully selecting, scheduling, managing, monitoring, and controlling
Sub-Factor 2.b – Sub-Contract Management
Provide a written description or plan that delineates or demonstrates the ability to: 1) integrate numerous sub-contractors into the project to include schedule and awareness of overall project; 2) manage the progress of each subcontractor to ensure timely completion of their work; and 3) manage performance issues.
Sub-Factor 2.c – NMD:
Provide a written description or plan to utilize the full capabilities of NMD. Briefly outline staffing plan to accomplish timely reporting within the time limits as defined in Section C.
Factor 3 – Resource Capacity: The Offeror shall provide a proposal in the form of a written description or plan that documents their understanding of what is required to successfully complete the highly complex USS GRIDLEY (DDG-101) FY 16 DSRA maintenance and modernization requirements. The proposal’s plan and written description shall provide the following information:
a. Overall Schedule Integration Plan The plan to perform the overall creating and management of the integrated production schedule as the Lead Maintenance Activity (LMA). The plan should demonstrate and show the Offeror has the capability to estimate, schedule, integrate, control, progress, certify and complete complex ship repair requirements for not only the work for the prime contractor, but also the work of the Government sponsored AIT’s, Fleet Maintenance Activity, and Ship’s Force Work.
b. High level Integrated Production Schedule
A Gantt chart showing a high level integrated production schedule for all work items (at the work item level vice activity level) based on the key events and milestones in Attachment J-3 and the Events Readiness List in Attachment J-4. There is no page limit associated with this documentation and this documentation shall not count against the Offeror’s overall 100 page count limit.
c. Detailed Integrated Schedule for Specific Controlling Items
A detailed schedule at the activity level for the following specific Work Items (WI) 123-31-001; 243-11- 002, 243-12-002, 245-11-001, and 245-12-001. The Offeror’s proposal will be evaluated using the proposed work breakdown structure and a resource loaded schedule to determine prime contractors ability to schedule and resource plan for completing several controlling work items within the requirements of the solicitation. Specific submissions requirements for the Detailed Integrated Schedule for Specific Controlling Items are as follows:
Schedule each Work Item to the activity level listing the planned start, planned completion dates, and durations for each activity. Each activity shall be displayed to reflect its relevancy to the applicable key events and milestones. Assign each activity in the Integrated Production Schedule a short title to describe the nature of the activity, system and equipment or machinery involved.
Scheduled work to support the Key Events and Milestones in Attachment J-3 and the Events Readiness List in Attachment J-4.
Develop and provide the Manpower Curves for the specific WI’s. Include individual key craft/trade/supervisor/support manpower curves showing proposed manning by craft/trade/supervisor/support throughout the work period in men per day for these work items.
The curves shall indicate that portion of the total that is subcontractor provided.
The Gantt charts shall be provided on 11 x 17 inch paper. There is no page limit associated with this documentation and this documentation shall not count against the Offeror’s overall 100 page count limit.
Factor 4 – Past Performance: The Government will evaluate the Offeror's past performance as a prime contractor.
In the investigation of an Offeror's past performance, the Government reserves the right to contact former customers and Government agencies and other private and public sources of information.
Past performance information is documented as a Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) and available in the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRSF). The Government will utilize all recent and relevant past performance reports in demonstrating their ability to perform the proposed effort. The contractor will not be required to submit these reports as they are available in the database already.
All offerors (including small business offerors) are requested to address historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-8 (Utilization of Small Business Concerns) in a separate narrative not to exceed one page. In addition, large businesses are requested to address historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219- 9 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan) and DFARS 252.219-7003 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan (DOD CONTRACTS)) in a separate narrative not to exceed one page.
(End of Summary of Changes)
The following items are applicable to this modification:
AMENDMENT 0009
PPI-082
Question:
Regarding work item 593-11-001 of Attachment J-1:
Contractor notes that PPI-016 and PPI-019 provided on a recent solicitation modification state to perform Operational Testing of the equipment listed in 1.3.1, 1.3.3 and 1.3.4 using Test memos 59312-3-010A and 59312-3-
005. This will require testing prior to docking the vessel.
Contractor requests clarification: With regards to these Pre Op-tests; will there be a designated time/date/ place for this to be accomplished before the ship goes in to dry dock? If so, please provide location and dates to accomplish prior to docking.
Answer:
The Prime Contractor will be responsible for the Test and Inspection Plan and scheduling of operational tests of equipment.
