Attachment 2 - Addendum to FAR 52.212-2.pdf
PDF 203 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NNSY Shuttle Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N4215825QN065
About this file
This document is an Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation for Commercial Items, detailing the evaluation criteria for a Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) set-aside contract for NNSY Shuttle Services. The solicitation will result in a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) single-award contract with a base period and one option year, covering shuttle services at Norfolk Naval Shipyard. Evaluation will focus on three primary factors: Technical Capability, Past Performance, and Price, with offerors required to receive an acceptable rating in technical and past performance while providing the lowest evaluated price to be considered for award.
The Government will assess Technical Capability as either acceptable or unacceptable based on the offeror's Technical Capabilities Statement and fleet management plan. Past Performance will be evaluated using references from the past five years, with relevance and recency as key considerations. Offerors with insufficient past performance may be rated as having "unknown" past performance. Price evaluation will involve multiplying estimated quantities by unit pricing and including all option quantities. Offerors must submit their proposals via email by 1:00 PM EST on Monday, 11 August 2025, with questions due by Tuesday, 05 August 2025 at 10:00 AM EST.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 4 - Pricing Sheet.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment N4215825QN0650002 SF 30 (1).pdf | ||
| SF 1449 - N4215825QN0650001.pdf | ||
| Amendments and Question and Answers.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation Amendment N4215825QN0650001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Addendum to FAR 52.212-1.pdf | ||
| DD 1423 CDRL Form - Shuttle Contract - Approved.pdf | ||
| Final Shuttle SOW.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2_shuttle map 2025_inside CIA.png | PNG image | |
| SF 1449 - N4215825QN065.pdf | ||
| NNSY OPSEC Plan for Contractors Enclosure 3 Fillable Template.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Contractor Technical Certification.pdf | ||
| Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Shuttle QASP.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1_shuttle map 2025_outside CIA.png | PNG image |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104 Enclosure (2) Page 1
52.212-2 EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (ADDENDUM)
(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this RFQ to the responsible vendor whose proposal, in full compliance with the RFQ, is deemed most advantageous to the Government, considering price and other factors. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
Technical Capability Past Performance Price
The Government intends to award a Firm Fixed Price (FFP), single-award contract covering a base period with one option year inclusive of a six (6)-month option to extend consistent with guidance in FAR 52.217-8. This solicitation will be competed on a Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) set-aside.
In accordance with FAR 15.101-2, an award will be made to the responsible offeror who receives an acceptable rating in technical and past performance and provides the lowest evaluated price, representing the best value to the Government.
Offerors who fail to possess the required technical capability will not be considered for award and the other elements of their offer will not be evaluated.
The Government also reserves the right to not award a contract if a contract award is not in the best interest of the Government.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY: The Government will evaluate the offeror’s technical capability as either acceptable, or unacceptable, based on their submission of Attachment 3 - Technical Capabilities Statement and their narrative provided regarding a fleet management plan.
Technical Capability will be evaluated to determine an overall rating of “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable”.
Adjectival Rating Description
Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.
Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.
PAST PERFORMANCE: The Government will assess the degree of confidence it has in each offeror’s ability to perform the services described in the Performance Work Statement based on the offeror’s demonstrated record of past performance.
That degree of confidence will be assessed based on the relevance of the offeror’s past performance and the recency of that past performance.
Relevance is determined by those aspects of an Offerors history of contract (or subcontract) performance that would provide the most context and give the greatest ability to measure whether the Offeror will successfully satisfy the current requirement.
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104 Enclosure (2) Page 2
Recency is generally expressed as a time period during which past performance references are considered relevant, and is critical to establishing the relevancy of past performance information. Per Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, Offerors shall provide Past Performance references from the past five (5) years.
In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR
15.305 [a][2][iv]). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance.
Adjectival Rating Description
Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown (see note above).
Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort
PRICE
The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposed price to determine price reasonableness in accordance with FAR 13.106-3.
The Government will multiply the estimated quantities provided in the schedule by the unit pricing proposed to determinate the estimated amount for each line item.
The estimated amount for each line item will then be added together to determine the total estimated price which will become the evaluated price.
The estimated/evaluated price will include all option quantities (including FAR 52.217-8 OPTION TO
EXTEND SERVICES (NOV 1999)).
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .