N4523A-16-R-0003-0008_GRIDLEY.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

This amendment is being issued to answ er Pre-Proposal Inquiries, Section L and Section J.

Section L:

Pre-Proposal Information due date: changed from 03 March 2016 change to 10 March 2016

Section J:

J-1 Work Package

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 17

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 02-Mar-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4523A-16-R-0003

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

20-Jan-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

02-Mar-2016

CODE

PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYARD CODE 400

2000 WEST MARINE VIEW DR CODE 440

EVERETT WA 98207-2400

N4523A 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4523A-16-R-0003

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

AMENDMENT 0008

PPI-056

Question:

Work Item 593-11-001 of Attachment J-1 has many clerical errors in the work specification:

3.1 directs contractor to accomplish operational test of TLI system for equipment listed in 1.3 and located in 1.2 using 2.2 for guidance.

The equipment listed in 1.3 includes manhole covers, brackets, pipe bends, couplings, flanges, and anodes.

Contractor requests clarification. If the intent is to accomplish preservation of each tank listed in 1.3.1, and 1.3.3 and 1.3.4, contractor recommends modifying the work item to correspond with the correct intent.

Answer:

SUPERVISOR concurs with contractor recommendation. Work item will be changed with ERRATA.

PPI-057

Question:

Work Item 593-11-001 of Attachment J-1 has many clerical errors in the work specification:

Paragraph 3.4 directs the contractor to accomplish the requirements of 009-32 of 2.1, including Table 4, Line 11, Columns A and B, for the interior surface of the locations listed in 1.3.

There are no locations listed in 1.3, only equipment.

Contractor requests additional clarification: Is it the intent to accomplish the requirements of 009-32 of 2.1, including Table 4, Line 11, Columns A and B, for the interior surfaces of each Tank listed in 1.3.1, 1.3.3, and 1.3.4?

If so, contractor recommends modifying work item 593-11-001, paragraph 3.4 to correspond to the intended scope of work appropriately.

Answer Paragraph 3.4 will be changed with ERRATA.

PPI-058

Question:

Work Item 593-11-001 of Attachment J-1 has many clerical errors in the work specification:

Paragraph 3.6 tasks the contractor to remove, disassemble, clean and inspect each flushing nozzle for the locations listed in 1.3, using paragraphs 6-4 and 6.2.4, Paragraph 6-5.20 through 6-5.20.4 and Figure 6-17 of 2.2 and 2.5 for guidance.

There are no locations listed in 1.3, only equipment.

Contractor requests additional clarification: Is it the intent to accomplish this task for each tank listed in 1.3.1, 1.3.3, and 1.3.4?

Answer:

Paragraph 3.6 will be changed with ERRATA.

PPI-059

Question:

Work Item 593-11-001 of Attachment J-1 has many clerical errors in the work specification:

Paragraph 3.7 tasks the contractor to assemble each flushing nozzle removed in 3.5, using paragraph 6-5.20.5 of 2.2 and 2.3 for guidance.

Paragraph 3.5 accomplishes a visual inspection of the locations listed in 1.3, and does not task the contractor to remove nozzles.

Contractor requests clarification: Was this paragraph intended to read “Assemble each flushing nozzle removed in 3.6, using paragraph 6-5.20.5 of 2.2, and 2.3 for guidance?

Answer:

Paragraph 3.7 will be changed with ERRATA

PPI-060

Question:

Work Item 593-11-001 of Attachment J-1 has many clerical errors in the work specification:

Paragraph 3.8 tasks the contractor to remove existing and install new, the equipment listed in 1.3.4 and 1.3.5, located in 1.2, including studs and fasteners, using 2.2, 2.5, and 2.6 for guidance.

Contractor requests clarification: Is it the government’s intention to replace the equipment listed in 1.3.4 ( Quantity (One EA), Plumbing Drain Tank, Number 2, Capacity: 400 gallons?), or just the equipment listed in 1.3.5 (Zinc Anodes)?

Answer:

Paragraph 3.8 will be changed with ERRATA.

PPI-061

Question:

Work Item 593-11-001 of Attachment J-1 has many clerical errors in the work specification:

Paragraph 3.9 tasks the contractor to accomplish the requirements of 009-32 of 2.1, including Table 4, Line 12, Column C, for preservation of the interior surfaces prepared in 3.3, including interior surfaces of access covers and piping.

Contractor requests clarification: Paragraph 3.3 accomplished this task for exterior surfaces, not interior surfaces.

Interior surfaces are addressed in paragraph 3.4, assuming the intent of interior surfaces was only to capture the equipment listed in 1.3.1, 1.3.3, and 1.3.4. Additionally, Contractor does not recommend applying a single coat system (or any paint) of 20-30 mils DFT to the inside of any piping associated with this work.

Answer:

Paragraph 3.9 will be changed with ERRATA.

PPI-062

Question:

Work Item 593-11-001 of Attachment J-1 has many clerical errors in the work specification:

Paragraph 3.10 directs the contractor to install each flushing nozzle removed in 3.5, using Paragraph 6-5.20.6 and Figure 7-13 of 2.2, and 2.5 for guidance.

Paragraph 3.5 accomplishes a visual inspection for structural integrity, deterioration, pitting, cracks, and areas of damage or distortion. There are no activities written into 3.5 that would have removed any nozzles.

Contractor requests clarification: Contractor suspects clerical error, and that the work item should address paragraph

3.6 as the vehicle which would remove the nozzles, vice 3.5.

Answer:

Paragraph 3.10 will be changed with ERRATA.

PPI-063

Question:

Paragraph 3.5.4.1 States to remove existing scupper drain valves, using 2.12 for guidance. This is to support cleaning of the drain piping in the troughs. Since the ship is in Drydock during the cleaning and during the freedom of flow after preservation, there is no requirement to catch the water, as it can flow into the Drydock and be processed with the rain and hydroblast water and the valves due not prevent the cleaning contractor from cleaning out the piping. This then alleviates the need for valve removal.

Contractor recommends revision to the Work Item; to include removal of Paragraphs 3.5.4.1, 3.5.4.2, 3.5.4.3, 3.5.4.4, 3.5.5 and 3.6.4.6 as they are not needed to perform cleaning to trough piping or prove freedom of flow after preservation.

Answer:

The SUPERVISOR does not concur. The requirements of Work Item 588-21-001 are to be accomplished as invoked.

PPI-064

Question:

Work item 123-17-002 Paragraph 3.4 of attachment J-1 states to Remove existing and install new, bracket, clamps and bushings, for the equipment listed in 1.3.1 at location listed in 1.2.2, in accordance with 2.2.

Ref 2.2 SN572-AH-MMA-010, Technical Manual for Tank Level Indicators

Problem: There is no reference or identification in the Tech Manual for TLI brackets, clamps, or bushings.

Contractor requests clarification from the SUPERVISOR.

Answer:

Clarification:

Ref 2.2 SN572-AH-MMA-010, Technical Manual for Tank Level Indicators Table 1-4. Equipment Required, But Not Supplied Figure 7-30 Transmitter, Bottom, Bracket Mtd, XM-79660 Figure 8-1 Typical Transmitter Installation references Transmitter Type XM-79660 and GEMS Part No.

PPI-065

Question:

Work Item 631-11-001 of Attachment J-1 lists a reference that is not applicable to the DDG101 Hull, reference 2.2 – 622-7058592 Revision B, Floor Plates, Gratings & Handrails – Air Cond Mchry & Pump Rm Fab & Instal

The material list does not contain information on this Hull, and the Drawing is not in DDG101 Standard Drawing Index (SDI).

Contractor research revealed that the suspected drawing applicable to this hull is 622-6221274 IAW the DDG101

SDI.

Contractor requests concurrence from the SUPERVISOR on this discovery. If the SUPERVISOR concurs, recommend incorporating the correct drawing into work item 631-11-001 of Attachment J-1.

Answer:

GOV concurs, DDG101 Hull, reference 2.2 – 622-7058592 Revision B, Floor Plates, Gratings & Handrails – Air Cond Mchry & Pump Rm Fab & Instal is not the correct reference for this work space.

The following recommended drawing by the contractor 622-6221274 IAW the DDG101 SDI is not correct.

The correct DDG101 Hull, reference 2.2 is 622-6219164 Rev U, Floor Plates, Gratings & Handrails – Air Cond Mchry & Pump Rm Fab & Instal

Change will be incorporated during next ERRATA

PPI-066

Question:

Work Item 534-11-001 of Attachment J-1 lists an Ingalls reference that is questionably applicable to the DDG101 Hull; reference 2.3, 534-7058561 Revision E, Waste & Oily Waste Water Piping System Diagram.

The Drawing is not in DDG101 Standard Drawing Index (SDI). It is in the DDG86 SDI, which is an Ingalls ship.

Contractor research revealed that the suspected drawing applicable to this hull is 534-6567443 IAW the DDG101

SDI.

Contractor requests concurrence from the SUPERVISOR on this discovery. If the SUPERVISOR concurs, recommend incorporating the correct drawing into work item 534-11-001 of Attachment J-1.

Answer:

Government concurs with KTR, work specification will be correct to reflect correct reference during next ERRATA update. Drawing 534-6567443 DDG101 SDI.

PPI-067

Question:

Work Item 110-11-002 accomplishes UT thickness readings in 500 locations of bilge area, deck, tank tops, shell plate, and support structure as designated by the SUPERVISOR. Assuming this is to accomplish inspections of the interior shell or hull of the ship, this assumes several areas will be impacted by this work as defined in 1.2.1.

Contractor requests clarification on the following standard items not struck out in J-1 of the work package, for applicability and bidding purposes:

1) NSI 009-06 paragraph 3.6 cannot be scoped appropriately for the same reason as listed above, therefore contractor recommends accomplishing this task under the individual production items as validation of completion of work will be addressed via the number shots accomplished as designated by the SUPERVISOR, will 009-06 paragraph 3.6 be addressed via RCC in the event that the UT reading areas cannot be consumed in within locations that will be able to be repaired by other preservation items in the work package. Additionally,

2) NSI 009-81 for Compartment Closeout cannot be scoped for the same reason.

Contractor recommends either of the following:

1- Issue modification to J-1 package, work item 110-11-002 to define the specific spaces to be accomplished for Scoping (IE to be accomplished in conjunction with locations as defined in bilge preservation items), and Quality Assurance purposes, or

2- Recommend SUPERVISOR provide concurrence that 009-06 Paragraph 3.6 and the requirements of 009-81 not be addressed for this individual work item. All other requirements would still stand (IE Containment(s), containment checks etc, as applicable).

The purpose of WI 110-11-002 is to provide 500 UT locations to be used throughout the DSRA at the Supervisors discretion. The quantity of UT locations is to remain as a standalone WI.

009-06 Paragraph 3.6 and the requirements of 009-81 do not apply to this WI

PPI-068

3.1 of work item 551-53-001 of attachment J-1 tasks the contractor to Accomplish the requirements of 009-90 of 2.1, and

3.1.1 Provide the services of a RIX Industries qualified on-site technical representative to provide assistance, special tooling, parts, material and guidance to accomplish repairs for equipment listed in 1.3.1, located in 1.2.1, using 2.2 and 2.3 for guidance.

Dresser Rand is a qualified OEM representative for this equipment in accordance with NAVSEA instructions.

NAVSEA letter attached for reference.

Problem: Contractor recommends modifying specification to delete “RIX industries,” based on NAVSEA references provided.

Answer:

Government does not concur with contractor recommendations, Work Specification will remain as currently written for RIX Industries.

PPI-069

Question:

Work Item 113-11-001 of Attachment J-1 lists a reference that is not applicable to the DDG101 Hull, reference 2.3 - 611-6595936 Revision U, Fab of Misc DK FTG-Zone 3.

The Drawing is not in DDG101 Standard Drawing Index (SDI), and is an Ingalls Drawing.

Contractor research revealed that the suspected drawing applicable to this hull is 611-6221132 IAW the DDG101

SDI.

Contractor requests concurrence from the SUPERVISOR on this discovery. If the SUPERVISOR concurs, recommend incorporating the correct drawing into work item 113-11-001 of Attachment J-1.

Answer:

Government concurs; Reference 2.3 will be changed with ERRATA.

PPI-070

Question:

Attachment J-3, Execution Milestones, advises that the ship will be defueled A+9 and comp water will be removed A+17.

Para 3.4 of this item advises that the tanks in groups 3 through 6 and the service tanks will be emptied at Naval Station Everett.

Please clarify as to the dates and ship's location that these eighteen (18) tanks will be emptied.

Para 3.5 advises that the tanks listed in 1.2.19 through 1.2.29 (groups 1 & 2) will be emptied at Contractor's facility.

Is it the government's intention that the FWD bank remain full while putting the ship on dock and that this is the comp water to be removed on A+17?

If not and the intent is to empty the FWD tanks prior to docking, what is the source of the Comp Water removed on A+17?

Para 4.6 advises that the liquid in 3.5.1 (105,537 gallons) is expected to be 95% fuel. For bidding purposes, may contractor assume fuel quantity to be 100,260 gallons and comp water to be 5,277 gallons?

Para 3.4.1 estimates the total quantity of fuel and comp water removed at Everett Naval Station to be 329,469 gallons.

For bidding purposes, may contractor assume the same 95% expectation for 312,995 gallons of fuel and 16,474 gallons of comp water?

If not, please advise percentages to be expected. Please note that even though the contractor will not have disposal costs at the Naval Station, the comp water will have to be handled twice.

At a substantial savings to the government, may contractor utilize pier-side holding tanks vice a barge to contain comp water removed at the Naval Station?

Attachment "A" provides direction for the required process for disposing of the water at the Naval Station.

Will one (1) analysis of the established waste stream be sufficient?

Answer:

Para 3.4 Clarification: Removal of Fuel and Compensating water (18) Tanks will commence 12SEPT16 at Naval Station Everett.

Para 3.5 Clarifications: Correct. It is the government’s intention that the FWD banks remain full while putting ship on the dock and defueled once on the dock. Tanks will contain both fuel and compensating water.

Para 4.6 Clarifications: Correct. Fuel Percentage is estimated to be 95%.

Para 3.4.1 Do not assume Liquid Load to be 95% fuel 5% compensating water. Government expects contractor to use cost effective method for removal of compensating water. Government expects equitable adjustment through

RCC.

Attachment A Clarification: Analytical’s are required for each individual tank filled on the pier prior to offsite removal.

PPI-071

Question:

In response to Amendment 7 of the solicitation issued on 2-25-2016 identifying PPI-51:

Please clarify the following:

Will the fuel removed at the contractor’s facility be accepted via truck at Manchester?

If the contractor opts to use a barge will the barge be able to deliver at Manchester?

If the Contractor’s Barge is allowed to deliver to Manchester, will the fuel be offloaded by Manchester personnel or will the Contractor need to provide offloading services?

Answer:

Fuel removed at contractor’s facility will be executed by fuel barge provide by Manchester fuel depot.

Para 3.5 Provide pumps, equipment and personnel to supplement Ship’s Force efforts in transferring fuel from the tanks listed in 1.2.19 through 1.2.29 at the Contractors Facility. Manchester will provide offloading services.

PPI-072

Question:

Work Item 259-11-003 of Attachment J-1 lists an Ingalls reference that is questionably applicable to the DDG101 Hull; reference 2.3, 259-7060867 Revision B, Fab & Install of GTRB Uptake Eng Rm No.2 & Above.

The Drawing is not in DDG101 Standard Drawing Index (SDI). It is in the DDG86 SDI, which is an Ingalls ship.

Contractor research revealed that the suspected drawing applicable to this hull is 259-6218424 IAW the DDG101

SDI.

Contractor requests concurrence from the SUPERVISOR on this discovery. If the SUPERVISOR concurs, recommend incorporating the correct drawing into work item 259-11-003 of Attachment J-1.

Answer:

Reference 2.3 will be changed with ERRATA

PPI-073

Question:

Work Item 259-11-002 of Attachment J-1 lists an Ingalls reference that is questionably applicable to the DDG101 Hull; reference 2.3, 259-7060868 Revision B, Fab & Install of GTRB Uptake Eng Rm No.1 & Above.

The Drawing is not in DDG101 Standard Drawing Index (SDI).

Contractor research revealed that the suspected drawing applicable to this hull is 259-6218406 IAW the DDG101

SDI.

Contractor requests concurrence from the SUPERVISOR on this discovery. If the SUPERVISOR concurs, recommend incorporating the correct drawing into work item 259-11-002 of Attachment J-1Question:

Answer:

Reference 2.3 will be changed with ERRATA

PPI-074

Question:

Work Item 113-11-001 of Attachment J-1 lists a reference that is not applicable to the DDG101 Hull, reference 2.2 - 611-6595935 Revision W, Fab of Misc DK FTG-Zone 2.

The Drawing is not in DDG101 Standard Drawing Index (SDI), and is an Ingalls Drawing.

Contractor research revealed that the suspected drawing applicable to this hull is 611-6221131 IAW the DDG101

SDI.

Contractor requests concurrence from the SUPERVISOR on this discovery. If the SUPERVISOR concurs, recommend incorporating the correct drawing into work item 113-11-001 of Attachment J-1.

Answer:

Government concurs; Reference 2.2 will be changed with ERRATA.

PPI-075

Question:

Work item 520-11-001 Paragraph 5.1 of attachment J-1 incorporates 85 valves as GFM. Attachment A of 520-11- 001 incorporates 84 valves.

Contractor requests clarification on the subject discrepancy from the SUPERVISOR.

Answer:

Government Technical Authority misidentified 2 groups of valves; government ordered one extra to make up for the error. Change will be made in Attachment A during next ERRATA.

PPI-076

Question:

Work item 520-11-001 Paragraph 5.1 of attachment J-1 and Attachment A of 520-11-001 have several NSN discrepancies as currently listed:

1) Item 10 of 5.1 identifies 1 EA Gate Valve, 1.50IPS, 400 PSI, NSN 4820-01-550-2954. Attachment A identifies this Valve (APL 882047489) as NSN 4820-00-482-8905.

Contractor requests clarification from the SUPERVISOR as to which item is correct for PTD purposes.

Manufactures part number is the same for both NSN’s and references the APL. No changes will be made to the work specification.

PPI-077

Question:

1) Item 19 of 5.1 lists 7 EA Gate Valves, 2.5IPS, 250 PSI, NSN 4820-01-431-2508. In Attachment A, there are only 6 with APL 883041552. Process of elimination determined Item 16 to be the 7th. Additionally, The APL listed is Item 16 in Table 5.1, APL 883041552, which is NSN 4820-01-431-2508 which is the 2 ½” valve listed as Item 19 in Table 5.1.

Government Technical Authority misidentified 2 groups of valves; government ordered one extra to make up for the error. Change will be made in Attachment A during next ERRATA.

PPI-078

Question:

1) Items 21 and 22 of Table 5.1 both list 1 EA Gate Valve, 8.00IPS/250PSI, Item 21 as NSN 4820-01-461- 6621, and Item 22 as NSN 4820-01-172-8985. Attachment A provides both of these valves as Items 37 and 38, both with APL 883041742, which translates to NSN 4820-01-461-6621.

Both NSN’s are associated with the same APL, no change will be made to this work specification.

PPI-079

Question:

1) Item 27 in 5.1 lists 2 EA Scupper Valves, 2.00IPS/150PSI, NSN 5820-01-397-2216. This translates to the APL being listed for item 80 in Attachment A, to being item 27 in Table 5.1. APL 882120157 has no NSN, but was the only 2 inch scupper valve left on the list.

Government is unclear of KTR request, APL 882120157 does not have a direct associated NSN but contains manufacturers information. Paragraph 5.1 and Attachment A have been reviewed and approved by Government technical authority, no changes to work specification will be made.

PPI-080

1) Item 11 of 5.1 identifies 1 Globe Valve, 1.50IPS, 250 PSI, NSN 4820-00-585-7567. Item 16 on Attachment A (FM-V-86)- the first 6 columns are for item 19 in table 5.a. APL 882051262 is NSN 4820- 00-585-7567 which is the 1/12” valve listed in item 11 in 5.1.

Item 11 of 5.1 identifies 11 EA, Item 16 of Attachment A identifies valve number FM-V-83. Government does not understand KTR question. Question #68 and 63 possibly relate. Request KTR clarify question. The work item does not contain a Table 5.a; and there are no 1/12” valves.

PPI-081

Question:

Since the issuing of Amendment 003 on 2/10/16 through Amendment 007 issued on 2/24/16 there have been 19 questions that were answered with an Errata revision forthcoming. Contractor has not received any Erratas as of this writing.

The following is a list of pending Errata. PPI answers 4,13,16,17,18,19,21,27,32,35,36,38,41,44,46,47,50,51,54.

Historically on Government firm fixed contracts the PPI cutoff date is 10 to 14 days before bid due date. In conjunction with PPI 005, contractor would like to request the following:

Question cut-off date to be revised from March 3rd to March 23rd

Government will extend close out date for PPI’s to 10 March 2016.

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

DOCUMENTS/EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS

The following document(s) exhibits, and other attachment(s) form a part of this solicitation and will form a part of the contract resulting from this solicitation.:

Attachment No. Document J-1 Work Package – Errata 1 J-2 References J-3 Key Events and Milestone Listing J-4 Event Readiness List (ERL)

J-5 S/A 82710 Hybrid Electric Drive SIDS for DDG 106 J-6 SPAWAR Information Brief

J-7 AIT POA&M

J-8 Contractor’s Proposal Guide J-9 Naval Station Everett Environmental Process Instruction J-10 Local Standard Item 099-01NW J-11 S0570-AC-CCM-010/8010 NAVSEA Tech Manual 8010 - Chapter 12 J-12 Pre Proposal Information Form (PPI) J-13 Eligibility Factor Data Sheet J-14 Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet containing Work Item Pricing, Material Burden Rates and

Total Evaluated Price

J-15 RESERVED

J-16 Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) J-17 Shipyard Access J-18 Contract Security Classification Specification (DD Form 254)

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

SECTION L

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This solicitation is a Request for Proposals (RFP) that will result in the award of a single Fixed-Price contract for the FY16 Docking Selected Restricted Availability (DSRA) for USS GRIDLEY (DDG-101). The Government anticipates awarding a single contract through a Best Value Source Selection Trade-Off Procedures described in

FAR 15.101-1.

ALL INQUIRIES shall be made in writing and directed to Eric Niemann, Contracting Officer, and Valerie Heart Broker, Contract Specialist, at eric.c.niemann2@navy.mil and valerie.k.heartbroke@navy.mil. To ensure the Government is able to adequately address and respond to offeror requests for information (RFIs) via amendment, it is requested questions be submitted no later than 10 March 2016 at 3:00pm Pacific Standard Time (PST). The Navy reserves the right to not answer any requests received after 10 March 2016 at 3:00 pm PST. Furthermore, offerors should note that the proposal due date will not be extended solely on the basis of requests received after 10 March 2016. RFIs should reference a solicitation and/or specification page and paragraph number and be submitted on the Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) form (Attachment J-12) provided with this solicitation. PPI form (Attachment J-12) is to be submitted for each inquiry and question.

This acquisition will be accomplished in accordance with FAR Part 15 and is full and open competition with execution performed in the Puget Sound Region, NAICS 336611. The award will be based on a “Best Value trade-off” determination.

Estimated Award Date: The Government anticipates making a single award on or around 14 July 2016. Offerors must provide a period of 150 calendar days from the proposal due date for Government acceptance of the offer (Complete block 12 of the Standard Form (SF) 33).

2.0 INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF OFFERS

Proposal Due Date: NAVSEA will not accept electronic submission of proposals. All copies of the proposals (Volumes I & II) shall be submitted to the PCO no later than 1:00 pm PST, on 23 March 2016 at the address below.

Late proposals will not be considered. Partial proposals or attachments submitted late will not be considered.

Proposals shall be sent United States Post Office (USPS) certified mail, other methods (FEDEX, UPS, or etc) with signature required upon delivery or hand deliveried.

Proposals shall be sent to:

PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYARD & INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE FACILITY, DETACHMENT

EVERETT

ATTN: ERIC NIEMANN / VALERIE HEART BROKER

NAVAL STATION EVERETT

BUILDING 2200

2000 WEST MARINE VIEW DRIVE

EVERETT, WASHINGTON 98207

Hand Deliveried Proposals:

ATTN: ERIC NIEMANN / VALERIE HEART BROKER

NAVAL STATION EVERETT

BUILDING 2200 RM167

2000 WEST MARINE VIEW DRIVE

EVERETT, WASHINGTON 98207

Offerors shall mark all submittals “DO NOT OPEN PACKAGE IN MAIL ROOM—FORWARD UNOPENED DIRECTLY TO CODE 444”. The outside of the package shall clearly indicate the offeror’s name, the solicitation number, and the contents of the package.

Offerors shall submit:

Volume Title Number of

Paper Originals Number of

Paper Copies Number of CDs

I Price Proposal 1 3 3 II Technical Proposal 1 4 4

Note 1: The CDs must be scanned to ensure that the files contained on them do not contain any computer viruses.

The CDs shall be labeled to indicate the Offeror’s name, the solicitation number and the associated volume numbers.

Note 2: The files on the CD shall be in a format that is compatible with and capable of being opened in Microsoft Office Suite 2007 or Adobe Acrobat. The material presented in electronic format shall be identical to the paper copy of the proposal. In cases where the hard copy and the electronic copy of the proposal conflict, the hard copy shall take precedence. All spreadsheets shall be in Microsoft Excel format such that each mathematical equation is obvious. No fields shall be password protected. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included.

Note 3: Originals may be shipped in the same boxes as the copies to eliminate excess shipping costs. However, originals should be separately wrapped inside the container, and clearly labeled “ORIGINAL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL” or “ORIGINAL PRICE PROPOSAL.” The exterior of each box must clearly indicate its contents.

3.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

Ship Checks: The USS GRIDLEY (DDG 101) will be available for a ship check in San Diego, CA, prior to the proposal submission due date. Offerors, including significant subcontractors, may inspect the USS GRIDLEY (DDG 101) on 10-11 February 2016 and 23 February 2016. To schedule a ship check, offerors shall email a request for ship check to Eric Niemann, Contracting Officer, eric.c.niemann2@navy.mil and Valerie Heart Broker, Contract

Specialist, valerie.k.heartbroke@navy.mil no later than 2:00 pm PST on 22 February 2016. Participants will be provided additional information to the ship check and will be subject to security, safety, and other applicable regulations established by Southwest Regional Maintenance Center (SWRMC) and the Commanding Officer of the USS GRIDLEY (DDG 101). Subject to the Commanding Officer USS GRIDLEY (DDG 101) final approval, photography is anticipated to be authorized during the six (6) ship checks on 10-11 February 2016 and 23 February 2016; between 8:30 am to 3:00 pm PST. Schedule of ship checks are the following:

1. 10 February 2016 at 8:30 am to 11:30 am PST

2. 10 February 2016 at 1:00 pm to 3:00 pm PST

3. 11 February 2016 at 8:30 am to 11:30 am PST

4. 11 February 2016 at 1:00 pm to 3:00 pm PST

5. 23 February 2016 at 8:00 am to 3:00 am PST

Information required to be granted access for ship check is listed in attachment J-17 Shipyard Access.

Specifications and associated reference documentation: Offerors shall request a CD by contacting to Eric Niemann, Contracting Officer, or Valerie Heart Broker, Contract Specialist, at eric.c.niemann2@navy.mil and valerie.k.heartbroke@navy.mil. Offerors are required to provide the following in the request for the CD of the RFP for the USS GRIDLEY FY16 DSRA:

1. Subject Line: N4523A-16-R-0003 USS GRIDLEY FY16 DRSA

2. Company Name

3. Attn: Responsible Person/Party

4. Mailing Address

5. City, State Zip-Code

6. Phone Number

7. Email Address

The Government will provide a CD, upon request. The CDs shall include the solicitation, amendments, and attachments; which includes Section J attachments.

Alteration of Solicitation: Offerors shall respond to the solicitation as posted. Offerors who alter the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications) may be considered non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.

Proposal Information: Offerors shall not presume the Government has knowledge outside of information provided in the proposal. Additionally, offerors are advised that statements such as: “the offeror understands”, “the offeror has a long history of outstanding support”, “standard procedures shall be used”, “well known techniques shall be employed”, or any paraphrasing of the solicitation, shall be considered inadequate to demonstrate experience, knowledge of, or compliance with solicitation requirements. Offerors are encouraged to provide specific and concise information to validate all assertions.

Amendments: The Government may revise the solicitation at any time by means of an Amendment. It is an offeror’s responsibility to ensure it is accessing the Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) website to view potential amendments and procurement notifications for this solicitation.

Teaming Arrangements: Proposals must be submitted by one (1) prime contractor. An Offeror may be listed as a subcontractor in multiple proposals but may only submit one (1) proposal as a prime contractor with a unique Commercial and Government Entity code and Taxpayer Identification Number. To be evaluated as a Joint Venture (JV), offerors must provide a notarized agreement (with the price proposal) delineating roles and responsibilities for all proposed work.

4.0 PROPOSAL FORMAT

To facilitate efficiency and consistency in proposal evaluation the following is mandatory. Proposals which do not follow this direction may be rejected as non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.

Hard Copy Proposals: All pages shall be double-sided on 8.5 x 11 inch paper with a one-inch margin. The text used shall be Times New Roman with a minimum font size of 12-point. Each side of the page will count as one “page”.

Any type contained on graphics pages will not be smaller than 10-point font. Any pages that may be revised as a result of discussions (if required) shall contain revision numbers and date of the proposal revision submission.

Offerors shall use the attachments provided with this solicitation for their proposal content as specified in Section

5.0 where required.

Page Limits:

The cover letter is limited to three (3) pages Non-price proposals submitted as Volume II shall be limited to one hundred (100) pages, which is inclusive of the Eligibility Factor Data Sheet (Attachment J-13) for Factor 1 – There are no other page limitations

5.0 PROPOSAL CONTENT

VOLUME I

Price Proposal: The price proposal shall not contain non-price factor information. The price proposal shall be comprised of the following documentation:

a. Cover Letter (page limit of 3 pages)

b. Signed SF 33 with all amendments acknowledged,

c. Small Business Subcontracting plan per FAR Part 19 (large businesses only),

d. Any Joint Venture / teaming agreements (if applicable),

e. Completed Section B carrying forward information from J-14, and

f. Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet containing Work Item Pricing, Labor & Material Burden Rates, and Dry Dock daily rate (J-14)

Cover Letter: The cover letter, which shall not exceed three (3) pages, shall meet all the requirements of the “first page of the proposal” outlined in FAR 52.215-1(c)(2)(i-v). In addition to those requirements, the offeror shall include the following in the cover letter:

Identification of all enclosures included with the proposal, CAGE and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) numbers for the Prime contractor, Notice of any alterations to the solicitation, such as “fill-in” blocks and certifications, and Notice of any alterations to the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications).

Standard Form 33 (SF 33): As part of the price proposal package, the offeror shall submit the completed SF 33 with blocks 12 through 18 completed, as well as all sections with applicable “fill-ins” filled in and shall acknowledge all amendments. The representative who signs this form must be authorized to contractually bind the company providing the offer. Section B CLIN pricing must also be completed for ALL CLINs. The Offeror shall complete and provide all Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements included in Section K of the solicitation.

Submission of a signed offer to the Government constitutes agreement and acceptance of the terms and conditions of the solicitation in a FFP contracting environment.

Subcontracting Plan: An acceptable subcontracting plan is required to be submitted by large business concerns. A subcontracting plan is NOT REQUIRED from small business concerns and will not be evaluated.

Completed Section B and Attachment J-14 : Offerors must propose on all contract line items (CLINs), complete the clause entitled “SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED)” in Section B, complete the Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet containing Work Item Pricing, Labor & Material Burden Rates and Dry Dock daily rate (J-14) to be considered responsive. Offerors shall enter zero dollar value for CLIN 0002 Section B and include the price associated with CLIN 0002 as part of the total price entered for CLIN 0001.

The contractor must submit prices on both CLIN 0001 Section and J-14 Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet in the format provided. Attachment J-14 contains a total of four (4) worksheets. There are two (2) worksheets for Work Item Pricing and Labor & Material Burden Rates which will automatically populate a total price on a third Summary worksheet. The total price listed on the Summary work sheet shall be entered by the Contractor under CLIN 0001, Section B, and Offerors are to ensure these two total prices match. If there is a discrepancy between the total price on the Summary worksheet of attachment J-14 and the amount entered in CLIN 0001 Section, the summary price listed CLIN 0001 Section B shall govern. The contractor is also required to enter their Dry dock day rate on the fourth worksheet of attachment J-14. For Attachment J-14, offerors are to insert pricing in all yellow shaded fields.

The RFP specified 58,303 labor hours and $1,029,422 included for material in the Labor & Material Burden Rate worksheet contained in Attachment J-14 are for evaluation purposes only. The proposed labor and material burden rates included in Attachment J-14 and inserted in Section B, Note A paragraph (7) shall be the fixed rates and be used for negotiating growth and new work during the entire availability regardless of how many labor hours and material dollars are procured and negotiated. Additionally, Offerors shall breakout and provide the dry dock day rate as prescribed in Section B, Note C and in J-14 Pricing Workbook.

VOLUME II

Non-Price Proposal: The non-price proposal shall be limited to one hundred (100) pages and is inclusive of the Eligibility Factor Data Sheet (Attachment J-13) for Factor 1; – Technical Capabilities narrative and resumes for Factor 2; Resource Capacity narrative for Factor 3 as follows:

Factor 1 – Eligibility Factor: Offerors must provide the following to demonstrate eligibility:

Eligibility Factor Data Sheet (Attachment J-13). If any criteria cannot be met on Attachment J-13, the Offeror shall provide a mitigation plan to meet the needed services. Any mitigation plan will be included as part of the evaluation.

A letter signed by the Principal identifying and confirming ownership or committed access (in the form of a letter signed by the subcontractor identifying and confirming committed access) to a pier capable of berthing the DDG-101 and a dry-dock capable of docking the DDG-101. Offerors shall include any teaming agreements, commercial contracts or other arrangements as necessary to demonstrate capability and committed access to pier and dry-dock facilities.

Co-signed Master Ship Repair Agreement or proof of MSRA Equivalency to demonstrate capability

MSRA Equivalency (Applicable to Non-MSRA holders only): Offerors that do not hold an MSRA must submit MSRA equivalency documentation to demonstrate sufficient organization and facilities’ capabilities. (Specific documentation requirements provided upon inspection request).

To be eligible for the this award, a prospective contractor must possess a MSRA as described in DFARS 217.71 Master Agreement for Repair and Alteration of Vessels (MARAV) or demonstrate organization and facilities equivalent to that reflected in a MSRA prior to contract award anticipated on or about 14 July 2016. To ensure sufficient time in evaluating a non-MSRA’s eligibility, Offerors meeting this eligibility requirement with documents and evidence outside of a MSRA are encouraged to contact the Eric Niemann, Contracting Officer, eric.c.niemann2@navy.mil and Valerie Heart Broker, Contract Specialist, valerie.k.heartbroke@navy.mil no later than 03 February 2016 to further schedule an on-site inspection. All inspections will be completed by a representative from Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Center (CNRMC) independently of this solicitation process. The on-site inspection will be used by the Offeror and the Government supplement documentation provided with the offeror’s proposal to determine MSRA equivalency. Failure to request an inspection, receive a satisfactory inspection or gain MSRA equivalency by the designated time will result in a negative determination of offeror eligibility.

The Government reserves the right to conduct a pre-award survey or to require other evidence of technical, production, managerial, financial, and similar abilities to perform prior to the award of any proposed contracts;

regardless of whether the offeror has an existing MSRA. There is no page limit associated with this documentation.

Factor 2 - Technical Capabilities: The Offeror shall provide a written description and supporting documents that outlines their plan to complete the maintenance and modernization of the vessel. Factor 2 consists of three (3) sub-factors as outlined with submission requirements listed for each sub-factor. As outlined in Section M, each of the three sub-factors will be rated independently, and then consequently those ratings combined to determine the overall Factor 2 rating.

Sub Factor 2.a – Management Capabilities:

Provide a written plan that delineates and demonstrates the ability to provide a management organization geared toward completing highly complex ship repair requirements.

Additionally, provide an organizational chart and a list of proposed personnel with their associated resumes for the following management positions at a minimum: Project Manager, Quality Manager, Contracting Manager, Hull Manager, AIT Zone Manager, two (2) General Zone Managers, Scheduler and Sub-Contracting Manager. Resumes submitted shall count against the 100 page limit for Volume II. The Resumes should demonstrate the following abilities based on their qualifications, credentials and experience (years):

o Demonstrate ability to provide engineering and design support capabilities with sufficient capability to diagnose and evaluate technical problems and issues, and to make competent technical recommendations o Demonstrate ability to provide project management expertise for the establishment of tools and processes to manage complex availabilities o Demonstrate ability to provide scheduling expertise to include estimating, progressing, and integrating complex ship repair requirements o Demonstrate ability to provide purchasing, monitoring, receiving, inspecting, segregating, issuing, determining nonconformance, and disposing of material o Demonstrate ability to manage subcontractors successfully, including successfully selecting, scheduling, managing, monitoring, and controlling

Sub-Factor 2.b – Sub-Contract Management

Provide a written description or plan that delineates or demonstrates the ability to: 1) integrate numerous sub-contractors into the project to include schedule and awareness of overall project; 2) manage the progress of each subcontractor to ensure timely completion of their work; and 3) manage performance issues.

Sub-Factor 2.c – NMD:

Provide a written description or plan to utilize the full capabilities of NMD. Briefly outline staffing plan to accomplish timely reporting within the time limits as defined in Section C.

Factor 3 – Resource Capacity: The Offeror shall provide a proposal in the form of a written description or plan that documents their understanding of what is required to successfully complete the highly complex USS GRIDLEY (DDG-101) FY 16 DSRA maintenance and modernization requirements. The proposal’s plan and written description shall provide the following information:

a. Overall Schedule Integration Plan The plan to perform the overall creating and management of the integrated production schedule as the Lead Maintenance Activity (LMA). The plan should demonstrate and show the Offeror has the capability to estimate, schedule, integrate, control, progress, certify and complete complex ship repair requirements for not only the work for the prime contractor, but also the work of the Government sponsored AIT’s, Fleet Maintenance Activity, and Ship’s Force Work.

b. High level Integrated Production Schedule

A Gantt chart showing a high level integrated production schedule for all work items (at the work item level vice activity level) based on the key events and milestones in Attachment J-3 and the Events Readiness List in Attachment J-4. There is no page limit associated with this documentation and this documentation shall not count against the Offeror’s overall 100 page count limit.

c. Detailed Integrated Schedule for Specific Controlling Items

A detailed schedule at the activity level for the following specific Work Items (WI) 123-31-001; 243-11- 002, 243-12-002, 245-11-001, and 245-12-001. The Offeror’s proposal will be evaluated using the proposed work breakdown structure and a resource loaded schedule to determine prime contractors ability to schedule and resource plan for completing several controlling work items within the requirements of the solicitation. Specific submissions requirements for the Detailed Integrated Schedule for Specific Controlling Items are as follows:

Schedule each Work Item to the activity level listing the planned start, planned completion dates, and durations for each activity. Each activity shall be displayed to reflect its relevancy to the applicable key events and milestones. Assign each activity in the Integrated Production Schedule a short title to describe the nature of the activity, system and equipment or machinery involved.

Scheduled work to support the Key Events and Milestones in Attachment J-3 and the Events Readiness List in Attachment J-4.

Develop and provide the Manpower Curves for the specific WI’s. Include individual key craft/trade/supervisor/support manpower curves showing proposed manning by craft/trade/supervisor/support throughout the work period in men per day for these work items.

The curves shall indicate that portion of the total that is subcontractor provided.

The Gantt charts shall be provided on 11 x 17 inch paper. There is no page limit associated with this documentation and this documentation shall not count against the Offeror’s overall 100 page count limit.

Factor 4 – Past Performance: The Government will evaluate the Offeror's past performance as a prime contractor.

In the investigation of an Offeror's past performance, the Government reserves the right to contact former customers and Government agencies and other private and public sources of information.

Past performance information is documented as a Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) and available in the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRSF). The Government will utilize all recent and relevant past performance reports in demonstrating their ability to perform the proposed effort. The contractor will not be required to submit these reports as they are available in the database already.

All offerors (including small business offerors) are requested to address historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-8 (Utilization of Small Business Concerns) in a separate narrative not to exceed one page. In addition, large businesses are requested to address historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219- 9 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan) and DFARS 252.219-7003 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan (DOD CONTRACTS)) in a separate narrative not to exceed one page.

(End of Summary of Changes)