26R0228 Amendment 0002.pdf

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

N4008526R0228 Design-Build (DB) Repair OTC Dorm King Hall Bldg 291, Naval Station Newport, RI

SEE SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

Contract POC: Catharine Keeling, catharine.a.keeling.civ@us.navy.mil

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

PAGE OF PAGES

1 21

5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC

CONTRACTING CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK, VA 23511

CODE N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

N40085-26-R-0228

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09/01/2026

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FACILITY CODE

(X)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE

10/13/2026

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The following have been added by fully text:

AMENDMENT 0002

The purpose of this amendment is to incorporate the following:

1. Provide a proposal due date extension

2. Updates to General Requirements (in red)

3. Provide Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPI) Responses

N40085-26-R-0228

1. The proposal due date is extended from 16 October 2026 2:00 PM ET to 29 October 2026 2:00 PM ET. PPI cutoff date is not extended.

2. Updates to General Requirements:

The following sections have been updated:

Time for Completion:

The deadline for completion of this task order (including Bid Options) shall be 1,278 calendar days from date of award (includes 10 calendar days for submission and approval of bonds and insurance). Completion of the entire work ready for use must occur prior to the aforementioned date. The time stated for completion shall include final cleanup of the premises.

VI. EVALUATION:

The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value—the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.202(a)(2)) (DEVIATION 2026-O0048). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

The best value tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

The technical factor (Factor 1 – Technical Solutions) is of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all non-price factors, when combined, are approximately equal to price.

Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal.

3. Pre-Proposal Inquiries

Qu est ion

Page Section Paragraph Question Response

2 RFP RFP page 2, Time of Completion: 15 calendar days to submit bonds and insurance; however, RFP Page 3 Bond Requirements says P&P bonds due within 10 calendar days of award. Please confirm the number of calendar days to submit all bonds and insurance following award.

10 calendar days for submission and approval of bonds and insurance. Please see Amendment 0002 for updates to the General Requirements/ Time for completion section.

2 01 11 00 1.6 The specification states that items designated by the Contracting Officer for salvage shall remain Government property and shall be segregated, itemized, 3delivered, and off-loaded at a Government-designated storage located within 10 miles of the construction site. Please identify the specific materials, equipment and or building components the Government intends to designate for salvation. Please confirm if any special handling, packaging or protection is required. Please identify the designated storage location.

REFER TO DB RFP IN ITS ENTIRETY

INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PROJECT

DESCRIPTION PART 3 CHAPTER 1/CHAPTER 2

AND ATTACHMENT R. Items scheduled for salvage, relocation and storage are FFE. No items schedule for salvage, relocation, or storage are related to construction.

2 01 30 00 1.3 Section 01 30 00 / 1.3 requires that the Elevator Subcontractor and Electrical Subcontractor be contracted directly with the Prime Contractor as first-tier subcontractors. The Prime Contractor intends to utilize a subcontractor responsible for executing multiple trade scopes associated with the project with the Elevator Subcontractor and Electrical Subcontractor being a 2nd tier subcontractor. Please confirm if the proposed subcontracting approach is acceptable, or whether the elevator and electrical subcontractors must be contracted directly with the Prime Contractor.

FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS OF DB RFP -

FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS OF ALL UFC, UFS,

FC, CODES, REGULATIONS, UFGS AND

REQUIREMENTS OF A DESIGN BUILD

CONTRACT. Follow requirements for first tier subcontractors as indicated in the DB RFP.

10 G-005 GENERAL

MASONRY

CLEANING

/REPAIR/R

EPOINTIN

G NOTES -

Note 1 & 3

Drawing G-005, Note 1 requires compliance with Specification Sections 04 01 00.91, Restoration and Cleaning of Masonry in Historic Structures, and 04 03 00, Conservation Treatment for Period Masonry. Note 3 requires a historic masonry consultant to evaluate the existing masonry and recommend cleaning and restoration procedures, and again refers to Section 04 01 00.91. Neither section appears in the RFP Part 5 list of prescriptive specifications. In addition, UFGS 04 01

00.91 has been retired and superseded.

Please clarify whether the Government intended to provide project-specific prescriptive specifications for this work. If so, please issue the applicable sections and revise G-005 as needed. If the intent is for the Design- Builder to develop the project specifications using the

Design Build contractor to provide design in accordance to all relevant UFC/UFS/FC CODES, Regulations as relevant at the time of award.

UFGS, please confirm whether current UFGS 04 03 00 is the governing guide specification, identify the applicable edition, and clarify whether the references to retired Section 04 01 00.91 should be deleted.

Please also confirm whether the historic masonry consultant identified in Note 3 is required to develop or review the cleaning, repair, and repointing criteria and proposed procedures for incorporation into the Design- Builder’s specifications.

734 Vol_2 Attachment G - Permit Record of Decision

Form

(PROD)

The Permits Record of Decision identifies Historic Preservation as not required and states that unaccompanied personnel housing is exempt from Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, subject to “Government to Confirm.” Drawing G-005 also identifies Building 291 and its masonry as historic and requires a historic masonry consultant.

Please confirm that the Government has completed its determination and that this project requires no State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) consultation, submission, concurrence, or approval by the Design- Builder. If any SHPO coordination or other historic preservation review is required, please identify the applicable requirements, responsible party, required deliverables, and review durations.

FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS OF DB RFP - Part 6, Attachment L (Environmental Compliance, Memorandum) Memo item #4 states that SHPO consultation is not required.

6 465 Vol_1 Vol_2

3.2 Site

Developmen t Requirement s / Permitting

Permits Record of Decision

(PROD)

Vol. 1, Part 3, Chapter 3, p. 18 estimates approximately one acre of disturbance. "Soil disturbances required for the project, including disturbances associated with the fire access road and treatment area, and disturbances associated with utility installation, where the existing surfacing will be replaced in kind, amount to approximately one acre. " Vol. 2, Attachment G, PDF p. 726 marks erosion and sediment control permitting “Y,” while p. 727 marks the general permit for ≥1 acre “N.”

Confirm the anticipated disturbance area, required construction stormwater coverage, and the basis for the differing PROD entries.

Design Build contractor to provide design in accordance to all UFC/UFS/FC CODES, Regulations as MOST CURRENT at the time of award.

7 10 Vol_2 G-005 Vol. 2, G-005, General Removals Note 4 identifies Building 60 at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard and requires approval by the PWD Maine Cultural Resources Manager. This RFP is for King Hall at Naval Station Newport.

Confirm that Note 4 is inapplicable and issue a corrected note identifying any King Hall preservation review that is required.

FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS OF DB RFP -

FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS OF ALL UFC,

CODES, REGULATIONS, UFGS AND

REQUIREMENTS OF A DESIGN BUILD

CONTRACT. Part 6, Attachment L (Environmental Compliance, Memorandum) Memo item #4 states that SHPO consultation is not required.

8 112 01 33 29 1.6.18 Section 01 33 29 includes three separate and overlapping Third-Party Certification provisions that appear to establish different project conditions and Contractor responsibilities:

•Paragraph 1.6.18.1 requires the Contractor to register the project, complete the design and construction work necessary to achieve GP Assessment (DoD) or a Government-approved equivalent, and bear the associated registration, review, certification, assessment/validation, and plaque costs.

•Paragraph 1.6.18.2 states that the project is already registered with the TPC organization and primarily requires the Contractor to provide construction-related sustainability documentation and complete the work necessary to achieve certification.

•Paragraph 1.6.18.3 again requires registration and achievement of GP Assessment (DoD) or an approved equivalent and requires the Contractor to pay registration and certification-related fees.

These provisions create uncertainty regarding the project’s current registration status, the applicable certification pathway, and the division of design, PROJECT WILL REQUIRE TPC - AS A DESIGN

BUILD CONTRACT - CONTRACTOR IS

RESPONSIBLE FOR REGERISTING PROJECT,

PROVIDING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

SUBMITTALS AND ALL REQUIRED

CHECKLISTS, REVIEWS, DOCUMENTATION,

ASSESSMENT/VALIDATION, MAINTENANCE

OF TPC CERTIFICATION PROCESS AND

REQUIREMENTS, CERTIFICATION,

CERTFICATION PLAQUE AND ALL REQUIRED

FEES.

construction, documentation, and fee responsibilities.

Please identify which of Paragraphs 1.6.18.1, 1.6.18.2, or 1.6.18.3 governs this project and confirm the following:

1.) Whether the project is currently registered with a TPC organization.

2.) If registered, provide the name of the TPC organization, project registration number, current registration status, and available registration documentation.

3.) Whether the required certification is specifically GP Assessment (DoD) or another Government-approved equivalent.

4.) Whether the Contractor is responsible for registration, review, assessment/validation, certification, plaque, and related third-party fees.

5.) Whether the Contractor’s responsibility encompasses both design- and construction-phase certification requirements or construction-phase requirements only.

6.) Whether the nonapplicable provisions will be deleted or otherwise identified as not applicable.

9 112 01 33 29 1.6.18 REFERENCES:

Section 01 33 29, Sustainability Requirements and Reporting, Paragraph 1.6.18.1.2(a), Page 10.

Section 01 33 29, Paragraph 1.6.18.2.1(a), Page 12.

Section 01 33 29, Paragraph 1.6.18.3.2(a), Page 14.

Section 01 33 29, Table 3-1, Volatile Organic Compounds Requirements, Pages 18–24.

PPI:

Paragraphs 1.6.18.1.2(a), 1.6.18.2.1(a), and 1.6.18.3.2(a) direct the Contractor to “Refer to TPC Checklist at the end of this specification section.”

Certain provisions further state that multiple checklists would indicate multiple buildings requiring Third- Party Certification.

However, Section 01 33 29 ends following Table 3-1, Volatile Organic Compounds Requirements, on Page 24, and the referenced TPC Checklist is not included.

The checklist is necessary to establish the applicable sustainability criteria, required certification pathway, documentation requirements, and basis for the Contractor’s design, construction, cost, and schedule obligations.

Please provide the project-specific TPC Checklist and confirm the following:

1.) The applicable checklist title, edition, and version.

2.) The designated TPC organization and assessment program.

3.) Whether a single checklist applies to King Hall or whether separate checklists are required for individual buildings, areas, or project phases.

4.) Any criteria that the Government has determined to be not applicable or previously satisfied.

5.) Whether an existing preliminary checklist, assessment, scorecard, registration record, or correspondence with the TPC organization is available.

6.) Whether the Contractor is required to use the checklist as issued with the RFP or update it during design and construction based on the final scope.

If the checklist was omitted inadvertently, please issue it as an RFP amendment and identify any associated changes to the Contractor’s scope, cost, or schedule obligations.

PROJECT WILL REQUIRE TPC - AS A DESIGN

BUILD CONTRACT - CONTRACTOR IS

RESPONSIBLE FOR REGERISTING PROJECT,

PROVIDING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

SUBMITTALS AND ALL REQUIRED

CHECKLISTS, REVIEWS, DOCUMENTATION,

CERTIFICATION PLAQUE AND ALL FEES

11 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

ED104 ED104: Demolition one line indicates there are two panels in each wing to be demolished. Are both located in the mechanical room? Where is the transformer to be demolished in each wing located?

Panels are located stacked facing the corridor in location shown on the floor plans. The transformer that feeds the panels in the wings is located in the mechanical room on that wing and feeds the floors above.

12 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

ED501 ED501. The existing conditions section states HPB panel is fed from a 150kva transformer. This differs from the one line. Please clarify.

The one line is correct. HPB is a 480 volt panel. The 150KVA transformer feeds MDP.

13 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

ED501 ED501. Is the 75KVA transformer existing? It is not mentioned in the narrative.

This transformer is existing as shown on the one line, fed via HPB.

15 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

ED501 ED501. Is the "Navy Exchange" a panel? If so, how old is it, what is the condition, size, and where is it located?

The Navy exchange panel is shown as LPG in photo utility 1021. It is a 100A. Westinghouse panelboard Cat BS-76687. It is an older panel.

17 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

EP103 EP103. Keynote 1. Please clarify the requirement to keep the existing switchgear operational until the new gear is installed and tested. The current electrical room does not appear to have the space to accommodate this requirement.

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN including required construction phasing as means and methods to complete the contract.

19 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

Section 01 11 00

Section 01 11 00 - What items require salvage, and are they to be reused in the new design?

REFER TO DB RFP IN ITS ENTIRETY

INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PROJECT

DESCRIPTION PART 3 CHAPTER 1/CHAPTER 2

AND ATTACHMENT R. Items scheduled for salvage, relocation and storage are FFE. No items schedule for salvage, relocation, or storage are related to construction.

21 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

Section 01 30 00 1.4

Section 01 30 00 1.4 Color boards. Please confirm that color finish boards will not be required within 90 days of contract award, but rather as defined in UFC 3-120- 10 Interior Design, with the 95% CID submission.

FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS OF DB RFP -

FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS OF ALL UFC,

CODES, REGULATIONS, UFGS AND

REQUIREMENTS OF A DESIGN BUILD

CONTRACT. Design Build contractor to provide design in accordance to all UFC/UFS/FC CODES, Regulations as MOST CURRENT at the time of award.

22 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

Section 01 33 10.05 20

2.2.4.

Section 01 33 10.05 20 2.2.4. Please confirm that hard copies of CID binders are required at each submission, or if digital binders will suffice until the IFC submission.

FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS OF DB RFP -

FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS OF ALL UFC,

CODES, REGULATIONS, UFGS AND

REQUIREMENTS OF A DESIGN BUILD

CONTRACT. Design Build contractor to provide design in accordance to all UFC/UFS/FC CODES, Regulations as MOST CURRENT at the time of award.

23 Attachm

_B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

Section 01 33 29 1.5.2

Section 01 33 29 1.5.2: Are DVDs required for the Amended Final Sustainability notebook or will electronic submission suffice?

FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS OF DB RFP -

FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS OF ALL UFC,

CODES, REGULATIONS, UFGS AND

REQUIREMENTS OF A DESIGN BUILD

CONTRACT. Design Build contractor to provide design in accordance to all UFC/UFS/FC CODES, Regulations as MOST CURRENT at the time of award.

24 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

Section 01 33 29

1.6.18.1.2

Section 01 33 29 1.6.18.1.2: The Guiding Principles Assessment & Guiding Principles Checklist does not require TPC site visit. Confirm that this can be removed.

FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS OF DB RFP -

FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS OF ALL UFC,

CODES, REGULATIONS, UFGS AND

REQUIREMENTS OF A DESIGN BUILD

CONTRACT. Design Build contractor to provide design in accordance to all UFC/UFS/FC CODES, Regulations as MOST CURRENT at the time of award.

25 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

Section 01 33 29

1.6.18.3.1

Section 01 33 29 1.6.18.3.1: Confirm this section is not required. AE2 has already registered TPC.

FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS OF DB RFP -

FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS OF ALL UFC,

CODES, REGULATIONS, UFGS AND

REQUIREMENTS OF A DESIGN BUILD

CONTRACT. Design Build contractor to provide design in accordance to all UFC/UFS/FC CODES, Regulations as MOST CURRENT at the time of award.

26 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

Section 01 33 29 3.1.h and i

Section 01 33 29 3.1.h and i: GPA and GPC do not require TPC On-Site Visit. Confirm this can be removed.

FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS OF DB RFP -

FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS OF ALL UFC,

CODES, REGULATIONS, UFGS AND

REQUIREMENTS OF A DESIGN BUILD

CONTRACT. Design Build contractor to provide design in accordance to all UFC/UFS/FC CODES, Regulations as MOST CURRENT at the time of award.

28 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

Part 3.

Chapter 2.

Section 2.3.6

Part 3. Chapter 2. Section 2.3.6. The progressive collapse standard was removed from the ATFP UFC, but the requirement wasn't completely eliminated.

Confirm ASCE 76-23 requirements do not apply for this project. Building is Risk Category III, within a controlled perimeter, and less than 6 stories, therefore, it classifies as CRDC A and thus exempt.

AS DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED

INVESTIGATIONS, TESTING, CALCULATIONS,

DESIGN (WHETHER PASSIVE OR ACTIVE)

WITH APPLICABLE POST MITIGATION

TESTING AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA PER

ALL REQUIRED CODES/UFC/AND

ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCIES

29 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

Part 3.

Chapter 4.

Section 4.1.1

Part 3. Chapter 4. Section 4.1.1. This section discusses the existing concrete structure, and areas of deterioration. However, specific repair requirements are not provided. Additionally, attachment A drawings do not provide guidance on concrete repair requirements. "Concrete repair" is shown on AE205, but nowhere else. Are repairs to existing concrete structure apart of the RFP? If so, what is the extent of the repairs required?

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS/CALCULATIONS

AND PROVIDE DESIGN

31 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

Part 3.

Chapter 5.

C10.

Part 3. Chapter 5. C10. Provide documentation for referenced facility "NSN"

References to "NSN" is "Naval Station Newport"

32 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

Part 3.

Chapter 5.

D5040.

Part 3. Chapter 5. D5040. Provide definition of security system requirements.

All exterior door and all interior lockable doors should be equipped withsealed contactless readers with programmable locks and low battery indicator alert. Berthingdoors must be able to be manually locked from inside room

33 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Part 3.

Chapter 5.

D2010

Part 3. Chapter 5. D2010. D20 mop sink size states 24" by 24", minor difference but mop sink size discrepancy.

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS/CALCULATIONS

AND PROVIDE DESIGN

Vol_1.pd f

34 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

Part 3.

Chapter 6.

D2020

Part 3. Chapter 6. D2020. There does not appear to be a booster pump system called out, however based on these numbers, one may be required. Should the design include a booster pump?

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT CODES/UFC/UFS/FC

BUILDING REQUIREMENTS

35 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

Part 3.

Chapter 6.

D202003

Part 3. Chapter 6. D202003. This section states to reuse existing oil fired heaters and equipment however other sections state "depending on condition". Provide clarity on existing condition of equipment and whether to reuse.

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT CODES/UFC/UFS/FC

BUILDING REQUIREMENTS

36 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

Part 3.

Chapter 6.

D301005

Part 3. Chapter 6. D301005.If project is to follow UFC 1-200-02, was a solar analysis and rainwater reuse analysis done? Systems are marked as not used, therefore confirm if LCCA is required to be performed and incorporated into design if effective.

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT CODES/UFC/UFS/FC

BUILDING REQUIREMENTS

38 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

Part 3.

Chapter 6.

D40

Part 3. Chapter 6. D40. The document states "Prior to the start of design, the Fire Protection Designer of Record must meet with the NAVFAC DFPE to determine the extent and types of fire protection required." Is this an in-person meeting or virtual?

ALL MEETINGS TO BE HELD IN PERSON.

CONTRACTOR TO PREPARE FULL BUILDING

LIFE SAFETY ANALYSIS AND CODE REVIEW

AND PROVIDE FINDINGS OF EXISTING

CONDITIONS ALONG WITH THE BASIS OF

DESIGN FOR PROPOSED LIFE SAFETY

UPGRADES AND PRESENT TO MIDLANT FPE

FOR CONCURRENCE AND ACCEPTANCE

PRIOR TO 35% DESIGN SUBMISSION

40 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

Part 4.

Section C10.

C102007

Part 4. Section C10. C102007 1.1.5: Request further definition of extent of electronic security systems required, connection to existing security systems headend, and system standards.

An access control system will be provided with magnetic door contact switches for monitoring on all exterior doors. A card access system will be provided at all exterior entrances, and interior doors within OTCN spaces (as well as common spaces). CCTV cameras must be provided. THIS IS A DESIGN

BUILD CONTRACT - CONTRACTOR IS

REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL NECESSARY

EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT CODES/UFC/UFS/FC

BUILDING REQUIREMENTS

41 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

The Proposal assumes the available flow and pressure will be sufficient (Part 3. Chapter 6. D4020). The proposal doesn't include designing fire pumps or addition of a fire water tank. Please confirm this is the intent.

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT CODES/UFC/UFS/FC

BUILDING REQUIREMENTS

42 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

Part 4.

Section D40.

D402001

Part 4. Section D40. D402001. Confirm that NAVFAC utility personnel will operate the valves and take measurements; FP DOR will only witness the test.

CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE UTILTIY

OUTAGE REQUEST. NAVFAC WILL SUPPORT

OPERATION OF VLAVES, CONTRACTOR TO

REPORT AND DOCUMENT ALL

MEASUREMENTS.

45 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

G006 G006. Allowable Floor Area. 75% frontage increase is more than what the code allows (the code allows 75%

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf of the non-sprinklered tabulated values). Please review and confirm the requirement.

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT CODES/UFC/UFS/FC

BUILDING REQUIREMENTS

47 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

PD-102 PD-102. Drawings are unclear on intent of replacement for domestic and sanitary piping. RFP states to replace leaking or degraded piping however for most floors above this level it states to remove/replace all except drinking fountain risers. Provide clarity on intent of demo on basement and underground levels.

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT CODES/UFC/UFS/FC

BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. INTENT FOR ALL

PIPING TO BE REPLACED

48 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

PD-107 PD-107. Showers state to only remove water piping however most other elements are to remove all sanitary and water. Confirm demolition and reuse intent.

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT CODES/UFC/UFS/FC

BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. INTENT IS FOR

ALL PIPING TO BE REPLACED

49 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

PD-401 PD-401. Confirm intent is to reuse existing piping and equipment in mech room. Drawings show most existing backflows, heaters, and piping to be reused.

RFP states to replace degraded piping and most other elements in building are stated to be replaced.

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT CODES/UFC/BUILDING

REQUIREMENTS. INTENT IS FOR ALL PIPING

TO BE REPLACED

50 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

P-601 P-601. TPA 1, 2, 3. Electronic trap primer manifolds are listed. Can barrier/insert type trap guards be used?

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT CODES/UFC/UFS/FC

BUILDING REQUIREMENTS.

51 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

P-601 P-601. RP-1 and 2. Two hot water recirculation pumps are listed but intent is unclear. Are recirculation pumps intended to operate in a redundant setup or series configuration?

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT CODES/UFC/UFS/FC

BUILDING REQUIREMENTS.

53 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

S-001 The structural drawings identify the new shear wall panels as “Special Reinforced Masonry Shear Walls” on sheet S-001. The design and detailing requirements for this LFRS are not required for a Seismic Design Category A building. Can CMU shear wall panels be designed and detailed as Ordinary or Intermediate reinforced walls?

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT CODES/UFC/UFS/FC

BUILDING REQUIREMENTS

54 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f, Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

Part 3 (vol 1), Seismic Evaluation, pdf page 615 (vol 2)

RFP Part 3, Chapter 4, Section 4.2.1 states that retrofits are required for the existing Lateral Force Resisting System based on the Seismic Analysis included in Part 6, Attachment E, and identifies proposed reinforced masonry shear walls as the proposed means of providing additional lateral resistance.

The RFP also states that the designs, calculations, and plans included in the Design Build RFP are conceptual in nature and that the Design Build Contractor and Designer of Record are responsible for providing an independent design. The RFP further requires the Contractor to perform design in accordance with the latest applicable DoD Facilities Criteria and to check the accuracy of the documents and data provided in the

RFP.

The seismic evaluation provided as part of the RFP is based on ASCE 7-16 and ASCE 41-13. The current UFC 3-301-01 references ASCE 7-22 and ASCE 41-

17. An evaluation using ASCE 7-22 and ASCE 41-17 would classify the building as having a “Very Low” level of seismicity rather than the “Low” level used in the RFP evaluation. For Collapse Prevention of a Type

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT CODES/UFC/UFS/ FC

BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. AS PART OF

DESIGN REQUIREMENTS TO MEET CURRENT

UFCS, BUILDINGS CODES AND STRUCTURAL

REQUIREMENTS, SHEAR WALLS ARE TO BE

CONSIDERED.

C3 building, the “Very Low” checklist does not require the Shear Stress Check identified as non-compliant in the RFP evaluation. If no other seismic deficiencies are found, the proposed new LFRS shear walls would not be required.

Please confirm that the DOR may perform an independent design and seismic evaluation using the current applicable UFCs and referenced standards and develop the structural design based on the results of that evaluation, concluding that LFRS shear walls are not required. For bidding, should contractors include or exclude the proposed shear walls in their base price?

55 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f, Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

Part 3 (vol 1), Seismic Evaluation, pdf page 615 (vol 2)

RFP Part 3, Chapter 4, Section 4.2.1 states that retrofits are required for the existing Lateral Force Resisting System based on the Seismic Analysis included in Part 6, Attachment E, and identifies proposed reinforced masonry shear walls as the proposed means of providing additional lateral resistance.

The RFP also states that the designs, calculations, and plans included in the Design Build RFP are conceptual in nature and that the Design Build Contractor and Designer of Record are responsible for providing an independent design. The RFP further requires the Contractor to perform design in accordance with the latest applicable DoD Facilities Criteria and to check the accuracy of the documents and data provided in the

RFP.

Please confirm whether the Government requires the seismic retrofit shown in the RFP regardless of the DOR’s independent seismic evaluation. If so, please confirm whether the DOR must use the RFP’s ASCE 7-16 and ASCE 41-13 criteria in lieu of ASCE 7-22 and ASCE 41-17 to evaluate and design that retrofit.

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT CODES/UFC/UFS/FC

BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. SCOPE INCLUDES

DESIGN TO MEET CURRENT UFCS,

BUILDINGS CODES AND STRUCTURAL

REQUIREMENTS

56 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f, Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

PART 3 -

CHAPTER

4 - Page 30

- 4.2.1 Structural

RFP Part 3, Chapter 4, Section 4.2.1 identifies Special Reinforced Masonry Shear Walls as the proposed retrofit for the dormitory wings and north and south cores.

Please confirm whether the DOR may design an alternate Lateral Force Resisting System in lieu of the proposed masonry shear walls, provided the alternate meets the applicable seismic performance requirements and is approved by the Government.

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT CODES/UFC/UFS/FC

BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. SCOPE INCLUDES

DESIGN TO MEET CURRENT UFCS,

BUILDINGS CODES AND STRUCTURAL

REQUIREMENTS

57 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f, Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

RFP Part 2, Section 01

33 10.05 20, paragraph

3.3.2, Order of

Precedence

RFP Part 2, Section 01

33 10.05 20, paragraph

3.3.2, Order of

Precedence;

Part 3, Chapter 4, paragraph

4.2.1, Structural

Part 6, Paragraph 4.2.1 requires LFRS retrofits and refers to the Seismic Analysis in Attachment E for further detail and to the structural concept drawings in Attachment A. Under paragraph 3.3.2, Attachment E ranks below Part 3, and the concept drawings rank last.

Please confirm whether these references make the retrofit locations, extent, and proposed masonry shear wall details in Attachments E and A mandatory requirements, or whether they represent a conceptual approach that the DOR may revise through its independent design. For a common bid basis, please state whether bidders must price the retrofit shown in those attachments or may price an independently designed solution that satisfies the Part 3 requirements.

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT CODES/UFC/UFS/FC

BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. SCOPE INCLUDES

DESIGN TO MEET CURRENT UFCS,

BUILDINGS CODES AND STRUCTURAL

REQUIREMENTS

Attachments A and E

59 ALL Please provide pictures of existing areas, as requested on the PDF titled "OTC King Hall - Photo Request". In addition, please provide photos of the existing equipment in the exam, immunization, therapy, and computer areas.

Please see Amendment 0002, Attachment "King Hall PPI 59 Response Photo Request"

60 ALL During the site walk, the team observed both concealed and exposed/surface mounted conduit, raceways, panels, lights, boxes, piping and devices. Is the intent for new work to be surface mounted, concealed, or a combination of both? Please provide clarity on this requirement.

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT

CODES/UFC/UFS/FC/BUILDING

REQUIREMENTS. SCOPE INCLUDES DESIGN

TO MEET CURRENT UFCS, BUILDINGS CODES

AND STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS. NOT

ALL ELECTRICAL IS ALLOWED TO BE

SURFACED MOUNTED. THE INTENT WOULD

BE TO BE CONCEAL ALL ELECTRICAL

WIRING AS POSSIBLE. AREAS WHERE IT NOT

FEASIBLE OR TOO COSTLY TO CONCEAL

WILL NEED TO BE DETERMINED AND

REVIEWED DURING DESIGN PHASE.

61 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

Part 3.

Chapter 6.

D101002

Part 3. Chapter 6. D101002. The RFP requires hydraulic elevators for elevator travel distances of 44 feet or less and electric traction elevators for travel distances greater than 44 feet. This appears to be more prescriptive than the applicable UFC criteria, which generally allow elevator type selection based on project-specific requirements and code compliance.

Please confirm whether the Government specifically requires hydraulic elevators for travel distances of 44 feet or less, or if alternative elevator systems may be considered.

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT

CODES/UFC/UFS/FC/BUILDING

REQUIREMENTS. SCOPE INCLUDES DESIGN

TO MEET CURRENT UFCS, BUILDINGS CODES

AND STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS

62 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

Part 3.

Chapter 1.

Page 6.

Are the Design Review Meetings in person or remote?

Are design review meetings required for each planned design submission?

DESIGN REVIEW MEETINGS ARE IN PERSON

AND MUST FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS OF ALL

UFC/UFS/FC /CODES/REGULATIONS

63 Please provide the level design effort needed for the swing space drawings. Is it acceptable to provide a single drawing for each location, showing the renovations and furniture required to support the effort?

AS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT - SWING

SPACE DRAWINGS MUST SHOW ALL

INTENDED CONSTRUCTION WORK AND

DETAILS AS REQUIRED. SWING SPACE

DRAWINGS MUST SHOW ALL INTENDED FFE

RELOCATIONS, INCLUDING A SCHEDULE FOR

BOTH MOVE IN AND MOVE OUT. ALL DESIGN

BUILD CONTRACT WORK MUST MEET

REUIREMENTS OF UFC/UFS/FC - INCLUDING

ACCEPTANCE OF WORK BY GOVERNMENT.

64 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

Part 6.

Attachment D. Page 11

Page 11 of the Fire Protection and Life Safety Analysis states "The Basement is provided with three exits (two stair enclosures and an exterior exit with exterior stairs up to grade). The "exterior exit" shouldn't be considered an egress exit since it passes through an electrical room, a room that is considered a higher degree of hazard than the surrounding areas. And these spaces are typically subject to locking. Please confirm if the exterior exit should actually be considered an exit.

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT

CODES/UFC/UFS/FC/BUILDING

REQUIREMENTS. SCOPE INCLUDES DESIGN

TO MEET CURRENT UFC, BUILDINGS CODES

AND STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS

65 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

Part 6.

Attachment D. Page 13, Page 13 of the Fire Protection and Life Safety Analysis states that “a new elevator will be provided for the building to provide accessible means of egress.”

However, Page 17 does not require emergency/standby power for the elevator. These requirements are inconsistent, as an elevator designated as part of the accessible means of egress requires standby power.

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT

CODES/UFC/UFS/FC/BUILDING

UFC 1-200-01 references ABA for accessibility requirements and permits use of the applicable requirements of IBC 2024 where the ABA Standards reference previous editions of the IBC per UFC 1-200- 01 §2-10. IBC 2024 §1009.2.1 contains the same four-story threshold.

In our assessment, the first deck is the story of exit discharge for this facility; therefore, there are only three stories above the story of exit discharge. Based on this configuration, our interpretation is that an elevator is not required as part of the accessible means of egress.

Please confirm that an elevator is not required for accessible means of egress and that a standby power is not needed.

Otherwise, please confirm that the elevator is required as part of the accessible means of egress and that a standby power is required. Provide the preferred method for providing this power.

REQUIREMENTS. SCOPE INCLUDES DESIGN

TO MEET CURRENT UFC, BUILDINGS CODES

AND STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS

66 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

Part 6.

Attachment

D. Page 9-10

Page 9-10 of the Fire Protection and Life Safety Analysis "Shafts". This facility will be treated as new construction for all affected floors. All shafts, stairs, elevators will be treated as new construction per UFC 1-200-01 requirements for exceeding 50% of the floor area. This is applicable for every applicable floor.

Please confirm.

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT

CODES/UFC/UFS/FC/BUILDING

REQUIREMENTS. SCOPE INCLUDES DESIGN

TO MEET CURRENT UFC, BUILDINGS CODES

AND STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS

67 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

Part 6.

Attachment D. Page 10, EP 103

Page 10 of the Fire Protection and Life Safety Analysis "Electrical Rooms" states out that the electrical room is only partially separated from the other areas of the basement and is open to a secondary exit from the basement. The analysis states "correction of this deficiency will be address as part of the project";

however correction of this issue is not identified within the RFP.

EP103 keynote 1 illudes that the switchgear location will be coordinated with the existing; however a location is not identified.

Please provide client preference on the location of the new switchgear, and also on the correction of the deficiency noted on page 10 of the Fire Protection and Life Safety Analysis "electrical rooms".

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT

CODES/UFC/UFS/FC/BUILDING

REQUIREMENTS. SCOPE INCLUDES DESIGN

TO MEET CURRENT UFC, BUILDINGS CODES

AND STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS

68 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

Part 6.

Attachment D. Page 13

Page 13 of the Fire Protection and Life Safety Analysis "Fire Flow and Hydrants" clarifies that the flow can be achieved, but doesn't confirm that the flow can be maintained for the duration of 2 hours. Please confirm that the required flow and pressure can be met for the duration specified and a fire pump and / or a fire water tank will not be required.

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT

CODES/UFC/UFS/FC/BUILDING

REQUIREMENTS. SCOPE INCLUDES DESIGN

TO MEET CURRENT UFC, BUILDINGS CODES

AND STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS

69 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

Part 6.

Attachment D. Page 13

Page 13 of the Fire Protection and Life Safety Analysis "Emergency Vehicle Access". The latest applicable UFC 3-600-01 requires compliance with NFPA 1 rather than the referenced § 9-1.2. Please confirm that NFPA 1 requirements for access to building is to be met rather than the older UFC 3-600-01 language.

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT

CODES/UFC/UFS/FC/BUILDING

REQUIREMENTS. SCOPE INCLUDES DESIGN

TO MEET CURRENT UFC, BUILDINGS CODES

AND STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS

70 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

Part 6.

Attachment D. Page 13

Page 13 of the Fire Protection and Life Safety Analysis "Emergency Vehicle Access". The latest applicable UFC 3-600-01 requires compliance with NFPA 1 fire

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf apparatus access. Please confirm that NFPA 1 requirements for §18.2.3.2.2 is to be met.

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT

CODES/UFC/UFS/FC/BUILDING

REQUIREMENTS. SCOPE INCLUDES DESIGN

TO MEET CURRENT UFC, BUILDINGS CODES

AND STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS

71 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

G-006 G-006, "SEPARATION FROM HAZARDS (NFPA

101, SECTION 39.3.2)". Per UFC applicable criteria, buildings with renovation of more than 50% of the PRV must meet new construction requirements rather than existing construction requirements. Please confirm that this facility doesn't exceed 50% of the PRV.

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT

CODES/UFC/UFS/FC/BUILDING

REQUIREMENTS. SCOPE INCLUDES DESIGN

TO MEET CURRENT UFC, BUILDINGS CODES

AND STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS

72 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

Part 6.

Attachment D. Page 6

Page 13 of the Fire Protection and Life Safety Analysis "Occupancy". The current floor plan doesn't comply with NFPA 101 of multiple, mixed occupancies egress requirements. Please confirm that the DB has the liberty to reconfigure the spaces or redefine the life safety codes occupancy classification to meet code compliance.

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT

CODES/UFC/UFS/FC/BUILDING

REQUIREMENTS. SCOPE INCLUDES DESIGN

TO MEET CURRENT UFC, BUILDINGS CODES

AND STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS

73 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

01 30 00 1.13.f

Section 01 30 00 requires an initial partnering session and follow-on partnering sessions at 3- to 6-month intervals or more frequently if needed. Please confirm the anticipated quantity of partnering sessions and whether Designer-of-Record participation is required for all follow-on sessions or only the initial partnering session.

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT

CODES/UFC/UFS/FC/BUILDING

REQUIREMENTS. SCOPE INCLUDES DESIGN

TO MEET DESIGN BUILD CURRENT UFC, UFS,

FC, BUILDINGS CODES AND STRUCTURAL

REQUIREMENTS

74 Attachm ent_A__ _B291_

KING_H

ALL_D_

B_RFP_

Vol_1.pd f

01 33 10.05

Section 01 33 10.05 20, Paragraph 2.2.2, Required Design Submittals, identifies a 14 calendar day Government review period for Final Design submittals.

Section 01 33 10.05 20, Paragraph 2.2.3, “Critical Path Design Submittals,” identifies a 21 calendar day Government review period for Final Design of Critical Path Design Submittal packages.

To support the project schedule and critical path design submittals, please advise if the review period for Final Design Critical Path Design Submittals can also be 14 calendar days, consistent with the standard Final Design review period .

THIS IS A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACT -

CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PEFORM ALL

NECESSARY EXISTING CONDITION

REVIEW/INVESTIGATIONS AND PROVIDE

DESIGN AND ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS

TO MEET CURRENT

CODES/UFC/UFS/FC/BUILDING

REQUIREMENTS. SCOPE INCLUDES DESIGN

TO MEET CURRENT UFC, BUILDINGS CODES

AND STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS - OR

PROVIDE 14 CALENDAR DAY REVIEW FOR

ALL SUBMISSIONS

75 Attachm ent_A__

B291_KI

NG_HA

LL_D_B

_RFP_V

ol_2.pdf

M-128 The includes rooftop DOAS units and cooling tower requiring periodic maintenance access. Under IBC

1015.6 ( adopted through UFC 1-200-01), guards or an approved alternative are required where serviceable equipment is within 10 ft of a roof edge more than 30" above the surface below.

The RFP does not provide direction on what will be required at these locations.