PPI-083
Question:
Work Item 980-11-001 of Attachment J-1 is not biddable as written. Contractor requests clarification on intent of what to propose on this work item, outside of the RTR listed in 3.1:
The entire item presents an “unknown” scenario to the availability, and is not specific to what crafts or support is requested to propose the base work item. Additionally, is the intention of paragraph 3.2 to provide a CFR to the SUPERVISOR via NMD during execution prior to the Ship’s LOA, defining the support and material required for SUPERVISOR approval and authorization?
Answer Clarification: Purpose of Work Item is for Contractor to assist in propulsion plant light off discrepancies in various trades to the extent of 200 man-hours of labor and 2,500 dollars of material.
Work Item Para 3.2 will be removed and 3.2.1 will be moved to NOTES in the Eratta.
PPI-084
Question:
Work Item 264-90-001 of Attachment J-1, LAR 85973/DDG77/1150121, on sheet 2, (Ref A), Item F0007 2 each, states Retrofit Kit. Contractor contacted the POC on the work item, and the POC was unable to provide this information as to what the Retrofit Kit consists of. It is believed to be 2 each elements, and 4 each new circuit cards, but cannot be confirmed.
Contractor requests additional information for preparation of bid: What is included in the kit listed in 5.3 of the work spec as noted above?
Answer:
Reference 2.2 Drawing 262-8659731A lists F0027 as Retro Fit Kit for Mod Heating Element Bundle Insert LO Purifier Heater.
GN 32 lists NSWCCD-Philadelphia POC for all questions regarding this Ship Alteration.
GN 31 of 2.2 lists NAVSESS as the responsible activity for providing the Kit # 810-195698: 4EA Non-ESS SCR Circuit Boards Preset 4-20 Ma. CCA’s will be issued when received from NAVSESS.
PPI-085
Question:
Work Item 980-90-008 of Attachment J-1, paragraph 3.3.3 tasks the contractor to accomplish PT Inspections IAW Line 13 on P-1 system piping as defined in 3.3, as well as Line 11, which is Radiographic Testing.
Contractor requests clarification: Historically, accomplishing RT on P-1 systems was a MIC level 1 requirement for steam and nuclear vessels. That said, previous availabilities accomplishing repairs and modifications to these systems on previous DDG51 class ships, work item certification was sufficient IAW Tech Pubs 271, 278 and 2035 to accomplish 5x VTs for root pass, and PT inspections for final, no RT required. If there is no engineering guidance requiring this task, contractor recommends removing Line 11 from the specification.
Additionally, this would result in huge costs savings to the government as well as limit the amount of scheduling and time required to accomplish RT inspections in excess of 160 P-1 piping joints.
Answer:
ERRATA will delete Paragraph 3.3.3 and add subparagraphs to 3.3.2.1 (Line 11 for HOPM) and 3.3.2.2 (Line 13) for Non-Destructive Testing Requirements for P-1 Piping. NSI 009-12 Table One, Column A, Line 11 will apply to weld joints of Hydraulic Piping with a design pressure that exceeds 600 PSI. Ref: S9074-AR-GIB-010/278
PARAGRAPH 10
PPI-086
Pages 3 through 5 of 5 (ATTACHMENT A) contain tables of information by compartment number.
Each row of information contains a series of columns that are either blank, contain the word “YES”, or “ALO”.
Please advise what the column titles are for each of the columns.
Answer:
As an integral part of the Work Item: Attachment “A” does not display the header title of each column. When attachment is opened from NMDr and printed, the column headers display and will print out. Attachment “A” has been added to Section J attachments/J-2 references/Misc References Folders/813-11-001 DDG101_ALO_CRS for contractor review.
PPI-087
Screening work for ILS/PTD requirements is not typically required under Firm Fixed Price contracts.
Submission of technical manuals and user guides provided with newly procured contractor furnished material, nameplate data and calibration documentation for new or repaired/disturbed gages, thermometers, meters, and switches is required by work item and/or standard item requirements.
Is work item 897-10-001 applicable to this solicitation?
Answer:
Work Item 897-10-001 applies to this solicitation.
PPI-088
Question:
Work Item 980-90-004 paragraph 3.4 requires an air test for each compartment listed in paragraph 1.2.
Is the air test requirement limited to an initial air test of each compartment prior to start of repairs in accordance with paragraph 3.1 of 009-25? If not, please identify how many compartment air tests are required for each compartment listed.
Answer:
ERRATA change will correct work item Paragraph 3.4, NSI 009-25 will be deleted from Paragraph 3.4 and changed to accomplish the requirements of Test Note T1 of 2.2 for local air hose test of new or disturbed cable penetrations.
PPI-089
Question:
Work Item 980-90-007 paragraph 3.9 requires 400 square feet of area.
A typical 8 foot by 40 foot storage container is 320 square feet.
Will an 8 foot by 40 foot container be sufficient for this requirement?
Answer:
An 8 FT x 40 FT storage container is sufficient for this requirement. Work Item will be changed by ERRATA.
PPI-090
Question:
Contractor has found files identified as J-5.1, J-5.2, J-5.3, J-5.4, and J-5.5 as identified in response to question PPI- 013 included in Amendment 0003.
File J-5.1 is Reference 2.2, 262-8670352 Rev A as listed in the work item.
File J-5.2 is drawing 235-8670351 Rev A which is not listed in work item Paragraph 2 references.
File J-5.3 is drawing 235-8670350 Rev A which is not listed in work item Paragraph 2 references.
File J-5.4 is drawing 182-8670349 Rev A which is not listed in work item Paragraph 2 references.
File J-5.5 is drawing 512-8670077 Rev A which is not listed in work item Paragraph 2 references.
Reference 2.5, 182-8670349 Rev A and LAR 82710/DDG106/1155534 cannot be found in the information provided.
Reference 2.6, S9324-GY-MMA-010 Rev 5 cannot be found in the information provided.
Please provide reference 2.5 (including LAR 82710/DDG106/1155534) and reference 2.6 as listed in the work item.
Answer:
Reference 2.5 and LAR 82710/DDG106/1155534 are located in folder: Section J Attachments (FINAL)\J-2 References\Drawings\ShipAlt 82710K Hybrid Electric Drive - SIDs for DDG 106.
Reference 2.6 is located in folder Section J Attachments (FINAL)\J-2 References\Tech Manuals
PPI-091
Question:
Work Item 721-31-001 of Attachment J-1, requires a chelate flush of the VLS system. Historically in the past due to cost and additional vendor issues, there was a flushing kit that was provided as GFM.
For preparation of bid, contractor wishes to confirm the intent, and whether or not it is the intent of the SUPERVISOR to provide this kit as GFM.
Answer:
The Chelate Flushing Equipment is no longer maintained by the Government and is not available as GFM/GFE.
PPI-092
Question:
For Hotwork Operations (Including Prime Contractor as well as subcontractors accomplishing hotwork) at Vigor SY, Seattle, WA will a Seattle Fire Dept Temporary Marine Hotwork Permit be required to perform Hotwork on the USS Gridley?
Answer:
Seattle Fire Department (SFD) Administrative Rule 26.01.14 references will be added to the solicitation as J-19.
- Excerpt from Paragraph 1.1 General:
Marine hot work permits are either temporary permits issued to contractors or individuals or annual permits issued to a facility. It is worth noting that facilities holding annual permits have the option of requiring outside contractors to obtain temporary permits.
Marine hot work permits are only issued for jobs occurring at approved locations that have been issued a designated marine hot work facility permit in accordance with Seattle Fire Department Administrative Rule 26.02.14.
PPI-093
Question:
The following PPI answers did not identify which work item the question was generated from.
Please identify work items for the following PPI’s: 10, 016, 017, 018, 019, 022, 024, 034, 036, 037 & 044
Answer:
PPI-010 WI 168-80-001 – answered on amendment N4523A-16-R-0003-0003 PPI-016 WI 593-11-001 – answered on amendment N4523A-16-R-0003-0003 PPI-017 WI 593-11-001 – answered on amendment N4523A-16-R-0003-0003 PPI-018 WI 593-11-001 – answered on amendment N4523A-16-R-0003-0003 PPI-019 WI 593-11-001 – answered on amendment N4523A-16-R-0003-0003 PPI-022 WI 259-11-003 – answered on amendment N4523A-16-R-0003-0003 PPI-024 WI 259-11-003 – answered on amendment N4523A-16-R-0003-0003 PPI-034 WI 150-11-001 – answered on amendment N4523A-16-R-0003-0004 PPI-036 WI 514-11-001 – answered on amendment N4523A-16-R-0003-0006 PPI-037 WI 168-80-001 – answered on amendment N4523A-16-R-0003-0006 PPI-044 WI 150-10-001 – answered on amendment N4523A-16-R-0003-0007
PPI-094
Question:
Work Item 980-90-008 of Attachment J-1, Errata One, contains a reference that was not included in the work package provided from the SUPERVISOR.
Reference 2.7: S9324-GY-MMA-010 Rev 5, 60Hz Switchboards, Load Centers, and 400 Hz Switchboards
Request SUPERVISOR provide reference.
Answer:
This question was answered in Amendment 3 under PPI-013. N4523A-16-R-0003-0003
PPI-095
Question:
Revised work item 813-11-001 added the referenced paragraph stating “Attachment "A" with column titles, header and footer comments available from the SUPERVISOR.” Instead of correcting the attachment in the specification.
Please provide corrected attachment “A”
Answer:
This question was answered in Amendment 7 under PPI-047. N4523A-16-R-0003-0007.
PPI-096
Question:
WI 992-31-002
It was asked if one analytical would be sufficient for disposal at the Naval Station and the reply was that one analytical will be required for each tank filled on the pier for OFF-SITE disposal.
Please confirm that each tank will require testing and that if analytical fails, then an RCC will be issued for off-site disposal.
Answer:
Each tank requires analytical testing prior to transferring oily waste to the Naval Station. The results of each test are submitted to Naval Station Environmental via the SUPERVISOR for adjudication of where to dispose of the oily waste; the Naval Station Oily Waste Treatment Facility or Off-Site Disposal. Off Site Disposal will be the subject of an RCC only when authorized by the Contracting Officer.
PPI-097
Question:
WI 992-31-001
Para 3.1.1 advises that the spaces 1.2.1 through 1.2.9 are to be maintained clean and dry for the duration.
Is it anticipated that this will be required beginning 9/12/2016 at the NAVSTA or once the vessel arrives at the Contractor's facility?
Para 3.1.6 and 3.1.7 advise to pump existing liquids and then another 30,000 gallons AFTER the initial cleaning.
For bidding purposes, may Contractor assume that bilge liquids will be below the level of the bilge well eductor regardless of where the work will be accomplished?
The reason for this assumption is that the last location of the ship before being towed in a dead ship status will be at the Naval Station where the ship can transfer oily water.
Answer:
The requirements of this work item state:
3.1 Clean, render dry, and maintain "Safe for Entry/Safe for Hot Work", each bilge for each space listed in 1.2.1.1 through 1.2.1.9 as certified for the duration of the availability.
3.1.1 Maintain each bilge to a clean, dry condition for the duration of the availability on a 7-day-a-week, 24-hour-a-day basis.
PPI-098
Errata #1 added the reference “ 4720 DDG101 FY16-A11”
Could you please provide this reference.
4720 DDG101 FY16-A11 is located in the J-2 References\Drawings folder of the solicitation.
PPI-099
Question:
Work Item 980-90-008 of Attachment J-1, Errata One, the AIT team is scheduled to accomplish the mounting of the HED unit, will the AIT team also accomplish the drilling and machining of piece 384 of assembly 9 on reference 2.5?
Request SUPERVISOR provide clarification for scoping purposes.
Answer:
The AIT will accomplish the drilling and machining of piece 384 of assembly 9 on reference 2.5.
PPI-100
Question:
WI 259-11-002
Paragraph 3.4 and 3.4.1 state to perform nondestructive testing IAW 009-12, including Table one, Column A, Lines 1-10 and also 13 for DPT. Gas Turbine Exhaust Collectors are not pipes but are classified as Machinery Class M.
Contractor recommends revision to the Work Item; Par. 3.4 and 3.4.1 changing Column A to Column F (Machinery Class M) to align with the correct designation for Gas Turbine Exhaust Collectors.
Answer:
Government does not concur with contractor recommendation.
Machinery Class M inspection criteria does not address the design temperature criteria of the Gas Turbine Exhaust Collectors.
PPI-101
Question:
WI 259-11-003
In accordance with work item 259-11-003 of J-1, Errata one, Paragraph 3.4 and 3.4.1 state to perform nondestructive testing IAW 009-12, including Table one, Column A, Lines 1-10 and also 13 for DPT. Gas Turbine Exhaust Collectors are not pipes but are classified as Machinery Class M.
Contractor recommends revision to the Work Item; Par. 3.4 and 3.4.1 changing Column A to Column F (Machinery Class M) to align with the correct designation for Gas Turbine Exhaust Collectors.
Answer:
Government does not concur with contractor recommendation.
Machinery Class M inspection criteria does not address the design temperature criteria of the Gas Turbine Exhaust Collectors.
PPI-102
Question:
As discussed in Amendment 8 issued 3/2/2016, with regard to responses to additional PPIs contained therein, there are additional changes that have not been captured in ERRATA One, which is inclusive of drawing revisions and modifications to various work items within the J-1 package. Based on this discussion, along with additional unanswered PPIs, as well as verification review to the correct drawings, including subcontractor quotes, the contractor requests that the due date for this proposal be extended from March 23, 2016, to April 20, 2016.
Government shall extend proposal due date to 6 April 2016.
PPI-103
Question:
Since the issuing of Amendment 003 on 2/10/16 through Amendment 007 issued on 2/24/16 there have been 19 questions that were answered with an Errata revision forthcoming. Contractor has not received any Errata as of this writing.
The following is a list of pending Errata. PPI answers 4,13,16,17,18,19,21,27,32,35,36,38,41,44,46,47,50,51,54.
Additionally, contractor is assembling facility pricing for submission to other contractors. The additional time requested below is required for us to finish assembling all costs associated for this, submit our pricing to others and for them to incorporate into their proposals.
Because of the previous stated, contractor requests the following:
Bid due date be revised from March 23th to April 6th.
This will allow contractors time to distribute Errata to subcontractors, give subcontractors time to supply accurate pricing to the contractors and allow contractors time to assemble their best proposal for the Government.
Answer:
Government shall extend proposal due date to 6 April 2016
Amendment N4523A-16-R-0003-0008 had J-1 Work Package ERRATA 1 that updated the following PPI’s PPI-004, PPI-013, PPI-016, PPI-017, PPI-018, PPI-019, PPI-021, PPI-027, PPI-032, PPI-035, PPI-036, PPI-038, PPI-041, PPI-
044, PPI-046, & PPI-047.
J-1 Work Package – ADDENDUM 1 – ERRATA 2 will update the following PPIs’ PPI-050, PPI-051, PPI-054, PPI-056, PPI-057, PPI-058, PPI-059, PPI-060, PPI-061, PPI-062, PPI-065, PPI-066, PPI-069, PPI-
070, PPI-072, PPI-073, PPI-074, PPI-075, PPI-077, PPI-083, PPI-085, & PPI-089.
PPI-104
Question:
For specification 980-90-008, of attachment J-1 Errata One, reference 2.5, Dwg 182-8670349 sheet 59 assembly A009 addresses the materials for the manufacture of the foundation supporting the HED itself, specifically the material listed for A384 quantity of “1 SF” of 2.5 inch Plate MIL-S-22698. Dimensionally this does not coincide with the requirements denoted in detail 36-7B on Sheet 36. Upon review of the remaining balance of the materials listing it was found that this size plate was not listed in any other line, in any quantity, let alone the 21 square feet (min requirement).
Contractor requests clarification on subject discrepancy from the SUPESRVISOR.
Answer:
Government concurs with contractors noted discrepancy. The Planning Yard will be notified regarding the material quantity discrepancy in DDG 106 SID’s.
For DDG 101 planning purposes - Assembly 009 HED Motor Foundation will be issued as Kitted Material -prefabricated for installation.
PPI-105
Question:
Vigor Marine respectfully requests an extension to the current due date and time for proposals of March 23, 2016 to April 6th, 2016.
This will allow the Government time to respond to the clarifications, Contractors to supply the clarifications to subcontractors and vendors who will incorporate into their proposals, contractors to evaluate Subs/Vendors quotes when received, incorporate their pricing into Contractor's estimates and evaluate/assemble entire proposal for submittal.
Additionally, contractor is assembling facility pricing for submission to other contractors. The additional time requested is required for us to finish assembling all costs associated for this, submit our pricing to others and for them to incorporate into their proposals.
Answer:
Question previously answered; PPI-103. Government shall extend proposal due date to 6 April 2016.
PPI-106
Question:
WI 992-11-009
Please provide details of Optional Waterborne Barrier Barge required by this work item.
Answer:
A standard Deck Barge is sufficient for the Waterborne Barrier Barge requirement. Barge is to serve as a vessel exclusion area / barrier for physical security requirements depending on the Force Protection Condition in effect in accordance with NSI 009-72 and Work Item 992-11-008.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .