Attachment_I_-_PPI_Log.pdf
PDF 44 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Waterfront Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N44255-18-R-5004
About this file
This document contains questions and answers regarding solicitation number N44255-18-R-5004 for a Waterfront Multiple Award Construction Contract. The solicitation involves construction and design experience requirements, past performance questionnaires, sustainable design features, and project cost thresholds. The Naval Facilities Engineering Command seeks experience on projects between $500,000 and $30 million completed within the past seven years. Offerors are to provide documentation of any applicable sustainable certification and consideration will be given to experience with sustainable features. Joint ventures must submit VETS 4212 reports for each company and past performance questionnaires may be resubmitted if previously completed by the customer. The proposal due date was extended until the date specified in Amendment 0001 due to federal holidays. Relevant projects over $30 million will be considered and sustainable design documentation is not included in page limits.
Attachment I- PPI Log
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 25
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Page Section Para.
In the RFP, within the Construction Experience qualifications, it states, “at least two projects shall involve Clean Water Act permit terms and conditions” and within the Design Experience qualifications, it states, “at least one project shall involve Clean Water Act permit terms and conditions.” we respectfully suggest removing the “Clean Water Act permit terms and conditions” requirement in both the Construction and Design Experience sections.
The Clean Water Act requirements will remain in this solicitation. 0001 13‐15 Section (2) Factor 2, Experience
Similar in Complexity Paragraph
The RFP requires that projects submitted shall have been completed within seven (7) years. Given the distinctive size/scope/complexity of the required experience, would the Government please consider extending the range?
After consideration and a review of the Market research the Government has determined this requirement to be adequate.
Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed (Beneficial Occupancy Date occurred) within the past seven years of the date of issuance of this solicitation.
0001 13‐15
Section (2) Factor 2, Experience – Construction
Similar in Complexity Paragraph
If the Offeror has a Past Performance Questionnaire on file previously completed by the Client that matches all fields of the required Attachments C.1 and C.2, may this be submitted in lieu of requesting a new PPQ specific to this solicitation? Our current NAVFAC contacts for previously completed projects are reluctant to fill out PPQs for the same project multiple times.
Offeror can Submit a copy of a PPQ Previously completed by the customer. Offeror shall provide current points of contact for verification.
0001 16 Section (3) Factor 3, Past Performance
A
The Phase One Proposal requires the submittal of the VETS‐ 4212 report confirmation. If the Offeror is a joint venture, please confirm if we are to submit a VETS‐4212 report confirmation for the joint venture entity, or if it is acceptable to submit for each company in the joint venture.
See Updated VETS 4212 Submission requirements in Amendment 0001.
0001 7 Section 00100 Bidding Instructions
Since the RFP was posted on 19 Dec 2018, right before the Christmas and New Year Holiday. Additionally, time is needed to complete Joint Venture Agreements. Offeror respectfully requests a 2 week bid due date extension
See updated Proposal due date in Amendment 0001. 0001 1 Block 13 A
REFERENCE
PPI # QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE Amend No.
For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this solicitation. In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features.
Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) or a similar organization or process. Applicable documentation is not included in the specified page limitation for this factor. Also, the description should address features detailing how the work was completed in accordance with the "Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties.” Will the Government please consider removing this requirement as it will likely increase the overall response and competition that the Government receives for this solicitation?
No. Not having Sustainable design features will not disqualify a project from consideration. As stated in Section 00100 Bidding Instructions, paragraph (B) Basis of Evaluation, on Pg. 16 "Offerors who provide relevant projects that demonstrate experience with sustainable features may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate expericnce with sustainable features."
0001 15 Section 00100 Bidding Instructions
The RFP states “Construction projects [are to be] between $500,000 and $30,000,000.” Our team has several relevant projects with a construction cost that is greater than $30,000,000. It seems that if a contractor has experience with similar projects that are larger than $30,000,000 then this experience should be evaluated as relevant, if not very relevant. Will the Government please consider adjusting the RFP in order to allow a project over $30,000,000 as a relevant project?
To be updated in a subsequent amendment. 13‐14 Factor 2 Experience
Similar in Size
Given the government furlough, we are concerned about getting the PPQ's back from our Federal government clients..
Will NAVFAC consider extending the deadline to accommodate the government furlough?
See Proposal due date in Amendment 0001. 0001 16 Section (3) Factor 3, Past Performance
A
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .