AMENDMENT 0002.pdf

ACQR6027989

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SOLICITATION NO. N4008525R2515 P993 F-35 AIRCRAFT SUSTAINMENT CENTER & P995 COMPOSITE REPAIR FACILITY, MARINE CORPS

AIR STATION, CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA

The proposal due date of 11 April 2025 NLT 1400 (EDT) remains unchanged.

SEE SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 5

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 03-Apr-2025

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008525R2515

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

12-Mar-2025

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

03-Apr-2025

CODE

NAVFACSYSCOM MID-ATLANTIC

CONTRACTING CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008525R2515

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0002

The purpose of this amendment is to provide the following:

1. Responses to Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPI’s)

Pre-Proposal Inquiry Responses:

Question # Reference

Question Government Response Page Section Paragraph

17 72 Price

Proposal

The Price Proposal instructs to include the Confirmation of VETS-4212 for the 2023 filing cycle. Please confirm that this should be the 2024 filing cycle.

Confirmed

18 71 Section

M

Please provide the adjectival ratings which will be used for Factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.

Adjectival ratings are incorporated into the Source Selection Plan which is considered Source Selection Sensitive Information.

19 7 Section

C 1.4.4.3

1.4.4.3 Notes the Design

Development Review Meetings are to be in-person at the "project site location design review meeting for each design submittal."

Please confirm the meetings will be at MCAS Cherry Point, NC.

Meetings will be held in the Havelock/New Bern, NC Area

20 7 Section

C 1.4.4.3

1.4.4.3 Notes the Design

Development Review Meetings are to be in-person but a virtual options maybe available for the Preconstruction Team Key Personnel. Please confirm offerors are expected to price travel to be in-person for all key personnel for these meetings (Project Manager/DOL, Cost Estimator, Scheduler, and System Experts.). Note it may not make sense for all these people from all potentially 3 contractors to be in-person in the same room.

Confirmed, price all travel.

Virtual option is to aid in coordinating schedules.

Please confirm the various meetings; Orientation & Coordination Meeting, Design Development Review Meetings, bi-weekly design-meets will have all awarded ECI contractors present. There will not be separate meeting for each contractor.

Design development review meetings will be held with each ECI contractor separately to discuss their comments determined to be confidential financial information.

22 69

FAR 52.228-17 was included in the contract, requesting information if offerors are using an Individual Surety. However,

1.3.2 notes not bonding is required for CLIN 0001. The only other requirement is for offerors to provide a signed letter from our bonding company that demonstrates single project bonding capacity of at least $350,000,000. Please what information is requested from the offerors surety.

Provide per RFP.

23 7 Section

C 1.4.2.4

System Expert resumes are required in Factor 2 submission.

Section 1.4.2.4 states the expert must have 10 years of experience in the area of expertise on projects of similar size and complexity. PPI 8 response in Amendment 1 defines relevant expires as size and scope in listed in Factor 1 which identifies Size as $60M and Scope as Aircraft Hangar or high bay industrial/warehouse but notes a project that only included airfield pavement will not be considered relevant. Does the Airfield Paving System Expert require 10 years on similar $60M hangars or highway industrial/warehouses or can they show 10 years of experience in concrete paving even if a hangar is not part of the scope?

The following statement from Factor 1, "A project that only included airfield pavement will not be considered relevant," is not related to the requirement to submit a resume for the Airfield Paving System Expert as outlined in Factor 2, Solicitation Submittal Requirements.

24 7 Section

C 1.4.2.4

System Expert resumes are required in Factor 2 submission.

Section 1.4.2.4 states the expert must have 10 years of experience in the area of expertise on projects of similar size and complexity. PPI 8 response in Amendment 1 defines relevant expires as size and scope in listed

The following statement from Factor 1, "A project that only included airfield pavement will not be considered relevant," is not related to the requirement to submit a resume for the Paint Booth Manufacturer as outlined in Factor 2, Solicitation Submittal Requirements.

in Factor 1 which identifies Size as $60M and Scope as Aircraft Hangar or high bay industrial/warehouse but notes a project that only included airfield pavement will not be considered relevant. Does the Paint Booth Manufacturer require 10 years on similar $60M hangars or highway industrial/warehouses or can they show 10 years of experience in Paint Booth projects?

25 76 Factor 2

The RFP states in Factor 2, Preconstruction Services Approach, that the offeror must submit an organizational chart identifying the team and key personnel, as well as lines of authority not to exceed one single-sided page. Please confirm that the 1 (one) single-sided page can be 11x17.

8.5x11 or 11x17 page size is acceptable for the organizational chart.

26 76 Factor 2

For Factor 2, in addition to an org chart we are to include a brief description of the roles and responsibility of each entity not to exceed one page for each entity.

Is entity referencing all the people identify on the org chart or the companies included on the org chart including the offeror. I.e. if we have 6 entities support the effort, we are allowed 6 pages (1 for each entity)

Each entity would be a prime contractor or a JV. Brief description is limited to one page, but the offeror is allowed to expand on the organization in the management plan if they feel it helps explain the offeror's approach for preconstruction services.

27 76 Factor 2

If the offeror has other parties supporting pre-con are any documentation or commitment necessary to be submitted other than the 1 page description? I.e.

if we have a Paint booth manufacturer supporting as the System Expert.

Explain in the approach for preconstruction services.

PPI 9 response did not address part of the question. Please confirm what other "Similar scheduling credentials" will be acceptable.

Similar to a Scheduling Professional from the Project Management Institute (PMI-

SP)

29 8 Section

C 1.4.6

1.4.6 notes within 21 calendar days of award of preconstruction services and within 21 calendar days of receipt of each design submittal our detailed information of the offeror's target cost is due.

Section 1.4.3 states an Orientation and coordination meeting is to be

The Government will attempt to have the orientation meeting within 7 days of award, and comments submission within 21 days of award.

held 14 days after award to discuss project status and roles of the team. Will the 65% design cost be due 21 days after award or will be conduct the orientation and coordination meeting first to ensure all parties are on the same page before the first submission.

The same question applies to the schedule and 65% design document submittal review comment required 14 calendar days after receipt of documents.

30 8 Section

C 1.4.6

1.4.6 states the cost information must be in Uniformat but is not required to be prepared using MII. Although the 3 potential offerors will have similar Uniformat cost information, will the government have a template they want offerors to follow for easy in review of 3 different costs?

The Government will provide a template for each offeror to fill out with their cost information.

The template will follow uniformat WBS.

31 8 Section

C 1.4.6

Will each offerors schedule, varions, VE, and cost be confidential or will the government share with all parties the information provided by each offeror for transparency.

Comments, schedule, and VE will be shared with the Government and AE.

Information marked as confidential will not be shared with other ECI contractors.

Cost information will be considered confidential financial information.

(End of Summary of Changes)